The Idea of America

Guest Post by Bill Bonner

“Elizabeth,” I asked this morning as my wife climbed out of the pool. “How would you describe that sea turtle we saw on the beach?”

Pausing for a moment, she replied, “Rotating its slow and majestic flippers, it ground its way slowly and inexorably toward China…”

The sea turtle was headed east. Whether China was its destination or not, I don’t know. I only know that it was about to leave the Latin America isthmus, from the west coast of Nicaragua, and put out to sea when a muscular, brown young man picked it up and carried it back up on the beach. He and his friends had dug a big hole in the sand where the turtle was placed.

At night, we often see the dim light of flashlights along the beach. “It’s the locals looking for turtle eggs,” Manuel explained. “It’s illegal to take them, but…” Manuel shrugged his shoulders.

Sea turtles are protected by international convention. But here in the wilds of Nicaragua, they still end up in the soup from time to time.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Not the Same America

This is America, too… but it is not the same America. It is the New World… but not as new as the world north of the Rio Grande. Here, the Old World has not yet been snuffed out. It survives in a semitropical paradise.

But the object of our attention today is neither the Old World nor the new one – but the ever-changing, never fully explored idea of America.

“Proud to be an American,” says one bumper sticker. “One nation – indivisible,” says another. America was, of course, founded on the opposite principle… the idea that people were free to separate themselves from a parent government whenever they felt they had come of age. But no fraud, no matter how stupendous, is so obvious as to be detected by the average American. That is America’s great strength… or its most serious weakness.

After September 11, so many people bought flags that the shops ran short. Old Glory festooned nearly every porch and bridge. Patriotism swelled in every heart.

Europeans, coming back to the Old Country, reported that they had never seen anything like it. A Frenchman takes his country for granted. He is born into it, just as he is born into his religion. He may be proud of La Belle France the way he is proud of his cheese. But he is not fool enough to claim credit for either one. He just feels lucky to have them for his own.

What Makes America Different?

America, by contrast, is a nation of people who chose to become Americans. Even the oldest family tree in the New World has immigrants at its roots. And where did its government, its courts, its businesses, and its saloons come from?

They were all invented by us. Having chosen the country… and made it what it is… Americans feel more responsibility for what it has become than the citizens of most other nations. And they take more pride in it, too.

But what is it? What has it become? What makes America different from any other nation? Why should we care more about it than about, say, Lithuania or Chad?

Pressed for an answer, most Americans would reply, “Because America is a free country.” What else can be said of the place? Its landmass is as varied as the earth itself. Inhabiting the sands of Tucson as well as the steppes of Alaska, Americans could as well be called a desert race as an arctic one.

Its religions are equally diverse – from moss-backed Episcopalians of the Virginia tidewater to the Holy Rollers of East Texas to the Muslims of East Harlem.

Nor does blood itself give the country any mark of distinction. The individual American has more in common genetically with the people his people come from than with his fellow Americans. In a DNA test, your correspondent is more likely to be mistaken for an IRA hitman than a Baltimore drug dealer.

America never was a nation in the usual sense of the word. Though there are plenty of exceptions – especially among the made-up nations of former European colonies – nations are usually composed of groups of people who share common blood, culture, and language.

Americans mostly speak English. But they might just as well speak Spanish. And at the debut of the republic, the Founding Fathers narrowly avoided declaring German the official language… at least that is the legend.

A Frenchman has to speak French. A German has to speak the language of the Vaterland. But an American could speak anything. And often does.

Be What You Want to Be

Nor is there even a common history. The average immigrant didn’t arrive until the early 20th century. By then, America’s history was already three centuries old. The average citizen missed the whole thing.

Neither blood, history, religion, language – what else is left? Only an idea: that you could come to America and be whatever you wanted to be. You might have been a bogtrotter in Ireland or a baron in Silesia; in America, you were free to become whatever you could make of yourself.

“Give me liberty or give me death,” said Patrick Henry, raising the rhetorical stakes and praying no one would call him on it. Yet the average man at the time lived in near-perfect freedom.

There were few books and few laws on them. And fewer people to enforce them. Henry, if he wanted to do so, could have merely crossed the Blue Ridge west of Charlottesville and never seen another government agent again.

Taxation With Representation

Thomas Jefferson complained, in the Declaration of Independence, that Britain had “erected a multitude of New Offices, and set hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.”

Yet the swarms of officers sent by King George III would have barely filled a midsize regional office of the IRS or city zoning department today.

Likewise, the Founding Fathers kvetched about taxation without representation. But history has shown that representation only makes taxation worse. Kings, emperors, and tyrants must keep tax rates low… Otherwise, the people rise in rebellion.

It is Democrats that really eat out the substance of the people: The illusion of self-government lets them get away with it. Tax rates were only an average of 3% under the tyranny of King George III. One of the blessings of democracy is average tax rates that are 10 times as high.

“Americans today,” wrote Rose Wilder Lane in 1936, after the Lincoln administration had annihilated the principle of self-government… but before the Roosevelt team had finished its work, “are the most reckless and lawless of peoples… We are also the most imaginative, the most temperamental, the most infinitely varied.”

But by the end of the 20th century, Americans were required to wear seat belts and ate low-fat yogurt without a gun to their heads. The recklessness seems to have been bred out of them. And the variety, too. North, south, east, and west, people all wear the same clothes and cherish the same decrepit ideas as if they were religious relics.

And why not? It’s a free country.

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
Chairman, Bonner & Partners

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
starfcker
starfcker
July 5, 2017 8:18 am

Keep shitting on Americans, bill bonner. I’ll bet that doesn’t end well for you.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 5, 2017 8:40 am

“Even the oldest family tree in the New World has immigrants at its roots.”

If your premise is a falsehood, everything that follows will be flawed.

The first arrivals were COLONISTS, not immigrants. Colonists bring with them their culture, language, laws, values, and the artifacts of their origination. Their purpose is to replace native populations and install a new people in their place. Immigrants bring their bodies and their potential with the intention of assimilation to the existing stock. If the oldest family tree in the New World had been immigrants we’d be speaking Algonquin and living in wikiwams.

It is understandable that words like immigration and migration re easily confused or that words like colonial or posterity are either forgotten or deliberately suppressed when speaking of the citizenry of a multicultural empire that has deliberately supplanted it’s founding stock with new people in order to maintain their hegemony.

i forget
i forget
  hardscrabble farmer
July 5, 2017 1:04 pm

Oy. If your premise is circumcised, everything that follows will be desensitized. At the least. (But accidents do happen. And nonsensitization is common. And yet the barbarians still engage in barbarous practices. If you can imagine that.)

Wherever you go, there you are. Magic mapwords – colonist, immigrant, whatever – are not the territory. Much of my immigratin’ has been about putting distance between me & logicians of “the word” & their graven lithographies. Rolling stones are a response to graven stoners.

I’ve prolly not been to as many locales as Bonner. But so far what I’ve found is that the logicians & lithographers are everywhere, & that density of infestation is all that varies. So the point of moving about, for some, is to find more fertile, less stony, fields. But the stoners always come along & follow the fertility seekers, and their goal is always just to pave paradise & put up a parking lot, as the song goes.

So let me see if I’ve got this straight. When COLONISTS, not immigrants, supplant the previous founding stock, installing themselves instead, & these new people establish hegemony – that’s good. But when immigrants, not COLONISTS, do the same thing – that’s bad. Right?

Ubers & unters. Missionary & cowgirl. I’d say don’t fear the reaper, but I think it’d only fall on cowbell deafened ears. More, more, more cowbell.

The power of 100 proof words. Bottle that stuff. The buyers, swillers, will queue up around the block to get what you’re selling. But I’ll continue to be far & away.

https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/more-cowbell-with-will-ferrell-on-snl-video-saturday-night-live-nbc/3506001?snl=1

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  i forget
July 5, 2017 1:49 pm

You asked the question “When COLONISTS, not immigrants, supplant the previous founding stock, installing themselves instead, & these new people establish hegemony – that’s good. But when immigrants, not COLONISTS, do the same thing – that’s bad. Right?”

The answer you are looking for is one of morality rather than reality. I used the correct words as opposed to the incorrect ones used by Mr Bonner because there is no way to have a rational discussion without first understanding the definition of the terms used.

An immigrant behaves one way and a colonist behaves another. You are wise to understand that what is different about the situation today- “But when immigrants, not COLONISTS, do the same thing – that’s bad.” (supplant the previous founding stock, installing themselves instead, & these new people establish hegemony) is that the new arrivals are in fact colonists, what you have confused is the terms. Those who come to the US today and maintain their allegiances, language, customs, culture and genetic posterity are not, in fact, immigrants.

Mr Bonner clearly misses the distinction and thus his argument is flawed.

[imgcomment image[/img]

i forget
i forget
  hardscrabble farmer
July 5, 2017 2:28 pm

HSF, as I’ve mentioned a few times, words are oversold. And that’s due to their addictive quality (but addictive qualities have much to do with addictive personalities, nervous systems). A rational discussion in words first requires a rational understanding of words. And using words to subvert morality, in favor of “reality,” cuts no ice. Which is why history is one long recording of slip-sliding away: goddamned “realists.” Which is also why some realists, recognizing, and accepting the impossibility of morality getting a permanent anchorage anywhere, keep their crampons sharp & ready to go. Have crampons, other tools, will travel.

I’ve left a lot of places. And I’m not done yet. Past, present & future locals’ allegiances, customs, culture, genetics that want to believe those pretenses justify trespass against me & mine, that those “realities” trump the inherent & inalienable moralities, are full of shit. I’ve been splattered by such, lost blood to such. If Oz (llpoh), or Argentina (Montefrio), or Nicaragua (Bonner) minimizes the splatter, sounds not only good to me, but smart. Collectives? Madness.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  i forget
July 5, 2017 5:55 pm

“And using words to subvert morality, in favor of “reality,” cuts no ice.”

I don’t really understand what you are trying to say. There are multitudes of realities that can be described using the proper words without any need for moralizing. And if we are discussing morals, then we need a metric we can both agree on- for example a Satanist and a Sunni are going to have very different baselines for what is “moral” in terms of human behavior.

I merely pointed out that Mr Bonner uses the wrong word to describe a set which leads to conclusions that are flawed. There are multitudes of citizens in this country who were neither colonists nor immigrants, using those terms to relate their experience is a falsehood. I’d think if we were talking morals the truth is nearly universal.

Unconverted
Unconverted
  hardscrabble farmer
July 5, 2017 7:15 pm

So a Satanist and a Sunni walk into a bar. And the bartender, who just happens to be the Devil himself, looks up to heaven and yells: “Hey, I have to go. My children are here.”

We can know them by their actions, understand them by their values, and judge them by the fruits of their labor.

The real question is this: Is being American in the eye of the beholder? If, so, then diversity has made America a relative term.

i forget
i forget
  hardscrabble farmer
July 5, 2017 7:39 pm

“I’d think if we were talking morals the truth is nearly universal.”

Me, too. So sunni-satanist relativisms are irrelevant…wordplay. As is the hoary constitution. As is the bible (whichever one by whatever name). As are the rank ordering of, & rank orderings by, colonists\immigrants\conquistadors of whatever banners or symbols.

So how does Bonner’s description of burning ships galleys become flawed because his immigrant forebears colonized Maryland &\but he decided to life raft? As others here have. What is this flawed conclusion of Bonner’s?

The planet Earth is real. None of its political map boundaries are. I’m an immigrant until I stop to colonize a spot until I immigrate to the next spot. What’s in a name? Or a word? Only as much magic as a particular utterer or scribbler believes there is. But, mostly, has been led, groomed, to believe there is.

There is a contingent here that takes exception to calling a spade a spade. Well, maybe more than just a contingent. Calling too creatively & not pasteurized\homogenized enough also provokes some ire. Exception is taken, too, for getting out of the too hot kitchen in advance of the prognosticated flames, of not going down gamely with the ship of state one just happened to be born – into steerage mostly – under. And, like sunnis & satanists, they moralize. But none of that has anything to do with morals, read out of inherent, inalienable, a priori first principles.

People get lost, & “found” (“identity”) in maps that are not the territory. “I’m an American.” Love it or leave it. But if you leave it you suck. And if you suck before you get here, we ain’t letting you in. And if you leave, & therefore suck, there oughta’ be a law preventing you from ever returning to the hallowed ground. blahblahblah.

I’m reading Darwin’s Pharmacy right now. It’s about “psychonauts” & their “doors of perception” cleansing. Turns out the quality of the windex is contingent on rhetorical set & setting. An advance scripting. Words. And then it turns out the experience is not relatable in, reducible to, words. Seems like a lot of people who have never ingested a psychedelic inducing substance, & never would, are just as script dependent & just as unable to relate or reduce with words what’s gnawing them. But I get the impression the psychonauts are more relaxed & friendly & live & let live about it.

Along the coast you’ll hear them boast
About a light they say that shines so clear. ♪♫♪ And some in flyover country would like the coasts to toast. A sandwich divided against itself cannot________…lol…..

Johnny D.
Johnny D.
  i forget
July 5, 2017 7:58 pm

The border was real. The plants were illegal.

i forget
i forget
July 5, 2017 1:00 pm

The idea of ‘murika. Expressed in words. Magic, inebriating, words. Punch drunk love. Those imbibers precede the koolaiders by forever.

oldtoad
oldtoad
July 5, 2017 2:07 pm

Shucks, I remember Bill Bonner when he was extolling the virtues of Baltimore.
Also remember when I turned him off.
This is my country, not going anywhere, do not care about opportunities in Nicaragua, Argentina or
even Baltimore 38.3 miles from D. C.

james the deplorable wanderer
james the deplorable wanderer
July 5, 2017 9:51 pm

There was a time when American history was taught in American schools. George Washington, Adams (John AND Sam), Jefferson, Franklin, Andy Jackson, TEDDY Roosevelt, Eisenhower; most kids could at least recognize the names and tell you one thing they did or stood for. American culture was also taught; Colonial times, the westward expansion and manifest destiny, the Monroe Doctrine and Civil War / War of Northern Aggression; the Industrial Revolution, Upton Sinclair’s _The Jungle_, inventions like the cotton gin, steam locomotives, Robert Fulton’s steamboat, clothing and fashions, and so on. Curricula were not standardized, but you could ask any child to recite the Pledge, sing the National Anthem (badly, unless they had some soprano talent), say a Robert Frost poem, name a Grant Wood painting. We had things in COMMON; whether they were ethnocentric, biased, written by slave owners or abolitionists, clearly leaned left or right, they were recognized as American.
Then the socialists got control of the schools, somehow, and it became important not to say those things. It became important to choose a DIVERSITY of authors, a SPECTRUM of stories and a VARIETY of viewpoints. And whether they were American authors and cultural elements became secondary, then tertiary, then it mattered not at all. And while I remember a story by an Armenian guy on his American experience, I doubt that would matter in schools these days (after all, most would consider Armenians white, and there are too many DWEMs stories in our history already). So now, fifty years later, half the country does not recognize the culture around it and the other half doesn’t recognize what culture really means, and how the lack of a common culture generates the lack of a coherent society.
Maybe they did; maybe, all those years ago, the socialists decided America must die, and took steps to make it happen. But if they had simply come out and said, “America must die, it is too white, too imperialistic, too rich, too greedy and too materially successful to be allowed to live”, NO ONE would have agreed or listened to them. So they subverted the schools and taught hate for America to get there. And they have apparently made it happen; errors of logic and deduction a fifth-grade student would have caught in 1888 pass in Congress today.
(notice how logic is not taught in every classroom now as it was once? If you can’t reason or value FEELINGS over reason you are easy prey for demagogues like Hillary).
So here we are; it is time to defend the ideals of America against its foes again. We will decide, one way or another, that America should die or be revived, and our descendants will live or die with and by our decisions.
It looks like I still don’t have enough ammunition.