Bill Barr Is Wrong On Assange

Guest Post by Jonathan Turley

undefined

Bill Barr has been (in my opinion) wrongly attacked for many of his actions with regard to the Special Counsel Report. Indeed, I defended his decisions in print and I testified in favor of his confirmation. I still believe that he is an excellent choice for Attorney General. However, on the charges against Julian Assange, he is wrong. Dead wrong. As I stated in a recent column, the use of the Espionage Act strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Now, the Washington Post is reporting that two prosecutors involved in the Wikileaks case argued against the new charges.

The Washington Post reported Friday, prosecutors objected that the charges “posed serious risks for First Amendment protections.” They were of course correct. It is reassuring that some of the prosecutors saw the dangers and raised their voices in opposition. However, the decision (presumably by Barr) to move forward has created a genuine legal crisis for the press freedom in the United States.

What is troubling is that the Obama Administration appears to have rejected this course. However, in 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions reportedly pushed the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia to take a second look the charges. Ironically, the veteran prosecutor who was asked to look at the case was named James Trump. He has a long and accomplished resume of prosecutions and is hardly timid in bringing charges. He was involved in the case against CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling for giving classified information to journalist James Risen.

However, Trump and his colleagues Daniel Grooms raised objections over the threat to press freedom. That debate appears to have raged for months.

I am assuming that Barr had to approve the final charges but there is no confirmation of his role.

I have always said that, despite our friendship, Barr and I hold divergent views in some areas. The most obvious is executive privilege and powers. I am a typical Madisonian scholar and tend to favor Congress in fights with the Executive Branch. My natural default position is to Article I. Barr’s natural default is to Article II and executive power. Barr is also a hawk on national security law, particularly when it comes to the protection of classified information. He is by no means anti-media. However, he has always been a hardliner on the protection of national secrets and national security.

Nevertheless, this is wrong and Barr should have stopped it. The initial charge against Assange avoided the direct attack on press rights but focusing on the stealing of information (and Assange’s alleged role in that theft). That restrained response was blown away with this all-out attack on First Amendment rights of journalists. Simply saying Assange is not a journalist is not enough. He is being charged for conduct that is indistinguishable from a wide array of reporters.

I previously wrote that Assange could have the makings of a modern John Peter Zenger trial. It now is and Barr and the Administration is on the wrong side of that fight.

Reprinted with permission from JonathanTurley.org.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
anarchyst
anarchyst
May 27, 2019 10:19 am

There is nothing “happy” about Memorial Day. It is a day to remember and reflect on those who served their country, losing their lives in the process…

mark
mark
May 27, 2019 10:22 am

More grist for my theory mill…

TRUMP IS BEING MANIPULATED BY THE DEEP STATE, NECONS, RULING ELITES , ZIONISTS…

http://www.battleforworld.com/2018/11/29/trump-being-manipulated-by-the-deep-state/

TRUMP IS BEING MANIPULATED BY THE DEEP STATE, NECONS, RULING ELITES , ZIONISTS… – Part 2

http://www.battleforworld.com/2019/02/22/trump-is-being-manipulated-by-the-deep-state-part-2/

Dan
Dan
May 27, 2019 11:34 am

One of Barr’s top priorities has been ensuring government workers have carte blanche to murder Americans. That doesn’t make me feel too warm and fuzzy about him.

Yancey_Ward
Yancey_Ward
May 27, 2019 12:03 pm

I don’t think it likely the British will extradict Assange to the US, and the latest charge makes it even more unlikely.

James the Deplorable Wanderer
James the Deplorable Wanderer
May 27, 2019 3:15 pm

Who hates Assange more?
Trump? Assange has spent the last seven years hiding out in an embassy; he has done Trump no real harm. True, precedent and policy might require Assange in prison, but really, Trump has no reason (personally) to want him there. Once, Assange was asked why he wasn’t publishing anything about Trump’s crimes. Assange’s response was essentially an exoneration: no one has sent me anything implicating Trump, or I’d have published that too.
Obama? Hell yes; Assange uncovered the trail that leads back to Obama’s crimes. Much of everything that can be shown publicly at this time can be traced back to Assange’s revelations. Obama should want Assange’s scalp.
Hillary? Hell yes; Assange published the hacked Emails that underpin much of the current knowledge of just how evil, unscrupulous and malicious Hillary (and her henchman Podesta) is. Hillary’s enemies rarely make it to prison, however.
Lots of other D.C. denizens have been unmasked as the duplicitous, partisan, stupid bastards they are by the trails and correlations Assange has published. I’d say most of D.C. wants Assange DEAD, not just in prison.
So why (aside from precedent and policy) is Barr chasing him?
Could it be to keep him from being Arkancided to prevent WORSE things coming out? Like the Marc Rich assassination by HRC partisans for revenge? “Q” has suggested as much.
If so, even a conviction might not be the end game. Trial (with all evidence of HRC and BHO, Podesta crimes released into the public domain as court records), followed by conviction (for form and precedent) followed by pardon (for actual justice rather than form and precedent) might be the blueprint. We’ll just have to wait and see.
It’s not possible right now to predict where this goes; Assange is a rogue agent, not in the pockets of anyone, and such people are DANGEROUS to established interests and power players. He is a threat to the status quo of official US corruption, money talks and I’ll-ignore-your-crimes-if-you-ignore-mine that is so much of Congress, the judiciary, and the MIC-MSM-corporate cabal (Shades of CHOAM from Dune: Combine Honnete Ober Advancer Mercantiles, the merchant alliance that controlled all economic affairs across the galaxy). Anyway, they ALL are threatened by truth, logic, knowledge and sunshine on their activities, and Assange will need protection for the rest of his life from those whose applecart depends on our ignorance.

John
John
May 27, 2019 10:26 pm

Article 1. Article 2. It is time for the state legislatures to use Article V to call a Convention of States and end this shitshow. Either propose/ratify an amendment to abolish the federal government or numerous amendments to put the federal government in its place with most powers returned to the states.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  John
May 28, 2019 4:54 am

Or, when it gets out of control, like the last one that gave us the Constitution, you could end up with no rights at all or an entirely new government, which will be, in all likelihood, based on what passes for government today, much worse than what we have now.

States’ rights ended with the defeat of the Confederate States during the War Between the States. That defeat extended to all of the other states within the union. Unless states are ready to fight for succession and fight another war between states and the federal government, that’s the end of it.

Quartermaster
Quartermaster
May 28, 2019 7:14 pm

Yes, some things Assange has done is not distinguishable from the activities of “reporters.” What the reporters have done is just as noxious as what Assange has done, and has cost lives. Those “reporters” should share a jail cell with Assange.

Depending on how the charges are drawn, Assange will lose his fight just as Bradley Manning did.