The Anti-Diesel Jihad Expands

Guest Post by Eric Peters

For reasons that aren’t inscrutable (give me a minute – I’ll explain) the jihad against diesels  is metastasizing to include FiatChrysler.

The combine – which subsumes the Jeep and Ram truck brands – has been accused of selling diesels that emit “as much as 20 times” the maximum allowable quantity of an exhaust byproduct, oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

This is exactly what got VW nailed to the cross. And it’s exactly the same demagogic coverage. “As much as 20 times” the allowable maximum!

Good god, it sounds apocalyptic! A lung-melting catastrophe!

Except of course it’s not.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

A bureaucratic standard may have been affronted – that is all.

Note the “as much as . . .” verbiage. As in, could be – or might be. As opposed to something exact.

Weasel words, the sort of copy an advertising shyster would use to hawk a product that didn’t actually do a damned thing but the words implied it did because it might. It is of a piece with third-empty cereal boxes – the box itself meant to make you think you are getting what you just paid for.

Only, it’s worse, because in this case there is nothing in the box.

Nothing in whole numbers, that is.

As in the VW crucifixion, the standard affronted amounts to a difference of less than half of one percent. If you don’t know this, you don’t know your Tiers and Bins – EPA-speak for the various levels and thresholds for allowable exhaust emissions. The difference between one Tier and Bin and the next is fractional.

I bold this out of exasperation.Because it is never explained by the media. Search for yourself and see. It is outrageous, a monstrous dereliction of duty. Because with explanation, without qualification, the “as much as 20 times” business creates an egregiously false impression.

People have been grossly misled about misled about the extent to which new cars do not pollute. The whole aim of practical politics, as H.L. Mencken once said, is to menace the public with dangers – all of them false – so as to instill in them a hysterical fear and make them clamorous to be led to safety.

Exactly so.

Most new cars with gas engines qualify as Partial Zero Emissions (PZEV) under the EPA’s Tiers and Bins – that is to say, they emit almost nothing offensive to human health. And recent-issue diesel-powered cars are within hair-splitting difference of that standard. But because they fall on the other side of the hair – so claims the EPA, at any rate – they must be extirpated.

Well, EPA doesn’t actually say that – but the Tiers and Bins will end up having the same effect: Outlaw diesels by regulatory fiat. Make it impossible to design and build a diesel engine that qualifies for the latest Tiers and Bins while also still being priced such that people would actually be interested in possibly buying the thing and while also delivering the attributes – high mileage and lower over-the-road maintenance costs – that make people interested in diesel engines, regardless of price. 

This is becoming not possible.

It is why Mercedes just pulled out of the diesel market in the U.S. You can no longer buy the excellent BlueTec turbo-diesel in models like the E-Class sedan and several other Benz models that formerly offered it. Not because it doesn’t meet the current Tiers and Bins – but because Mercedes decided it won’t be possible to meet the next round of Tiers and Bins, the next splitting of hairs, without either unacceptable costs or unacceptable functional gimps that buyers won’t tolerate.

Mazda is supposed to be offering the Sky-D diesel if sells everywhere else sometime next year in models like the CX5, a small crossover SUV – after more than two years of withholding it. But don’t hold your breath. The Tiers and Bins.

So, why?

I think because diesels actually work.

Economically work.

Unlike, say, electric cars – which are given every form of automotive affirmative action conceivable, including massive subsidies as well as a Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell policy with regard to the very real “environmental impact” of these things – which can be measured in whole numbers.

They are economically preposterous.

A modern turbo-diesel powered car, on the other hand, can be manufactured and sold for around $21,000 (VW did exactly that until EPA stomped them).

It can also deliver near-hybrid fuel economy, without the extra cost of the hybrid technology – negating the hybrid’s slight mileage advantage. For example, last week I test drove the 2017 Toyota Prius hybrid. It achieved about 56.2 MPG, which is excellent. However, the last VW Jetta TDI I test drove – before VW had to jerk them off the market – achieved 51 MPG. The diesel VWs routinely exceeded the EPA mileage numbers touted.

When you take into account the Toyota’s price tag – which is about $2,500 higher than the VW’s – the 5-ish MPG advantage the hybrid has is a wash, as far as economics.

Ans the Prius is the only hybrid that gets that kind of mileage. Or costs only a couple thousand more than a car like the TDI-powered Jetta.

The Chevy Volt costs $33,200 – about $11k more than the TDI Jetta.

A Tesla electric car is even more economically preposterous – as are all electric cars.

It begs the question – why are they being pushed so hard when they are economically preposterous? Of what use is a “zero emissions” (not!) electric car that very few people could afford to drive? How does it “save the planet” or “reduce the carbon footprint” for a tiny handful – in terms of the general population – of affluent people to motor around in $40k-plus electric cars?

The answer, of course, is that it does neither.

But that is not the true object of the exercise. Which, I have come to believe, is to make it very, very costly to motor – which will have the effect of making it an indulgence of the affluent while the Masses take the bus.

Diesel power is a problem for this agenda because it isn’t economically idiotic. High efficiency and a low price means problem solved. . .  if the problem is vehicles that use “too much” fuel, as the ruling class constantly singsongs about.

Because diesels are both efficient and affordable, they represent an affront to hybrid and electric vehicles which are neither. They are a pebble in the shoe of the people pushing an agenda very different from the one publicly spoken of.

This isn’t about economy. It is about mobility.

It is about restricting mobility.

Diesels aren’t dirty – not by any standard based on that which can be measured in the form of measurable harm caused to actual human beings. It is telling that the government isn’t required to adduce such harm before it issues it fatwas. Instead, it merely hypothesizes “risks” – which are not subject to evidentiary scrutiny, which never have to be proved, and which are almost never dissected by the lazy/owned (take your pick) media. Which instead uses guaranteed-to-rile-the-masses terms such as “spewed pollution” in a news story about FiatChrysler’s purported tailpipe sins.

It all makes sense – but only if you gaze upon it from a different perspective. When you do, it all becomes crystal clear.

Bins, Tiers and all.   

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
lamont cranston
lamont cranston
June 18, 2017 10:23 am

Eric-

I have owned a 71 220D, 74 240D, & 84 300D, all of which belched thick smoke and likely emitted more “pollutants” in a week than my 2010 & 2014 TDI Wagons did in a year. The latter two Benzes made it to 300K before they were sold.

I traded the 2010 at 200K for the 2014, which gets 40 mpg+ and has never had a problem in its 175K of service and still rides like it’s brand new. I’ll just rebuild the engine when it sorta dies and hope to get parts for the next 15 yrs.

This is an absolute f***ing shame. And I thought Trump would stop this crap.

Ed
Ed
  lamont cranston
June 18, 2017 8:48 pm

Trump could stop this shit with a single memo. Watch what he does instead.

Gator
Gator
  Ed
June 18, 2017 10:26 pm

Apparently fuck around with Cuba some more, since apparently thats more important than the long list of reasons we voted for him. About the only thing of Obama’s he has undone is one of the few things Obama did that I agreed with. Thanks for nothing.

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
  Gator
June 19, 2017 3:23 am

He crushed TPP though. That was one good thing in my opinion.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
June 18, 2017 10:25 am

Excellent article.

oldtoad
oldtoad
June 18, 2017 10:48 am

Bought a 12v Dodge Cummins from Florida then added another to the spare parts pile.
Remember, it is all on the level.
One more just to rub it in, “First I heard of this,” we are soooo doomed.

bob
bob
June 18, 2017 10:49 am

It is an excellent article and it is plain that the “persecution of the diesel” is for purpose. And while VW was made the public scapegoat for its errors, consider the rural person that needs the diesel torque for hauling heavy loads like cattle and hay. Years ago I had a ’95 F-350 that could tow a mind-blowing load, and also run without a load at 21 mpg on the freeway (10,000 lbs gvw pickup getting 21 mpg on the highway before the performance chip!). Nowdays, with all the EPA mandated restrictions to airflow on such vehicles its tough to buy a new one that’ll get more than 10 mpg on the freeway with no load-not to mention the loss of hauling capacity and the wear and tear created by reburners on exhaust valves and turbos…which are not a cheap fix. What I think I see is an orchestrated, concentrated effort on the part of our cruelest big brother to saddle Americans with a “fixed” expense to which there is now way around, and to thwart both the rural independent, and the small business person. VW took the hit because it was providing “more affordable” transportation to the masses-the TDI product is outstanding, providing power, performance and economy-but the truth is that once again the “flyover states” are squarely in the crosshairs of our officious and bloated unelected government agencies.

Old Dog
Old Dog
  bob
June 18, 2017 5:01 pm

Last year I bought a 2001 F-250 with a 7.3L motor because in my case older was certainly better than less old. I am not convinced that the newer Fords match up, especially with DEF….

I agree with Lamont, wish Trump would have addressed this…need to write a letter or 3.

bob
bob
  Old Dog
June 18, 2017 6:04 pm

What a great motor the 7.3 is. The only reason more diesel shops aren’t making more money rehabbing old 7.3’s is because its hard to get financing for a 10k vehicle and a 10k drivetrain rebuild, but its money far better spent than buying the new ones for sure.

Old Dog
Old Dog
  bob
June 18, 2017 6:21 pm

Right, sticker on one F-350 last year at the local stealership was $71,000. Ugh.

Gator
Gator
  bob
June 18, 2017 10:31 pm

Several of my friends are big diesel enthusiasts. Most of them agree that the 7.3 is the best engine any automaker has ever offered in a pickup truck. I’ve never been a ford fan, but Id love to have a excursion with a 7.3 in it, but the problem is they are insanely expensive for as old as they are and with as many miles. My brother in law has a 20 year old pickup with a 7.3, and he loves it, says he is never getting rid of it.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
June 18, 2017 11:05 am

Who does restricting mobility hurt the most? Those of us in rural fly-over country.
That’s just a coincidence of course.

Anon
Anon
June 18, 2017 11:12 am

Remember, this is all about making the world in to a big renter society. We no longer are to own our own means. EVERYTHING is now to be rented from someone in the elite world. If you want to drive, you must rent your transportation or pay for your single trip. If you need to be healthy, there is no incentive in a permanent solution, you need a lifetime of medication dependence for an incurable “condition”. If you want a place to live, you must rent your dwelling from the elite. I don’t believe this is a planned event – like Agenda 21, or new world order or what not – I simply believe that it is no longer possible for most companies to make money anymore based on you owning anything, and the only way now to keep people paying in to the system is to make everything so restricted (through high cost and low availability) you have no hope of owning anything moving forward. This concept can be seen by John Deere making it difficult for farmers to repair their own farm equipment. Got to keep that continuing revenue coming in. This is actively encouraged at the government level, as they can continue taxing you on this rent. If you pay once, they can’t extract the cash flow from you on a regular, guaranteed interval. Remember, government no longer works for US. If you can’t induce them to buy voluntarily often enough, then force the issue. This also gives the elite the added benefit of controlling everyone’s means of production. If you can’t possibly afford your own means of production, you can’t ever become competition to them.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
  Anon
June 18, 2017 12:00 pm

The government has been renting people what is supposed to be private property for a hundred years.
It’s called property taxes.

TampaRed
TampaRed
June 18, 2017 1:22 pm

Isn’t Chrysler owned by Fiat,an Italian company?
I believe that Peters and all of you are correct about pricing people out of their autos.
However,I also believe that there are additional reasons behind all this.
Foreign businesses have been being hammered with huge penalties and settlements for years now for relatively minor transgressions or stupid mistakes.Auto companies,BP,foreign banks-too many to remember.
How many billions of $ has the US govt collected over the last few years-that is $ that can be spent w/o having to vote 4 tax increases or debt increases,while at the same time driving foreign competition out of the marketplace.

RCW
RCW
June 18, 2017 3:28 pm

“In politics (government inferred), nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” -FDR

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
June 18, 2017 7:44 pm

If justice and truth could prevail in a nation run by vagina hat wearing and mangina card carrying Obamanites the Ethanol program never would have happened , electric cars would still be an expensive but viable alternative for some . But the Diesel originally designed to run on peanut oil would be breaking new ground and records from bio-fuel reasearch but no !
VW folded to the EPA ASSHOLES and they threw their guy under the bus and he dived on his sword . The VW ,Mercedes , Volvo and the Fiat Crysler diesels are probably fantastic so what else would government bureaucrats do but lie cheat steal to justify their pathetic parasitic existence . These are the vermin Trump promised to rid us of . What happened to your fired ?

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 18, 2017 9:39 pm

Reminds me of a tune…

Miles Long
Miles Long
June 18, 2017 10:09 pm

Now wait a minute. It’s been a long time & the books are buried somewhere in the basement, so I could be wrong, but if’n I remember correctly NOx is formed by raising exhaust temps. It only became a problem in 70s gas cars after air pumps were installed (see, I told you it was a long time ago). I’ve been away from cars & car stuff for almost 2 decades, but pick up tidbits of the newest madness here & there.

Are they using airpumps on diesels now? What is causing the NOx to form in the 1st damn place? What other bullshit is added (besides your basic piss injection) to clean up something that really didn’t need cleaning up until they fucked with it? Typical gub’mint… create a problem so you can solve it with more of my (& your) $$.

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
  Miles Long
June 19, 2017 3:53 am

On a diesel you want to have excess oxygen so it burns more completely and has better efficiency. A diesel at idle has has a higher ratio of oxygen to fuel and creates NOx more readily since the combustion at idle is more complete and has higher temperatures.

As the motor becomes loaded down, and more fuel is added, the ratio of oxygen to fuel decreases and you should get lower NOx.

Common rail injectors can perform multiple injections, usually three. Pre, main, and post. The post injection was used to dump extra fuel in the combustion chamber and tie up the oxygen and bring down the temperatures so it did not form NOx. This however was a waste of fuel that decreased efficiency, which the newer diesels have add-blue (aka NH4) to take care of decomposing back down the NOxs to form N2 and H20.

Miles Long
Miles Long
  Flying Monkey
June 19, 2017 6:05 pm

Thanks for the reply.

If you mean air/fuel rather than oxygen/fuel it makes sense since air would be the source of the Nitrogen.

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
  Miles Long
June 20, 2017 6:52 am

No problem….

…only oxygen counts in the stoichiometric equations for burning fuel. Since we can assume oxygen is a certain percentage of the atmosphere it is a moot point what ratio you wish to use, air or oxygen.

Yes, you are correct the Nitrogen to make the NOx comes from the atmospheric air. It makes up about 78% of the “air mixture” by volume.

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
June 19, 2017 3:42 am

Just wait for the next “pollution” fad. NOx is nothing compared to what is coming.

I used to work at Bosch in common rail diesel fuel injection, but in manufacturing, not design though. NOx increased with subsequent generations of common rail as the injection pressure increased, usually in 200 bar increments. This made the atomization smaller and smaller and more of the fuel was completely burned upping the engine efficiency. Thermodynamically an engine is more efficient when it has higher temperatures. With higher combustion temperatures you get the unpleasant reaction to form NOx when there is also excess oxygen and N2.

As the atomization got better and better the size of the partially burnt (soot) hydrocarbons got smaller and smaller. The engines got more and more efficient.

Now the particles are so small (Feinstaub, fine particles, respirable dust) that they can pass straight into the lungs and are a big hoopla here in Germany. Before, the particles were so large other parts of the system would not allow them in the lungs.

It is talk to ban the most modern diesels inside big German cities like Stuttgart and Munich because of this new pollutant. Also modern high pressure gasoline systems are having more issues with Feinstaub. It seems each improvement in efficiency is met with another problem.

Wait until the US grabs this new pollution. It is hitting both diesels and gasoline engines now because of the finer atomization to improve engine efficiency.

Car are just to complex anymore (and I am a mechanical engineer). I ride my bike most everywhere. It is much less costly, reliable, healthy, and I can park most anyplace.

Cars are a treadmill. You have to work a lot to just afford a car. You need the car so you can get you to work, so you can afford the car.

xxBONEsxx
xxBONEsxx
June 19, 2017 9:26 am

Have everything I need now….buy a farm enjoy life FTW and watch it as it all turns to a wet pile of shit (takes a bite of fresh apple) then laughs, knowing I’m going fishing next.