Apocalypse Avoided?

Guest Post by Eric Peters

If this one thing happens, electing Trump will have been worth the bother.

It’s actually two things.

Trump’s EPA will be “revisiting” the Obama EPA’s last-minute fuel efficiency and emissions fatwas, hurriedly ululated just two weeks before the end of the Obama EPA.

It might just prevent a catastrophe worse than the implosion of 2008 – when two out of three of the Big Three went bankrupt. This time, the industry could go bankrupt.

The first fatwa would require every car company to build cars that average 54.5 MPG by model year 2025 – irrespective of such banal things as what this will cost the people who have to pay for it all.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The Obama EPA’s imbecile reasoning – if taken at face value – is that the government decreeing cars must average 54.5 MPG will reduce fueling costs. People will save money on gas.

Certainly.

But the cars will cost a lot more. And not just that.

Executives from almost every major car company recently paid a visit to Trump’s new EPA chief, Scott Priutt, explaining to him that not a single car any of them make averages 54.5 MPG and to get there would involve literally throwing away two-thirds of the models currently available for sale and re-engineering the rest at huge cost.

All to salve the mania of EPA ayatollahs, who are convinced it’s their business to force the public into “efficient” cars – no matter how much it costs the public.

The second fatwa, though, is potentially much worse. It decrees – for the first time in the history of federal fatwa’ing – that the inert, plants-breath-it gas, carbon dioxide, be classified an “exhaust emission” and regulated as if it constituted a danger to air quality and public health.

It does neither thing, of course.

Some assert it “plays a role” in “climate change.” Maybe. Maybe not. It’s conjecture – and probably setting policy that will have enormous economic effects based on political “science” isn’t so savvy. But, regardless, it’s a fact that carbon dioxide “emissions” do not cause smog or acid rain or respiratory problems.

Not even a little bit.

In other words, there is no known/demonstrable harm caused by a motor vehicle “emitting” carbon dioxide. Which – along with water vapor – now constitutes the bulk of new car exhaust “emissions.” (If you want to get scientific about it, why isn’t the EPA sweating water vapor? It is a “greenhouse gas,” too.)

The scary part is that carbon dioxide (and water vapor) “emissions” can’t be chemically scrubbed into some other thing or rendered less by fine-tuning an engine. The only way known to lower the volume of C02 produced by an internal combustion engine is to reduce the amount of fuel used.

Bingo!

The objective of the Obama fatwas is not to save us money or protect people’s health. It is to make building cars more expensive and buying them more onerous. In order to “nudge” (this is their term; Google a guy named Cass Sunstein) people out of cars – and into something else.

The “nudge” given electric cars – heavy subsidies, mandatory production quotas – is of a piece.

These, likewise, are defined by their cost. Almost no one can afford them. Therefore, almost no one will drive them.

Bingo, again.

The only alternative explanation is that they – these regulatory ayatollahs – really are that stupid. That ignorant of mundane things like the cost of stuff affecting whether people can afford to buy the stuff. Which could be – given the endlessly succulent teat of taxpayer dollars they have access to.

How much do you suppose a mid-level EPA ayatollah takes home each year? It is probably enough to afford a $60,000 electric car.

Can’t everyone afford a $60,000 electric car?

That could well be their thinking.

Or, they are simply turning the screws on purpose. There is plenty of hard evidence that points in that direction, too. For example, Agenda 21 conclaves, well-attended by EPA ayatollahs and other such.

Either way, it’s us who are being screwed.

But, maybe not.

The word is that Pruitt is going to rescind the Obama EPA’s fatwa. If he does so, it will be Guy Fawkes Day for real; there will be squeals of outrage from the Fake News Media, outfits such as the Union of Concerned Scientists (those not in the “union” apparently being unconcerned),the leftie-Luddite Natural Resources Defense Council and – of course – the Sierra Club.

Good. It tells us – the rank and file powerless – where to aim our fire.

Italicized for a reason.

Express your support for Priutt – and for reasonableness in regulation. That future emissions regulations be based on provable benefits against known, also-proved harms.

Not conjecture, not political science.

Insist on it.

And demand that EPA get out of the business of dictating how much gas a car uses. That is something the market can do better and which people have the right to decide for themselves. It’s no more the business of the government’s how many miles-per-gallon your car gets than it is how many times each week you eat your veggies.

The government isn’t paying to gas up your car. You are.

It is therefore entirely your business.

This needs needs to be conveyed to the arrogant ayatollahs. And not just the ones within the EPA mosque. The bureaucratic Mecca itself must be put on notice, told that we’ve at long last had enough.

No one thought Trump was going to be president.

He is.

No one thinks the EPA’s fatwas can be rolled back.

They can be.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Anon
Anon
March 6, 2017 9:27 am

Good article, except that the 2008 style apocalypse in the auto business is going to come from finance, and particularly, subprime, well before EPA madness. Although, if he can get rid of the EPA stupid on Glo-bull warming we will all be better off. I like Tesla’s technology from an engineering point of view, however his company makes no money. None. If it was not for the religion of glo-bull warming and zealotry from the left, Tesla would still be a start up, and Elon Musk would not be close to a Billionaire. It also would be refreshing to stop having Prius loving libtards constantly chastising deplorable’s that they are not doing enough to “save the earth”. Please, the “earth” could sneeze and we would all disappear in a fortnight. The Earth certainly does not fear us, but these dumb asses that worship at the alter of glo-bull warming are a big threat to all of us humans for sure.
BTW, I wonder if any of these libtards have been to China, seen their air quality and wondered how it happened? Oh yeah, environmental arbitrage. I wonder if Leo DeCraprio and his ilk ever think about that when they host glo-bull warming conferences in Beijing, then flying back to their palatial carbon sucking mansions in their Gulfstreams? Probably not…

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 6, 2017 9:30 am

I doubt anyone at the EPA actually cares about the consumers they regulate, what they pay for anything, whether or not they can afford it, how much hardship and cost their regulations inflict on either the people or the companies they write the regulations for.

They have their little dictatorial empire and care not a whit about anything outside of it.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
March 6, 2017 9:54 am

Good news has a nice smell in the morning.

Gator
Gator
March 6, 2017 12:37 pm

They know exactly what they are doing with this regulatory nonsense. The end goal is to force everyone into cities and ride mass transit. Since they can’t just decree that people do this, they have to force them in underhanded ways, giving people the illusion of choice. If they came out and said it, people would demand an end to it, so they go about it sideways. Same with global warming nonsense. The goal is a global tax on everything and an end to national sovereignty. Can’t just say that though, people wouldn’t stand for it.

I doubt the auto industry has until whenever that date in the future is anyway. Subprime auto is very much in bubble territory. Once it pops, they are going to have trouble staying in business without another bailout regardless of any regulatory changes that may come.

Bob
Bob
March 6, 2017 1:52 pm

Bravo to the rollback of the Obama BS! Leave the guidelines where they were before 2016, or roll them back to where they were 5 years ago. That should be more than sufficient.

Anon and Gator, 2007-2008 taught us that people will hang on to their cars in preference to their houses. Lenders have caught on to this, and are making money hand-over-fist. Overextended? Maybe. Bubble? Not quite. Crisis on the horizon? Probably not.

ragman
ragman
March 6, 2017 6:00 pm

Good article except electing Trump was not a bother, it was a pleasure!