Mass Shootings & Psychiatric Drugs

Guest Post by Ben Swann

Let’s start with a question. When it comes to the debate over mass shootings in America, why does the discussion always go toward tougher gun laws?

And yet, we are not talking about the role of antidepressants and other psychiatric medication.

The truth? The connection between mass shooters and these medications is stunning.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Let’s give it a Reality Check you won’t get anywhere else.

The response to the mass shooting in Parkland, Florida has been call after call for tougher gun laws, but seems to ignore the issues once again surrounding antidepressants.

Without question, Nikolas Cruz, the 19-year-old man who killed 17 students and wounded more than a dozen that afternoon February 14, had for years exhibited signs of mental health problems. We talked about it on Reality Check a few episodes back.

Here’s what we know about Cruz.

Cruz’s adoptive father Roger Cruz died more than a decade ago, and his adoptive mother Lynda Cruz reportedly struggled with her son and his brother Zachary until her death in November 2017.

Barbara Kumbatovich, a former sister-in-law, told the Miami Herald, that Lynda Cruz “did the best she could,” and that Nikolas and Zachary “were adopted and had some emotional issues.”

Kumbatovich told the publication that she believed Nikolas was on medication to deal with those issues and that Lynda “was struggling with Nikolas the last couple years.”

In addition to Kubatovich’s statements, records show that police were called to the Cruz residence as many as 45 times since 2008, according to Buzzfeed News.

Between reports that Cruz had previously pulled a gun on his brother and mother, and an anonymous FBI tip from January that Cruz had been suicidal but then decided “he wants to kill people” and that he was “going to explode”… all evidence is indicating a clearly unstable young man with numerous documented concerns from those who knew him.

We still don’t know what, if any medications Cruz might have been on. But we do know that the number of high profile mass shootings over the past 30 years, and the link to psychiatric medication, is deeply concerning.

In 1989, 47-year-old Joseph T. Wesbecker shot 20 workers in a Louisville, Kentucky factory, killing nine people… just a month after he began taking Prozac. The drugmaker, Eli Lilly and Company, later settled a lawsuit brought by survivors.

1998: 15-year-old Oregon school shooter Kip Kinkel, who opened fire in his school cafeteria, he was on Prozac.

1999: Columbine killer Eric Harris was taking Luvox, another antidepressant.

An important fact about Luvox. According to author David Kupelian from his book, How Evil Works, “Luvox manufacturer Solvay Pharmaceuticals concedes that during short-term controlled clinical trials, 4 percent of children and youth taking Luvox — that’s one in 25 — developed mania, a dangerous and violence-prone mental derangement characterized by extreme excitement and delusion.”

In 2005, 16-year-old Jeff Weise, living on Minnesota’s Red Lake Indian Reservation, shot and killed nine people and wounded five others before killing himself. Weise had been taking Prozac.

2007: Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho, he shot and killed 32 people. Officials found prescription medicine “related to the treatment of psychological problems” among his personal belongings, according to the New York Times.

2012: Colorado theater shooter James Holmes was reportedly prescribed the antidepressant Zoloft.

2013: Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis sprayed bullets at office workers and in a cafeteria, killing 13 people including himself. Alexis had been prescribed Trazodone by his Veterans Affairs doctor.

2014: Elliot Rodger, the Isla Vista, California killer who went on a shooting spree after stabbing three men to death, had been prescribed psychotropic drugs, according to The Los Angeles Times.

2017: Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock, according to the Las Vegas Review Journal, had been prescribed diazepam.

Known by its brand name Valium, “a sedative-hypnotic drug in the class of drugs known as benzodiazepines, which studies have shown can trigger aggressive behavior.”

Paddock received the prescription in June 2017. That October, he carried out the deadliest shooting in modern American history.

And there are dozens of other examples. To be clear, we’re not saying that prescription drugs are to blame for mass shootings.

The underlying issues of mental health that these shooters seem to all have, however are alarming. And knowing that the majority of them were prescribed antidepressants, you have to consider this…

Some of the most alarming side effects of Prozac include suicidal thoughts, self mutilation and manic behavior.

Zoloft can cause hallucinations, agitation and memory problems.

For Valium, it’s also hallucinations, depression, and thoughts of suicide.

These are dangers that drug makers themselves are required to disclose.

The use these antidepressants in America has skyrocketed. As of 2013, 12 percent of Americans were filling prescriptions for them. And while millions of people do not suffer violent episodes, the drug makers warn that some people may… and do.

You’ve heard some of those warnings in the commercials those pharmaceutical companies pay to run on mainstream media networks. According to the New York Times, “771,368 such ads were shown in 2016 … an increase of almost 65 percent over 2012.”

Pharmaceutical companies were estimated to spend $6.4 billion on direct-to-consumer advertising in 2016, according to USA Today.

Further, Open Secrets reports that in the 2016 election cycle, pharmaceutical companies contributed $12.4 million to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, another $1.5 million to former Republican Gov. Jeb Bush, more than $812,805 to Sen. Ted Cruz, $446,400 to Chris Christie, $388,706 to Donald Trump, and $280,408 to Bernie Sanders.

So what you need to know, is correlation does not always equal causation. We do not know that the reason for these mass shootings is because of any one drug or any number of drugs. Nor do we know how much of a role these drugs may have played at all… but the question is, why is that?

Why are politicians and mainstream media pushing so many discussions about guns and virtually no discussion of whether or not antidepressants are playing a role? Because the numbers are compelling and beg a question that deserves an answer.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
MrLiberty
MrLiberty
March 14, 2018 2:07 pm

According to advertising industry statistics, 70% of the advertising revenue for mainstream media “news” programs comes from the pharmaceutical industry. As always….follow the money. Additionally, the FDA has what can only be described as a revolving door relationship with the heads of major pharmaceutical corporations when it comes to hiring, retiring, etc. Again, follow the money.

And how many signs being held up today during the “protests” will mention bigPharma’s drugs? And how many of those will EVER be shown on the news (not that there will actually be any)?

Gator
Gator
  MrLiberty
March 15, 2018 1:26 am

Yep, and now you know why you’ll never hear hannity or rush or any of the other ones talk about this on their shows, either. Im honestly surprised this guy still has a show. They depend on those companies so heavily they won’t risk pissing them off. Its not just anti-depressants, either. To hear them tell it, there’s a pill out there for just about everything. Of course, many of them have side effects, but don’t worry, theres a pill for those too. What you aren’t told, even by your doctor, is that a gym membership will cure most of what ails you. Or, just start walking/running and pushup/situps on your own, depending on your current level of fitness. High blood pressure, cholesterol, even depression. Getting regular exercise isn’t just good for your body, its good for your brain, too. Most people would be amazed at how much better they will feel, body and mind, after starting to work out regularly. Many people find they don’t need all these pills anymore. It’s cheaper, and its better for you. Humans weren’t meant to be as sedentary as modern Americans have become.

Alfred1860
Alfred1860
  MrLiberty
March 15, 2018 9:13 am

As a Canadian, the odd times that I ever watch American TV stations I am always stunned at the drug ad phenomena. I’ve always been annoyed by TV ads, but just knowing how many people subject themselves to this psychological abuse from Big Pharma blows my mind. That anyone would actually “talk to their doctor” about these drugs after hearing all of the crazy side effects is truly confounding, and a testament to how much power the mainstream media/entertainment complex has.

It is illegal to advertise prescription drugs in Canada.

Jake
Jake
March 14, 2018 2:43 pm

Looking for votes. Democrats could care less about gun control. They controlled the house and Congress did nothing. Just waiting for a Republican to get in. The last thing the Dems want is to solve the problem. All about votes.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Jake
March 14, 2018 8:28 pm

Government NEVER solves problems. It can ONLY cause or worsen them.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 14, 2018 4:30 pm

Do the drugs cause the problem, or do they just accentuate those inclined to violent and anti social behavior in the first place and make them go off the deep end more violently?

There are no widespread studies to speak of about this as far as I know.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Anonymous
March 14, 2018 8:32 pm

What difference does it make? The bigger issue is that these are handed out indiscriminately by physicians who bear NO liability for the possible side effects (just like bigPharma). That there are plenty of folks with anger or violence issues only makes prescribing these drugs EVEN MORE DANGEROUS and requires additional care and supervision of the patient. But nobody is going to make a big deal out of the possible side effects or they might scare off a potential lucrative buyer (patient).

And to a point I made on a previous post regarding MKUltra, there is also the possibility that these physicians and these drugs are all part of either the chemical foundation or the followup support mechanism for folks who are taken and exploited by the government to carry out these shootings. Stranger things have happened.

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  MrLiberty
March 15, 2018 7:53 am

“these physicians”. My wife is a VA psychiatrist, and she writes psych med scripts all day. If they’re part of some conspiracy, we aren’t getting a cut.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MarshRabbit
March 15, 2018 8:48 am

Why should they give you a cut when she’s willing to work for free?

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
  Anonymous
March 15, 2018 11:20 am

Obviously its the drugs. Humans are violent by nature, and have always walked a fine line throughout history. It is only recently with the introduction of these drugs, that people flip out like this. Imagine a kid in a village 5000 years ago flipping out and burning the whole place down after stabbing 7 people in their sleep with a spear. Didnt happen. It’s not just the drugs, it surely also has something to do with the extreme irrationality of our culture but together those two inputs produce one hell of an output.

Rife
Rife
March 14, 2018 4:33 pm

I dont disagree but numerous details of the event dont make sense……….except the simultaneous drill.
Can anyone think critically anymore?

rhs jr
rhs jr
March 14, 2018 4:59 pm

For the time being, put a lot of THC into the anti-depressants and see if it helps; for Cruz, we should have put in a double dose. Also figure out what makes psychos suicidal and put a lot of that in too.

Ottomatik
Ottomatik
March 14, 2018 7:21 pm

No worries, have patience, soon it will be mandatory that you take the pills if so directed and of course then they will find causation and 1/2 of America will be forbidden from owning or possessing a firearm.
Wait…

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 14, 2018 11:37 pm

There are a lot of veterans and retired “first responders” out there who are receiving disability benefits due to PTSD diagnoses. They won’t be very happy if their 2A rights are taken away because of it.

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  Anonymous
March 15, 2018 7:47 am

This is happening. My wife is a VA psychiatrist, and she provided a letter so a patient could get an armed security job. His PTSD status was barring him from employment in that field.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MarshRabbit
March 15, 2018 8:50 am

Does she bear any liability if the guy goes off the deep end and commits some sort of mass mayhem?

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Anonymous
March 15, 2018 11:27 am

Its called “sovereign immunity” and the answer is NO, of course not. Government employees NEVER take responsibility for their actions – regardless of the outcome. Taxpayers on the other hand ALWAYS pick up the tab….for their paychecks too. MarshRabbit’s posts are beginning to make sense now that more of his “bias” is revealed.

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  MrLiberty
March 15, 2018 6:34 pm

What bias? lol

overthecliff
overthecliff
March 15, 2018 11:24 am

No matter what we do to stop mass shootings nothing will work. We cannot harden all target rich areas. Schools, theaters, sporting events, concerts and churches are just a few of the places where a mass shooting can occur. Even with total gun confiscation shootings will happen. Crazy people and criminals and crazy criminals and terrorists will find a way to get guns. The left doesn’t care about mass shootings or criminality they care about us being unarmed before their police. Innocent victims of criminals or crazy people are just collateral damage to a Stalin or Pol Pot. They want our guns.