Bitcoin

 Guest Post by Nassim Taleb 

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

Foreword to the book by Saifedean Ammous

Let us follow the logic of things from the beginning. Or, rather, from the end: modern times. We are, as I am writing these lines, witnessing a complete riot against some class of experts, in domains that are too difficult for us to understand, such as macroeconomic reality, and in which not only the expert is not an expert, but he doesn’t know it. That previous Federal Reserve bosses, Greenspan and Bernanke, had little grasp of empirical reality is something we only discovered a bit too late: one can macroBS longer than microBS, which is why we need to be careful on who to endow with centralized macro decisions.

What makes it worse is that all central banks operated under the same model, making it a perfect monoculture.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

In the complex domain, expertise doesn’t concentrate: under organic reality, things work in a distributed way, as Hayek has convincingly demonstrated. But Hayek used the notion of distributed knowledge. Well, it looks like we do not even need that thing called knowledge for things to work well. Nor do we need individual rationality. All we need is structure.

It doesn’t mean all participants have a democratic sharing of decisions. One motivated participant can disproportionately move the needle (what I have studied as the asymmetry of the minority rule). But every participant has the option to be that player.

Somehow, under scale transformation, emerges a miraculous effect: rational markets do not require any individual trader to be rational. In fact they work well under zero-intelligence –a zero intelligence crowd, under the right design, works better than a Soviet-style management composed to maximally intelligent humans.

Which is why Bitcoin is an excellent idea. It fulfills the needs of the complex system, not because it is a cryptocurrency, but precisely because it has no owner, no authority that can decide on its fate. It is owned by the crowd, its users. And it has now a track record of several years, enough for it to be an animal in its own right.

For other cryptocurrencies to compete, they need to have such a Hayekian property.

Bitcoin is a currency without a government. But, one may ask, didn’t we have gold, silver and other metals, another class of currencies without a government? Not quite. When you trade gold, you trade “loco” Hong Kong and end up receiving a claim on a stock there, which you might need to move to New Jersey. Banks control the custodian game and governments control banks (or, rather, bankers and government officials are, to be polite, tight together). So Bitcoin has a huge advantage over gold in transactions: clearance does not require a specific custodian. No government can control what code you have in your head.

Finally, Bitcoin will go through hick-ups. It may fail; but then it will be easily reinvented as we now know how it works. In its present state, it may not be convenient for transactions, not good enough to buy your decaffeinated expresso macchiato at your local virtue-signaling coffee chain. It may be too volatile to be a currency, for now. But it is the first organic currency.

But its mere existence is an insurance policy that will remind governments that the last object establishment could control, namely, the currency, is no longer their monopoly. This gives us, the crowd, an insurance policy against an Orwellian future.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
January 22, 2018 8:11 am

Well, I am certainly in agreement that the “experts” are complete morons, outright thieves, or both, but Bitcoins reliance on technology concerns me, and I support article 1, section 8, clause 5 of the constitution and cash and coins. People mis-attribute the precipitous decline of the dollars value to the misconception that the dollar is a fiat currency, which it is not. It is linked to oil, which is stupid, and of enormous benefit to the Rockefellers as it was when Nelson Rockefeller worked in collusion with Henry Kissinger to institute the Petro dollar. Linking the dollar to a resource guaranteed to diminish in supply, guarantees inflation by the very laws of supply and demand! There is also not enough gold in the world to have a viable gold standard that wouldn’t be predestined to cause the entire economy and country to collapse relatively quickly either! There are 165,000 metric tons of gold in existence. Governments own 18% of that. If every individual on earth had an equal amount of gold, it would be the equivalent of five gold rings per person, so it would have to be smaller than a spec of dust!

How to Give a Central Banker a Nervous Breakdown in 13 Minutes – Andrea Iravani

How to Give a Central Banker a Nervous Breakdown in 13 Minutes

General
General
  Andrea Iravani
January 22, 2018 1:54 pm

Reprice gold to 100,000 dollars an ounce. Voila, enough gold to be used for transactions worldwide.

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
  Andrea Iravani
January 22, 2018 9:30 pm

Another reason not to go Bitcoin, I will consider Wired Magazine, the most credible source on this:
https://www.wired.com/2017/08/the-confessions/

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
  Andrea Iravani
January 23, 2018 1:07 am

I was also unaware that there have been at least three dozen bitcoin heists since 2011!

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/bitcoin-exchanges-risks/

Alfred1860
Alfred1860
January 22, 2018 8:21 am

Anyone dismissing Taleb out of hand is probably making a mistake. I’m not sold on Bitcoin (yet) but it is clear that the future will be more decentralized. Taleb and Martin Armstrong, two people with a rather impeccable track record, both arrive at this conclusion from different angles.

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
  Alfred1860
January 22, 2018 8:39 am

Alfred 1860- I’m dismissing bitcoin as a national currency, for the reasons that I stated.

SaamiJim
SaamiJim
January 22, 2018 8:26 am

“…didn’t we have gold, silver and other metals, another class of currencies without a government? Not quite. When you trade gold, you trade “loco” Hong Kong and end up receiving a claim on a stock there, which you might need to move to New Jersey…”

Well, that’s about correct as far as you describe it, but you aren’t really talking about physical metals anymore.
Since the price of physical metals is tied to the price of “paper” or the promise of metals, the powers that be are currently able to set the price of gold and silver.
Ever hear of the London Gold Fix, now the LBMA?

So, yeah, maybe we used to have gold & silver, and maybe to some extent we still do.

Dutchman
Dutchman
January 22, 2018 8:47 am

I think it’s complete bullshit. Is there a market to convert bitcoin to any country’s legal currency? NO!

AC
AC
  Dutchman
January 22, 2018 11:46 am

The exchanges exist, in part, to convert bitcoin to/from many countries (maybe all, not certain – likely varies by exchange) legal currency. Some are better than others at doing this in a timely manner.

https://www.worldcoinindex.com/exchange

Not endorsing any of these exchanges, just pointing out that they exist and perform the function of converting national currencies to and from cryptocurrencies.

The issue faced by cryptocurrencies is that the bankers love the control they have under their system, and will actively work as a unified force to destroy anything that threatens their power.

Hollywood Rob
Hollywood Rob
January 22, 2018 9:03 am

Don’t think that I am disagreeing with most of what is presented. I do agree with all of his points. But I don’t see that having bitcoin takes any power away from the ruling junta. All evidence that I see seems to point to the fact that their power is increasing and your power is decreasing. The way I see it, bitcoin is allowed to exist because they are either experimenting with the acceptance of digital currency or because it is too insignificant to bother with. If a digital currency gets too powerful, say powerful enough to be a finger on the scale, then they can shut it down just as fast as they shut down your twatter feed.

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
  Hollywood Rob
January 22, 2018 7:04 pm

Hollywood Rob- I think that they are allowing it because they have been mining it. Not sure how old you are, but it took me decades to realize that their only motives are power and money, since those were never my motives. People tend to default to the principal that others have the same motives and logic as themselves. It also took me decades to realize that neither of those are a given. I refused to believe that anyone would ever go to war for oil, because I never would.

c1ue
c1ue
  Andrea Iravani
January 23, 2018 11:42 am

“Mining” in the beginning used to be solving puzzles, but mining of bitcoin today is nothing more than the back office processing of bitcoin transactions. And it isn’t the government doing it – it is a handful of huge IT operations in China, Iceland, Romania and a few other areas with super cheap electricity.
Furthermore the cost is so high that it makes credit cards look cheap by comparison – even at the merchant side.

kokoda the Deplorable Raccoon and I-LUV-CO2
kokoda the Deplorable Raccoon and I-LUV-CO2
January 22, 2018 9:09 am

“No government can control what code you have in your head.”

Maybe it was in my head at one time, but now it has been entered into a machine and sits just waiting for the zeroes and ones to be hacked.

Governments will spend any amount and entice anyone to hack into that system.

22winmag - The South was Right (and slavery would have ended through legislation soon enough- not war, so don't give me that shit) What happened to places like Rhodesia and safe spaces for white folks? What comes next?
22winmag - The South was Right (and slavery would have ended through legislation soon enough- not war, so don't give me that shit) What happened to places like Rhodesia and safe spaces for white folks? What comes next?
January 22, 2018 9:32 am

NSAcoin

digitalpennmedia
digitalpennmedia
January 22, 2018 6:41 pm

BTC is a shitshow… a pooling system that rewards the early buyers. Its EXACTLY like holding a work of “art” as an investment. One buys a piece at $1M and believes that someone should pay $1M+ for it over a given amount of time. Bitcoin is no different except that there are many pieces all valued at the pooled pot of $ that everyone threw in at varying prices. How anyone can invest in something that is valued in the basic formula of [total available / total money in pool ] = price per coin … I have no idea. this isnt an investment … DRIPs are investment because they are based on available profit made from selling an actual profit. Bitcoin is like a pooled borrowing scheme, only you hope that someone pools in money at a higher price than you did and that you can actually get that money out when you want it.

c1ue
c1ue
  digitalpennmedia
January 23, 2018 11:35 am

I’ve said for years, and in every TBP bitcoin-related posting I’ve seen, that BTC is just “nerd art”.

c1ue
c1ue
January 23, 2018 11:34 am

Yet more proof that Taleb should stick to what he actually knows: long tail financial derivatives.
Here’s some data on Bitcoin:
1) 1 in 7 of all major cryptocurrencies has been stolen.
2) 1 in 3 major cryptocurrency exchanges has been hacked
3) Bitcoin and most of its brethren can handle a maximum of 7 transactions per second (tps). Visa averages 4000 tps with a 65000 maximum. Paypal is over 130. A few of the newer cryptocoins can theoretically go up to 50.
4) Bitcoin transaction costs are averaging well over $20, up to $50 per transaction

The arguments Taleb presents are that Bitcoin must be superior because ” it has no owner, no authority that can decide on its fate. It is owned by the crowd, its users. And it has now a track record of several years, enough for it to be an animal in its own right.”

Bitcoin has an owner: the consensus. And who controls the consensus? A handful of miners.
And it has an authority: the software programmers behind it. It isn’t “owned” by the crowd, it is “used” by the crowd because the miners extract transaction payments (and will forever) from the crowd while the programmers can (and have) forked the code to change fundamental bitcoin characteristics. Other cryptocoins have rolled back transactions in the hundreds of millions of dollars level.
In fact the miners’ impact on Bitcoin is severely underplayed. If a magic wand were to be waved and bitcoin value frozen (at whatever point), the miners would still continue to extract enormous value because they get paid with literally every single transaction. You move your bitcoin from one of your wallets to another? They get paid. You buy something? They get paid. Some of this payment is totally legitimate because the miners expend enormous amounts of electricity to execute the back office operations of bitcoin blockchain consensus.
Bitcoin uses more electricity than all but 59 nations on Earth.
The miners wouldn’t support bitcoin operations through payment of this cost if there weren’t a permanent profitability feature built into the system.
And so how is this different than a credit card, a fiat currency or any other financial instrument?
The main difference is in the omissions. You get no refunds if you lose your bitcoin. You get no protections if you’re hacked or otherwise swindled out of your bitcoin. You get no reliable storage of value. The list goes on and on and on.