Bring Back Smoking

Guest Post by The Zman

Are we getting stupider?

This is hard to know as we don’t have IQ exams from further back than last century. We have some ways to approximate IQ going back into the mists of time, but those will always get bogged down by debates over methods.Then you have the flat earth types who argue that IQ is not a real thing or that there are multiple forms of intelligence. Just sticking with the good data we have for the last 100 years or so, it does appear that the West is getting dumber. By how much and and how fast is the debate.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Why this could be happening is not much of a debate. There are three reasons related to biology. One is the Idiocracy example. The stupid are breeding like bunnies while the smart are reproducing at less than replacement levels. The high achieving man marries late and marries a high achieving women with a head full of feminist nonsense. They put off childbearing until she can only produce one child. Meanwhile, the guys that cut their grass are knocking up their girlfriends in high school and producing five kids.

Another reason is that stupid people are migrating into Western countries. This is an easy one as we just have to look at the news. The migrants flowing in from south of the equator into Western countries are bringing a mean IQ in the 80’s and sometimes, in the case of Somalis, the 70’s. They also breed like rabbits. A country full of 95-IQ white people that becomes 90% white and 10% Somali will lose almost ten IQ points. This is just an accelerated version of the above answer. It turns out that Magic Dirt is not real.

Finally, the hardest one to grasp is that something has happened to change the evolutionary pressure on the population that is now changing the rewards and punishments. Traits that in the past were punished, thus resulting in fewer children by those with those traits, are now neutral or maybe even slightly favored. We know smart people tend to live longer, so reducing the risk of death by misadventure or even death from common maladies could be lowering the over all IQ of Western populations.

If you want to read a bunch of smart people debating this, this post by Greg Cochran has a lively comment section. What you’ll note is that people focused on genetics tend not to consider environmental factors. In fact, they often veer into a form of genetic determinism that sounds a lot like astrology. The fault dear mortal is not in our stars, but in our genes, that we are just moist robots. People who tend to this sort of thinking are usually unfamiliar with 4GL programming languages or write JavaScript for a living.

That’s not to say free will is a real thing. Humans are not free to rewrite their personalities anymore than they can make themselves taller. We are the result of our wiring, plus some environmental factors like the community in which we were born, climate and serendipity. Someone born to the Amish will be raised to develop pro-Amish traits and ignore traits that are no useful to the Amish way. Environmental factors may play a small role over all, but they do play some role in what we are as people.

In specific cases, it could have an enormous role. Greg Cochran’s Gay Germ idea is a great example. Homosexuality is most certainly not genetic. Nature works against low-fitness. Males with a trait that sharply reduces their ability (or willingness) to mate will have far fewer offspring and therefore pass on this trait in low numbers. In just a few generations, the trait would die out. In the case of homosexuality, we know there were gay Roman emperors and Elton John is still with us, so this trait cannot be genetic.

Alternatively, homosexuality is either taught or the result of psychological damage done at a young by something like molestation. This is a popular idea on the Right, but it does not explain most cases. Lots of homosexuals grew up fairly normal lives and were simply attracted to the same sex once they hit sexual maturity. That’s where Cochran’s gay germ comes in. Instead of a trauma, it is a virus or parasite that triggers changes in brain chemistry, resulting homosexual behavior. That would provide an answer that fits the data.

Bringing this back to IQ, what if something like this is at work with Western IQ? Maybe not a germ, but environmental factors that are having a cascading effect on mean IQ. For example, such an idea has been posited to explain the spike in black crime. Many on the Left think the Tragic Dirt is contaminated with lead, leading to low-IQ and increased violence for the people living on the Tragic Dirt. It’s not a crazy idea, but like the Gay Germ, it is not proven idea. It’s more of a thought experiment at this stage.

Here’s soemthing else. Smoking rates began to decline in the middle of the last century, with the Baby Boomer interest in health. Nicotine is known to increase focus and increase your cognitive abilities. It’s why writers and computer programmers were all smokers. In fact, STEM fields in the 20th century were dominated by men who chain smoked at their desks. Anyone who has had to sit for hours working a math problem knows how exhausting it can be. Even a small boost in focus has enormous results.

What if the apparent uptick in Western IQ was accelerated by smoking? Tobacco was introduced to the West in the 16th century and its use increased steadily. By the 18th century, the use of tobacco was common. By the 19th century, smoking cigarettes was ubiquitous. Everyone smoked. It also corresponds with the Industrial Revolution. Once tobacco use became universal, Western technological progress took off like a rocket, culminating in a rocket literally taking off and putting men on the moon.

Once the anti-smoking crusades got a purchase in the 60’s and smoking rates declined, it does appear that the West began to decline. Perhaps that small boost to our cognitive ability had a huge impact on our intellectual achievements. Now that the crutch is gone, we’re doing idiotic things like putting minorities in charge and inviting in low-IQ barbarians from the fringes of civilization. Perhaps the lunacy that has gripped the West is simply the withdraw symptoms of kicking the habit.

Maybe we need to start smoking again.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
April 25, 2017 12:41 pm

The only people I see smoking these days are young, pasty, tattooed, hoodie-wearers slouching around the convenience store. I’m not sure smoking is boosting their focus, and the intelligence of spending an hour’s pay (if they are working a job) for something that literally goes up in smoke is also doubtful.

ross
ross
  Chubby Bubbles
April 25, 2017 8:59 pm

Me thinks that the author’s conclusion was, uh, let me think about it, ummmm, well….tongue in cheek. Maybe the author is pointing to you.

Vic
Vic
  Chubby Bubbles
April 27, 2017 12:49 am

I’m a smoker, started in 11th grade, now 40 years ago, and I have an above-average I.Q. per tests.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
  Vic
April 27, 2017 12:57 am

Yes, Vics, but you live in S.C where the average IQ is 70. It’s not tough to beat that. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

BL
BL
  EL Coyote
April 27, 2017 1:18 am

EC-Tell me again the average IQ in Cali and I guess there are no smokers in the golden state. I am for people having the right to do stoopid shit like smoking.

Vic
Vic
  EL Coyote
April 27, 2017 6:56 am

Just so you know, E.C., my I.Q. is 107.

Jake
Jake
April 25, 2017 1:42 pm

I would hazard all the stupid activity has more to do with affirmative action, allowing mentally and morally deficient people to be teachers and professors, along with smoking weed, crack, meth, opium etc. instead of cigarettes.
I’ve seen the Somalis in Minnesota. Idiot migration is certainly another big factor.

Ryan
Ryan
April 25, 2017 2:59 pm

I’m a cigar smoker and wish smoking would return to its proper glory, but the baby boomer, Neo-Nazi do-gooders would never allow it. Plus, a return to smoking would reduce the obesity epidemic.

Vic
Vic
  Ryan
April 27, 2017 12:51 am

Ryan, I agree with you completely.
Today, if you’re a smoker, you almost have to hide in a closet to smoke in peace.

Jason Calley
Jason Calley
April 25, 2017 3:16 pm

Hey Zman! You may be right on the smoking. Some young graduate student ought to do a study. 🙂

You say, “Homosexuality is most certainly not genetic. Nature works against low-fitness. Males with a trait that sharply reduces their ability (or willingness) to mate will have far fewer offspring and therefore pass on this trait in low numbers.”

It may be more subtle than that. Consider the following, maybe even set it back in paleolithic or neolithic times. (Hey, whatever happened to the mesolithic? Surely there must have been something between the old stone age and the new stone age. I digress.) Suppose there is some simple combination of genes that shuffles around such that one man in 20 is born with a propensity to be homosexual. This is the guy who hangs around the women, not to get laid, but to help with the hairdos, watch the kids, and gossip about the men. When times are good the tribe can put up with the poor schmoo and he does women work and grows old with the women. But what if there is a war? All the viral, young, masculine guys go out on the warpath but every time they do, there is always the chance that they will get their butts kicked. Sometimes they will get their butts kicked so bad that no one, NO ONE, comes back alive. Now you have a tribe of women with no masculine men — but they still have Gay Charlie. He may not prefer to have sex with women, but they will darn sure prefer to have sex with him, and chances are at least some of them will have enough determination to get pregnant and carry on the tribe, at least a bit better than just waiting for some of the little boys to grow old enough to mate. Point being that gay men might be a sort of last-ditch insurance policy to be cashed in when all the straight men have gone to Valhala, or maybe just died of food poisoning from eating bad mammoth during a long group hunting expedition.

As a side note, historically speaking, only about 40% of men ever reproduced. We live in unusual times where monogamy is practiced, which allows a much higher percentage of men to have access to fertile women. If nature works fine with a surplus of 60% men, having a few percent of men who are gay is not a major problem, especially if having that gay guy saves the tribe every four or five hundred years.

Which brings us to an uncomfortable subject, pedophilia. A pedophile is very unlikely to successfully have an offspring with a prepubescent child but he may keep the child around long enough for the child to reach puberty. Consider the case where a couple have a girl who is ten years old and the couple dies of disease. Who will take care of the child until she is a woman? Maybe no one. Maybe everyone else is having a hard time and want to keep their food for themselves and their own children. The tribe will lose a member who is almost, almost, capable of being an asset instead of a liability. A pedophile may take that child as his own (with the resulting abuse), but the tribe as a whole gains if he cares for that child another five years.

Unpleasant subjects — but nature does not care about pleasant or unpleasant. We tend to think about genetics with a bias toward normal times, but nature works based on what happens during hard times of war and disease as well as what happens during good times.

Just some thoughts, and I only wanted to point out that genetics and survival can have some not-so-obvious pathways.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Jason Calley
April 27, 2017 9:22 am

As usual, Archie Bunker explains the whole thing in little over a minute:

Vince
Vince
April 25, 2017 4:37 pm

I think Zman is onto something. Consider that aboriginal inhabitants of North America introduced the early European colonists to tobacco. Once the colonies reached a critical mass of population and economic size -Boom! – there was a revolution. Another do-gooder anti-smoking advocate published a paper that enumerated tobacco production (and thus consumption) in the former Soviet Union. He deplored the dramatic rise in tobacco use during the 1960’s into the 1970’s, but, less than 20 years later -there was no Soviet Union! In the 1960s a large proportion of the American population smoked. When the government initiated an ill-advised, imperialistic military adventure, the populace protested to such a degree that they were about ready to burn the joint down. I believe tobacco use was studied by Army psychologists in the 1950s and was found to make users more skeptical, less compliant, less cooperative, and more cynical. For these reasons, TPTB demonized tobacco use and their hysterical anti-tobacco propaganda persists to this day.
The 20th century also witnessed the greatest advancement of the human condition in all history (when a large proportion of the populace smoked). I suspect that tobacco is what made America great and that believing the government’s line and abandoning it could be a subtle reason for the failure of the American experiment.

Nurse Ratched
Nurse Ratched
April 25, 2017 5:37 pm

Proper neurons require good fats. Low fat diets make kids stupider; low fat diets in pregnant women make their babies stupider. Statins cause cognitive decline in middle age and elderly. Fluoride is a neurotoxin. And no one bothers about the long term effects of starting kids on methamphetamine and antipsychotic medication. Pick your conspiracy, they are ALL against us.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/virus-that-makes-humans-more-stupid-discovered-9849920.html

doug
doug
April 25, 2017 7:49 pm

The solution is not smoking more. And it is NOT breeding more. The solution is not rewarding the breeding of the ne’er do wells and lo IQ types. Right? Did I get that right? So as far as I can tell the mediation is the problem. That would be Government, right?? And just who is currently manipulating and controlling government? A certain Mr. Kushner, right? And who does he represent as a group? Help me out here……

underfire
underfire
April 25, 2017 8:14 pm

This brings to mind Robert Oppenheimer of the Manhattan Project, who is often pictured with a cigarette and was said to be a chain smoker. Zman might be writing this somewhat in jest, but this theory does hold some water.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
April 25, 2017 10:22 pm

Bullshit, underpants, he was a genius. Smoking had nothing to do with it. The beer bitch smokes, I don’t get much brilliant comments from her.

mangledman
mangledman
April 25, 2017 11:06 pm

Go Ratched I love a good conspiracy. Knock off 5 or 10 points off the IQ with early vaccines. Stopped using glass bottles for bph in plastics, causing endocrine and hormonal problems. Bovine growth hormone in most milk. WIC program no longer allows whole milk for infants, needing milkfat for early brain development. Bph now is used to line cans. Feminizing males masculine females are side effects. Major hormonal imbalance, earlier puberty, add an immoral indoctrination education. Voila!! These kids don’t know if they are coming or going. Flouride adds lower IQ, birthrate, dumbing down and sterility. I remember when the surgeon General labeled cigarettes to cause. I thought they would have the problem solved as fast as we were making great strides in research then. I find out later they were making it more addictive, and adding carcinogens. Today they add carpet glue and call it firesafe. My dad smoked 5 pack a day at one time, quit around 40, lived past 70.

gilberts
gilberts
April 26, 2017 1:57 am

What about birth control pills?
Ever heard the theory that birth control hormones drive women to pick asshats over good productive males? Perhaps the increase in homos in the last 50 years correlates to that?

I once heard (no proof) from a friend of mine that scientists did a study of rats in a cage. They overpopulated the rats to test their reaction. After a certain period of time, some of the rats were crazy, some were extremely violent, and some were homosexual. The idea was perhaps homosexuality was a pressure release on population, since it slows reproduction.

I kind of figure homosexuality is a form of mental disorder. The Diagnostic Manual considered it a mental disorder prior to the 1970s when the libtards took over and began redefining illness. All the homos I’ve ever known had a variety of problems. In “The Coming Plague,” you can read about one of the more extreme cases, in which one homosexual man claimed to have had countless thousands of partners in the San Fransicko bathhouse scene and he rattled off all his STDs, including AIDs, all the Heps, syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes, warts, and others; some multiple times. Say what you want-anyone who chases that much ass, gay or straight, isn’t healthy.
Oh, and if homosexuality is genetic, why does it only appear in some men very late in life? I’ve heard about successful family men who drop their families to become homosexuals. (even happened to a girlfriend of mine once) What’s more, the Kinsey Institute released a study years ago that stated on a scale of 1-1o, the average gay male shifted up to 6 points during their lifetime. SO that seems to invalidate the idea of birthright homosexuality.

But if it is natural, as the media and snowflakes endlessly claim, can we please stop talking about it? Because I don’t care what you fuck when you’re alone, as long as it’s consensual. Also, if you could drop the stupid homo lisp, that would be nice, too. Seriously, where did that come from? That shit is a learned behavior. Stop it. I don’t even know how you find the energy to tack that stupid affection on.