Breakup Of The West?

Guest Post by Pat Buchanan

By the time Air Force One started down the runaway at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, to bring President Trump home, the Atlantic had grown markedly wider than it was when he flew to Riyadh.

In a Munich beer hall Sunday, Angela Merkel confirmed it.

Europe must begin to look out for itself, she said, “take our fate into our own hands. … The times in which we could rely fully on others, they are somewhat over.”

Merkel’s apprehensions are understandable. A divorce could be in the cards. During his visit to NATO in Brussels and the G-7 in Sicily, Trump, with both his words and body language, revealed his thinking on who are friends and who are freeloaders.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Long before arriving, Trump had cheered Brexit, the British decision to quit the EU, and shown a preference for nationalist Marine Le Pen in the French election won handily by Emmanuel Macron.

But when it comes to leaders, Trump seems to prefer Deke House to student council types. He has hailed Vladimir Putin as a “strong ruler” and “very smart.” In Riyadh, Trump declared King Salman a “wise man.” He calls China’s Xi Jinping “a great guy,” and welcomed Turkish autocrat Recep Tayyip Erdogan to the Oval Office: “It is a great honor to have you with us.”

When Egypt’s President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, who has imprisoned and killed thousands of the Muslim Brotherhood, came to visit, Trump said, “He’s done a fantastic job in a very difficult situation.”

In a phone call, Trump also praised Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, who has had narcotics dealers gunned down in the streets, for doing an “unbelievable job on the drug problem.”

Trump has even found merit in Kim Jong Un, the 33-year-old dictator of North Korea, describing him as a “a pretty smart cookie.”

And where Trump was photographed by the Russians grinning broadly with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, his confab with Merkel was marked by a seeming reluctance to shake hands.

But the disagreements with Europe are deeper than matters of style. Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson have indicated that in dealing with foreign nations, U.S. support for democratic norms and human rights will now take a back seat to strategic interests.

In Riyadh, Trump signaled the Sunni King of Bahrain we will no longer be giving him instructions on how to treat his Shiite majority. We’re not “here to lecture,” Trump assured the Arab royals.

After the conclave, the king’s police killed five and wounded dozens of demonstrators outside the home of a Shiite cleric, and arrested 286 of his supporters.

Of greater concern to Trump and Tillerson is the retention of the Persian Gulf naval base of the U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

Trump also tilts toward GOP skepticism of the threat of global warming and is considering pulling out of the Paris climate accord that is the altarpiece of the environmentalist international.

In Brussels, Trump praised NATO’s decision to back the U.S. war in Afghanistan after 9/11, but did not specifically recommit to Article 5, requiring all NATO nations to treat an attack on one as an attack on all, which our nervous NATO allies had wanted to hear.

Instead, they got an earful of pure Trump about how they owed back pay for NATO and that only five NATO nations were meeting their obligation to allocate 2 percent of GDP to defense.

Merkel seemed to take this as an implied threat that the U.S commitment to defend Europe from a Russia with one-tenth of NATO-Europe’s GDP may be contingent, and may have a time limit on it.

Moreover, France, Britain and Germany appear far more solidly committed to the Iran nuclear deal than are Trump and Congress.

A U.S.-NATO collision could come here, and soon.

The Iranians have signed on to purchase 100 Airbus aircraft and 80 commercial airliners from Boeing. If the Republicans impose new sanctions on Iran, or scupper the Boeing deal, Europe would have to decide whether to abandon the Airbus sales, or deliver the planes and perhaps take over the Boeing contract. That could bring a crisis.

And any U.S. confrontation with Iran, pressed upon us by Saudis, Israelis and Sunni Arabs could find Europeans bailing out wholesale on the next U.S. war in the Middle East.

Trump also seems less committed to the sanctions on Russia for its reannexation of Ukraine and support of pro-Russian rebels in the Donbass than does NATO Europe or Congress.

From his rough remarks, Trump sees the Europeans as freeloaders on U.S. defense, laggards on their NATO contributions, and mercantilists who craft policies to run endless trade surpluses at our expense, especially the Germans who are “bad, very bad.”

The European half of Trump’s trip should be taken as a fire-bell-in-the-night warning: Shape up, Europe, or you may find yourselves on your own when it comes to the defense of your continent.

For we Americans have had about enough.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
May 30, 2017 12:54 pm

A lot of negatives on a divorce – how about all the benefits!!!

LetsPlay
LetsPlay
May 30, 2017 1:02 pm

Merkels hissy fit would have been more truthfully stated as “we need to take more responsibility for our own defense. We thank the US for it’s long time and unwavering support, and President Trump speaks the truth that too many of us have abused the largess of the American tax payer for too long.”

Instead she, as defacto leader of NATO, shows her ignorance and childlike behavior at having her character called into question by the adult in the room.

Well, she is right on one thing … it is time for the European’s to depend on themselves. Finally.

Crawfish
Crawfish
May 30, 2017 1:05 pm

Very few NATO countries are our friends, they are happy to have us pay the bills, then cause us problems in the UN. I am glad Pres. Trump placed them on notice. See how quickly Germany decided it may be time to go in another direction.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
May 30, 2017 1:41 pm

NATO is worthless. Fair weather friends at best, and adversarial leeches worst.
The UN is simply a stacked-deck debating society of enemies, supported by US money.
I’d stop funding either one.
Maybe do just enough to keep veto powers.

rhs jr
rhs jr
May 30, 2017 1:46 pm

Can we call this Trump’s kick ass and take names first world tour? Now clean house of liberals, RINOs and NeoCons here!

LaLa Blood
LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 2:05 pm

The idea that Arab autocrats are our “friends” while the democracies of Western Europe are not, is ridiculous.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 2:18 pm

You’re right. None of them are our friends. Hell, they’re not even their own friends – as the recent elections in Holland & France have shown.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
  LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 3:08 pm

Neither are friends that I would want.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 3:36 pm

There is a difference between allies and friends, they are not necessarily the same.

FWIW, for the U.S. in today’s world allies are far more important than friends.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 3:52 pm

Nation states do not have friends-they have common interests and common concerns,risks,etc.–

Das Arschloch
Das Arschloch
May 30, 2017 2:07 pm

A country without borders does not need an army. Anything that would have been taken by force in the past by an invader, can be had for free today. The German navy/ferry service will even provide free transportation, if your country of origin is inconveniently separated from the promised land by a large body of water.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Das Arschloch
May 30, 2017 2:25 pm

So true. If I were a European (citizen) I’d rather be invaded by Orthodox Russians than by Muslims. If Merkel wanted to start defending Europe, she should start sinking the Doctors Without Borders ships that are picking up “refugees” 12 miles off of Libya and dropping them off in Italy.

nkit
nkit
May 30, 2017 2:28 pm

Breakup? Say it ain’t so. They were just getting started….

LaLa Blood
LaLa Blood
  nkit
May 30, 2017 3:29 pm

Who would you rather be with, young hunk Trudeau or old hag Merkel? 🙂

TampaRed
TampaRed
  LaLa Blood
May 30, 2017 3:54 pm

sick

Festering Boil
Festering Boil
  nkit
May 30, 2017 11:53 pm

Those two have the hots for each other. How much you want to bet they hooked up in the bathroom several times during the summit.

Ed
Ed
May 30, 2017 4:50 pm

Pat watches too much TV. This whole ridiculous idea that the US defends any NATO member country against outside threats is laughable. NATO is a just a convenient excuse for Congress to use for spending money that doesn’t even exist.

A politician will waste a billion dollars just so he can rake off a few thousand for himself. Pouring money down the NATO rathole allows our elected thieves to rake off enough to hand over to their mistresses for a shopping excursion.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
May 30, 2017 5:28 pm

I recall an article by JC Collins of Philosophy of Metrics where he predicted the slow abandonment of Europe in favor of the US siding with/defending the ME/NA.

Under SDR economics, the price a country pays for SDR’s is determined by a number of factors including the resources each nation brings to the table. We have built and are building many billions of dollars of state of the art bases in and around the ME and Africa. tRumps recent SA trip seems to tangentially reinforce this. Militarily protecting the ME/NA oil fields effectively equates to control of said oil fields.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
May 30, 2017 7:25 pm
jimmieoakland
jimmieoakland
May 31, 2017 12:36 am

Does anyone know if the the slow payers in NATO have some excuse as to why they haven’t paid their share of the bills? I believe Germany hasn’t met the 2 percent goal, and I would love to hear their rationale for not doing so. It seems such a cut and dried issue.