The Evils of the Automatic

Guest Post by Eric Peters

It’s easy to get suckered by the convenient. We’re all susceptible. It is human nature to take the path of least resistance.

This is the nature of the subtle evil that is the automatic transmission.

It has taken most of the effort out of driving. In particular, out of learning how to drive. Accordingly, most people never do learn. They know how to push the start button and pull a lever from Park to Drive, of course. But that is not what I mean

It has ruined the art of driving.

And it is an art.

Or, was.

Well, a skill at least.

Before the automatic came along in the ’40s, brought to us by GM through its Oldsmobile division, driving a car required more talent than being able to open and close a door, sit down – and push on two pedals.

There was a third pedal – the clutch pedal. When it was out, the engine was directly connected to the transmission, which was directly transmitting the engine’s power to the driven wheels via the driveshaft. If the driver did not push the clutch pedal in as the car rolled to a stop, the car would buck and finally, stall out – because the engine could not turn the pavement (or the Earth to which it was attached).

To resume forward motion, the driver had to gradually let out the clutch while simultaneously easing into the gas pedal – allowing just enough enough slippage to avoid (once again) stalling out the car. It took a bit of practice to master this delicate balance – to be able to do it smoothly. It was a right of passage, something almost every aspiring teenage driver had to learn.

Clutching was just the beginning. There was also shifting.

Before the advent of synchronizers in the transmission, one had to time one’s shifts just so – matching engine speed to road speed. It was necessary to choreograph this delicate ballet yourself. If you failed to do so, the result was a a hideous grinding of the gears and general embarrassment, especially if you were a man and had a woman along for the ride.

Now combine the two, clutch – and shift.

A driver had to learn how to engage and disengage the clutch – smoothly. Those who rode the clutch kept it partially engaged, allowing excess slippage and quickly burned up the clutch. Those who engaged it too soon or too abruptly made the car buck like a bronco – annoying passengers and (eventually) breaking something else.

The driver also had to know when (and how) to shift the transmission into the appropriate gear for road speed and load. He had to know when to upshift – and when to downshift – in order to avoid either over-speeding or lugging the engine – either of which could result in a hurt engine.

It was about being in tune with the mechanical goings-on as well as skill. The driver had to pay attention. How else to know what gear you happened to be in? When it was time to shift?

Which gear to shift into?

No one else was going to do it for you. And if you didn’t do it, there would be consequences. Immediate, real – tangible. The car would bog. Or stall out, roll back – and into the car behind you.

In a manual-equipped car, it’s harder to be vacuous, a meatsack behind the wheel. You’re compelled to participate. You have no real choice but to observe the progression of traffic signals, in order to anticipate what’s likely to happen next.

The change from red to green, the ebb and flow of traffic.

The wheels (in your head) turn. It’s necessary to focus on your environment, what’s going on around you. To be ready – and to know what to do. If you need to slow down quickly it will be necessary to do more than stomp on just the brake pedal.

Not that you couldn’t also have a conversation with your passenger at the same time. Certainly. But it was secondary to the task at hand. In the Age of the Clutch, it was less common for people to space out at red lights or in traffic, as is common today. Some did – but not for long. The situation would not indulge it.

This made for better drivers because they were necessarily more attentive and involved drivers – as well as more skilled drivers.

Automatics have greatly eroded all of that, given us Meatsack Culture.

They are like high fructose corn syrup, fluoride and other soporifics. They induce and encourage inattentiveness and passivity. Staring off into space. Wondering about what’s for dinner. Playing with the GPS. Sending texts.

The automatic-equipped modern car pretty much drives itself. Very little is expected of the Dunsel behind the wheel – and not surprisingly – not much is given. As automatic-equipped cars became dominant and manual cars a relative rarity – and people could “learn to drive” and get a driver’s license without ever touching a clutch – real skill behind the wheel ebbed, for the simple reason that it was no longer required or even expected.

The bar had been lowered.

Driving is serious business. It’s not for everyone. The introduction of the automatic served as a kind of affirmative action for driving, enabling those who couldn’t make the grade to get behind the wheel.

Which is why there are so many terrible drivers out there.

Automatics are not per se evil. But they have had evil effect. Maybe it amounts to the same thing, ultimately.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
August 5, 2018 9:25 am

I was a gear head back when the Beach Boys ruled the roost and a muscle car without a 4 speed Hurst was a unimaginable. Now I have an A6 and I love the paddle shifters. I use them to downshift to slow down instead of heavy breaking and grabbing a gear for more torque passing another vehicle. I don’t miss the clutch except for nostalgia-like those daily morning erections.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 5, 2018 9:25 am

Most drivers today don’t even know how to double clutch an unsyncronized transmission to shift it smoothly, or even worse, know how to start a car with a crank instead of a start button.

Grog
Grog
  Anonymous
August 6, 2018 1:21 am

I start my car everyday with a crank.

She sits in the right seat.

Peter Bowman
Peter Bowman
August 5, 2018 9:34 am

The rise of the automatic transmission mirrors our society; we’ve become lazy and shiftless.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Peter Bowman
August 5, 2018 10:51 am

I think something similar was said during the days of the Model T replacing horses and buggies.

Over time, most man made things improve.

Unfortunately, men don’t.

unit472/
unit472/
August 5, 2018 11:09 am

Hard to get a manual transmission these days. I bought a Mazda Miata in 2011 and had to request a manual transmission as most of the dealers stock were autos. Why anyone would want a ‘sports car’ with an automatic was a mystery to me. Now if I was still living in San Francisco with its steep hills a manual transmission might be a bit of a problem particularly if there was a stop sign every block and you had to heel toe the brake and accelerator to get going on the hill.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 5, 2018 12:05 pm

“Now if I was still living in San Francisco…”I would sell and GTFO.

Dave
Dave
August 5, 2018 12:06 pm

My first car was a stick shift 48 Chevy. During my first 35 years of marriage, I drove stick shifts so none of my kids or my wife could use my car.

NoneYaBiz
NoneYaBiz
  Dave
August 5, 2018 1:34 pm

Stick shifts are great anti-theft devices! 🙂

overthecliff
overthecliff
August 5, 2018 1:44 pm

My daughters now in their 40’s were not allowed to drive on their own until they mastered driving 1980 Bronco with 4 speed granny transmission. They also had to show me that they could change a flat tire. It didn’t hurt them.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 5, 2018 1:59 pm

By purchasing a 2005 stick shift Camry (yeah, I didn’t know they made them either until I saw one at the dealership), I got a car that was nearly 100% Japanese, and was not impacted by ANY of the dozens upon dozens of recalls from Toyota over the past decade or so. Plus, the dindoos and others are way to ignorant to steal it…even for parts.

Per/Norway
Per/Norway
August 5, 2018 2:08 pm

luckily automatic gears never was a hit up here in “socialist heaven”, even now most cars have manual gears up here… i have only driven auto once in my entire life tbh,(42) and that was just bc i got a 1993 Dodge Grand Caravan LE 3.3L with auto gear instead of some money a guy owned me.. i agree with the author completely on this.

Tennessee Budd
Tennessee Budd
August 5, 2018 10:08 pm

My folks taught me to drive on a manual. The logic was that if you could drive a stick shift, an automatic would be simple. I did the same with my kids–and, like overthecliff, they had to be able to change a tire (and jump-start a car with a dead battery).
By the way, Eric, it’s “rite of passage”. Back when we had clutches, we also spelled correctly & proofread what we wrote.

C1ue
C1ue
August 6, 2018 9:05 am

Meh.
Good old days of manual transmissions. Let’s also get back to the good old days of 5 mpg.
Not.
The performance aspect is also plain wrong. While you can shift gears faster with a clutch, you can’t control engine performance better than a computer. And if you’re already using a computer to control performance, why not the gearing too?

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
August 6, 2018 11:15 am

Can’t get my ex-urban wife to learn to drive a standard; she can’t drive my truck or tractor; she can’t even row a boat straight. What’s she going to do if I keel over in my truck, boat, small plane, or she has to run this farm? How come they are our better half?