Sad Death of a Crooner

Guest Post by Southern Sage

In the latest news from Chile, a kangaroo court has just convicted and sentenced to 18 years in prison eight former soldiers for the killing of Victor Jara, a Communist folk singer who was shot following the September 11, 1973 coup that overthrew the regime of Salvador Allende, the “socialist” president of that long, thin, country at the tip of South America.  One other soldier was sentenced to five years for his part in a “cover up” of the killing.

For one who has spent much of his life fighting people Like Jara, these “convictions” are a dreary repetition of many similar instances whereby soldiers and police officers who fought the Communists in Latin America are being hounded by their liberal and leftist enemies for actions taken under desperate circumstances.  In view of the looming civil conflict in America, it would be well for all of us to remember that a fight is not over until the last one of these rats and their sympathizers are put in a place where they are never again in a position to take revenge on their political enemies.

Imagine an America where the lunatic left has managed to seize power and then imagine the fate of those who have opposed their conspiracy to destroy our country.

Uninformed Americans have been spoon-fed a tale of a “democratically-elected socialist” government in Chile that was tossed out by a brutal military coup which was followed by the mass killing of innocent people, with the complicity of the CIA, Nixon, etc.  The truth, of course, is totally different.

The facts are that feckless, self-centered Chilean politicians allowed Salvador Allende to be elected through a minority vote.  Allende was the head of the Chilean Socialist Party, a party that was even more radical than the stodgy Chilean Communist Party.  Once the levers of power were in his hands Allende set up making sure that there would one man, one vote, one time.

Surrounded by a gang of vicious bodyguards and terrorists from the Movement of the Revolutionary Left (MIR) and a host of Cuban intelligence agents and special forces soldiers, Allende and his even more extreme supporters began to a calculated campaign to destroy the democratic system that brought him to power.  It is an old Communist tactic.  Allende set out to marginalize the Chilean middle class, neuter the military, and make his “fundamental transformation” of Chile irreversible.  Sound familiar?

Illegal “worker’s militias” were formed with weapons brought into the country through clandestine drops by Cuban fishing boats.  Hordes of other Latin American Communists were brought in to staff government positions (I knew one of them, an ex-Communist, quite well; he described to me the sequence of events in great detail).  Land and factory seizures soon followed.  The courts were packed with revolutionaries and the other political parties were outflanked using unconstitutional means.  The free press was attacked using financial pressure and open threats.  Censorship was imposed by denying the opposition any means to state their case.  Again, sound familiar?

Chile, while certainly not perfect, had been a functioning democracy for many years with no military interference in politics, a vigorous intellectual life, a relatively strong economy, and no recent history of political violence.  It was no banana republic.  True, there was poverty and as in all Latin American countries economic equality and social justice could have been improved but it was already making progress in all of these areas.

The “moderate” Chilean political parties were similar to the Republican Party in their utter selfishness and lack of imagination.  They thought they could “deal” with Allende and his Communist friends.  Wrong.

The Chilean military, one of the most professional in Latin America, initially took a strictly hands-off attitude, trusting in the institutions of government to work and with the idea that these would act as a brake on Allende’s radicalism.  They soon found they were gravely mistaken.

When the United States quite properly refused to play ball with what was quickly becoming a Soviet/Cuban satellite (this was the height of the Cold War, Vietnam was just winding down in a humiliating loss for the U.S.) the liberal press screamed about the injustice being dealt to this “democratically-elected” Communist state.

In the meantime, the CIA became involved in a comic opera coup attempt that fizzled out and included the killing of a Chilean general, a thoughtless opportunist who had thrown his support to Allende out of stupidity and personal ambition.  Remember that!  Just as there were dozens of senior U.S. generals eager to advance their careers by sucking up to Obama, so it was in Chile, their country be damned.

The Chilean Congress and the Chilean Supreme Court eventually woke from their slumber and tried to control Allende, who was wrecking the economy and imposing a police state.  They essentially declared Allende an outlaw.  Allende ignored them.  His supporters spit in the faces of these weaklings who, after all, had allowed this disaster to happen in the first place.

Senior military officers began to realize that their institutions – not to mention their lives and those of their families – were at risk if things continued down this road.  They knew all too well the fate of the officers of the pre-revolutionary Cuban Army once Fidel Castro had total power in his hands.  They knew they had to act and act fast.

The die was cast when military intelligence learned of a plot by the MIR and their worker militia friends to decapitate the regular military, infiltrating military units with revolutionaries, murdering the officers and their families, and eliminating the last threat to the Communist regime.

In an incredibly well-planned operation the military quietly set the stage for the removal of Allende.  In a clever move the Chilean navy (a formidable force in the Latin American context) set sail for its annual war games with the U.S. Navy (Allende was still trying to maintain a show of normal relations and, in any case, preferred to have the navy sailing around the Pacific).  The fleet sailed over the horizon – and waited.

Early in the morning the army struck and the navy sailed back to port.  The Chilean Air Force took out key communications facilities.

Allende, stuck in the Moneda Palace, fretted and ran around with a silly helmet on his head, a submachinegun (a present from Castro) cradled in his arms.  He was surrounded by his GAP, a group of heavily armed thugs from the MIR.  He was also accompanied by Cuban intelligence officers.

Allende, no doubt prodded by the MIR and the Cubans, refused an offer of safe passage out of the country.  Considering that Allende’s henchmen had planned to massacre the military officers and their families, this was an exceedingly generous offer.  The refusal was met with precision bombing of the palace, an amazing feat as it is located in downtown Santiago.

Allende would die that morning with a bullet to the head, either a suicide and an accident.  It is possible he was executed by the Cubans in order to ensure that the portly old pervert (the army later found his personal residence stuffed with porno and sex toys) would become a martyr.

The military made short work of the worker’s militias and began to round up the main Communist hotheads, Jara among them.  A couple of American Communist “revolutionary tourists, including Charles Horman, were swept up in the dragnet.

It is estimated that about 2,500 Communists were summarily executed.  Jara took 44 rounds, or so it is said.  Others spent long years in intensive re-education in the cold, barren south of Chile.  The coup leader, General Augusto Pinochet, erred by extending mercy to a great number of Communists who were allowed to go into exile.  He should have hanged all of them for treason.  These “exiles” would form the hard-core of dozens of Latin American terrorist organizations in the coming years.

With Pinochet in power, Chile soon became the economic powerhouse of that region.  The radical left was all but extinguished.  When Pinochet left power years later these Communists had learned their lesson.  They had largely dropped their violent tendencies and had accepted to play by constitutional and democratic rules.  These reformed Reds are now part of a responsible and democratic reborn Chilean political system.

I knew one of these former Chilean terrorists, still a leftist but dedicated now to the rule of law and a free enterprise economy.  He expressed grudging respect for Pinochet and shuddered to think what would have happened to his country had he and his friends gained total power.  He is a wiser and more thoughtful man now.

Revolution and civil war are not games.  All of the leftist Democrats screaming about Trump and threatening to bring down our country should consider that carefully the next time they feel the urge to pen their mouths or punch a Trump supporter.  Things may not turn out the way they want them to.

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
33 Comments
BB
BB
July 7, 2018 7:58 am

America will probably have to learn the hard way. Half the population will probably vote for the Communists like they did Obama . I hope I’m wrong but I have my doubts . Seems like the only thing I can do is pray and prepare.

whiskey tango foxtrot
whiskey tango foxtrot
July 7, 2018 8:52 am

We cannot afford to lose sight of the orchestrated, directed effort by corporate, political interests to “bundle” all peoples into an obedient, cowed slave class to serve their needs. This is globalism. This is the end game. Don’t EVER give up your weapons. Keep your nerve. And prepare to make sacrifices.

AmazingAZ
AmazingAZ
July 7, 2018 9:02 am

Thanks SS. It’s always good to consider the other side of the story. I’ve often wondered if the military here would step in if things got dicey. I do believe that this November will either be the beginning of the end for the Dims, or the end of freedom & sanity as we know it. It’s a dangerous but heady time. 4th turnings aren’t for the faint hearted…

Stucky
Stucky
July 7, 2018 10:55 am

I object to countries named after a food. It makes it hard to take them seriously.

Although further research reveals the following MIGHT be true —- in the Aymara language “Chilli” means “end of the world”, or possibly “place most faraway” or possibly “the lowest place in earth”.

However, there’s no excuse for naming a country Turkey. Or, China. Jeezus, all this talk of food is making me Hungary.

Stucky
Stucky
  Stucky
July 7, 2018 11:35 am

Speaking of countries …

Am absolutely DELIGHTED that Brazil is finito. That Neymar dude is the biggest pussy in soccer. A faker. A flopper. A fraud and a fag with a fine girlfriend.

All The Great Powers are toast. Germany. Spain. Argentina. Portugal. Good thing I didn’t bet, I would have lost my shirt and nuts.

Fuck England. Fuck Sweden. How in the hell does one choose between one shit sandwich and another? Nevertheless, it’s an all European Final 4 for only the second time in World Cup history.

Pray for Russia to beat Croatia. Never cheer for a team that wears faggy tablecloths as their uniform.

[imgcomment image[/img]

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
  Stucky
July 7, 2018 12:10 pm

England is a tough, physical team, as they proved this morning 2-0…If England the nation can get rid of its treasonous leaders, they will be a force.

Grizzly Bare
Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 11:04 am

I wonder how Cuban fishing boats were delivering arms to Chili. Were they transiting the Panama canal or motoring around Cape Horn? The risks seem overwhelming either way.

Socratic Dog
Socratic Dog
  Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 11:49 pm

That gives perspective to the whole story. Is it all bullshit, like the Cuban fishing boats? It sure sounds like it, revisionist history at its worst. “A guy I know told me that…).

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
  Socratic Dog
July 8, 2018 9:32 am

Excuse me. I worked in Latin America for 30 years against the Communists. Cuban fishing boats? These were large ocean trawlers liuke the Japanese and Russians send all over the world. As stated, this is a matter of public record, pal. Do some research. The Colombian navy sunk one of these ships, called “Karina”. Same deal. Delivering arms. By the way, the Panama Canal was and is a neutral waterway. Ships are almost never searched.

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
  Grizzly Bare
July 8, 2018 9:29 am

They were going around the Horn. Of course, they weren’t real fishing boats. They were large trawlers designed for this work. The Colombian Navy sunk one called the Karina in the Caribbean and a famnous Colombian novel was written about it.

Grizzly Bare
Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 11:37 am

I wonder when you start eliminating people who hold ideologies different than your own, where does it end?

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
  Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 12:13 pm

If you don’t eliminate the communists, it will end in the destruction of your country and mass executions, as we have seen before.

Grizzly Bare
Grizzly Bare
  Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 12:14 pm

I know, stupid question. Do it to them before they do it to you, right? Human nature is a bitch.

Wiptoe through the tulips
Wiptoe through the tulips
  Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 5:06 pm

This is why we need borders based on race, language and culture. And maybe even religion.

MN Steel
MN Steel
  Wiptoe through the tulips
July 7, 2018 7:31 pm

That actually used to be the law of this land, per the Naturalization Act of 1790, which extended citizenship to free white men of good character after two years residence.

http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Naturalization_Act_of_1790/

It was rightfully extended to 5 years residence in 1795, and at any time a person was found to be “not of good character” before becoming a citizen, it was back to wherever they came from.

Methinks there will be many a helicopter ride given to those “not of good character” in the not-too-distant future, and when the JP-8 gets low, rides off of tall buildings.

Wip-Me-Not
Wip-Me-Not
  MN Steel
July 7, 2018 11:52 pm

We can only hope.

gilberts
gilberts
  Grizzly Bare
July 7, 2018 7:44 pm

No, you do it to them because they intend to do it to you if you let them. Communists ALWAYS resort to force. Violence and mayhem are baked into the ideology from go. How else do you intend to found a workers and peasants dictatorship of the proletariat without forcefully dispossessing the possessing class?
Our fatal weakness is we trust people in our system to play by the rules and we hold ourselves to our rules, even when others don’t follow them. Communism should be stomped out with force anywhere it raises its head, because as a movement, it seeks to destroy the states that harbor it. The end goal is violence and destruction of the existing system. Just like you wouldn’t suffer cancer or AIDS gladly, you shouldn’t suffer communists, either.

Our own CPUSA was working directly with the Soviet Union against us throughout its existence. The KGB recruited spies directly from its ranks and used it essentially as a tool for spotting and assessing sources. Would-be traitors didn’t need to bother going to the Soviet Embassy to find the KGB or GRU, because all they had to do was contact their CPUSA party organizer to get access. You can read about it in Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America.

One of the authors was an ex-KGB agent and briefly had access to the KGB’s files during the post-collapse 1990s and had permission to use their files for books on the KGB’s 1930s-1950s operations in America. He managed to get out a lot of transcribed files before the doors swung shut and he escaped with his life to the West. What he got was an infuriating and disturbing confirmation of just how many traitors and spies we had in the 1930s-1950s when the USG finally started trying to find and root out the commie traitors.

FYI- if you’re a libtard commie progressive apologist, Alger Hiss was a traitor pretty much his entire career. I.F. Stone was a traitor. Pretty much anyone with Spanish Republican service was likely to be a traitor. Julies and Ethel and their buddies were all traitors. Congressman Dickstein was a traitor. Harold Glasser, Victor Perlo, Lauchlin Currie, Harry Dexter White, and many more were all traitors. McCarthy might have been an alcoholic opportunist, but he wasn’t wrong. The govt was full of commie traitors.

Communism is a direct threat to any otherwise open state, like ours, and should be crushed at all costs for the preservation of that state. It was true in the 1930s, in the 1940s, 1950s, and today. The only reason to allow communist organizations to exist would be to use them as a honeypot to identify all the fellow travelers and detain them when they get beyond drinking coffee and bitching about The Man.

Socratic Dog
Socratic Dog
  gilberts
July 7, 2018 11:51 pm

And it’s just a coincidence that most of them were jews.

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
  Grizzly Bare
July 8, 2018 9:34 am

Grizzly,
Eliminating Communists has NOTHING to do with eliminating people who hold “different ideologies”. We are not talking about the nice liberal Democrat down the street. These are members of a violent, criminal conspiracy whose “views” have led to the death of 100,000,000 innocent people. They need to be stopped, not “reasoned with”.

AC
AC
July 7, 2018 4:13 pm

True, there was poverty and as in all Latin American countries economic equality and social justice could have been improved but it was already making progress in all of these areas.

The problem with ‘making progress with economic equality and social justice’ is that as soon as you improve the lot of the native presant class in Latin America (or South Aftica/Rhodesia, and other places as well, for that matter), they have as many children as it will take to put the next generation right back into the same poverty they were just pulled out of. The next generation then demands a bigger cut of what you built – this goes on, generation after generation, until there is nothing left for them to take from you and they murder you and yours (South Africa is this in action, right now), or until you stop them.

The coup leader, General Augusto Pinochet, erred by extending mercy to a great number of Communists who were allowed to go into exile. He should have hanged all of them for treason. These “exiles” would form the hard-core of dozens of Latin American terrorist organizations in the coming years.

Note the lesson here: the only good communust is a dead communist. It’s worth remembering.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  AC
July 7, 2018 4:50 pm

how correct you are ac–
lenin was in prison for revolutionary activity & was freed,ditto hitler–
think how differently the 1900 s would have been–

gilberts
gilberts
  TampaRed
July 7, 2018 9:10 pm

And Stalin and others were granted banishment to Siberia, from which it was apparently not impossible to escape if you really wished. Another soft punishment that set up the Czars for failure.

TampaRed
TampaRed
July 7, 2018 4:51 pm

sage,
you’ve been prolific lately,keep it up–

TampaRed
TampaRed
July 7, 2018 4:53 pm

a question for you guys–
would you rather be governed by a hillary/obama or a pinochet?

gilberts
gilberts
July 7, 2018 11:58 pm

I’m all for crushing Communists, but I do have one minor objection to the whole Chilean story.

Wasn’t a significant portion of the Chilean counter-revolution a CIA operation following the attempts by the Allende regime to nationalize the significant US copper mine and fruit holdings and an extension of the gunboat banana republic wars of the 1800s and early 1900s that USMC GEN Butler, referenced here previously, wrote against in his pamphlet, “War Is A Racket!”?

WAR IS A RACKET

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_Chile

Were we down there to liberate a people? A people who genuinely liked the idea of Free Shit for Everyone and elected the guy who promised it? Or were we down there to topple a government to install people who would ensure US Business kept profiting? I think it was the latter and, if so, hard to support.

By the 1970s, I think the Soviet world was already teetering (just look at Brezhnev and tell me the USSR was a potent threat) and we were probably in no danger of the terd world states falling like dominoes. If you read Confessions of an Economic Hitman, US policy around the world for at least 50 years has been to co-opt or kill any leader who got in the way of US interests.

I can’t say I support that, even if it potentially helps me, because I’m offended by the use of state powers and the wholesale spending of American lives and treasure to benefit a narrow class of individuals. What’s good for, say, Standard Oil or Dole Fruit is not necessarily good for me. What’s good for Haliburton isn’t necessarily good for us or Iraq.

So on that count, I’m not a fan of Pinochet. Allende might have been Maduro 40 years ahead of his time and his inevitable failure might have illustrated for later suckers that socialism is a massive disaster.

gilberts
gilberts
  gilberts
July 8, 2018 12:01 am

As an aside, I read a book a while back, Fortress America, by William Greider. Greider was criticizing our massive defense budget in a (late-1990s) world in which we face no serious threat. He believes we could cut way back on our defense spending and come up with a more intelligent way of funding the military. Greider asks the question, “Is America becoming Darth Vader to the rest of the world?” He argued America has increasingly stood for the status quo in the world and literally earns more enemies worldwide as the order we attempt to maintain becomes oppressive to more and more people, primarily in the developing world. For every country, region, ethnic group, etc that finds itself on the losing end of the US-maintained world system, there is no appeal. If you attempt to oppose the US order, you face invasion, economic sanctions, sponsored coups and resistance, and denunciations at world government bodies. And with no other options, these people must see the US as their enemy #1. We aren’t likely to change willingly, so barring an external emergency, we are going to be seen as the worst thing since Hitler as long as we’re here.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  gilberts
July 8, 2018 12:24 am

a good portion of our 1990 s prosperity was because of reduced defense spending if i recall correctly-

gilberts
gilberts
  TampaRed
July 8, 2018 1:53 pm

As TimeLife used to say, Read the book. Geider makes some horrifying points about wasteful defense spending. For instance- after the Cold War was over, the US did not in any way change their defense spending plans. So, for instance, they built thousands of then-obsolete M60 tanks. Once production was complete, they had no use for them. They couldn’t sell them for their actual price, because nobody wanted to buy an old model tank, even if it was brand new. What could they do with them? Issue them to the Army? Use them for target practice? Scrap them for razor blades? Sell them at an immense loss to the terd world?
Their solution?
Throw the brand new tanks into the Gulf of Mexico as an artificial reef.

Geider discussed the massive WWII-era military plant system we maintain, or at least as of his publication in 1999. According to Geider, we have been paying to maintain an alternative manufacturing and storage system ever since WWII, just in case we need to ramp up military production some day. The plants and storehouses aren’t used for anything and are a massive burden, but we keep them just in case. Never mind none of the existing WWII-era plants would be able to help us today. Geider described a 1 (ONE) mile long warehouse in Texas, near Fort Hood, where they originally built bombers for WWII. This massive installation is (as of publication)/was used for manufacturing F16s for foreign export in one tiny lit bay in the cavernous empty warehouse. I believe he also pointed out our own Air Force needed F16 parts, but we weren’t making them anymore, just stuff for export.

David Stockman would argue with you about the source of the 90s prosperity. He would tell you it was a bait-and-switch economy with the appearance of success, but it was primarily fueled with debt and the results of which we are still suffering.

The Supposed Clinton Prosperity of the 1990s

Obama's boyfriend
Obama's boyfriend
  gilberts
July 8, 2018 11:58 pm

What a bunch of claptrap, the M-60 ended production in the early 1980s. It remains in active service and is highly sought after today by foreign militaries because of its ability to be upgraded. But let’s not look or acknowledge reality when fiction and fantasy serves the argument, eh wot?

Let us also make the ridiculous argument that it is wasteful to maintain stockpiles of spare parts. Yup in an emergency its so simply to ramp up production. In the meantime you just sacrifice hundreds of thousands of your troops because you aren’t repared-its something our liberals are always guilty of. Just look at what Carter, Clinton and Obama have done to the military.

Hey skippy, tell us about your long military experience. Inquiring minds want to know what a seasoned veteran such as yourself has seen while in the military.

By the way is it true your draft rating is 4HC-you’re drafted 4 people after Hiladbeast Clinton?

What a sad joke.

Grizzly Bare
Grizzly Bare
July 8, 2018 1:12 am

I think that just about everyone commenting at this blog sees collectivism as destructive to prosperity, liberty and individual rights. I think we can all agree that it is economically counter-productive and tyrannical. Where we may have disagreement is how best to deal with it. I might be reading what is being said here the wrong way, but it would seem that some of y’all would like to start killing folks who hold a leftist viewpoint.

Pyrrhus says, “If you don’t eliminate the communists, it will end in the destruction of your country and mass executions, as we have seen before.” That’s hard to argue with. There is truth in it, but it begs questions. Lots of questions. How do you define what is a communist? What evidence will you go on in deciding who is a communist? How do you eliminate them? If we can justify eliminating people because they are communists, how far of a stretch is it to justify eliminating other people for other beliefs? What if the neighbor you feud with and who covets your property turns you in for being a communist? It’s your word against his. There were 65 million people who voted for Hillary in 2016. Do we eliminate all of them? If not all of them, then which ones? How will it be decided which ones get eliminated and which ones don’t? Who will be doing the deciding? What about the millions of people who would have voted for Hillary, but couldn’t or didn’t show up? We could be talking numbers that start to compete with Uncle Joe here. That’s a lot of blood to spill.

Gilberts says, “Our fatal weakness is we trust people in our system to play by the rules and we hold ourselves to our rules, even when others don’t follow them. Communism should be stomped out with force anywhere it raises its head, because as a movement, it seeks to destroy the states that harbor it.” He goes on to say, “Communism is a direct threat to any otherwise open state, like ours, and should be crushed at all costs for the preservation of that state.” Again, that’s hard to argue with. There is truth in that as well. The problem I have with it is the rules that he is talking about. Things that make us civilized people like laws against murder, rape, theft and arson. Things our founders enumerated in the constitution and particularly in the bill of rights. Things like the right to free speech, the right to defend yourself, the right to freedom of assembly. The right to freedom of and from religion. The right to a trial by your peers. Being secure in your house and papers. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Can we selectively enforce those rules and selectively grant those rights? Do we criminalize certain beliefs and sentence the holders of those beliefs to death? Or do we skip the pretense of criminalizing and sentencing and just resort to indiscriminate murder? What are the rules worth if they don’t apply to all of us? If we grant rights selectively, then they are no longer rights, they are privileges that can be revoked at any time, on any whim. If we go around killing all those we fear and with whom we disagree, what kind of a State will that be? Certainly not a State that has any kind of liberty. Something every bit as tyrannical as communism. That is a very slippery slope. When there is no one who will speak up to disagree for fear of being “eliminated”, is that what you really want? When you are done eliminating communists then what? Will you stop there or find another group that needs eliminating? It sounds a lot like witch burning.

When you start advocating for the death of fellow human beings as a solution to problems, the foundations of civilization begin to crumble. You are talking about tossing out the rule of law. You throw the baby out with the bath water.

gilberts
gilberts
  Grizzly Bare
July 8, 2018 2:33 pm

Like I said, that’s the fatal flaw. We want to believe we’re open and willing to talk to anyone and we’re free and whatnot, but if you really have no limits, the opportunists are going to exploit you. It’s the same problem with islam. Muslim weirdbeards come to the West, enjoy the freedoms it offers, while building their movement to infiltrate, overturn, subjugate, and destroy the West. Their imams are on record teaching them to consider themselves like soldiers trapped behind enemy lines when they’re in the West. As long as they aren’t directly caught breaking the law, they can work to undermine your system from every direction until it no longer functions or they’re numerically strong enough to rise up and take over. Look at London. From the bastion of Empire and fish-and-chips to weirdbeard Londonistan in pretty much 1 generation. Not one shot was fired. Not one battle was fought. It won’t be long before the ISIS black flag is flying in Britain and it will be their own fault.

The Communists have been similarly successful. Their best innovation was the Fabians who consciously worked towards revolution one small step at a time, leading to the disaster that is Britain today. It’s happening here, too, but we’ve fought back some. Not enough. They have been winning slowly, but gradually. You can see evidence of it in, for instance, our discussion of the Middle Class and our resentment of the Upper Class. Class is a Communist invention. You can see it in the existence of Social Security, which we borrowed from the Prussians, who created it as a freebie to stave off Communist revolution. You can see it in Obama’s “Share the Wealth” comment to Joe the Plumber. You can see it in the creation and continued existence of a National Labor Relations Board, which unconstitutionally attempts to control business. Not a legit govt power, just another attempt to stave off revolution. How about Labor Day? A federal holiday to honor “The Workers” only created to prevent Americans from celebrating May Day, the famous Communist Workers day, and yet another sop to the Communists to prevent revolution. How about national healthcare? How about the idea of compulsory public education? How about the idea you can have the govt seize a car company, fuck the shareholders, and bail out the union workers? Communism is on the rise in this country and it’s only the hardcore fringe right that has been resisting it since the 1960s after the media made it uncool to be suspicious of “Reds Under The Bed.” If you look it up, however, many of the people who were suspected of being Reds were, in fact, Reds.

So we face a viral infection. Our body politic is not used to this infection and its antibodies are not properly educated to identify the infection and not properly armed or tasked to root it out. While the infection is sort of covered by the law, that doesn’t make it right, nor does it help the body survive and thrive. What we need are antibodies trained and armed and educated to recognize the threat and tasked with stopping the infection by any means necessary. The body needs to be educated about the invader, too. And we need to use every means at our disposal to stop it before it kills the host.

We sleep peacefully at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf. It’s the sausage nobody wants to see being made. And it’s the necessary secret violence that must be committed so the Eloise can continue their day life, secure and ignorant about the reality of the threats in the dark.

Freedom is great, but it only works if everyone agrees they won’t wreck the system purposely to collapse it with the long-term goal of enslaving everyone else. That’s what the Communists are working towards and what we are too ignorant to see and resist. We’re only swatting at individual flies, individual criminal acts when we can, but never actually dealing with the threat.

After almost 200 years of counter-revolution, they’ve learned how to be sneaky and use the system’s laws against itself. It doesn’t make the system safer if the violent revolutionary movement has temporarily stopped using violence, but is still pursuing its revolution. I believe the Constitution should not be used to protect their freedom of speech, because their goal is to tear up the Constitution and eliminate that speech. Since their stated goals are world revolution, the only response can be world counter-revolution. If we can’t get the rest of the world to join us in that goal, at least we can pursue it here within our borders.

What I think we need to do is honestly discuss the threat, face its never-ending goal of world conquest honestly, and make it a crime to support it, promote it, teach it, aid it, or fight for it. Pursue it in all its forms everywhere possible and shame, shun, try and jail, exile, and even kill its adherents.

Again, they only succeed because we allow them to temporarily clothe themselves in the same banner of freedom we fly, but their goals, as they state again and again, are to destroy our nation. Red Pride World Wide. With goals like that, I think we can safely mark them enemies. It may not seem like it, but the Red trials of the 1950s were actually a success. If you read the KGB’s files, you learn they terminated all operations in the US for some time and did not re-contact their existing spy networks for years, due to the heat. The true believers were compelled to either disavow their own movement, plead the 5th, which only made them look guilty, confess, or perjure themselves in the face of often overwhelming evidence. Some even fled to Canada.

This crusade would be a hard sell to much of the country, since much of the country is politically ignorant and has been propagandized by the red media most of their lives, and de-educated by same to sit passively in front of the TV. They’ve been fractured racially and socially, again by the media and the leftist politicians. And the Reds control nearly all our educational institutions, from which they promote this stuff for a guaranteed can’t-fire-me paycheck. So it would be a very hard uphill battle. Much of this battle would have to be fought in the shadows by intelligence agencies, since you can’t afford to let the public in on it too much up front. And the bulk of the battle would be fighting the reds in the culture with education and discussions of the threat, much like we did in the 1950s with those educational films.

Otherwise, we’re going to have to wait for the Reds to succeed in toppling the system and fight them for it afterwards. Looking at the world today, I think we’re going to be fighting in the streets over the issue.

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
July 8, 2018 9:36 am

Grizzly,
I get it but, unfortunately, this is the ONLY way to deal with Communists, as the American people will soon find out.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Southern Sage
July 8, 2018 12:52 pm

imo,in the short term it will take at least some violence to regain control of our society–
that is because leftists & statists will not accept the results of elections and also because they use the law to their own advantage–
in the long run,about which i am very pessimistic,we have to regain control of the education system and popular culture–i believe history will show you that it is hard to put the genie back into the bottle w/o either violence or a great religious awakening–
i grew up in a rural part in this county & the county maintenance barn was around the corner from where we lived–
every summer they would hire 10 schoolboys to do grunt work that the full timers were always behind on such as cleaning ditches,scooping out culverts,etc.–
the summer i turned 16,1974,i got on there–
part of the pre employment paperwork was signing a paper that stated i was not a communist,had never been one,etc.–
i wonder if employees still have to sign those today?