LIBERAL GUN CONTROL NARRATIVE OBLITERATED IN ONE CHART

30
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
BB

99% of the things Liberal Progressives​ say about gun control is lies.They cannot open their mouths about anything they profess to believe Without lying. This just shows the vileness in their hearts.

Gilnut
Gilnut

I gave up trying to argue logically with Liberals a long time ago. I began to understand that , fundamentally, Liberals replace thier entire belief system with a liberal ethos, usually based on humanism. This is why most Liberals have no spirituality other than Liberalism itself, it becomes their entire belief system, which is why most Liberals ar athiest or agnostic. IMHO.

Anonymous
Anonymous

So you that actually know something about guns, read this story and watch this video and tell me some of the things wrong with it (a hint: one very obvious one is a felony).

https://www.truthrevolt.org/news/watch-gun-owner-destroys-ar-15-after-florida-school-shooting

PeakMaster
PeakMaster

A snubnose AR. Not a brilliant idea

Anonymous
Anonymous

You caught that fast, everyone should be sending that video to the ATF and the local State prosecutor. Manufacturing an illegal unregistered SBR is a major, major no no.

There is another major fallacy (not illegal) involved here that the anti gunners would never notice in their ignorance and joy at seeing the AR “destroyed”. Two of them actually.

The Modern Chronicler
The Modern Chronicler

That weapon is still quite usable. It will still fire, and with a new barrel, a new handguard, and a new gas tube, it’d be as good as new. The lower receiver – the actual “gun,” legally speaking – was intact after that slicing of the barrel and handguard.

This man later cut the lower receiver in half, but this doesn’t mean that from a rigorous interpretation of the law, he committed a felony – a minimum 10-year prison sentence and a $10k fine.

Dan
Dan

Fascinating chart. On the USA graphs, if you remove the homicides from Chicago, and the other top 4 cities, that death bar drops to almost nothing.

nkit
nkit

comment image

nkit
nkit

comment image

nkit
nkit

comment image

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit

“sources: wikipedia”

Seriously???

Zarathustra

Japan is the place to be. No guns, no need for ’em.

Anonymous
Anonymous

With double the suicide rate we have and almost no measurable migration, especially “asylum seeker” migration coming from Muslim countries.

You wouldn’t be allowed to be there (other than as a short term tourist).

pdxr13
pdxr13

Full of Japanese. It’s great if you are Japanese, or an honored foreigner (White-tall-blonde- female, or any kind of wealthy person, and make a good effort to learn the local customs and hack up enough local language to get along). Sucks if you are a hated not-Japanese.

Betcha Japan and Japanese exist in 200 years!

BUCKHED
BUCKHED

Gilnut…it is the Liberal Ethos that allows them to round of people for extermination without a scintilla of guilt

Cynicles
Cynicles

How many of those last few shooters were on Rx drugs?
Likely most, if not all of them…peculiar.

TreeFarmer
TreeFarmer

I thought the same thing as MarshRabbit. I would have reused that graph if it didn’t have Wikipedia as the source. While Wikipedia may be a decent place to do some “preliminary” research on a topic, using it as the source of facts for any argument is an invitation for failure. The big concept around that graph is most likely true, but I would prefer a better data source.

Anonymous
Anonymous
rhs jr
rhs jr

Bottom line, the murder rate corresponds to the number of murderers not to the number of guns. I think the Faithland Map makes it clear that the number of murders corresponds to the number of godless leftist. In the meantime, pray for peace but pass the ammunition (a GI expression).

Anonymous
Anonymous
JK
JK

I shut off my ad block and allow 50+ ads. I shut off my tracking and allow 15+ trackers and still the content of articles does not come up(mostly submitted by admin). I enjoy the content enough to shut all that down and tolerate 30 sec. downloads clickoing from one page to the next, but what gods need appeased to view all of the content on this site?

TampaRed
TampaRed

i don’t have that problem jk and rarely hear others talking about it so the snafu is most likely on your end–good luck–

Zarathustra

What that chart tells me is that there is little correlation between gun ownership and gun violence. Relatively homogenous societies have the lowest murder rate, regardless of gun ownership and third world shitholes have the highest…and I doubt that would change whether or not people had moar guns.

tim

UNOC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) has the homicide information. https://www.unodc.org/gsh/

Gun ownership per capita is more difficult to obtain. However, by using Wikipedia one can probably achieve an accuracy rate of +/- 5%. Wikipedia typically includes footnotes and sources concerning methodology and such per entry (the country that you are reviewing). Of course, any curious person may test the accuracy by verifying independently, although most won’t because of laziness or other reasons. 🙁

A link to the expanded chart is included here along with an Excel file that includes raw data to slice and dice to illuminate truth from different vantage points:

pdxr13
pdxr13

People lie and do their best to obscure/conceal accurate facts about gun ownership/sex/money. All this data is questionable. I will guess that there are many-many-more guns in the USA than have been sold in the past 20 years, maybe over 1Billion firearms, and the even-more-important trillion cartridges ( in private hands) for those weapons.

Cynicles

That’s being conservative, very conservative. That’s why these events are common, say the MSM. The gun control sheeple come out preaching the MSM talking points without any substance.

ZombieDawg
ZombieDawg

comment image

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading