Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter
As a person of absolutely no color who embodies an intersectional reality that includes my utter lack of genderfluidity and my unemployment-questioning, differently-veteraned, and non-pagan experiences, I am totally oppressed by progressivism’s hegemonic power structure. I am also the victim of a systemic system of hostile paradigms that denies my truth regarding my phallo-possessory identity.
My struggle is real, and my male-identifying genitalia will no longer be silent!
I bear a heavy burden in the form of my pasty, easily-sunburned skin. For too long, the fact that a previous Schlichter was booted out of Stuttgart in 1750 has meant that I have been subject to the hateful discourse of unabashed Fritzophobes. And that’s when society hasn’t stolen my Teutonic legacy outright. You are culturally appropriating my cold, emotionless people’s heritage every time you are punctual and efficient.
The same is true regarding my Scot ancestry. You shamelessly pillage the cultural treasures of the folk of the moors whenever you speak unintelligibly, or refuse to spend freely and without restraint. Enough of your condescending Braveheartism.
My kilt, my choice.
Even in my own home, I am oppressed. I live under a tyrannical framework of Cubano-supremacy. I am constantly reminded of my minority status as the only non-Latino in the family whenever I am prepared to leave on time while everyone else is still getting ready, whenever I am belittled for my love of mayonnaise, and whenever I am forbidden to dance in public.
“Intersectionality” means that I have lots of complaints about various stuff that I am, and I’m just getting started.
For instance, I am seen as enjobbed, in that I have a job and support my family. This hateful label marginalizes me and subjugates me to the stereotyped role of “provider” and “useful member of society.” It cruelly differentiates me from preferred progressive social actors, like “bums” and “welfare cheats.” The progressive paradigm is, after all, based upon compelling non-Democrat bodies to toil to generate tax revenue for the government to give to freeloaders.
My veteranness also makes me a target for othering. My soul roils from the conscious and unconscious prejudice poured upon me every time someone asks me if I was drafted, or if the Army is the one with Marines. Why don’t you just burn a hammer and sickle in front of my quarters, you monsters?
And no, I don’t have PTSD. I’m just really annoyed by you.
I am also victimized for my unpaganhood, and I am constantly pressured to conform and accept weird weather religions and the theological musings of internet hipsters who think the idea of Christian grace is some sort of supernatural point system where you get into heaven for accomplishing a set number of good deeds. I reject these attempts to subjugate me to the dominant discourse, just as I reject the liberal Jesusplaining that seeks to steal my savior and turn him into some sort of socialist hippie, a Bernie Sanders in a robe who thinks the only sin is generating too big of a carbon footprint.
And then there is the systemic hate for my rigidly male monosexual identification and my pronounced pro-chick agenda. Too often those of you who are genderfluid deny the identity of those of us who are gendersolid.
Finally, it is time to reject society’s paradigm of unphallused privilege. This bias results in interlocking systems of domination that produce the conditions under which oppressed peoples like me are forced to live, and usually manifests in me getting called whenever someone needs help lifting something heavy.
Those of us who wield a penis demand that you cease your dehumanizing unmale gaze and validate the manly values that stand firm against your anti-testicular hegemony.
We male-identifying men proudly shout out these radical truths:
Boys don’t cry, and it is lame to shed a tear in public, except on Memorial Day or when a dog dies.
Feelings are stupid, except for patriotism and a love of dogs.
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman.
Also, no man should ever listen to Maroon 5. Nor should anyone else. Including dogs.
We will no longer be man-junk marginalized. From this moment forth, my people’s pronouns are “he,” “him” and “if you touch my stuff, I’ll slug you.”
Your hate speech against us, which is defined as anything you say that we don’t like, must be banned, starting on campuses. As fellow social justice warriors have observed, “Free speech, a right many freedom movements have fought for, has recently become a tool appropriated by hegemonic institutions. It has not just empowered students from marginalized backgrounds to voice their qualms and criticize aspects of the institution, but it has given those who seek to perpetuate systems of domination a platform to project their bigotry.”
Right on! I mean, how could normalizing limitations on free speech ever backfire? You social justice warriors surely shouldn’t worry about this kind of thinking being expressed by people who don’t like you and who have a lot of guns.
Our initial non-negotiable demand is for a safe space for all German/Scot-Employed-Judeo/Christian-Veteran-Straight Males-Of Relatively Good Health on every college campus, as well as a Department of German/Scot-Judeo/Christian-Veteran-Straight Males-Of Relatively Good Health Studies to explore the issues regarding, and the terrible social stigma and prejudice faced by, us German/Scot-Judeo/Christian-Veteran-Straight Males-Of Relatively Good Health. We further demand a curriculum that teaches using unique German/Scot-Judeo/Christian-Veteran-Straight Males-Of Relatively Good Health pedagogic strategies, like “reading” and “studying.” It must also educate us about suppressed German/Scot-Judeo/Christian-Veteran-Straight Males-Of Relatively Good Health truths, like about how the Chinese stole the idea for the Great Wall from Deutschland’s autobahns, and how Steve McQueen is a million times cooler than Ryan Reynolds will ever be.
That is our intersectional reality; that is our cry for revolution. We refuse to allow the forces of social injustice to continue to deny our existence, and our suits, clean shaves, and combed hair shall be the transgressive body modifications that demonstrate our alienation from the dominant paradigm.
No longer will we allow our pallor to render us invisible!
No longer will we tolerate being left out of the acronym LGBTQ!
No longer will we be scrotum-shamed!
Damn…you covered it all…ditto…Now, how can I convince Mexifornia’s Jerry Shit-Brown to move the legislature to the west side of the fault line overlooking S.F. Bay…maybe I’ll get lucky and God will move it (fault line) to the east side of the capitol dome.
I agreed with everything this guy said until he said … ” because a man with a cat is a woman “Oh Hell no .Hold on hear a cotton picking minute . Little bb is a cat , a damn good pet and he is sitting right here beside me.Goes with me a over the country.Good watch cat at night to. So let’s lay off the catism for now … However, I am about ready to kill about half the damn people in this country.
Great read! I don’t agree on the cat thing though. I think every barn needs a few. Keeps the rats and mice out. They quit hanging out in the barn lets you know the coons showed up.
How great was that to read ! And I agree a man with a cat is a women, lol
I like pull cats one guy slips up and reaches down an grabs it by the handle, while the guy with the shotgun yells PULL!!!
Just kiddin
I cried when my dog died. So it goes. If men cried for anything else, we would be crying all the time. But we got shit to do, so it is only cry for a good dog. Cats I take out to the back yard with a shovel, that is when the are dead. It gets me away from the wailing wimenfoke.
Affirmative Discrimination is still a crime and Whites and Asians are the victims. There will be a painful reckoning for the criminals soon.
Preach rhs jr!
It is not just whites getting the shaft!
Racial Profiling Dominates Medical School Admissions. And It’s Not How the Left Believes.
http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/racial-profiling-dominates-medical-school-admissions-and-its-not-how-the-left-thinks/
Chokal-Ingam describes his story in detail on a website promoting his forthcoming book, titled “Almost Black: The True Story of an Indian American Who Got Into Medical School Pretending to Be An African American”:
According to the American Medical Association (AMA), between 2013 and 2015 applicants to medical school who self-identified as “Black or African American” were significantly more likely to be accepted with relatively mediocre grades and MCAT scores compared to “White” or “Asian” applicants.
The above sounds like something Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren would do.
Here is an example of Asians getting the shaft at Harvard without committing admissions fraud:
The Harvard Admissions Lawsuit, Explained
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/11/7/harvard-admissions-lawsuit-explainer/
“An Asian-American student has to score 140 points higher than a white student, 270 points higher than a Hispanic student and 450 points higher than a black student on the SAT to be on equal footing,” Princeton Professor Thomas J. Espenshade and RTI International researcher Alexandria Walton Radford argue in the book.
Asian-American groups accuse Harvard of discrimination
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/17/us/harvard-asian-americans-discrimination-complaint/
Is Harvard’s Past Discrimination Against Jews Relevant to Anti-Asian Bias Suit?
http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/349450/judge-harvard-s-past-discrimination-against-jews-not-relevant-to-claims-of/
So in the past, they banned ((students)).. now these ((students)) are the largest group at many of the “elite” educational institutions.
How does ((2%)) of the population become 25% of Harvard and 27% at Yale? Is this the true meaning of ((Affirmative action))?
Inquiring minds want to know.
anonatard says: “How does ((2%)) of the population become 25% of Harvard and 27% at Yale?”
First, those percents have been proven incorrect. A percent around 16% has been shown more accurate.
Second, 2% is incorrect in that the schools draw from an area, generally, where the population of Jews is much higher than 2%. In New England – the primary residence of Yale and Harvard students – the percentage of Jews in the population runs somewhere between 3 and 10%, state dependent.
Third, Jews perform substantially better academically than the general cohort.
Fourth, Jews attend private schools at high rates – which is a significant advantage.
Damn those high achieving, smart, dedicated Jews and their families that sacrifice to send them to private schools in order to get them good educations. It is discrimination, I tell you!
Do not let facts get in the way of a good lie, though.
Llpoh- Last census put joos in the US at 1.8% of population. Harvard has approx. 20-24% jooish students .
BL –
Same answer I gave above:
1) those figures re Jews at Harvard are inaccurate. 16% is more accurate. Harvard neither counts nor reports the number of Jews in its classes.
2) Harvard draws primarily from the NE, where Jews are a much higher % of the population. Not many Jews in the mid-West or East Coast. Why so few Jews at Stanford? Because location.
3) Jews do far better than whites, for instance, academically. Far better.
4) Jews attend private schools at a high rate, giving them additional advantage.
How is it that you folks can quote false facts, and not do some actual research?
I worked in the Admissions office once for an Ivy. For certain, Jews were not given priority. But they were powerful applicants judged purely on merit. And they batted well above their weight.
LLPOH running to save the day with his “facts”! Nothing like keeping the propaganda/lie going.
“I worked in the Admissions office once for an Ivy. For certain, Jews were not given priority. But they were powerful applicants judged purely on merit. And they batted well above their weight” – LLPOH
It’s nice you got to see the admission process first hand.
The Myth of American Meritocracy How corrupt are Ivy League admissions? is a MUST READ to understand the corruption of America’s top universities.
Rebuttal:
1) percentages from ((their)) sources
2) Harvard receives applicants from all over the world. The fact that ((they)) are over represented because of “location” alone is not enough to justify their enrollment percentages. Stanford has 10% ((student)) population. Lots of ((them)) in Midwest(especially Illinois and Ohio), East Coast, and West Coast (especially California).
Vital Statistics: Jewish Population in the United States, by State
(1899 – Present)
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-population-in-the-united-states-by-state
3) See article:The Myth of American Meritocracy How corrupt are Ivy League admissions?
4) See article:The Myth of American Meritocracy How corrupt are Ivy League admissions?
Here is some inconvenient truth. Mostly from ((their)) sites.
What is Hillel?
As the largest Jewish student organization in the world, Hillel builds connections with emerging adults at more than 550 colleges and universities, and inspires them to direct their own path. During their formative college years, students are challenged to explore, experience, and create vibrant Jewish lives.
2015 Top 60 Schools by Jewish Student Population
http://www.hillel.org/about/news-views/news-views—blog/news-and-views/2015/06/24/2015-top-60-schools-by-jewish-student-population
Top 60 Schools Jews Choose (A breakdown by percentage)
The following are the top 60 schools with the largest percentage of Jewish students to the total undergraduate student population
12. Yale University: 1,500 Jewish students, 28%
22. Harvard University: 1,675 Jewish students, 25%
THE MOST HEAVILY JEWISH US COLLEGE AND OTHER FACTS ABOUT JEWS AT AMERICAN COLLEGES
http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/The-most-heavily-Jewish-US-college-and-other-facts-about-Jews-at-American-colleges-437701
3. Yale is the most-Jewish Ivy, but Cornell has the most total Jews
Yale University’s undergrad student body is 27 percent Jewish (1,500 Jewish undergrads out of 5,477 total). Percentage-wise, it narrowly beats out its Ivy League rival Harvard University, which is 25 percent Jewish (1,675 out of 6,694 undergrads). But Cornell University and Columbia University both have more Jews in total — 3,000 and 1,800, respectively.
Stanford University
http://www.hillel.org/college-guide/list/record/stanford-university
6099
Undergrads
9771
Graduates
600* (10%)
Jewish Undergrads
(Percent of Population)
1000* (10%)
Jewish Graduates
(Percent of Population)
The Myth of American Meritocracy
How corrupt are Ivy League admissions?
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/
“Just a few years ago Pulitzer Prize-winning former Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden published The Price of Admission, a devastating account of the corrupt admissions practices at so many of our leading universities, in which every sort of non-academic or financial factor plays a role in privileging the privileged and thereby squeezing out those high-ability, hard-working students who lack any special hook. In one particularly egregious case, a wealthy New Jersey real estate developer, later sent to Federal prison on political corruption charges, paid Harvard $2.5 million to help ensure admission of his completely under-qualified son.8”
“In fact, Harvard reported that 45.0 percent of its undergraduates in 2011 were white Americans, but since Jews were 25 percent of the student body, the enrollment of non-Jewish whites might have been as low as 20 percent, though the true figure was probably somewhat higher.51 The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.”
“This overrepresentation of Jews is really quite extraordinary, since the group currently constitutes just 2.1 percent of the general population and about 1.8 percent of college-age Americans.52 Thus, although Asian-American high school graduates each year outnumber their Jewish classmates nearly three-to-one, American Jews are far more numerous at Harvard and throughout the Ivy League. Both groups are highly urbanized, generally affluent, and geographically concentrated within a few states, so the “diversity” factors considered above would hardly seem to apply; yet Jews seem to fare much better at the admissions office.”
“Karabel’s massive documentation—over 700 pages and 3000 endnotes—establishes the remarkable fact that America’s uniquely complex and subjective system of academic admissions actually arose as a means of covert ethnic tribal warfare. During the 1920s, the established Northeastern Anglo-Saxon elites who then dominated the Ivy League wished to sharply curtail the rapidly growing numbers of Jewish students, but their initial attempts to impose simple numerical quotas provoked enormous controversy and faculty opposition.10 Therefore, the approach subsequently taken by Harvard President A. Lawrence Lowell and his peers was to transform the admissions process from a simple objective test of academic merit into a complex and holistic consideration of all aspects of each individual applicant; the resulting opacity permitted the admission or rejection of any given applicant, allowing the ethnicity of the student body to be shaped as desired. As a consequence, university leaders could honestly deny the existence of any racial or religious quotas, while still managing to reduce Jewish enrollment to a much lower level, and thereafter hold it almost constant during the decades which followed.11 For example, the Jewish portion of Harvard’s entering class dropped from nearly 30 percent in 1925 to 15 percent the following year and remained roughly static until the period of the Second World War.12”
“As Karabel repeatedly demonstrates, the major changes in admissions policy which later followed were usually determined by factors of raw political power and the balance of contending forces rather than any idealistic considerations. For example, in the aftermath of World War II, Jewish organizations and their allies mobilized their political and media resources to pressure the universities into increasing their ethnic enrollment by modifying the weight assigned to various academic and non-academic factors, raising the importance of the former over the latter. Then a decade or two later, this exact process was repeated in the opposite direction, as the early 1960s saw black activists and their liberal political allies pressure universities to bring their racial minority enrollments into closer alignment with America’s national population by partially shifting away from their recently enshrined focus on purely academic considerations. Indeed, Karabel notes that the most sudden and extreme increase in minority enrollment took place at Yale in the years 1968–69, and was largely due to fears of race riots in heavily black New Haven, which surrounded the campus.13”
“Yale replaced its admissions staff in 1965 and the following year Jewish numbers nearly doubled.14”
“Such fears that checking the “Asian” box on an admissions application may lead to rejection are hardly unreasonable, given that studies have documented a large gap between the average test scores of whites and Asians successfully admitted to elite universities. Princeton sociologist Thomas J. Espenshade and his colleagues have demonstrated that among undergraduates at highly selective schools such as the Ivy League, white students have mean scores 310 points higher on the 1600 SAT scale than their black classmates, but Asian students average 140 points above whites.19 The former gap is an automatic consequence of officially acknowledged affirmative action policies, while the latter appears somewhat mysterious.”
“Power corrupts and an extreme concentration of power even more so, especially when that concentration of power is endlessly praised and glorified by the major media and the prominent intellectuals which together constitute such an important element of that power. But as time goes by and more and more Americans notice that they are poorer and more indebted than they have ever been before, the blandishments of such propaganda machinery will eventually lose effectiveness, much as did the similar propaganda organs of the decaying Soviet state. Kahlenberg quotes Pat Moynihan as noting that the stagnant American earnings between 1970 and 1985 represented “the longest stretch of ‘flat’ income in the history of the European settlement of North America.”120 The only difference today is that this period of economic stagnation has now extended nearly three times as long, and has also been combined with numerous social, moral, and foreign policy disasters.”
“Over the last few decades America’s ruling elites have been produced largely as a consequence of the particular selection methods adopted by our top national universities in the late 1960s. Leaving aside the question of whether these methods have been fair or have instead been based on corruption and ethnic favoritism, the elites they have produced have clearly done a very poor job of leading our country, and we must change the methods used to select them.”
Let us NEVER FORGET the FIRST and ONLY President of USA with a MBA.
George Walker Bush
After graduating from Yale University in 1968 and Harvard Business School in 1975, he worked in the oil industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
I’m sure he was the brightest bulb in the box. He was ACCEPTED into Yale and Harvard and GRADUATED based solely on merit?
Does Bush have an IQ of 140+?
Inquiring minds want to know.