TWO AMERICAS

Guest Post by Michael Owen

No amount of statistics or facts will sway either side in the gun control debate, because they are all looking for simple solutions to complex problems. The facts of those complex problems are uncomfortable and nobody really wants to come to grips with them.

For example, we don’t really have a single America with a moderately high rate of gun deaths. Instead, we have two Americas, one of which has very high rates of gun ownership but very low murder rates, very comparable to the rest of the First World democracies such as those in western & northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, South Korea. The other America has much lower rates of gun ownership but much, much higher murder rates, akin to violent third world countries.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The tough questions are those like, why do we have these two Americas? But that’s an uncomfortable discussion to have. So instead those on the left favor simple minded restrictions that target first world America, with its high gun ownership but very low murder rate, but don’t address the root causes of third world America’s violence at all. Meanwhile those on the right correctly feel their civil rights are constantly threatened, so they are constantly in a state of “better stock up before they finally ban it” and the guns and ammo fly off the shelves. The left’s constant gun control rhetoric is the greatest thing ever for arms manufacturers.

Meanwhile, over the past 40 years, while the number of guns in private hands has doubled, the murder rate has dropped by half. The left are constantly prattling about “assault weapons” which are almost never used to commit murders (about 1% of gun murders; all rifles combined are around 3%). More murders are committed with baseball bats than “assault rifles”; the vast majority of gun homicides are committed with handguns, but it’s easier to sell restrictions that target “assault weapons”, even though such restrictions, even if 100% effective, would make no detectable change in the murder rate (especially because of substitution effects). They favor ridiculous measures such as bans on “high capacity magazines”, as if magazines weren’t cheap and easily swapped out in a fraction of a second.

The uncomfortable fact is that roughly 80% of the US homicide rate is associated with the drug trade, and the drug trade is violent because the drug war reserves it for violent criminals. We have a system in place where the government subsidizes poverty in urban areas, imposes economic blight in those same areas through heavy taxes and regulations, renders the residents permanently unemployable via the “criminal justice” (sic) system, and creates a lucrative black market in drugs by restricting supply (not to mention increasing demand as people are desperate to escape their circumstances by getting high), meaning the only game in town is often entering the drug trade. The drug trade is violent because those in it have no access to courts to settle disputes. Powerful industries lobby to keep the drug war going; the top spenders are law enforcement unions, the prison industry, big alcohol, tobacco, and pharma.

Guns are not the proximate cause of gun violence in the US. Childlike magical thinking and simple “fixes” to complex problems will not work. But it is comfortable, and self-righteousness feels so good. So I expect it to continue indefinitely.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

18 Comments
starfcker
October 25, 2017 4:04 pm

“For example, we don’t really have a single America with a moderately high rate of gun deaths. Instead, we have two Americas, one of which has very high rates of gun ownership but very low murder rates, very comparable to the rest of the First World democracies such as those in western & northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, South Korea. The other America has much lower rates of gun ownership but much, much higher murder rates, akin to violent third world countries.” That’s a lot of words. Is there anyway you could make that statement a little more black and white?

Kauf Buch
Kauf Buch
  starfcker
October 25, 2017 4:44 pm

I see what you did there. 😉

Dirtscratcher
Dirtscratcher
  Kauf Buch
October 25, 2017 5:53 pm

I see what he did there, too. And it was brilliant.

The Modern Chronicler
The Modern Chronicler
October 25, 2017 4:05 pm

Beautifully stated.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 25, 2017 4:36 pm

Prior to guns there were no gun deaths.

The world was at peace in those days, with no guns to cause people to murder or go to war with each other.

javelin
javelin
  Anonymous
October 25, 2017 4:55 pm

Good one.
Next they’ll come after blades because with only blunt instruments there would be peace, harmony and a world without violent assaults.

Done in Dallas
Done in Dallas
  javelin
October 25, 2017 5:31 pm
doug
doug
  javelin
October 25, 2017 8:52 pm

Except of course baseball….

Wolverine
Wolverine
October 25, 2017 4:41 pm

If you missed it, you will find a great answer to the two Americas question in a comment on Marc Faber post by Brian says:
October 22, 2017 at 4:09 pm
Stefan Molyneux did a great series r/K selection theory. It explains why blacks are the way they are. They evolved on a continent that mostly has abundant food resources leading to fucking like rabbits. It also has a large chance of predators eating you or disease killing you leading to more fucking like rabbits. Not a whole lot of planning required to stay alive. Eat, fuck and RUN! Truly the strongest not necessarily the smartest survive.

Now move to the higher latitudes where food is seasonal and living is very tough approx half the year or more in a traditional sense. To stay alive means planning for winter. Storing food, building tough shelters, and limiting your fucking as it gets tough to feed a whole lot of kids with limited food supplies…that or the kids die from starvation or cold, leaving the smarter ones left standing.

Run this formula for thousands of years and you can see the results by the IQ chart by country.
comment image

comment image[/img]

Hagar
Hagar
  Wolverine
October 26, 2017 12:58 am

Wolverine,
The r/K certainly explains the ghetto and middle class but lacks an explanation of the genetic drive of TPTB and the ruling elite. Nevertheless a worthwhile 50 minutes. I will catch part II and III for sure, perhaps I’ll get some more answers. Thanks for the video.

Brian
Brian
  Hagar
October 26, 2017 2:45 am

“lacks an explanation of the genetic drive of TPTB and the ruling elite.”

Factors that can lead to an explanation:
Human nature.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Approximately 3-5% of humans are psychopaths. Psycho’s generally bubble up to the top echelons of power centers (governments, corporations, etc). They have no empathy and will do anything to achieve and maintain power.
Look at Hillary or Mugabe or Kim Jung Fatty….birds of a feather.

Hagar
Hagar
  Brian
October 26, 2017 8:09 am

Brian,
Yeah I get all that, just wondering if there is a genetic factor for power. Maybe a collection of genes for psychos?

Interestingly, my parents both grew up in the Depression, served in the Navy and Army Air Corps, and had 6 children between 1946 and 1956. Guess they fit the mold as I do.

Brian
Brian
  Hagar
October 26, 2017 11:08 am

It wouldn’t surprise me at all if there was a genetic component to psychopathy.

MN Steel
MN Steel
October 25, 2017 5:40 pm

Huh. Wonder what the FBI stats would be if Hispanics and Middle Easterners were given their own, politically correct categories instead of being lumped in with “Ebil Hwites”….

Take a look at the FBI 10 Most Wanted to see ” Ebil Hwite Men” like Alejandro Castillo and Yaser Abdel Said.

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten

Coal Clinker
Coal Clinker
October 25, 2017 7:37 pm

Mr. Owen is brilliant in the way he described a most basic problem in America. I would love to see this article on Politico, but I’m sure the chance of this happening would be the same as a snowball’s chance in hell. The fun part would be reading the comments posted by the commie scum that inhabit that place like roaches. They would all be screaming “rascist”! White Supremacist! Alt-Right!

AC
AC
October 25, 2017 8:05 pm
TampaRed-
TampaRed-
October 25, 2017 8:51 pm

it’s actually worse than what he says–most murders are committed not just by blacks,but by young black males–even among blacks there are very few murderers–
i would also like to see the murder rate by actual whites w/o the hispanics included–
though i do not know if the stats would show it,it would be interesting to know the average socioeconomic level of white murderers–

TampaRed-
TampaRed-
October 25, 2017 9:07 pm

from the article–
Powerful industries lobby to keep the drug war going; the top spenders are law enforcement unions, the prison industry, big alcohol, tobacco, and pharma.”
note that law enforcement unions spend big to keep drugs illegal–most of that is from prison guards,not street cops–
like many of you,i’m not a fan of private prisons–
in 2012,gary johnson was not so loopy as he was in 2016–
i had a chance to talk w/him one on one at a meet & greet–i brought up for profit prisons,which he is a proponent of–
he told me that when he was governor of new mexico he received more pressure from corrections unions for harsh sentencing laws then he did from private prisons–

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading