Who’s Lying: FBI Says 5 Months Of Texts “Lost,” Yet IG Horowitz Says His Office Received Them In August

A major contradiction has been discovered between yesterday’s revelation that the FBI “lost” five months of text messages, and a claim by the DOJ’s Inspector General, Michael Horowitz – who claimed his office received the texts in question between FBI employees Peter Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page last August.


Michael Horowitz testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee

Knowledge of the missing texts was revealed in a Saturday letter from Ron Johnson (R-WI), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC) – after the Committee received an additional 384 pages of text messages between Strzok and Page, several of which contained anti-Trump / pro-Clinton bias. The new DOJ submission included a cover letter from the Assistant AG for Legislative Affairs, Stephen Boyd, claiming that the FBI was unable to preserve text messages between the two agents for a five month period between December 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017 – due to “misconfiguration issues” with FBI-issued Samsung 5 devices used by Strzok and Page (despite over 10,000 texts which were recovered from their devices without incident).

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

However – as the Gateway Pundit‘s Josh Caplan points out, the lost text messages are in direct contradiction to a December 13, 2017 letter from the DOJ’s internal watchdog – Inspector General Michael Horowitz, to Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley and HSGAC Chairman Ron Johnson, in which he claims he received the texts in question on August 10, 2017.

In gathering evidence for the OIG’s ongoing 2016 election review, we requested, consistent with standard practice, that the FBI produce text messages from the FBI-issued phones of certain FBI employees involved in the Clinton email investigation based on search terms we provided. After finding a number of politically-oriented text messages between Page and Strzok, the OIG sought from the FBI all text messages between Strzok and Page from their FBI-issued phones through November 30, 2016, which covered the entire period of the Clinton e-mail server investigation. The FBI produced these text messages on July 20, 2017. Following our review of those text messages, the OIG expanded our request to the FBI to include all text messages between Strzok and Page from November 30, 2016, through the date of the document request, which was July 28, 2017.

The OIG received these additional messages on August 10, 2017.

This glaring contradiction suggests someone is lying or perhaps simply incompetent.

Did Horowitz’s office *think* they had received the texts in question without actually verifying? Did the DOJ screw up and fail to read Horowitz’s letter before “losing” the text messages so that “leaky” Congressional investigators wouldn’t see them? Either way, this question needs answering.

While you can draw your own conclusions, keep in mind that Inspector Horowitz has been described as your archetypical Boy Scout bureaucrat – who as we reported two weeks ago – fought the Obama administation to restore powers taken away from the OIG by then-Attorney General, Eric Holder.

After a multi-year battle, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) successfully introduced H.R.6450 – the Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016 – signed by a defeated lame duck President Obama into law on December 16th, 2016cementing an alliance between Horrowitz and both houses of Congress. 

And Congress has been very engaged with Horowitz’s investigation; spoon-feeding the OIG all the questions they need in order to nail the DOJ, FBI and the Obama Administration for what many believe to be egregious abuses of power.

As such, the OIG report is expected to be a bombshell, while also satisfying a legal requirement for the Department of Justice to impartially appoint a Special Counsel to launch an official criminal investigation into the matter.

As illustrated below, the report will go from the Office of the Inspector General to both investigative committees of Congress, along with Attorney General Jeff Sessions.


OIG report flowchart, courtesy TrumpSoldier (@DaveNYviii)

At this point, Horowitz’s office needs to clarify whether or not they indeed took delivery of the “lost” text messages. If the OIG does have them, it will be interesting to get to the bottom of exactly what the DOJ claims happened, and particularly juicy if they’re caught in a lie.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
January 22, 2018 9:30 am

OIG probably misstated what they’d gotten, whichever was all texts except those between Strzok and his honey over that five month period. So Horowitz will have to get them from the NSA.

Mossberg
Mossberg
January 22, 2018 9:31 am

Is this whats on the news this morning? Fuck no. But fucking ten minutes on the self congratulatory SAG awards, where we listen to saggy cunts both male a female, #metoo and #timesup the fuck on and on forgetting its their own industry that are the worst players. Fuck!!!! I like news, I like being entertained, but how much longer can I put up with this s hit? And when will the news go back to being newsworthy?

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
  Mossberg
January 22, 2018 8:21 pm

“how much longer can I put up with this?”

As long as you keep pushing the “on” button more than the “off” button.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
January 22, 2018 9:53 am

People in the FBI should be fired for willful incompetence, additional proof they are corrupt.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 22, 2018 9:56 am

This is a real shocker!

I’m going to throw it on the big pile of shockers an stunners I’m building out back.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
January 22, 2018 9:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/17/us/politics/robert-mueller-special-counsel-russia-investigation.html

“…the FBI was unable to preserve text messages between the two agents for a five month period between December 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017”
May 17, 2017
May 17, 2017
May 17, 2017
May 17, 2017

MAY 17, 2017 / 11:00 AM / 8 MONTHS AGO
Former FBI chief Mueller appointed to probe Trump-Russia ties
MAY 17, 2017 / 11:00 AM / 8 MONTHS AGO
Former FBI chief Mueller appointed to probe Trump-Russia ties
MAY 17, 2017 / 11:00 AM / 8 MONTHS AGO
Former FBI chief Mueller appointed to probe Trump-Russia ties

Pay no attention to the date good people, it is merely a coincidence.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
January 22, 2018 10:00 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

Lisa Page, confident, sassy, alluring…

Don’t know much about history.
Don’t know much biology.
Don’t know much about science books.
Don’t know much about the french I took.
But I do know how to read a human face and that one looks troubled.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
  hardscrabble farmer
January 22, 2018 11:08 am

Its the face of getting caught up in an internal FBI corruption case, helping to break up a marriage (I presume), and starting to achieve the notoriety of Monica.

Dave
Dave
January 22, 2018 10:21 am

I thought the OIG’s report was supposed to be released on the 17th of January?

overthecliff
overthecliff
January 22, 2018 12:51 pm

The texts were not lost they were destroyed. The FBI didn’t do anything it is a paper organization. Some person or persons destroyed or disappeared the texts. Who was responsible for preserving this evidence? Make his life miserable until he flips on who told him what to do. Nothing will be done until someone is held accountable and goes to prison.

overthecliff
overthecliff
January 22, 2018 12:52 pm

I’m sure Jeff Sessions will get to the bottom of this.

nkit
nkit
January 22, 2018 3:40 pm

An excellent summation of the FBI/DOJ/Obama Administration Illegal spying by former Federal Prosecutor, Joe DiGenova. An excellent video if you have a half hour to spare

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa95jLxZfc4

Anonymous
Anonymous
  nkit
January 22, 2018 5:04 pm

Great video nkit. Clear, concise, ties it all together.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  nkit
January 22, 2018 5:10 pm

That’s the kind of reporting that should be on every news station each night. A halftard could understand that breakdown.

Simple, concise, accurate and factual and yet all they do is obfuscate to advance their narrative.

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
January 22, 2018 6:50 pm

Oh shit. I guess that I will just have to have their phones seized. Dumb fucks don’t realize that all data is stored on their phones. Is the FBI now overtly a wireless provider now? Cause if not, the provider would also have that stored under section 702, or is that just for us plebes?!

I’m sure that there must be a second grade hacker somewhere capable of hacking into their phones to retrieve the texts.

Andrea Iravani
Andrea Iravani
January 22, 2018 9:35 pm

Irrelevant but great read from Wired Magazine, which I checked to see if they were covering the FBI scandal of the hour:

Another reason not to go Bitcoin, I will consider Wired Magazine, the most credible source on this:
https://www.wired.com/2017/08/the-confessions/

Dan
Dan
January 22, 2018 10:00 pm

Reminds me of when the FBI “lost” the front door to the Branch Davidian residence in Waco, TX which clearly showed that all of the shots fired through the door came from outside (per local press). Completely at odds with the government narrative of course.

bill
bill
January 23, 2018 7:16 am

since the configuration problem seems to apply to more than just the principles, I would think that all fbi investigations ongoing in the time frame would be hopelessly compromised due to lack of any meaningful discovery process. If a couple hundred defence attorneys petition the courts on this issue I suspect that the texts etc. will suddenly turn up.