Cruelty Legitimized. NYT Hires from Caligula’s Basement. Applicants Must Supply Own Pliers

Guest Post by Fred Reed

By now I suppose that everybody and his dog knows (well, actually, I haven’t asked my dog) that the New York Times has hired, and defended, one Sarah Jeong, an avowedly racist, sexist, mouthy, and apparently kinky twitess as tech writer. “Kinky” is the polite term for people who enjoy cruelty. Which, she says, she does. Anyhow, among her eructations:

“Dumbass f****** white people marking up the internet like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”

And:

“Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men.”

Wow! What are her rates, I wonder? Does guttersnipe language cost more? She is right, though, it is at least kind of sick. And astonishing that the Times would be so candid about its politics by hiring her. Even David Duke has never said that he wanted to hurt  blacks. Sez me, the foul-mouthed little monster doesn’t need a job. She needs a psychiatrist or an internship with Gina Haspel. Or a spanking.

Ever genteel, Sarah also opined, “White men are bullshit.” The latter is boilerplate Left, the normal yowling of the sexually disturbed and racially hostile. Sarah is not exactly an argument for diversity and makes white nationalism look reasonable.

If in my newspapering days I had written, “Gook women are bullshit”–unlikely since, when I lived in various Asian countries, I really liked the women, as white men usually do–I would have been fired.  The Times is perfectly happy with her though. Different rules for different people.

But suppose that  she had said, “black men are bullshit,” or that she “enjoyed hurting old Jewish men” (presumably not a career-enhancing move at a Jewish paper). She would have been hove out the door on her delicate round sit-down, thump, the door perhaps not having been opened beforehand  Which would make sense. When you live in a country where everyone hates everybody else like poison, arguably a newspaper should not publish name-calling likely to inflame the hatreds for no reason. Or, worse, take sides with some groups against others. Which the Times did: Enjoying the suffering of whites is fine.

So why did the Times, the national school marm, bloated with  goodness, give her a pass? Me, I figure it’s because  she is a protected twofer, a feminist, and “of color.” (Every time I see that phrase, I want to load my Strunk and White with hollow point and let fly, but never mind.) I guess that if she were found to be grinding white orphans into dog food, the Times would say something about her legacy of colonialism and how getting a job at the Times showed discrimination against women and that she was oppressed and making a political statement and anyway it was only a few orphans. Well, unless they were orphans of color. That would be genocide.

I believe I might say to her as follows regarding old white  men:, which I happen to be one of:

Now see here, Sweet Potato. I’ve got nothing against bile and bitchiness and bad manners and ill-breeding, though I suspect they could be cured by application of a baseball bat. Maybe you should see somebody about this. Sort of, you know, therapy. I understand that we can’t all be ladies (though I get the impression that a lot of  men in New York are), and feminists traditionally have the the appeal of the underside of a theater seat. This is usual and as the Good Lord intended.  I cannot complain. What bothers me, Sweet Pea, is your lack of gratitude.

Look around you, Thistle Down. Take your time. Get some binoculars and look out the window. Unscrew the lid on your computer, if you can find a screwdriver with the instructions on the handle. Contemplate at leisure. Reflect. And tell me:

Do you see anything invented by a Korean feminist?

Now, Buckwheat, I don’t want to seem other than gallant and gracious. That’s just how I am. Urbane and mannered. No one can doubt it. So I would never suggest–even think of suggesting–that old white men have provided everything that keeps you fed and comfortable while you piss and moan.

I would never say that. My mother taught me to be considerate to women, or approximations. But in a minor vein–a capillary, so to speak–I will note that if it weren’t for us old white men, vile though we be, and patriarchal, and probably cannibals, you and the sisterhood would be in grass huts, picking lice out of each other’s hair.

You are welcome.

Further,  Moonflower, if I were a curmudgeon–which I assuredly am not–I might say rude, uncouth things such as that you seem to be a confection of mass-market drivel, elegant as a truss ad, and could be replaced by a DO-loop .This is true, but I won’t say it. It wouldn’t be gentlemanly.

But just out of curiosity: Have you ever flushed a toilet in plumbing that was not designed, built, and maintained by men? Been in a building that wasn’t built by men? Yes,  yes, we guys are a sorry lot, and dim, and sinners all, but when your car makes a funny  sort of,  you know, chinalank and then a grinding noise, and the light on the thingamajig starts flashing, who do you take it too? Gloria Steinem?

Just asking.

What I think, Maple Syrup, is live and let live. There’s a place in this big world for everybody. This may be a design flaw, but it is what we have.  Since consistency is a virtue, the New York Times would seem about right for you. Soul mates, sort of. Still, since you are a tech writer, I wonder what, without the inventions of men, mostly white, you would have to write about? Buffalo hides? Pointed sticks?

But here we come to deep philosophical waters, specifically relations between the sexes. The truth is that most men like women. You may find this offensive, but I assure you that it is true. I hope you will not hold this affection against us. Our mothers were women. Also our sisters, wives, grandmothers, daughters and girlfriends. We even have female friends. We think women are peaches, often being smart and funny and feminine–I’m sure the Times has an online dictionary–and really good at neat stuff like biochemistry. There are no substitutes. Most women are slightly crazy, yes, but then they don’t get into bar fights.

So, Marmalade, when we run into what seems to be a woman but with the personality of a menopausing rattlesnake, we are taken aback. It jangles our neves because it isn’t what we are used to, or weren’t until recently, and we don’t know what to do. Remedial drowning comes to mind. Often, though, we are not near a body of water. (Why am I thinking of the East River?)

Tell you what, Sugar Beet, I just don’t know what to think. I live in Mexico, which is sexually dimorphic, so you can understand my confusion in the  US. Here women manage to do things without becoming venomous. Up North, I guess, this would be a whole new idea.  Mexicanas  go into law, medicine, dentistry in volume–it is hard to find a male dentist, here assuming one had a reason for looking–and nobody seems to give a damn.

These women are civil, (try the dictionary again), good at what they do, and of exceedingly muted crocodilian impulses. (My theory is that Mexicans have never interbred with reptiles and so do not act like them. No year of the Dragon and all that.) When a Mexican woman becomes a doctor, she thinks she is a Mexican doctor. She is not full of snot and bile and racial animosity and misandry and kinky urges. You, Sweet Pea, are. That the New York Times fronts for you says something about how far gone the US is.

16
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Bob P
Bob P

Excellent, well-written, witty article.

Yes, men, white men, in fact, did invent the airplane, the phone, the printing press, electricity, antibiotics, television, the computer, the world wide web–pretty much everything useful–but a woman invented liquid paper. So let’s give credit where it is due.

Anonymous
Anonymous

No they did not invent liquid paper, but they can be taught to use liquid paper in some cases. Most, unfortunately, seem to be unable to use it correctly and make a mess of whatever they are trying to correct. You would think that they would be better at it as they seem to be able to paint their nails with all kinds of different colors. I guess they don’t see that painting a nail and painting a computer screen are basically the same skill.

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles

The mother of one of the Monkees (the one with the hat) invented Liquid Paper and made a pretty penny off of it.

“While continuing to work as a secretary, she educated herself in business methods, promotion, and research until she was satisfied that the product she had developed was really worthwhile. She then offered Mistake Out to IBM which turned it down.

“Over the next twenty five years she and a select group of executives would build the Liquid Paper Corporation into a multimillion dollar international company which she finally sold to Gillette in 1980 for $48 million USD.”

Mike Nesmith Of The Monkees Mother Invented Liquid Paper

Joe Fahy
Joe Fahy

Mr. Reed,

Outstanding!

Thank you,

Joe

Gloriuosly Deplorable Paul
Gloriuosly Deplorable Paul

Fred pisses me off regularly, but this missive is spot on.
Well done, Mr. Reed

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

I keep waiting to hear Camille Paglia’s take on Sarah Jeong, but I guess the latter doesn’t deserve the former’s attention.

Morongobill
Morongobill

Perhaps an old white sugar daddy cut her off, got to be a reason for such bile.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421

The funny part is the fact that if she pulled that crap against some other races there would be bullet holes or bombs going off around her. But that’s one of those things that just doesnt compute for someone like her.

NoneYaBiz
NoneYaBiz

Candace Owen did exactly that! She took some of the white hate tweets made by feckless cunt Jeong and changed all the references from white to black and/or jewish and was immediately banned from twitter.

Note: Jeong’s hate against white people/men filled crap is still on posted to her account on twitter.

Additionally, it seems she wrote hate filled screed against the NYT! You can’t make this stuff up! Bash a future employer and get hired! What a formula!

overthecliff
overthecliff

What Deplorable Paul said.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED

Ever notice that women like the miscreant are women that you’d never want to fuck ?

Mike
Mike

“… application of a baseball bat …” ??? 🙂 How about a prolonged and repeated dance with a riding crop. – every square inch? So that bat doesn’t slip over the line. She can’t suffer when she’s dead.

“… grass huts …” WTF? On that survivors show, the (allegedly adventurous) chix never even got THAT far.

“ … interbred with reptiles …” 🙂 🙂 Three hits! Someone homer him in!

I almost smile as I visualize the OLD WHITE MEN who hire the editorial board, cringing in supplication under the boot of (the Star Wars) Emperor Palpatine, or Soros – who, grinning with sadistic glee – sez: “We got pictures of you naked with a little boy and pronging a puppy. What would your advertisers – f**k the readers – think?”

I’m glad they hired her – we get a glimpse into their very souls.

Hopefully, this is offensive enough to the high level alpha male wannabes on Wall Street that they whisper to their friends in industry to stop advertising with Slim’s Times. It would make me smile for days to see the story of the New York Banner in The Fountainhead re-enacted in real life.

Unlike Fred, I implore “Please, Please, Please! Keep talking!”

And all you Allahu Akhbars out there? Put her picture on your phone. And text it to all your friends. Then grow a couple. She HATES you too, she will not submit to Allah or Sharia, probably eats pork, so she may be lotsa fun. Social JustUs.

JC
JC

Nice to see Fred back on point after the last few “misfires”. YMMV

Taras 77
Taras 77

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-05/armed-bystander-takes-down-gunman-childrens-event
Check out the size of most of the women at this event: 300-350 lbs is the norm.

The us is so totally screwed.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading