The Surveillance State and Big Brother Trump

undefined

Despite his opposition to surveillance during the campaign, Trump has flip-flopped once again and now supports the surveillance state.

His Homeland Security advisor, Tom Bossert, who worked with the Bush administration, penned an editorial for The New York Times this week calling for a reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Section 702 allows for vacuuming up emails, instant messages, Facebook messages, web browsing history, and more in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

“Cabinet officials and security professionals from different agencies will testify on this matter on Wednesday,” writes Bossert. “President Trump stands with them 100 percent on the need for permanent reauthorization of Section 702. Officials from the past two administrations also agree that we cannot have a blind spot in our defenses simply because a foreign terrorist on foreign land chooses an American email provider.”

Former NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander and Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers have repeatedly claimed NSA snooping has thwarted 54 terrorist attacks. This claim has been completely debunked. Like the baseless and politically motivated claim Russia hacked the election, the 54 terrorists claim is little more than fiction. It’s propaganda to justify a surveillance state.

Jenna McLaughlin writes “the reason there haven’t been any large-scale terror attacks by ISIS in the US is not because they were averted by the intelligence community, but because — with the possible exception of one that was foiled by local police — none were actually planned.”

The NSA and the government insist they only conduct surveillance overseas but this was dispelled after a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union showed the NSA intentionally violated the law and spied on American citizens.

The surveillance state was created not to protect Americans from terrorists. It was created to spy on political targets in the United States. Evidence of this arose in 2014.

“Inside NSA there are a set of people who are — and we got this from another NSA whistleblower who witnessed some of this — they’re inside there, they are targeting and looking at all the members of the Supreme Court, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Congress, both House and Senate, as well as the White House,” NSA whistleblower William Binney said in March.

Binney said nothing will change “until we put people in jail, because they have violated laws and the Constitution, as well as the Constitution and laws in Europe and around the world. Until we start putting people in jail to make sure they don’t do this again, and start cleaning up what is going on, I don’t see this changing.”

Trump and his advisers will make sure nothing changes and the surveillance state continues to grow until it becomes the sort of totalitarian leviathan portrayed in George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen-Eighty Four.

Finally, is the move to make Section 702 permanent supported by Trump loyalists and the alt-right? Thus far, they have supported everything Trump has done, including killing people in Syria and Iraq. Trump’s pathological lies made during the election do not seem to bother them in the least.

Besides, the alt-right is too busy attacking the left and vice versa in a never-ending ideological running battle that serves as a huge distraction.

That’s why I call Trump Republicans and the alt-right neo-neocons. They are continuing the forever war and police and surveillance state agenda of the Bush neocons.

Reprinted with permission from Another Day in the Empire.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Mike Murray
Mike Murray
June 11, 2017 10:25 am

No damn difference between the D’s and the R’s, they are all (99.9%) a bunch of big government loving statists. They don’t argue about control, power, or surveillance, only about who is in charge of it. Their ideology is the State. Their place in society requires it.

Clive
Clive
  Mike Murray
June 11, 2017 2:27 pm

And that’s why Trump was elected. He’s not one of them. They actually spied on his campaign and got caught!

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 11, 2017 10:41 am

Those who should support Trump turn on him.

That is why the Elite Establishment wins and their opposition loses.

And, of course, that is all the fault of the Jews. It can’t possibly be the fault of those who should support Trump and do not.

Anon
Anon
June 11, 2017 11:05 am

I see the problem as this. Just like every other person with an ego – Trump sees no problem with the surveillance state collecting info on everyone, for the same reason why people who own a tiger in their home, or other wild animal eventually get eaten. They think, wrongly in almost every case, that THEY are special, and that they can control an wield the power to THEIR ends.
Just like the person that is strangled by their own Boa Constrictor, and found dead, or the Las Vegas duo of Siegfried and Roy, Trump does not realize that the NSA, CIA etc. are wild beasts, that will turn on him in a second. He just THINKS that he is “smart enough” to control them to get dirt on the “other guy”.
Complete idiocy and hubris, just like all of Government today (and for a long time past). Like nuclear weapons, the safest place for the NSA, CIA and most of the other agencies of the “deep state” is a jail cell for the higher ups, and the dustbin of history.

suzanna
suzanna
June 11, 2017 11:15 am

A dirty look, destroys the marriage. If a political rule
or law or practice isn’t immediately stopped, disseminated,
and stripped, and people jailed = Trump is a dump.
If we ever
needed some meta data…it is now. It may be valuable for
security (enemies within) and it may allow for a softer landing.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
June 11, 2017 12:21 pm

Please bring back Obama – at least he didn’t lie and was opposed to the surveillance state.

jamesthedeplorablewanderer
jamesthedeplorablewanderer
  kokoda - the most deplorable
June 11, 2017 6:08 pm

What are you smoking?
You will save $2500 per year on insurance premiums under ObamaCare. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. I wrote a book called Dreams From My Father. …
There are whole websites dedicated to listing his lies!
https://www.infowars.com/252-documented-examples-of-barack-obamas-lying-lawbreaking-corruption-cronyism-etc/

Clive
Clive
June 11, 2017 2:33 pm

I don’t remember Trump saying he was going to abolish the surveillance state if elected. He criticized it. This article and comments are a lot of guff about a NYT’s editorial supporting the program going forward. Congress can kill it if they want to. That’s politics. Good grief. The last administration completely abused the powers of the state…. and they’re so far held to no account… by anyone of their party or their electorate nor the DOJ. THAT’s the problem! Evidently the checks and balances and wiser minds and harsh penalties for abuse are totes BS. His name was Seth Rich.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
June 11, 2017 4:51 pm

We knew he was a snake when we picked him up.