The Treasonous Secession of Climate Confederacy States

 

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism. Via Frontpage Mag

After President Trump rejected the Paris Climate treaty, which had never been ratified by the Senate, the European Union announced that it would work with a climate confederacy of secessionist states.

Scotland and Norway’s environmental ministers have mentioned a focus on individual American states. And the secessionist governments of California, New York and Washington have announced that they will unilaterally and illegally enter into a foreign treaty rejected by the President of the United States.

The Constitution is very clear about this. “No state shall enter into any treaty.” Governor Cuomo of New York has been equally clear. “New York State is committed to meeting the standards set forth in the Paris Accord regardless of Washington’s irresponsible actions.”

Cuomo’s statement conveniently comes in French, Chinese and Russian translations.

“It is a little bold to talk about the China-California partnership as though we were a separate nation, but we are a separate nation,” Governor Brown of California announced.

In an interview with the Huffington Post, the radical leftist described California as “a real nation-state”.

Brown was taking a swing through China to reassure the Communist dictatorship of California’s loyalty to an illegal treaty at the same time as EU boss Juncker was bashing America and kissing up to Premier Li Keqiang at the EU-China summit. It’s one thing when the EU and China form a united front against America. It’s quite another when California and China form a united front against America.

The Climate Alliance of California, New York, Washington, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Oregon, Colorado, Hawaii, Virginia and Rhode Island looks a lot like the Confederacy’s Montgomery Convention. Both serve as meeting points for a secessionist alliance of states to air their grievances against the Federal government over an issue in which they are out of step with the nation.

“We’re a powerful state government. We have nine other states that agree with us,” Brown boasted.

Two more and Jim Jones’ old pal could have his own confederacy.

All the bragging and boasting about how much wealth and power the secessionist states of the climate confederacy represent sounds very familiar. But that wealth and power is based around small enclaves, the Bay Area and a few dozen blocks in Manhattan, which wield disproportionate influence.

Like the slaveowner class, leftist elites are letting the arrogance of their wealth lead them into treason. And as they look out from their mansions and skyscrapers, they should remember that the majority of working class people in California and New York will be far less enthusiastic about fighting a war to protect their dirty investments in solar energy plants and carbon credits funded by taxes seized from many of those same people in these left-wing slave states.

The declared intention of the Climate Alliance, in words appearing on the New York State government website, is to treasonously “convene U.S. states committed to upholding the Paris Climate Agreement”.

States cannot and are not allowed to unilaterally choose to “uphold” a treaty rejected by the President. Their leaders are certainly not allowed to travel to enemy nations to inform foreign powers of their treasonous designs and to solicit their aid against the policies of the United States government.

This is all the more treasonous at a time when the United States is on a collision course with the People’s Republic of China over North Korea’s nuclear weapons and trade agreements.

“It’s important for the world to know that America is not Washington,” Brown declared. “Yes, we’re part of the union, but we’re also a sovereign state that can promote the necessary policies that are required for survival.”

Governors don’t normally feel the need to declare that their state is still part of the union. But they also don’t announce that they’re a separate nation and then set off to cut separate deals with enemy powers. No state should be issuing, “Yes, we’re part of the union, but” disclaimers before going to China.

The disclaimer is the first step to leaving the union.

Governor Brown’s trip to China isn’t funded by California taxpayers. That might be a relief to that overburdened tribe except that it’s partially being paid for by the Energy Foundation. Behind that generic name for a pass through organization are a number of left-wing foundations who have been paying for American politicians to travel to the People’s Republic of China.

Donors to the energy foundation include Ecocrat billionaire Tom Steyer who has pumped millions into EF. Steyer’s finances are entangled with China and even with members of the Chinese government.

Steyer has accused President Trump of treason for rejecting the unconstitutional Paris Climate Treaty. But who are the real traitors here?

Other major EF donors include the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Bloomberg and George Soros.

There is something deeply troubling about a governor’s treasonous trip being funded by private interests with business ties to a foreign power. If Democrats were really serious about rooting out influence by foreign powers, they would be taking a very close look at Brown’s backers.

But the greater outrage is that the governors of secessionist states are using a manufactured crisis to conduct “diplomacy” with foreign governments in defiance of the policies of the United States.

Washington’s Jay Inslee was recently talking Global Warming in a meeting with Canadian PM Justin Trudeau. “We’re both very strongly engaged on issues of climate change, on issues of openness to trade, on leadership on refugees as well,” Trudeau declared.

“We share an incredible commitment to defeating climate change,” Inslee flattered him. “And it is a great pleasure we have a national leader on the North American continent who is committed to that.”

And he didn’t mean the President of the United States.

Inslee’s fondness for the illegal Paris Climate treaty is unsurprising as his own efforts on Global Warming similarly depended on unilateral moves that lacked legislative support. But that is a problem for Washington’s Constitution. His participation in a secessionist pact is a problem for our Constitution.

And the problem isn’t limited to the Climate Alliance.

California and many of the other entities declaring that they will enforce an illegal treaty are also sanctuary states and cities. They are choosing not to follow Federal law while implementing foreign treaties that they have no right to unilaterally participate in.

This is a treasonous situation that is more troubling in some ways than the original Civil War because it involves states making open alliance with enemy powers such as China and welcoming them in. State governments are undermining the united front of the national government in the face of the enemy.

“California will resist this misguided and insane course of action,” Governor Brown ranted. The logic of “resistance” has inevitably turned into treason.

A civil war is underway. In the last election the territorial majority of Americans rejected the rule of a minority of wealthy and powerful urban enclaves. Outside of their bicoastal bases, the political power of the Democrat faction has been shattered. And so it has retreated into subversion and secessionism.

“China is moving forward in a very serious way, and so is California,” Brown declared. “And we’re going in the opposite direction of Donald Trump.”

While Democrats have spent the better part of the previous week waving their arms in the air over a back channel with Russia, one of their faction’s leading governors is openly allying with China against the President of the United States. And the treasonous Democrat media is cheering this betrayal.

Brown and his colleagues are in blatant violation of the Logan Act. Their actions are in violation of the United States Constitution. And all this is another dark step on the road to another civil war.

If the climate confederacy is not held accountable for its treason, the crisis will only grow.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
30 Comments
Persnickety
Persnickety
June 15, 2017 4:12 pm

It’s just mighty entertaining how the leftists, after spending 80+ years forcing national-this and national-that upon anyone and everyone, have now magically become believers in federalism and states’ rights after they experienced some trivial setbacks in their globalist nanny-state agenda.

Icing on the cake is that they’ve chosen issues that are 100% black-and-white, where there is no plausible claim that the individual states have the power to do what the leftists want them to.

rhs jr
rhs jr
June 15, 2017 4:55 pm

Rejoice Rejoice America! Atten: NY, California, et all: Climate is driven by Solar Cycles (CO2 is irrelevant) but do not let the Facts deter your welcomed exits! Don’t let the door hit you in your stupid leftist asses! Good riddance to liberals; there is Hope at long last: the trash is taking itself out, MAGA! Praise God who works in mysterious ways!

peaknic
peaknic
June 15, 2017 5:06 pm

This article is so overblown. It’s not a “foreign treaty” with the individual state if a state decides to try and become more carbon neutral in their energy mix. They are not signing anything and they are not obligating their state or the nation to do anything. They are just trying to move their economies to be more efficient and try to tap natural power flows (e.g., photons hitting the earth or air blowing past them) for energy rather than use fossil fuels.

States have always been free to set their standards, no matter for what, to be higher than the Federal government requires. That is, unless the industry lobbies the shit out of Congress and gets them to pass laws/regulations that make it illegal to be better than the Fed requires.

Ed
Ed
June 15, 2017 5:20 pm

This asshole screeching about treason apparently hasn’t read the Constitution. To him, treason consists of anything he doesn’t like. The states do not have any lawful power to make treaties, that is one of the state powers surrendered to the federal government. States do have the power to secede, regardless of the claim that the issue was “settled” by Lincoln’s war.

The obvious fact of the matter is that these states are not in the process of seceding. Their libtard politicians are just having a little hissy fit. That’s all this amounts to, despite what this Greenfield asshole and that retard, Marty Armstrong say.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Ed
June 15, 2017 5:44 pm

Ed – I stopped reading at that point. Treason is specifically defined in the Constitution. This, once again, ain’t it.

There may be great value in the article. But if the title is so misleading, I will read no further.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
  Ed
June 15, 2017 6:17 pm

I’ll side with M. Armstrong and his very reputable legal knowledge.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  kokoda - the most deplorable
June 15, 2017 7:04 pm

kokoda – treason is defined as making war on the US, or aiding the enemy. The US is not ar physical war.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Francis Marion
June 15, 2017 7:17 pm

Francis – the US is not at war. When and if Congress says so, get back to me.

Persnickety
Persnickety
  Llpoh
June 15, 2017 8:02 pm

Touche! The US is currently at war with “terror” – and “globally!”

Anyone who gives aid and comfort to “terror” is therefore a traitor. I nominate CNN to be prosecuted first. For that matter, I nominate any and all government agencies AND private businesses that use three initials as their name to be so prosecuted.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Francis Marion
June 16, 2017 12:15 am

Francis – I am not defending said turds. What I am doing is sticking to the definition of treason as found in the Constitution, and also pointing out the need for Congress to declare war. The US has no business imvolving itself in armed conflict without a declaration of war. If war is declared, then treason can indeed come into play. But not until then.

There must surely be other means to stop the illegal activity, though. Just not charges of treason.

By the way, very often on this sort of thing I eventually am told “well, technically you are right, but..”. I stop the conversation right there, by saying “If technically I am right, then I am right. No such thing as being untechnically right”.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  kokoda - the most deplorable
June 15, 2017 10:42 pm

If he actually has “reputable legal knowledge” then he knows he is lying by calling it treason.

Treason has to do with helping an enemy defeat the United States during war, it’s quite an easy thing to understand.

But he counts on his readers having no knowledge and being unwilling to acquire any to get by with it.

Ed
Ed
  Francis Marion
June 16, 2017 6:51 am

Franky, treason is not “a bit strong of a word” to use here, it’s the wrong word. These libtard politicians who threaten to make treaties with the UN don’t even represent the citizens of the states they claim to.

Virginia, for example, is nothing like the governor who is doing all the climatard screeching. That asshole was put in office with massive vote fraud in the northern counties around DC. The author of this piece doesn’t seem to know that.

Treason is always trotted out as an accusation by political pundits who may or may not even know the constitutional definition of the term. It’s usually a good indicator of whether they have a valid point.

i forget
i forget
  Francis Marion
June 16, 2017 1:09 pm

Treason is parliamentary procedural bs. Gov apologia is bs. Status quo forever & ever, amen: bs. A cartel’d mind is a terrible thing. Cartel’d hive minds are geometrically worse. Africanized locusts. Let my people go? 2 misfires: They are not my people. Or yours. DC, CA, Moses, whatever, whoever. Phucking pharaohs all…cuz slaves & slavemasters got more codependent love, more Stockholm syndrome, more Manchurian candidacy than decent people can do anything about. Let the indecents drown in it, even tho decents always die too, cuz you can’t stop ‘em or save ‘em. Sine wave surfing isn’t sport. It’s 1st & last resort. Because this pyramid•scheme planet’s infested with bugs. (So bugging out is perfectly sensible.)

Word games & gamers: Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason. ~ John Harington

zelmer
zelmer
June 15, 2017 5:22 pm

They don’t have to sign a treaty to implement what is in it. The 10th amendment gives them that right. If they want to be the state that experiments with the crap the treaty would have shoved down everyone’s throat go for it. I can always move.

peaknic
peaknic
  zelmer
June 16, 2017 9:47 am

That was my point, exactly.

digitalpennmedia
digitalpennmedia
June 15, 2017 6:02 pm

the Constitution… whats that? /s

But seriously, where exactly has this been followed and not subverted? It is absolutely disgusting that this is little more than a whispered argument for the rights of the populace, but it is where we are now in this time period. The Constitution is little studied (and in some cases not at all) in school, and even when it is the leftist puke “teachers” change the wording or meaning or address it as a “living” document. If the people have their 2nd amendment curbed state to state and now even the 1st is slowly being curbed state to state what would ever wake up a populace of zombies like dipshit peaknic above that decides to make an argument from their own view point because it suits their beliefs…
No…the Constitution little matters anymore as each person has decided they can interpret and change things in it as they see fit; how else is it that… “shall not be infringed” …is interpreted so many different ways and as such treason is even more vague to different biased opinions.

We are now in a place of history in which ideologies are so split and the mentality of the cry-baby – I always get my way leftists – is that of a crusader, true-believer of a cause to the point of forced belief much as any immature and mentally lower functioning child would tend to violence and emotional outbursts. This is going to be a dangerous mix, given approx half the country of leftists and in psych studies it has been shown 1 in 5 of the youth have mental issues today (most of whom I would bet tend to leftist ideals). This is how we got the shooter yesterday… would one think he would care about the secession of CA, NY or any other leftist state? probably not.

dawolf
dawolf
June 15, 2017 6:21 pm

Fourty years ago the governor of my state made a pact with a large, (foreign government subsidized) foreign auto manufacturer. Nearly all of the consequences have been beneficial to the citizens of my state.
It is part and parcel of many state governments to send large business/government delegations abroad to woo trade and manufacturing deals. Look it up, and stop spouting reactionary drivel.

Interior Norm
Interior Norm
June 15, 2017 6:41 pm

If you take the all the northern counties of California, and them run a line down the center of the state from north to south, you get a new state. The people in the north and east wish to leave the state. It is the coastal wealthy areas controlling the rest of the populace. It looks like it may be time for those counties to look at leaving California. Believe me, once you leave the Bay Area, most citizens in the interior, and the mountain regions hold great contempt for their California government.

Hondo
Hondo
June 15, 2017 6:49 pm

It galls my ass to no end that forty-five years ago he (Brown) was fucking Linda Ronstadt. When she got out of bed with the bastard, she probably sat down and wrote one of her biggest hits: “You’re No Good.”

monger
monger
June 15, 2017 7:13 pm

Brown declared. “Yes, we’re part of the union, but we’re also a sovereign state that can promote the necessary policies that are required for survival.”

His wording leaves much to be desired unless he was also making a case for the confederacy

TampaRed
TampaRed
June 15, 2017 8:11 pm

Good article Foxy,good comments guys.
You know what I was thinking the other day while reading another article about the climate change con-what ever happened to the “crisis” of acid rain?

peaknic
peaknic
  TampaRed
June 16, 2017 9:57 am

The crisis of Acid rain was actually addressed through the trading of “pollution credits”. It worked.

Larry Haynes
Larry Haynes
June 15, 2017 8:47 pm

This was all I needed to read to know that I have been right all along. We need to kill ALL libturds. Just get rid of them, no matter the method. Libturds must all be eliminated! ALL OF THEM !!!

John
John
June 15, 2017 10:11 pm

Brown will fly to Paris and Bali and sign resolutions with other sanctimonious publicity hounds. They will wine and dine together and give each other awards.

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
June 15, 2017 10:51 pm

The dissolution of this empire is inevitable. It really doesn’t matter what is the ultimate cause. North America is an odd place, separated from the rest of humanity by vast oceans. It is likely that one day, a few centuries from now, a new North American Empire will once again attempt world domination. It may succeed, or come close enough to dominate the planet for a few centuries but it will fall again, for whatever reason. That is the way of history. We just see things through our very narrow lens of time and at the present, North America doesn’t really have much of a historical record relative to the ancient countries who have risen and fallen many times in the past. Some were accidents of history; neither Macedonia, Rome nor Mongolia are ever likely to conquer vast swaths of the planet again, or England, for that matter.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
June 15, 2017 11:45 pm

LET THEM GO!
Despite what the tyrant named Lincoln and the whipped dog supreme Court decided, there is plenty of historical evidence that secession was considered a right of the States. In fact several northern states thought about secession in the 1840’s.

“Whether we remain in one confederacy, or form into Atlantic and Mississippi confederacies, I believe not very important to the happiness of either part. 
Those of the western confederacy will be as much our children and descendants as those of the eastern. 
And I feel myself as much identified with that country in future time as with this. 
And did I now foresee a separation at some future day, yet I should feel the duty and the desire to promote the western interests as zealously as the eastern, doing all the good for both portions of our future family which should fall within my power.”
-Thomas Jefferson
The Thomas Jefferson quote is from an 1804 letter TJ wrote to his friend Joseph Preistley. Jefferson always believed in secession and was convinced the states would not stay together in perpetuity.

Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of power delegated to itself, since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself…
— Thomas Jefferson

Hollow man
Hollow man
June 16, 2017 6:38 am

The country needs to split up into 2 or 3 countries. Painful yes, but necessary.