The Last Redoubt?

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

Some of you may remember station wagons.

Before SUVs and crossovers – before minivans – station wagons were the family car of choice for millions of American families. They were as everywhere as SUVs and crossovers are today. As minivans were, before SUVs and crossovers supplanted them.

Wagons were natural things, created as the result of market demand for them. They were in demand because they could comfortably carry more than five people and a bunch of stuff in the back plus pull a trailer, if the need was there. Such attributes appeal to families, to people who have kids and often have to cart around other people’s kids, too.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The big wagons were based on the big sedans that were dominant at the time – the time being the ’60s and ‘70s.

This was the time before government got into the business of dictating to the car industry how many miles-per-gallon cars would have to deliver in order to avoid being fined for noncompliance. When cars were designed to meet buyer – rather than government – demands

When that reversed, the car business hit the equivalent of a patch of black ice and skidded in a different – and unplanned – direction. Station wagons disappeared almost overnight, because the large sedans they were based on had been fatwa’d out of existence by fuel economy mandatory minimums which made them too expensive to build, due to the “gas guzzler” taxes heaped on them.

But – at the time – there was an end-run.

Pick-up trucks were not yet subject to the fatwas – which only applied to passenger cars. It occurred to someone at one of the car companies – it was Ford that hit paydirt first – that pick-ups share the same basic attributes which made large sedans – and the station wagons spun off from them – so popular with the market. The were big and had lots of room inside. They had big engines.

And they were rear-wheel-drive.

Exactly like the big sedans and wagons extincted by fatwa. Just with a bed out back, open to the elements.

Well, how about we enclose that bed? Lay down some carpet, bolt seats to the floor? Add extra doors?

Voila – the SUV.

It was Ford’s Bronco II which began what would soon become a boom. It was a Ranger pick-up with an enclosed bed. Which made it agreeable as a passenger carrying vehicle that wasn’t – in regulatory terms – a passenger vehicle; i.e., a “car.”

It was – for regulatory purposes – a “light truck” and these skated elegantly past Uncle and his fatwas, as they did not have to abide by the MPG mandatory minimums that had forced an unnatural changed in the way cars were designed. But the most unnatural thing was the sudden effusion of these SUVs, which Blitzkrieged the roads like the panzers into Poland. Within three years of the Bronco II’s appearance as a new model in 1983, others had joined in. By 1990, every major car company had at least one SUV in its lineup – and those that didn’t were working on it.

It was like the muscle car frenzy set into motion back in 1964, when John DeLorean pretty much invented the muscle car by taking a mid-sized Tempest coupe and replacing its small V8 with a huge V8 from Pontiac’s full-sized cars – with the difference being that DeLorean was end-running GM’s internal edict that its smaller cars must only have engines so big (and no bigger) while Ford and the rest were end-running Uncle.

But there was a common thread – the car companies were trying to give the people who bought their cars what they wanted, not for altruistic reasons but rather because that’s how you made money. Well, used to – before it became possible to make money by passing laws forcing people to buy your goods or services (e.g., car insurance, Obamacare).

And now comes the next end-run, the last redoubt.

Uncle’s MPG fatwas have been applied to “light trucks” – and so, to SUVs built off them – and these fatwas are already at a level that cannot be complied with. Uncle demands they – like “passenger cars” – average 35.4 MPGs – or else. And the fatwa is on track to almost double, if the National Cockatiel doesn’t intervene. The good news is it looks as though he might. The bad news is that even if he does, the odds of his successor re-imposing the fatwas are high.

But the fatwas do not – yet – apply to heavy-duty trucks in the 2500/3500 series (and up) class. Why not let history repeat? Why not take, say, a Chevy Silverado 2500 dualie pick-up and enclose the bed.

Voila – instant super-sized SUV!

With an even bigger V8!

If people can no longer buy “light truck” – and SUVs – on account of their having been fatwa’d out of existence, but the same basic thing is still available to them in something even bigger and heavier and – the irony is almost too much – even less fuel-efficient – then they will buy it because the car industry will build it.

Because there’s money in it.

It’s what people want – a concept the people who work as Uncle’s minions seem congenitally incapable of grokking. Stifle what people want and people will find a way around it – often, with the net result being more of what the government claims it didn’t want and tried to prevent via the original fatwa.

Right now, Uncle – his minions (and this includes the media, which might as well be officially christened the Ministry of Truth or some such equivalent) moan mightily about what they regard as the not-so-great economy of the average new vehicle. Which is an SUV – or a crossover SUV, which is the same basic animal (i.e., big, heavy and so, thirsty).

Which is a class of vehicle that would not exist – not as a mass-market offering – were it not for the distortion of the marketplace caused by Uncle’s fatwas. Trucks would have remained trucks – built in small proportion relative to cars and sold mostly to tradesmen, farmers and so on. Most people would have bought cars – and if the market signaled that most people pined for smaller, gas-sippier cars, the car industry would have made them, no fatwa necessary.

Because there would have been money in it.

Doubt this? Check into how many old Beetles VW sold. Or Honda Civics. Pre-fatwa, when market demand for them was what served as the genesis for their manufacture.

But this was not enough for Uncle. It never is. He had to meddle. Had to intervene – had to supersede and second-guess. And thus was born the arguably grotesque SUV boom, which continues to blossom like an endless far cloud to this day. Vast fleets of jacked-up hybrid truck-car things that suck oceans of gas – not that there is anything wrong with that; people have every right to be as profligate with their resources as they wish to be. Once pumped, gas is their to burn and the idea that a third party busybody should have anything to say about it is as obnoxious as a busybody issuing fatwas about what kind of carpet you may throw down in your own home.

But it’s silly for so many millions of people to be driving around in these grotesque truck-car things, which are creatures of Uncle.

And it may just be about to get a lot sillier, once production of of 2500/3500 series SUVs ramps up.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
44 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
February 15, 2018 7:00 am

Good column. I see that Trump recently broached the idea of a 25 cent increase in the gas tax, but Republicans supposedly won’t even consider it. God forbid we contemplate a simple way to incent conservation when instead we can keep the convoluted system of fatwas we have now. At 15,000 miles per vehicle and 30 mpg, a 25 cent increase would cost $125/year. That’s cheaper than the indirect increase in the cost of vehicles brought about by the Byzantine matrix of mandates.

unit472/
unit472/
  Iska Waran
February 15, 2018 8:31 am

I have no problem with a gas tax if it is used to improve highways and motor vehicle bridges. 25 cents a gallon seems a bit stiff since a fuel tax is regressive as it would hit hardest those who have long commutes because they cannot afford to live in more expensive neighborhoods. The other problem is you know liberals would try and divert the money to fund negro haulers and other mass transit boondoggles as California has long done.

Oldtoad of Green Acres
Oldtoad of Green Acres
  Iska Waran
February 15, 2018 6:05 pm

Just got back from Yuma, Az in a ’98 Dodge Ram wif a Cummins diesel. Had a 3,000+ lb truck camper on board. BLM has 12.5 million acres of land open to the people. The living was good in the coldest months.
Buy a pre pollution southern truck or car, undercoat it, fix it and keep it.
The national IQ is dropping like a rock and the tech in the new cars is getting much more complicated, who is going to fix the high tech cars???
Every penny given to the government is less for you to spend on your needs, be real.

I am
I am
  Oldtoad of Green Acres
February 16, 2018 4:33 am

And the real benefit is your “Green” Your like a tree, with all the carbon expended locked into metal and even better scant depreciation. If you brought a new SUV for $50,000 within in a year you have done $15,000 in crisp clean notes. But Hey you commie bastard and hater of big business, we need to junk em to build em.
Can you spot the difference between a $50,000 vehicle and a $15,000 vehicle… I can’t, they cost near the same to make as Air volume is free. 4 wheels, 4 doors, one motor, 4 brakes seats for 5/6 4 door handles one windscreen, one steering wheel, headlights, a screen wiper motor and turn signals.. following me here. Big is beautifully profitable, Luxury even more so.. I laugh at silly Humans

card802
card802
February 15, 2018 7:09 am

With five kids my dad was a big station wagon fan. In 1968 he bought an Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser and a 21 foot Holiday Rambler travel trailer with a single axle.

He loaded up mom, five kids aged 2-10, a small lap dog and our 18 year old neighbor for a babysitter and we headed from west Michigan to Anaheim California our ultimate destination, Disneyland.

Other than the big highlights of driving through the desert at night witnessing meteor showers, swimming in Great Salt Lake, the mountains, Mt Rushmore, the Redwood forest, and two weeks camping outside Disneyland watching the every evening fireworks with Peter Pan flying off of Magic Mountain, I have one stronger memory.
I rushed into the trailer one day to use the toilet, when I opened the door to the bathroom there was 18 year old Julie, all soaped up with a shocked look, holding in one hand the flexible shower head, the other hand vainly attempting to cover first her gorgeous full breasts, then her mysterious yet suddenly spectacular womanhood, me standing there mouth agape eyes wandering up and down her shimmering and glorious nakedness.

The spell was broken as Julie suddenly and quite rudely used her free hand to spray water directly into my face the same time my mom grabbed me by the neck pulling me from an angel sent directly from heaven.
I had a huge crush on Julie anyway, now I felt we shared a personal connection, and then my first boner.

musket
musket
  card802
February 15, 2018 8:08 am

aka early wood……

Anonymous
Anonymous
  card802
February 15, 2018 9:27 am

A hard on looking at your sister?
You might need some help.

Wip
Wip
  Anonymous
February 15, 2018 10:37 am

It wasn’t his sister.

Wip
Wip
  card802
February 15, 2018 10:38 am

That’s a post all by itself. I remember seeing my first pair of titties, it was glorious.

NtroP
NtroP
  card802
February 15, 2018 3:15 pm

802
Great post ,what a memorable trip!
I bet Julie remembers it too!

card802
card802
  NtroP
February 15, 2018 3:43 pm

Can’t tell you how many times I wanted to look her up, she’d be 67 now……….

unit472/
unit472/
February 15, 2018 7:18 am

I had to laugh when I saw Rolls Royce is coming out with an SUV! Years ago there was a horse rancher in Marin County who had customized his Rolls into a pick up. As I recall Rolls Royce did not provide much data on its auto engines, e.g., it only described motor power as ‘adequate’.

As for my own ‘fleet’ I have a 4wd Nissan Titan I use for long trips despite its fuel economy being terrible. Maybe 15 mpg though its EPA listing was 17 and a Mazda 6 that I use for short trips around town. The reason? Something the EPA does not consider. Driver comfort. I once had a Mazda Miata. I liked it but as we get older we are not as limber as we once were and getting in and out of the thing became difficult. OTOH stepping up into the Titan is easy and once in I have an enormous seat with a table sized console and large door pockets to put stuff in. I do not have to worry about my cell phone ( as an Allstate ad now points out) or anything else sliding down into the space between the tiny console and bucket seat of the Mazda 6 so if I have to drive for more than 30 minutes to get where I’m going I take the Titan!

karl
karl
  unit472/
February 15, 2018 12:27 pm

What I really miss is the 1986 -94 Nissan hardbody pickup. I bought one new the first year and drove them for the next 20 years. I fit–I could carry– I could sleep in the back with a shell– and it got 27 mpg on long trips.
They were 12 year throw away trucks in the salt belt.
I’m driving a small Toyota car now -small wheels-short wheelbase–liteweight—Horrible highway ride experience. 43 MPG.
I can’t ( won’t ) get myself to own 2 vehicles. I can afford that second $1000 a year cost, but , for some reason I won’t do it.

NtroP
NtroP
  unit472/
February 15, 2018 3:18 pm

I remember author John D. MacDonald’s manly hero, Travis McGee, drove a Rolls pickup.

Martin brundlefly
Martin brundlefly
February 15, 2018 7:50 am

My sled has an air cooled 550 2-stroke. Smallest motor available. 8mpg and a gallon of 2stroke oil at 40 bucks per each gallon every 20 gallons of gas. Expensive, and i dont care. Seems only libs care what fuels cost. Plenty of people drive boats, atvs, utvs, sleds, tractors, hot rods, all spewing high emissions and drinking fuel. For fun. We dont shop mileage or emissions, but cool, and or powerful. The auto industry used to capture a market share of that.

charlotte corday
charlotte corday
February 15, 2018 8:18 am

I have wondered about these swollen, enormously unparkable things…Obviously not for work, with the 3 foot bed, and unoccupied extra cab…really they should be called “Nancy” trucks, to avoid a more obvious name….

Grog
Grog
  charlotte corday
February 15, 2018 10:25 am

When you write “about these swollen, enormously unparkable things… Obviously not for work…” are you referring to SUVs or Card’s boners?

Mossberg
Mossberg
  charlotte corday
February 15, 2018 11:58 am

Bed size isnt an issue for someone with a trailer, and my job truck seats six. Bed is five foot seven inches, what you call three foot. Gear in the bed, materials in the trailer, workers in the cab. Useless to you, perfect for me. And I can tow a trailer with six sleds, or three utv side by sides. Or a skidder or a hoe. Park with your mirrors. With practice you can abandon that smart car, and maybe become a man. Prolly not though.

Fulton
Fulton
  Mossberg
February 15, 2018 6:35 pm

And you have an inadequate talkeywhacker?

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
  charlotte corday
February 15, 2018 6:21 pm

Ahh no honey, how about room for two German Shepherds.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 15, 2018 8:40 am

I don’t mind some tax increases if I get something for them, and if what I get is what I was promised to get me to support them the way the same or similar promises were made last time.

Promises I currently have a hard time seeing in practice around me.

But first of all, before I support them, I want to see an exact accounting of how every penny I’m paying now is being spent compared to how I was promised it would be spent last time around, something which is never done with lame explanations used in place of real world accounting figures and exact explanations of them.

TC
TC
February 15, 2018 8:57 am

Even the trucks have gotten ridiculous – $60k for an F150 or $40k for a Tacoma isn’t that out of the ordinary. If someone would come out with the equivalent of an ’88 tacoma – small, light with no frills but reliable and durable, with a corresponding cheap price tag, say $15k, they’d sell a million of them a year. But just like you can’t find a new construction home in our area for under $200k, there’s much more profit to be made selling a more expensive item whether it’s a house or a truck.

RiNS því miður
RiNS því miður
  TC
February 15, 2018 3:09 pm

Yup I agree TC.

I bought my Ranger 11 years ago. It was 20 Grand CAD all in and on the road. I have looked after it and now there is no end to the folks who want to buy it. Even now the dealer keeps asking still when I am going to trade in and get a new one. Six years after I made my last payment. …

Apparently there is a New Ranger coming this fall but I have been warned already by those in the know that it won’t be anything like the old ones. Gonna be tricked out power everything and 50 Large to buy. I can’t see why the need to buy that much truck. I’m going to keep the truck I own. The hell with the rest.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Does a truck for the average guy really need 4 doors?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  RiNS því miður
February 15, 2018 5:35 pm

Does a truck for the average guy really need a steering wheel on the wrong side?
EC

RiNS
RiNS
  Anonymous
February 15, 2018 6:46 pm

Actually as it wuz explained to me by my friend in Scotland the steering wheel is on the right side in that picture.

I am
I am
  Anonymous
February 16, 2018 4:50 am

America111, Light switches wrong way, shitters with bowl water way to close to the manhood and you drive on the opposite side you aim when shooting. Now don’t get me started on lbs, inches, feet, yards, acres and all the other shite abandoned for metric by the rest of the World eons ago.
want to MAGA … Build a 54 chevy with Yanky iron, metric bolts and screws and to EU standards.
Winning! Yes I am (serious)

NtroP
NtroP
  TC
February 15, 2018 3:32 pm

TC
Good post. It reminded me of when I worked in Saudi many years ago, the go-to work trucks there were these really cool (I thought) Toyota pickups, with four doors, 4WD and small diesels. They were everywhere around the refineries and industrial plants.
I tried to look into them when I was back home (Houston area at the time), and found they were only available overseas, none to be had in the good ole USA. Bummer.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  NtroP
February 15, 2018 5:49 pm

And they say the people of the united States are free! Buwahahahahahahahaha!

bob
bob
February 15, 2018 9:08 am

I do not see the wisdom in owning anything less than a 3/4 to 1 ton, four door pickup. I even owned a 2 ton dually for a time. But I live in the sticks where parking is not an issue, and I have hay to haul and firewood and sometimes farm equipment and livestock, and grocery shopping usually takes place in 1 to 2 month intervals. I pity those-like my former self-whose lifestyle doesn’t require a big truck.
That said, trying to tax someone into an arbitrary righteousness is folly, aggravating, annoying, frustrating to a significant degree if one allows oneself to dwell on the matter.

Stucky
Stucky
February 15, 2018 9:16 am

One thing Eric has done for me is increase by ABSOLUTE LOATHING for the motherfuckers at the EPA by one billion percent.

I appreciate that.

If Trump would eliminate that scourge on American society I might just bend my knee and worship him.

When TSHTF please consider double tapping a few of those fuckers.

Stucky
Stucky
February 15, 2018 9:20 am

FATWA THIS YOU MUTHERFUCKERS!!!

[imgcomment image[/img]

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 15, 2018 9:33 am

What’s the latest Q droppings on the EPA? Is it secretly running Venezuela?
Are the blue ovals from Ford really Chem trail mind control nozzles spraying nanobots on the Garden State Pkwy.?

You gullible dumb fucks better read up on SHTF tactics because if you believe that Q bullshit it’s a wonder you survived this long.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
February 15, 2018 10:04 am

Oh, come on.

Next thing you’ll be trying to tell me John Titor was a fraud.

Alfred1860
Alfred1860
February 15, 2018 10:26 am

I can’t understand why there isn’t a market for more fuel efficient vehicles of all platforms. Why are there no 1/4-ton trucks on the market? Why does the horsepower in a full-sized truck now start at almost 300 HP, when 180 is perfectly adequate for 90% of truck users? All the commercials show manly men towing a trailer through the Rockies with a fucking bulldozer on it. The lowest HP you can get in a Ford truck is 290, yet the fucking thing has, as standard, auto start/stop? Why, to fucking save fuel? In a 290 HP engine? OK, that makes some fucking sense! How many fucking starters and solenoids will it burn through by the time it has 100k mile on it?

For me personally, a car or truck is 100% utilitarian and nothing more than a money drain. I don’t hate driving, and I’m an excellent driver, but I derive no pleasure from it. I just want something reliable and reasonably comfortable that costs me as little as possible. I guess I’m a rare bird.

RHS Jr
RHS Jr
February 15, 2018 12:17 pm

When I took my 20 year old quarter ton 5 speed Tacoma in to Toyota, I told the salesman I wanted a new one just like it. He said “So do I, but they don’t make them anymore”.

BB
BB
February 15, 2018 12:36 pm

The EPA is another group that has been weaponized against the Auto industry but there is hope with Trump behind the wheel.My little Toyota Tacoma has been the best car / truck I have ever owned .I bought it for 15000 brand new in 1998 .I have 480,000 + miles on it and I could still drive to the Moon and back.It still gets 30 miles to the gallon on open highway.My point is small Trucks are great for transportation.

Rather Not
Rather Not
February 15, 2018 1:41 pm

Not thinking big enough. Ever seen the tractor part of a tractor trailer with the part with the hitch for the 18 wheeler trailer covered and replaced with a luxury SUV equivalent interior? Kind of like a modestly shorter luxury bus based on a Mack or Peterbuilt. That’s the next step. Pain to get in and out of though.

I once saw one with a hot tub mounted. And it had the suspension to drive around with it full.

Oilman2
Oilman2
  Rather Not
February 16, 2018 11:08 am

Agree – they don’t make my FJ Cruiser anymore, and that baby did pull a bulldozer on my double axle trailer over Raton Pass and that V6 never even flinched.
They also don’t make my F250 with the 7.3L turbo diesel anymore, which is a shame because I never did find something it could not pull.

I am restoring a ’78 El Camino, and dropping the 305 in favor of the old 283 small block. I can take that to town for little trips and it will do plywood and such with the tailgate down.

I gave up on buying new with the FJ Cruiser – it cost me over $30k new, and while it did do over 300k, it is needing a new motor soon. The F250 has 325K on it and just redid the tie rods and all – purring now.

I can’t stomach the ECU’s that force you to the dealership for everything, nor can I abide prices approaching $40k for anything that fits 4 REAL people, not mannequins.

All-in, the resto on the El Camino will cost me about $20k, and that is frame up too – still cheaper than any truck I could by. And I can do the tuning and maintenance without dealership and warning lights and sensors and the other madness.

Buying new means fewer meaningful options, leveraging your wallet heftily and always running to the delaership to get the damned sensor lights and ECU madness fixed. Also get to paint it my way when I do resto, which I enjoy.

John Prokovich
John Prokovich
February 15, 2018 4:34 pm

My 1992 Honda Accord EX with 78000 works just fine for this 82 yr old man….bought new, was made in Ohio.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  John Prokovich
February 15, 2018 5:22 pm

78,000? You drive 60 miles a week? You’d save even more if you just walked everyday.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
February 15, 2018 4:41 pm

All I want is a 2-door pickup with decent gas milage that doesn’t cost $30K+ and with a bed big enough for a 4×8 sheet of plywood to lay flat. Those don’t exist anymore because the price of all the safety and fuel economy gizmos makes that kind of simple pick-up too expensive to make unless you add on so much shit that the cost exceeds $50,000.

So, fuck em’. My mechanic and I will keep my 23 year old T100 with 235,000 miles running just fine and I’ll keep my money in my wallet.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
February 15, 2018 6:41 pm

My next and my last around town vehicle will be a ~1976 to 81 Toyota FJ40 / 43.
Its a tractor, but reliable and will hold its value. When I die, it will be passed down to my daughter.

yahsure
yahsure
February 15, 2018 9:25 pm

F-250 4×4 extra cab with a 460.Great for towing/hunting rig. My idea is to use it when I need a truck.Drive a paid for car that is good on gas most of the time. Use the truck as a spare vehicle in case the car breaks.
New trucks are crazy priced! I prefer the old truck and be debt free thing. Everyone already pays a tax for driving vehicles that are hard on gas, It shows the taxes you pay on the gas pump.Check it out next time you fill up.

jamesthedeplorablewanderer
jamesthedeplorablewanderer
February 16, 2018 12:40 am

My Dad and Mom had five kids, so a station wagon to get them all around in was a NECESSITY. We could get the five kids, a trumpet, trombone, two clarinets and a French Horn in it, drive to the various schools for band practice, and still have enough room to haul everyone’s books and lunches. At Christmas we would load it up and haul from middle Tennessee through Arkansas and down to eastern Texas to visit the grandparents, luggage strapped mostly to the roof and the two youngest lying on top of a bed of luggage in the “back in the back”; usually a ten to twelve hour trip with the roads of the time and food / potty stops when desperate. I remember the oil fields in Arkansas and Texas flaring natural gas at night, enormous plumes of green – blue – red – yellow flames billowing up into the night; the eternal grey of Arkansas in November / December rolling away beneath the wheels as we took whatever roads were moving towards family, friends and holiday cheer. Coming back was always a bummer, but classes would be starting in three days, so to have time for laundry and unpacking we would tearfully say goodbye and load back up for the long, sad haul back home.
I still see station wagons from time to time but unless they’re Mormon the big families seem to be quite rare these days; yet another thing our “betters” have managed to ruin for the “normies” ….