If This Chart Doesn’t Scare You Out Of Stocks, Nothing Will

Authored by Sue Chang via MarketWatch.com,

A lot has changed since the stock market crash of 2000. Apple Inc. has gone from being just another computer brand to becoming the most valuable company in the world, Amazon.com Inc. went from being an e-book retailer to a byword for online shopping and Tesla’s Elon Musk has risen from obscurity to Twitter stardom.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/MW-GO005_scared_20180808145310_MG.jpg?itok=mGSKlYrj

Too scary for words

Yet some things never change and Doug Ramsey, chief investment officer at Leuthold Group, has been on a mini-campaign highlighting the parallels between 2000 and 2018.

Among the numerous similarities is the elevated valuation of the S&P 500 then and now, which Ramsey illustrates in a chart that he has dubbed as the “scariest chart in our database.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/MW-GO007_Leutho_20180808145701_NS.jpg?itok=1tqDQ0qG

Leuthold Group

“Recall that the initial visit to present levels was followed by the S&P 500’s first-ever negative total return decade,” he said in a recent blog post.

Price-to-sales ratio is one measure of a stocks value. It isn’t as popular as the price-to-earnings ratio, or P/E, but is viewed as less susceptible to manipulation since it is based on revenue.

He also shared a chart which he claims is “unfit for a family-friendly publication” that shows how in terms of median price to sales ratio, the S&P 500 is twice as expensive as it was in 2000.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/MW-GO008_Leutho_20180808145702_NS.jpg?itok=TaA5I78-

Leuthold Group

“Overvaluation in 2000 was highly concentrated; today it is pervasive, with the median S&P 500 Price/Sales ratio of 2.63 times more than double the 1.23 times prevailing in February 2000.

In a follow-up post, he then reiterates how 2018 is starting to increasingly look like 2000.

“The statistical similarities between the two bulls are on the rise, and the wonderment surrounding the disruptive technology of today’s market leaders seems to have swelled to maybe 1998-ish levels,” he writes.

That upward trajectory of the market isn’t sustainable, he warns. Ramsey admits that history isn’t the best guide for the future but the S&P 500’s performance since it touched its peak on Jan. 26 is closely mirroring what happened 18 years ago.

“In the earlier case, a volatile five-month upswing that began in mid-April ultimately fell just a half-percent short of the March 24th high by early September. This year, a similarly choppy, six-month rebound has taken the S&P 500 to within 1% of its January 26th high,” Ramsey said.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/MW-GO012_Leutho_20180808150901_NS.png?itok=bph-k-6p

Leuthold Group

There are other resemblances such as healthy breadth as denoted by the uptrend in the daily NYSE Advance/Decline Line while corporate profits, measured by Leuthold’s internal earnings indicator, are extremely robust, according to Ramsey.

But even without 2018 mimicking 2000, the persistent trade clash between the U.S. and its trading partners that in the worst case scenario could derail global trade looms as a huge threat to stocks.

China is expected to levy tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods if the Trump administration proceeds with its plan to impose 25% tariffs on $16 billion in Chinese imports later this month.

On Aug. 22, the market will officially become the longest bull market in history. Coincidentally, the previous titleholder is the decade-long one that gave up the ghost when the tech bubble burst in 2000.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Hollywood Rob
Hollywood Rob
August 9, 2018 11:30 am

Looks like 4chan has decided to come for TBP.

Rather, Not
Rather, Not
August 9, 2018 2:58 pm

Simple iterative prisoners dilemma problem. Two parties can each choose ‘Free Trade’ (F:little to no tariff and non-tariff barrier to imports, no subsidies to exports) or ‘Mercantilist’ (M: high tariff/non-tariff barriers to imports, subsidies to exports).

The payoff diagram is (0,0) for (M,M): No value creation.
(+5,+5) for (F,F): Best Global answer, creation of 10 value, balanced benefits
(+7, -2) for (M,F): 5 Value creation: imbalanced benefits
(-2, +7) for (F,M): 5 Value creation: imbalanced benefits

For the last 50 iterations (years), you have chosen F, the other party has chosen M. The other party is quite happy with maintaining the status quo of they get +7, you get -2 every year/iteration.

What do you say prior to, or do (no communication version) in the upcoming iteration?

Anyone who answers that honestly will understand Trump’s trade messaging, and policy if that message is disbelieved/disregarded.

Econman
Econman
August 10, 2018 11:34 pm

The difference is, now we have a coordinated effort by central banks around the world to levitate the US stock market and other markets. Everyone counterfeiting $ and spending it on each others’ stocks (& bonds).

Who knows how long this scam can work? World economies may blow up and stocks still keep rising as the computer algos stay plugged in.