Some 600 Detained Migrants Are Pregnant, Will Bear Citizen Children

Guest Post by Joe Guzzardi

In as troubling an immigration story as anyone will read this summer, between December 2017 and April 2018, U.S. Border Patrol and other immigration officials detained nearly 600 pregnant illegal aliens. All hope to give birth to children who will automatically be granted the world’s most coveted and cherished prize, United States citizenship.

Atop most analysts’ immigration grievance lists would be anchor baby citizenship, the process through which any child born on U.S. soil automatically receives U.S. citizenship. Over the decades that birthright citizenship has been adopted as common practice, even though the Supreme Court has never ruled on its legitimacy, tens of thousands of new American citizens have been born.

The birth tourism industry adds another ugly layer to the citizenship scam. The infants’ mothers, several months pregnant, enter the U.S. legally, but deceitfully, on a temporary tourist visa. Along the way, they lie to immigration officials about the true purpose of their travel which is not to go mall shopping as they claim. Instead, their travel goal is, specifically and excluding all else, to give birth to a U.S. citizen child.

Lying to immigration officials, called willful misrepresentation, and falsifying facts on an immigration document are crimes that can result in inadmissibility and being banned from the U.S. for up to 10 years. They may carry financial penalties too. The mothers and their spouses who fund the extravagant journey, mostly from China to California, show contempt for U.S. law.

But since birth tourism abuses are rarely prosecuted, foreign nationals continue to arrive with impunity. Maybe a gullible Congress has applied the “Keep Families Together” mantra to birth tourism, a troubling but not farfetched probability. Over the last several Congresses, numerous well-intended bills have been drafted which would require that for a newborn to become a citizen at least one parent must be a citizen, a lawful permanent resident or a military enrollee. The bills received little floor debate and only a handful of votes.

The dire consequences of Congress’ winking at anchor baby citizenship grow graver daily. According to the Congressional Budget Office, and based on data compiled from the Department of Homeland Security and other immigration offices, it estimates that about 4.5 million U.S. citizens, anchor babies, under the age of 18 have at least one inadmissible or deportable parent.

The 4.5 million anchor babies estimate exceeds the four million American children born every year. In the next decade, the CBO projects that there will be at least another 600,000 anchor babies, which would put the anchor baby population on track to exceed annual American births – assuming a stable U.S. birthrate – by more than one million anchor babies. Birthright citizenship is a huge illegal immigration lure.

Furthermore, CBO’s projection excludes the likely millions of anchor babies over the age of 18, and anchor babies living overseas with their deported foreign parents, but who nevertheless retain U.S. citizenship.

Even retired Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) recognized the ruinous anchor baby effect. In 1993, Reid, then a bastion of immigration enforcement, said about birthright citizenship: “No sane country would do that….you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship, and guarantee full access to all public and social services this society provides – and that’s a lot of services.”

An immigration do-nothing Congress lets the anchor baby abuse roll on even though demographers predict that it, along with legal immigration and immigrants’ children, will add 103 million to the U.S. population from 2015 to 2065.

Disregarding the anchor baby folly only increases the problem’s magnitude, and will lead to yet more unsustainable population growth.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Dutchman
Dutchman
July 23, 2018 8:02 pm

Ship them back – pronto!

Cranford Ducain
Cranford Ducain
  Dutchman
July 26, 2018 7:44 am

when you put them on a bus, give me a call. If you need some money for gas, just let me know. I will be happy to kick in a couple of hundred to help a good cause.

KaD
KaD
July 23, 2018 8:02 pm

I dispute that claim. Being a naturalized citizen is not only based on being born on US soil but being SUBJECT TO US LAW. If these people broke the law to be here then no one can honestly believe these people think themselves subject to US law, and neither their offspring.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  KaD
July 24, 2018 7:36 am

Being born on US soil doesn’t require naturalization to become a citizen, being born of foreign soil does.

https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-naturalization

Cranford Ducain
Cranford Ducain
  Anonymous
July 26, 2018 7:47 am

Oh! Naturalization. You mean like Ted Cruz never did, even though he was born in Canada, before becoming a U S Senator ???

Old 1811
Old 1811
  Cranford Ducain
July 26, 2018 9:55 pm

There are three ways a person born abroad can be or become a U.S. citizen. The most common is naturalization, where the person comes to the U.S. as an alien, becomes a lawful permanent resident, and subsequently is sworn in as a U.S. citizen. The second way is to “acquire” U.S. citizenship, which a minor lawful permanent resident does when his parents naturalize. The third way is to “derive” citizenship. A person born to two U.S. citizens outside the United States “derives” U.S. citizenship if both U.S. citizen parents meet certain requirements regarding time and age of residency in the United States. (The exact requirements are determined by the law at the time of the person’s birth. The law has changed several times in the past 50 or so years.)
Ted Cruz derived citizenship from his U.S. citizen parents, so he was a U.S. citizen at birth.

Old 1811
Old 1811
  KaD
July 24, 2018 7:43 pm

Illegal aliens ARE subject to U.S. law. If they weren’t, they couldn’t be arrested and tried for crimes in the U.S. The only persons present in the U.S. who are not subject to U.S. law are foreign diplomats with diplomatic immunity. Whether or not their illegal entry ( and half of them entered the U.S. legally) makes illegal aliens (or you) think they’re not under U.S. jurisdiction, they are.

Sink
Sink
  KaD
July 26, 2018 8:05 am

Agree. Congress must make this clear

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 23, 2018 8:38 pm

Time to get real and deal with this kind of BS! Things are getting more “FUZZED” up everyday!

bluestem
bluestem
July 23, 2018 8:39 pm

The law needs to be abolished. John

Anonymous
Anonymous
  bluestem
July 24, 2018 7:38 am

Try telling that to Congress.

Or the Courts.

You’ll get the same result in either of them – no result at all.

Todd H.
Todd H.
July 23, 2018 9:50 pm

Well, this is an interpretation of the law, but not the law per se. I expect that this will be ruled on by the Supreme Court once the great RBG has retired or expired. Citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. to a mother illegally present in the U.S. will no longer be granted and those that already have it will have theirs revoked. Count on it.

IluvCO2
IluvCO2
  Todd H.
July 23, 2018 10:31 pm

Let’s hope Todd, do you have some insight?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Todd H.
July 24, 2018 7:40 am

A citizen by birthright, no matter the reason for it, cannot be revoked. They have the same citizenship status as you do (if you claim to be one because you were born here).

Old 1811
Old 1811
  Todd H.
July 24, 2018 5:38 pm

Hate to break it to ya, but “birthright citizenship” is enshrined in the Constitution. The 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside . . . ”
The only persons present in the United States who are not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are foreign diplomats. The only persons who could be “born . . . in the United States” and not subject to U.S. jurisdiction are the products of two alien parents who are born in a foreign embassy, or on a foreign warship in U.S. waters, or some other ridiculously unlikely scenario. And after birth, if they leave the embassy or the foreign warship, they are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, as long as they’re not covered by their parents’ diplomatic immunity. (But since they weren’t subject to U.S. jurisdiction at birth, they wouldn’t be U.S. citizens.) So changing the law is going to take a lot more than a Supreme Court decision.

John
John
July 23, 2018 11:52 pm

Find a photo that actually matches the subject. Here are a couple to choose from:
comment image
comment image

Dr. Doom
Dr. Doom
July 24, 2018 1:29 am

All these smug fools and their angry smirks should now ask themselves this simple question. Who will care about those phony baloney papers when this failed state falls down? If overthrown, these foreigners face a bleak fate. If collapse comes their only path is to run back where they came from, I’d expect. What will they get if the whites are gone? Chains? Food? Or perhaps starvation.
What is legal in a failed state that has no rule of law? Replaced by another, those papers are worthless unless renewed. One contract need not replace another with any sort of continuity.
Whites need not this dead weight. They didn’t ask, or even consent. It was done as trickery and by force. Those papers may be uncomfortable toilet paper after the House of Cards falls down…

Bob P
Bob P
July 24, 2018 8:53 am

How do we know some of these children might not grow up to contribute something incredible to our society? Just consider all the valuable inventions that’ve come out of Mexico. There’s, um, Margaritas, and uh, that thing at parties that kids smash to get candy. And just think of all those classic Mexican novels, such as . . . There must be one. Look at how many Mexicans and South Americans have won Nobel Prizes in the sciences . . . uh, never mind. Send them back.

IluvCO2
IluvCO2
  Bob P
July 24, 2018 9:12 am

but but but, they are all future valedictorians.

whofa king
whofa king
  IluvCO2
July 24, 2018 2:17 pm

Waycis’ Trump is keeping them from being Nobel Prize winners.

Dutchman
Dutchman
  Bob P
July 24, 2018 9:45 am

Bob: You forgot refried beans / tacos / Donkey shows at Tijuana – all solid contributions to the world.

o
o
July 24, 2018 12:00 pm

Suicide of a culture. It reflects the minds of Boobus Americanus.

Natural Born US Citizen
Natural Born US Citizen
July 24, 2018 1:03 pm

Hold them in Gitmo. Not US soil, no birthright citizenship. Or on ships at sea, or seize some Mexican territory and set up a temporary camp there.

Build the fucking wall.

Monica Bey
Monica Bey
July 25, 2018 5:24 am

Insight into misinterpretation of 14th Amendment with Dr. John Eastman, Dean of Chapman University School of Law: