The Clover Who Squealed

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Late last week, it was revealed who squealed.

The Clover responsible for making it impossible for any of us to buy a diesel-powered Volkswagen henceforth – and a lot more – is Stuart Johnson, the former head of VW’s Engineering and Environmental Office in Auburn Hills, Michigan. He was outed in a book written about the VW “cheating” business by New York Times reporter Jack Ewing.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Johnson, of course, is about to get everything short of a ticker-tape parade. A bust of him will likely be cast and placed in the Hall of Mirrors – or whatever the equivalent is in the foyer of the EPA. He is already being lionized in the Usual Corners as a “hero” (that term, along with “community,” has worn out its welcome and ought to be etymologically euthanized).

You’d think he did something good. I suppose this depends on your perspective.

If you are a government bureaucrat then Johnson is your kind of guy. The sort who is pained by the idea of any action contrary to regulation or edict. Who feels guilty when – as here – a business attempts to get around a ridiculous edict or absurd regulation.

Which are never perceived as ridiculous or absurd by people like Johnson because they come from the government, are “the law” and therefore must not merely obeyed but reverenced. Visualize the ritual triple curtsey before The Presence of the king. . . .

Such people are the new people in American business, popped out of their molds after 12 years in care of government molding centers, then sent – the smarter ones – for higher technical training. But never training in how to think conceptually, beyond the narrow range of their specialty, such as engineering. And then off to work either for the government or on its behalf in the increasingly not-private sector of the economy. Which has become – operationally speaking – a kind of adjunct or subsidiary operation of the government.

They are fully compliant – not just in letter, but in mind.

Goodthinkful.

Consider this Johnson character. Being an engineer, he had to know that the “cheating” performed by VW was fundamentally the same thing as using a radar detector to avoid a speed trap. Just as the “speeding” driver causes no harm and is only guilty of using a device to dodge a con, so also VW’s only crime was to use a device – software – to dodge another con.

Of course, Johnson is probably the kind of guy who objects to the use of radar detectors.

Remember the children’s story about the Emperor’s New Clothes – which didn’t exist? The Emperor was a fool, suckered by a con man, who sold him a fine new outfit made of materials that no one could see but everyone pretended to – out of fear of affronting the duped Emperor.   

Same thing here.

The media, most of the automotive press (except your humble off-the-reservation narrator) and of course the EPA/CARB/DOJ ayatollahs ululating in ecstasy over Johnson’s squealing  . . . have any of them produced anything that can be seen, felt, handled as far as demonstrating or even tending to suggest some tangible, actual harm caused by VW’s “cheating”?

That is, other than harm caused by the alphabet agencies to VW – and to us?

That can be quantified.

Multiple felony indictments, $25 billion – so far – in fines, “fixes” and buybacks. Hundreds of thousands of near-new and actually new perfectly good cars simply thrown away in a disgusting orgy of gratuitous waste.

The complete elimination of all diesel-powered engines from VW’s U.S. model lineup.

The needless burning of oceans of gasoline instead.

VWs like the Golf and Beetle and Jetta sedan with the TDI diesel engine were capable of better than 50 MPG on the highway. I have driven all of them and know it from first-hand experience.

The best any of them can do with a gas-burning engine is mid-high 30s.

Instead of incredibly fuel-efficient but fraction of a percent per car higher oxides of nitrogen emissions – the “cheating” at issue – and this only under certain conditions, such as wide-open throttle) diesel engines, we get gas engines that burn 20 percent – whole numbers! – more fuel and produce whole numbers more of things like carbon dioxide, which in this case, the “environmentalists” are strikingly not “concerned” about.

Other manufacturers – Mercedes-Benz, for instance – are pulling diesels out of their lineups, not because they “cheated” but because the compliance costs have become prohibitive and also because the manufactured stink emanating from the VW Thing has tainted diesel engines generally.

We ought to feel cheated.

But few care – and many cheer. One can almost picture the Party orator at the lectern, fist raised, shrieking about the atrocities committed by Goldstein. It will come to that, soon enough. Because the people in the crowd were popped out of the same mold as Johnson.

They, too, are fully compliant.   

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
April 24, 2017 7:45 pm

‘Regulation Nullification’ should be legal for auto companies due to any ridiculous or absurd bureaucratic Fatwa.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
April 24, 2017 9:18 pm

The VW Diesel : one of the most efficient versital engines ever designed so good in fact the big 3 in the US should be hanging their head in shame ! Anybody out their with a modest level of experience with Diesel engines knows that VW was set up and it was probably by the corn alcholol lobby . The biggest fuel farce pulled on the American people since 1973 . And these walking talking rectums of acedemia with their degrees and awards for participation are gleefully having a circle jerk of epidemic proportions . All this at VW and the American consumers expense . As with most bureaucrats once you satisfy one regulation or standard they must immediately go back and develop even more stringent standards to fuck with you . I will never believe anything else other that that for VW and the poor basturd thrown under the bus on the companies behalf . Perhaps if the Feds would have supported Willie Nelsons push for Bio-Diesel none of this would have ever come up !

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
April 24, 2017 9:27 pm

Do you think that there might be larger forces looking ahead to reserving diesel for essential uses like farming (and -arguably- mobilizing the military).., rather than having random regular people just burn diesel off by driving around doing nothing particularly useful?
——-
https://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2017/02/you-are-not-in-control.html
Dmitry Orlov:

… the technosphere strives to optimize the burning of gasoline; everything else is just a byproduct of this optimization.

It turns out that the fact that so many people are forced to own a car has nothing to do with transportation and everything to do with petroleum chemistry. About half of what can be usefully extracted from a barrel of crude oil is in the form of gasoline. It is possible to boost the fraction of other, more useful products, such as kerosene, diesel fuel, jet fuel and heating oil, but not by much and at a cost of reduced net energy. But gasoline is not very useful at all. It is volatile (quite a lot of it evaporates, especially in the summer); it is chemically unstable and doesn’t keep for long; it is toxic and carcinogenic. It has a rather low flash point, limiting the compression ratio that can be achieved by gasoline-fueled engines, making them thermodynamically less efficient. It is useless for large engines, and is basically a small-engine fuel. Gasoline-powered engines don’t last very long because gasoline-air mixture is detonated (using an electric spark) rather than burned, and the shock waves from the detonations cause components to wear out quickly. They have few industrial uses; all of the serious transportation infrastructure, including locomotives, ships, jet aircraft, tractor-trailers, construction equipment and electrical generators run on petroleum distillates such as kerosene, jet fuel, diesel oil and bunker fuel.

If it weren’t for widespread private car ownership, gasoline would have to be flared off at refineries, at a loss. In turn, the cost of petroleum distillates—which are all of the industrial fuels—would double, and this would curtail the technosphere’s global expansion by making long-distance freight much more expensive. The technosphere’s goal, then, is to make us pay for the gasoline by forcing us to drive. To this end, the landscape is structured in a way that makes driving necessary. The fact that to get from a Motel 8 on one side of the road to the McDonalds on the other requires you to drive two miles, navigate a cloverleaf, and drive two miles back is not a bug; it’s a feature.

Ed
Ed
  Chubby Bubbles
April 25, 2017 9:08 am

That’s the first time I ever saw it laid out that way. I don’t know if you’re right, because I’m not qualified to even have an opinion on whether or not gasoline should be a waste product of diesel fuel, but you’ve given me something to look into.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
April 25, 2017 9:30 am

The thing I never understood about The Emporer’s New Clothes: So he couldnt see the clothes, but didnt want to say anything. But clearly he also couldnt “feel” the clothes either. How could you not feel the clothes you are wearing? You would feel the air on your skin. So what, does that mean the air itself is unfit or hopelessly stupid?

Anon
Anon
April 25, 2017 10:36 am

Yawn. While I agree wholeheartedly with Eric’s point of view, until they start prosecuting banksters for the largest fraud in world history, I just can’t see this as nothing more than government being government. Period. They choose who is prosecuted, depending on what their agenda is, and what they want the simpletons to believe. This guy is no hero, he is just another government boot licker. Yet the people that came forward as whistle blowers against the banks, what happened to them? Yep, that is what I thought….