Guest Post by Eric Peters
There’s a reason why you almost never hear Talking Heads talk about sex – not the act; the bifurcation of normal mammals into male and female – while they talk endlessly about gender.
Which isn’t biological and thus is fungible.
A biological man can claim he feels he’s female and – shazam! – by dint of those feelings and his assertions regarding them his biological sex (male) becomes gender female . . . because “she” insists.
Well, one could just as logically assert Lobsterhood on the same basis – and insist on appropriate accommodations, such as brine tanks in all “public” places – as well as other things not as amusing, such as a 60-year-old man who feels his gender is teenage girl and thus insist on his right to date teenage boys.
Or a teenage boy in high school who wants to get close to teenage girls – naked ones – by claiming that he is one and so must be admitted to their locker rooms and that they must “accept” his presence among them. Parents who object will be derided as “haters.” 
This is already happening and much worse will – since feelings are endlessly fungible. One can feel they are . . . anything at all.
Biology, on the other hand, isn’t fungible.
A medical examiner or anthropologist can discern very quickly and without contestation whether the body – or skeleton – before him is male or female. The differences in bone construction, density and so on are biological facts.
It is one – or the other.
It cannot be either.
Excepting the abnormal – such as hermaphrodites and so on – sex isn’t debatable.
It just is.
The question becomes what to do about those unhappy with what nature – their parents (their fathers, to put a finer point on it) bestowed upon them.
Obviously, such people have a right to be let alone, so long as their eccentricity isn’t harmful to others. 
If a man wishes to wear a dress, put on lipstick – and take off various parts – that is certainly his right. Even if pathological.
To deny anyone the right to do whatever they wish to do with themselves is as evil as it gets because it amounts to claim of ownership over that person, which is the functional definition of master – and slave.
But the man who doesn’t want to be one hasn’t got the right to demand that others “accept” that he is now she because he says so.
Some will regard this as petty – even mean.
If so, it is petty – and mean – to refuse to play along with the lunatic who believes he is Ney, Marshall of France – because he says he is and dresses the part.
The earnestness of the lunacy doesn’t change he fact that it is lunacy.
He is not Ney, Marshall of France. And it isn’t funny if he actually believes that he is – as opposed to just dressing up. The man is mentally ill. Far worse, if he insists we believe he is not ill – and are compelled by the government to genuflect, accordingly. 
In which case, the pathological becomes indistinguishable from the normal. There no longer is a normal . . . anything.
In which case, how do we distinguish that which is criminal?
What happens when a 60-year-old man tells the court that his 12-year-old boyfriend is appropriate because he’s not a actually 60-year-old man (despite the XY chromosome, the stubble, the Adam’s apple and birthdate circa 1955) but really a 12-year-old girl?
Because he feels – very strongly – that he is one?
If reality (biology as well as chronology) no longer decides, if “identity” is to be a question of feelings, then this person is in fact the young girl he claims to be and has every right to play doctor with the young boy.
Just as grown men in dresses are already asserting their right to use women’s bathrooms.
And the new doctrine is that no one has any business judging, forbidding let alone punishing this.
Those who dispute that she is in fact he are guilty of a form of Thoughtcrime is called “misgendering” – and are already subject not merely to civil punishment but – far worse – a kind of psychological torture of the sort administered by the character O’Brien to his victim Winston Smith in Orwell’s 1984. They must be forced to see the New Truth:
Smith is manacled to a table; an apparatus affixed to his head applies a kind of lobomotomic power that corrodes Smith’s capacity to perceive objective reality. O’Brien shows Smith his hand, with four fingers raised and asks him how many he sees. Smith replies four. O’Brien then says, “and if the Party says there are five fingers, how many do you see”?
Smith says four – attempting to preserve his sanity by refusing to deny objective reality. Instantly, the current is passed through his body; he arches his back against the restraints, feels agonizing pain.
And – for just a moment – he does see four fingers and believes he sees four.
“You see, at any rate, that it is possible” O’Brien explains.
This is where things are headed – if fungible feelings replace granite facts; if gender becomes a synonym for sex.
One feels the urge to either bay at the Moon – or head for the hills.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
WTF is the difference between gender and sex?
That’s the trick. You’re to believe there is none. It’s thought control via word substitution. Sex (objective, male/female) is equivocated with gender (subjective, masculine/feminine). “Gender” becomes the prevailing term. Then pesky things like biological facts can be brushed aside along with societal standards.
Words have gender: masculine, feminine, or neuter.
Animals (eg. humans) have sex: male or female. No other choice. It’s binary. End of discussion.
Dickface Carrenza — the most evil “educator” in all Amerika — just implemented a new gender policy; children in grade school can now SIMPLY DECLARE which gender they are. No documentation of any kind needed. Not even permission from parents! Soooo, an 8th grade boy can simply declare he is a girl … and he MUST be allowed to play in girl sports, and must be given access to girl bathrooms. Carrenza is doing this in the spirit of fairness, inclusion, and diversity. Naturally.
Rocket Man needs to drop a nuke on NYC. Really.
All part of the plan to destroy decency and replace it with unbridled licentiousness, which in turn is the goal of sexualizing children. Ignoring facts, irrefutable facts, and replacing them with an ‘anything goes’ agenda further serves to destroy society, the family and decency and replace them with perversion, in the name of ‘fairness.’
Now, if I was a horny adolescent lad and I wanted access to female bodies what better way than to claim I was a female and ergo, I must be allowed to shower with the girls. That same construct can apply to adult males who want access to children or other potential victims: claim to be a twelve year old girl and voila, enter the women’s bathroom.
I was riding my bike yesterday and noticed a little cafe a mile and a half or so from my house. I stopped to see what they had – thinking there might be a remote chance they would have something I might want someday (there wasn’t). They had a sign that said “we welcome women. We welcome black people. We welcome Hispanic people. We welcome LGBTQ people.”
I guess they don’t welcome me, so fuck ‘em.
When they staged the hoaxed OJ murders, they pasted a male jaw onto “Nicole” just to fuck with you.
http://mileswmathis.com/oj.pdf
“To deny anyone the right to do whatever they wish to do with themselves”
vs.
“To deny anyone the right to do whatever he wishes to do with himself”
Eric, please don’t misquantify. It’s so intolerant.
So per leftist ideology, I could identify as a 16 year old boy and date 16 year old girls……
Idiots.
On the Retro channel recently I happened to watch an episode of The Tonight Show from the 70s where Johnny Carson was interviewing a young Bruce Jenner, shortly after his decathlon Gold medal at the Olympics…Bruce Jenner spoke of his wife being pregnant with their first child and his hopes for the future…I was struck by the awesomeness of his athletic achievement, and what he’s become today…a troubled human who thought a chop-a-dick-off-a-me would make them happy…such a terribly sad outcome for a human of extraordinary potential.
DON’T EAT THE WHEATIES!
Peters is such an ignorant hater,as are many of you,don’t make me name names.
These people who are confused have been damaged neurally by hormone mimics in the environment. They are victims and should be treated medically but not socially encouraged.
It may very well be seriously mental as well. For some reason these folks are terrified of the prospect of facing life as a man or a woman. Maybe its the pregnancy thing, maybe its the being a father thing. Maybe its the way society has so demonized the male of the species. Whatever the case, once the hormones get flowing and the genital mutilation is done, pregnancy is no longer an issue. While I don’t deny the BPA and other hormone mimic issues, I think mental is playing a far bigger role. But TREATMENT, not pandering, is required.
Crazy is still crazy regardless of what the American Psychiatric Association says.