Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan
“Is Russia an enemy of the United States?” NBC’s Kasie Hunt demanded of Ted Cruz. Replied the runner-up for the GOP nomination, “Russia is a significant adversary. Putin is a KGB thug.”
To Hillary Clinton running mate Tim Kaine, the revelation that Donald Trump Jr., entertained an offer from the Russians for dirt on Clinton could be considered “treason.”
Treason is giving aid and comfort to an enemy in a time of war.
Are we really at war with Russia? Is Russia really our enemy?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
“Why Russia is a Hostile Power” is the title of today’s editorial in The Washington Post that seeks to explain why Middle America should embrace the Russophobia of our capital city:
“Vladimir Putin adheres to a set of values that are antithetical to bedrock American values. He favors spheres of influence over self-determination; corruption over transparency; and repression over democracy.”
Yet, accommodating a sphere of influence for a great power is exactly what FDR and Churchill did with Stalin, and every president from Truman to George H. W. Bush did with the Soviet Union.
When East Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Poles rose up against Communist regimes, no U.S. president intervened. For those nations were on the other side of the Yalta line agreed to in 1945.
Bush I and James Baker even accused Ukrainians of “suicidal nationalism” for contemplating independence from Russia.
When did support for spheres of influence become un-American?
As for supporting “corruption over transparency,” ex-Georgia President Mikheil Saakashvili resigned in disgust as governor of Odessa in November, accusing Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, our man in Kiev, of supporting corruption.
As for favoring “repression over democracy,” would that not apply to our NATO ally President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, our Arab ally Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi of Egypt, and our Philippine ally Rodrigo Duterte? Were U.S. Cold War allies like the Shah of Iran and Gen. Augusto Pinochet of Chile all Jeffersonian Democrats? Have we forgotten our recent history?
The Post brought up the death in prison of lawyer-activist Sergei Magnitsky in 2009. Under the Magnitsky Act of 2012, Congress voted sanctions on Russia’s elites.
Yet China’s lone Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Liu Xiaobo, sentenced to 11 years in prison for championing democracy, died Thursday of liver cancer, with police in his hospital room. Communist dictator Xi Jinping, who makes Putin look like Justin Trudeau, would not let the dying man go.
Have something to say about this column?
Visit Pat’s FaceBook page and post your comments….
Will Magnitsky Act sanctions be slammed on China? Don’t bet on it. Too much trade. Congress will do what comes naturally — kowtow. Yet our heroic Senate voted 98-2 to slam new sanctions on Russia.
What are the roots of this hostility to Russia and hatred of Putin, whom a Fox analyst called “as bad as Hitler”?
During the Cold War, every president sought detente with a USSR that was arguably the most blood-soaked regime of the century.
When the Cold War ended in December 1991, the Soviet Union had dissolved into 15 nations. Moscow had given up her empire, a third of her territory, and half the population of the USSR. Marxist-Leninist ideology was dead. An epochal change had taken place.
Yet hostility to Russia and hatred of Putin seem to exceed anything some of us remember from the worst days of the Cold War.
Putin’s Russia is called imperialist, though Estonia, next door, which Russia could swallow in one gulp, has been free for 25 years.
Russia invaded Georgia. Well, yes, after Georgia invaded the seceded province of South Ossetia and killed Russian peacekeepers.
Russia has taken back Crimea from Ukraine. True, but only after a U.S.-backed coup in Kiev replaced the elected pro-Russian regime.
Russia has intervened to back Bashar Assad in Syria. Yes, but only after our insurgent allies collaborated with al-Qaida and ISIS to bring him down. Is Russia not allowed to support an ally, recognized by the U.N., which provides its only naval base on the Med?
Russia has meddled in our election. And we have meddled in the affairs of half a dozen nations with “color-coded revolutions.” The cry of “regime change!” may daily be heard in the U.S. Capitol.
Putin is not Pope Francis. But he is not Stalin; he is not Hitler; he is not Mao; and Russia today is not the USSR. Putin is an autocrat cut from the same bolt of cloth as the Romanov czars.
His cooperation is crucial to the peace of the world, the freedom of the Baltic States, an end to the Syrian civil war, tranquility in the Persian Gulf, and solving the North Korean crisis.
While our tectonic plates may rub against one another, we are natural allies. The Russia of Tolstoy, Pushkin, Solzhenitsyn and the Orthodox Church belongs with the West.
If America stumbles into a war with Russia that all our Cold War presidents avoided, the Russia baiters and Putin haters will be put in same circle of hell by history as the idiot war hawks of 1914 and the three blind men of Versailles in 1919.
They don’t hate or fear Russia, they hate and fear their domestic political opponents. They simply use Russia as a proxy for their hatred and fear because it is far more acceptable to try and agitate against a foreign enemy than to declare open warfare against your neighbors.
This is a declaration of hostility directed at their fellow countrymen in as palatable a form as they can manage.
That’s only true of libs in their battle against Trump, I think. There is a longstanding neocon (both parties) hatred of Russia. “What is the root?” Buchanan asks. I don’t fully understand it, but there is something within the experience of a lot of Jews that is at play. That so many current Jewish neocons come from Jewish communist families and that all the while they seem to have disdained Orthodox Russians cannot be un-seen.
HSF,
Yours is a purr-fect response. Russia is the proxy
for the guy next door that may have or states so…
that he did not vote for the lauded Hil.
You, Mr Farmer, are a genius.
Suzanna
Roots to hostility towards Russia and Hatred of Putin:
1. Russian hostility is a false flag. The MIC needs enemies to sustain the economic waste for bombs, bullets, planes, ships, missiles.
2. After the USSR broke apart, Russian oligarchs surfaced and controlled Russia economically. The U.S. stepped in and were working with the oligarchs. Putin arrived and destroyed the U.S. gambit to eliminate Russia as an opposing force to U.S. hegemony.
Yes, that too. Oligarchs = Israelis.
Russia won’t (nor should) abandon Assad. Israel and teh Saudis want him gone. Our masters have spoken. Russia must die.
Tis about the pipelines and who services Euroland.
The Russiaphobes make me laugh. The US is guilty of everything they accuse Russia of being and doing. Once you accept that only the US is allowed to pursue its “national interests,” the upcoming war seems inevitable. The fools who preach it think that they will escape destruction. The delusion is great and its source is the Father of Lies. Justice will be served, and it will be very costly.
It is painful to go hungry. Germany had ration
booklets/organized bastards….but the USA will
not have those. As in Venezuela, the $$people
will have the stores…the peasants will have the
garbage.
Propaganda pure CIA/NSA/Soros NWO.Notice after channel surfing same sh#t Russia propaganda.IMO over Syria and Assad US and Saudis want to loot resources nat gas pipeline,gold oil.So to start a war the NWO has to gin up the US -They think fake news will do the trick.Will add the dollar as the reserve currency at stake too
well…if one refuses to get conscripted? One
gets shot in the head, onto the bed, organs
harvested.
A form of Haiku.
“Putin is not Pope Francis.”
All the more reason to admire Putin. Putin is not Antichrist.
Hillary brokered a deal, selling (~25%?) of our national uranium reserves to a Russian firm, almost certainly in exchange for significant “donations” to the Clinton Foundation (or to a subsidiary of it).
Obama, with Hilary’s help, was funding, training, and arming ISIS, an entity sworn to the utter destruction of America – that literally constituted treason, as defined in the Constitution.
Where was the leftist media then?
Where were the screaming masses of paid ‘protestors?’
Where was the facade of outrage among the Democrats?
From the days of England up to the United Kingdom, that island has been opposed to Russia as far back as to 1776. As a nation of anglophiles, we have generally, and without thinking, shared the attitudes of our once colonial masters. However, if we stop to think about it, we will see that Russia played a large part in our freedom throughout our history. This would include vital support, especially naval, during our Revolution and support of the Union during the Civil War. In those times and even today, that monarchy has sought a return of “their colonies,” especially the United States. To substantiate that remarks, read the will of Cecil Rhodes and his reasons for Rhodes Scholarships. Also, when the Obamas visited the Queen, she asked BHO when she would get her colony back. And, finally for now, England has through much of its history, tried to break up, divide other powers that could be a threat to its own. Such powers were Russia and the United States.