Lew Rockwell: US Fascism behind Websites Purge

undefined

In a new interview with host Tom Woods at the Tom Woods Show, libertarian communicator Lew Rockwell provided a fascinating critique of private technology companies such as PayPal and the Google subsidiary YouTube recently ending their provision of services to organizations they deem unworthy. Rockwell, chairman of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and publisher of the popular website lewrockwell.com, identifies the companies’ decisions as part of the shift toward fascism in America.


Rockwell, in the interview, dates the beginnings of the United States “fascist regime” to the Woodrow Wilson administration during World War I and further argues that that fascist regime became permanent during the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration with the partnership of businesses and the government under the New Deal.

“It seems to me,” says Rockwell, that fascism, which he calls a “disastrous, evil philosophy,” has “reached new levels in recent years” with “the fascist state erecting a public-private partnership for the police state.”

Concerning the recent websites purge and its relation to fascism, Rockwell, offering an analogue from persecution in China during the Cultural Revolution, states:

So you have companies like Google, like Twitter, like PayPal and GoDaddy, many, many other companies that seem to be working in cahoots with the government to suppress dissent. And, yes, of course, they start with the easy [websites and organizations to suppress].

In the days of the Cultural Revolution in China, which sometimes I think this is beginning to resemble, the Red Guards would demand at, say, a university that all the professors come to a self-criticism session, which was mandatory. And, of course, these were all communists — members of the Communist Party; they were not regular people. And they would pick one guy to wear a dunce cap, a literal dunce cap, and to be especially beaten — and that might be the best that would happen to him because he could go to the gulag too — and be taken around the campus afterwards. What the Red Guards called this was “killing a chicken to scare the monkeys.” Apparently, if you have a band of marauding monkeys, which is a problem in some countries, you can scare them away by killing a chicken that you are going to eat. They run away screaming. So, they knew they only had to do this to one guy, maybe the worst guy from the standpoint of their alleged principles, in order to terrify everybody else.

So that is what’s happening now.

If, in response to the internet crackdown, “everybody else calms down, shuts up, doesn’t say anything politically incorrect, is very careful to abide by” what they are told to do, then Rockwell suggests the crackdown will be a success.

Rockwell also warns that the reach of the websites purge may, with time, expand much further.

Listen to Rockwell’s complete interview here.

Though in an early stage, the websites purge appears to have already reached the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, with YouTube recently routinely refusing to place advertisements on the institute’s Ron Paul Liberty Report daily program. You can read more about that here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Stucky
Stucky
August 31, 2017 8:31 am

Admin

I tried to post a comment on my QOTD Joo article …. to encourage readers to get to 400 (so you can send them a $400 check).

However, I see that “comments are closed”.

Hmm, that appears to be a first.

FASCIST !!!!!

.
.
Ha ha. j/k

Stucky
Stucky
  Administrator
August 31, 2017 8:47 am

No doubt! I totally agree.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Stucky
August 31, 2017 12:28 pm

There are several ways to interpret the meaning of the story itself and several ways to interpret the author’s intent but fetishizing is not one of them. That is an extravagant claim. I suppose you are feeling some guilt and feel the need to cast aspersions elsewhere. Feel free to do so, I am not so innocent of packing the comments with inane chatter but if you think I derive any pleasure from the thought of any harm coming to YoBo or anybody here, you are severely mistaken. It is my hatred of violence that drives me to resist his theme even when I would rather ignore it. I would be crazy to wish harm on him while proclaiming to be a pacifist. Have a nice day!

zazzle
zazzle
  Anonymous
August 31, 2017 1:16 pm

If what I wrote in that thread last night was the step too far then it’s a net positive for all (I can take the feedback) and I’m glad for the opportunity and the lock down.

Based on the tenor and content of your posts the past week or so, I’m encouraged by the positive influence certain commenters have been having on you. Your words and suggestions of suicide are not violence, and the literal knee jerk reading isn’t necessarily the sane rational interpretation, on that you and I both agree.

Nice day back to you.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  zazzle
August 31, 2017 1:31 pm

There was a condition to that suggestion, when a person cannot stand to see so many hated people, it may be helpful to remove himself from that environment. If I was on monkeyplanet and I wasn’t a monkey, I might want to leave by any means possible.

You are right, a rational person, and I assume I am addressing one when I suggest such an extreme measure, has a functioning instinct of self-preservation. Imagine the power I would wield if I could get somebody to do as I say here on a blog.

Wow.

Besides, Admin said he was tired of that thread, it’s not all you, your not that important you little piffle.

zazzle
zazzle
  zazzle
August 31, 2017 1:34 pm

I also assume you were speaking to a rational person (well maybe, ((anon)) does have some bot like qualities)… which is why your comment probably had little impact on them and it was put in context.

But you are are right about power. Imagine being able to get in someone’s head enough that they can’t stop thinking about what you’ve said and start to make it a part of their identity. It’s probably wise to buttress our psyches from such attempts.

— “Besides, Admin said he was tired of that thread, it’s not all you, your not that important you little piffle.”

So you’re saying as Trump said, that there were bad actors on both sides? Cool, I can roll with that.

Take care, you can have the last panglossian word if you wish.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  zazzle
August 31, 2017 1:49 pm

Only to add that in this place it would be a good idea to toughen up one’s hide. It can get rough up in here. Which is why I practice being cruel to be kind to noobs.
See, I got it out of your head that it was all your fault, your welcome!

EL Cibernetico
EL Cibernetico
  zazzle
August 31, 2017 9:51 pm

Based on the tenor and content of your posts the past week or so, I’m encouraged by the positive influence certain commenters have been having on you.

WTF are you suggesting? I’m a recovering racist. Nobody has ‘turned’ me. Don’t get it into your head that a barrage of anti-Semitic video is somehow going to turn me into a raving re-tweeter. But see my post below.

Maggie
Maggie
August 31, 2017 9:24 am

I guess I will just post this here. I tried to post the link on the comment thread about the number 23.

Ann Barnhardt’s site was denied service and her first podcast after was her twenty-third… proving that there is really something special about 23.

Barnhardt Podcast #023: It Ain’t Just Houston That Has A Problem

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Maggie
August 31, 2017 9:45 am

That is bizarre.

Maggie
Maggie
  Anonymous
August 31, 2017 9:58 am

Barnhardt Podcast #023: It Ain’t Just Houston That Has A Problem

Ann’s show focuses on Catholic issues primarily, but since the Vatican is just about the richest country in the world, that means everything in the world is their business.

TampaRed
TampaRed
August 31, 2017 10:08 am

from TakiMag,”A Tale Of Two Sisters”
The woman behind the firing of the Google engineer a few weeks ago was the Google founders former landlady,who now works there.
Her sister was married(now divorced) to one of the founders and now owns a genetics testing company.
The short article contrasts how one sis refuses to acknowledge biology while being very hypocritical about it while the other sis makes $ showing people their genetic makeup.

A Tale of Two Sisters

razzle
razzle
  TampaRed
August 31, 2017 11:33 am

They get away with this hypocrisy because they know they are lying. They are using these narratives for control by forcing people from childhood to develop minds that are living in permanent dissonance, while ensuring they are the only ones who are in a position to profit from facts.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  razzle
August 31, 2017 12:58 pm

I can appreciate that scenario since knowledge is power applies to foreknowledge as well as specialized knowledge. If I knew a certain airline was going to tank, you can bet your sweet bippy I’d be shorting it. I made a habit of guessing wrong, so I had no knowledge or power. Bah.

I only want to have enough money to buy and sell you. Pangloss

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Anonymous
August 31, 2017 1:30 pm

“I only want to have enough money to buy and sell you.” Pangloss

kinda like the ol farmer who wasn’t greedy-
“i don’t want to own all the land,just that which is next to mine.”

AC
AC
August 31, 2017 1:00 pm

Why can’t boomers comprehend that communism is not fascism?

james the deplorable wanderer
james the deplorable wanderer
  AC
August 31, 2017 2:03 pm

But they are both Leftist (socialist) schools of thought, so they are related.

Sort of like arguing that murderers and cannibals should not be equated. They are both criminals.

So, in Russia, China, Cambodia, Cuba, the former East Bloc in Europe, and various other places including Berkeley now, are the socialists now also criminals.

EL Cibernetico
EL Cibernetico
  AC
August 31, 2017 9:44 pm

Doc Pangloss asked a bunch of officers if they could think of another economic system besides capitalism or communism. Crickets.

Mussolini had the fascist program that Germany and later the US sought to emulate. That is government collusion with corporations. Communism promotes a socialist program. Such was the revulsion of industrialists to communism, or public ownership of industry, that they set out to program Americans against that heresy. The nifty 50’s was the culmination of that mass brainwashing.

Americans just don’t have a threat next door to engender nationalism. Today, we have manufactured threats that are intended to inflame the nationalist spirit, trade, immigration, religion. The only thing holding back this promising program is the fucking boomer generation that is familiar with the Nazi experience. Once the boomers are gone, the coast will be clear for a pogrom against minorities.

Boomers don’t actually have to die off in a mass extinction, by 2030, the last of the bastards will be close to senility and will cease to be any kind of political force. They will rage unintelligibly like Grandpa Simpson while Americans march to war against the enemy within and without.

By that time, a president Bezos or Zuckerberg will advocate a one-world government which they will head. They are laying the groundwork for a grassroots movement in the next decade. It’s going on now; the removal of statues and the suppression of white nationalism will pave the way for the future fascists, AKA neocons.

There really is a plan which we see unfolding, as Zazzle said above, we are deliberately kept in the dark in order to implement the plan slowly but surely, starting with the Patriot Act or earlier.

I will quit now before Vodka wonders if I’m drunk again.

Can anybody recall things that are no longer in evidence, like real silver certificates?

Jake
Jake
  AC
September 1, 2017 1:01 am

AC: Why choose between competing piles of diseased shit?

EL Cibernetico
EL Cibernetico
  Jake
September 1, 2017 1:11 am

Snake, you have to get up pretty early in the morning to comprehend AC’s subtle reference to Tiki-torch Nazis and Antifa. He implies that the oldsters which he calls boomers can’t discern which group is commies and which is fascist. From the sound of your obtuse question, you can’t either.