Robert Bronsdon (Hollywood Rob) September 2019
I really didn’t want to step into this particular part of the swamp. Others have far greater knowledge on their religion than I do. After all, I don’t even believe in a god at all so I have almost no incentive to learn more about teachings from people who were just learning to write, were mostly illiterate, and had not invented toilet paper yet. So you can see that I make no claim to knowledge in this regard. What I want to offer is a response to a question asked in a recent post.
ordo ab chao
Hollywood…
I read a pretty long response from you, left it to consider a condensed reply, and lost the trail to what thread it was on.
You are correct, a whole lot of what transpired I missed, and from writing style alone I can’t say whether you are right or not except in a few rare occasions. If you have a technical way of knowing as you call out the origins of another handle, then I may have missed that as well….
Either way, you are strongly convinced and clearly lay your cards on the table. I can’t get dealt in because the pot holds no value, just as errant comments from the subject at hand create a distraction that destroys a ‘train of thought’ on a thread……not much to take to the bank
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<—– those who destine to achieve this will do anything to get there, and the commie is a large part of it, for sure.
And on a final note, ‘He’ is not MY God…..He is THE GOD……and the answer to what ails this world has already been provided….tick tock, tick tock..
All I can say is thank your god for Google Translate because I was not raised Catholic so I don’t speak Latin. Well, that is actually the point that I would like to make. Who exactly do you think The GOD might be? First off, he is most definitely “your god.” And in addition to being your god, he is also the god of the Jews, and the god of the Muslims. And in all three Abrahamic religions, he has a different name. In all three religions he is worshipped in many different ways and within each religion there are sects who not only interpret his teachings differently but have fought wars for thousands of years over insignificant differences. Sunni killing Shia. Catholic killing Protestant. And on it goes.
So which is you’re “The GOD?” And you see, this is a really important question because some The GODS demand civility and kindness and other The GODS demand blood on the sand. But all of them demand some kind of murderous assault on the non-believers and all of them are The GOD to their adherents.
But let’s face it, I kinda know which incarnation of The GOD is your The God. So let’s approach this like Grace County Pastor would. In fact, let’s use his explanations in general because he is the only man of the cloth available to us. His header on his website proclaims:
“We teach Jesus Christ according to the mystery kept secret since the world began and revealed to the Apostle Paul.”
He doesn’t mention his affiliation but much of what he preaches appears to be based on Southern Baptist dogma. I am not claiming to know this myself, my son is a Southern Baptist pastor and he says that he see’s much of what he teaches in GCP’s writing but I will leave it to GCP to elaborate on which of the major Christian religious affiliations he finds most compelling. But regardless, we can be assured that both his The GOD and your The GOD are the Christian god.
Whatever his affiliation he gives a particularly good explanation of why specifically Baptists are so supportive of Israel. I encourage you to visit his web site as I will only pull one paragraph here and there is much more. In addition to GCP’s explanation, my son also told me exactly the same thing.
https://gracecountrybiblechurch.com/2015/03/18/why-israel/
In Genesis 12:1-3 God calls Abram out of Ur (Babylon) unto a new location that remained undisclosed to Abram. Abram believed what God was saying to him and, following the Lords instruction, left his fathers house. God made a promise to Abram (because of that belief) that He would make of Abram a great nation which would in turn be a blessing to those who would bless Abram. I think we can fairly identify a nation as a large group of people. Key words to my point are located in Gen 12:3(b)… “and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” This is the very beginning of the nation Israel and defines their very purpose; that they should somehow be a blessing to others (all families). Many years later, the covenant of circumcision comes into play. It is the wall of partition which separates out those whom God has a covenant agreement with (a covenant is an agreement between parties) from those He does not. God has a covenant agreement with Israel and no other nation. See Genesis 17:11-14 (KJV…Only).
In essence, The GOD made a covenant with Israel and if you believe that the bible is the true word of god, and the Baptists do, then you must support Israel as all countries that support Israel will be blessed as Israel is blessed. This is why you see so many people like Mike Pence proclaiming their support for Israel.
So as with the support of Israel, we can see that one’s faith, one’s belief in The GOD, predetermines one’s approach to problem solving. If one with the Baptist faith is asked “should we support Israel”, the answer has to be yes for The GOD favors those who favor Israel. If you believe in the faith, you must accept the tenets dictated by that faith. If you ask a Baptist that question you will get one answer. If you ask a Catholic that question you will get a completely different answer. If you ask a Jew or a Muslim that question you will get even more complex and different answers. All from believers in The GOD.
This is only one question that faith is attempting to answer, and it is a relatively simple one. So let’s take a look at a more complicated one. Let us follow the logic of putting things in The GOD’s hands and see where it might lead us.
So far I have been discussing the three major Abrahamic faiths and their sub divisions. But within each faith and within each subdivision there are even further fractures which have led people to even more constrained faiths. No you can’t smoke. No you can’t dance. No you can’t drink. We have all known about these prohibitions but there are more. You must put your faith in the lord to heal your sickness. God will protect you from your enemies. Put your faith in the lord god and he will give you all that you need.
The lord god will smite the philistines as they are unbelievers. But the lord didn’t smite the Nazis. The lord didn’t smite the Maoists, nor the Khmer Rouge. And the lord didn’t smite the Jews who invaded Russia and murdered all the ethnic Russians. So how does one come to the conclusion that god will take an active part in your life if he wasn’t interested in people who were being slaughtered wholesale. And by the way, which side did he take in Russia? There the chosen people, the Jews, were slaughtering the Catholics and when that was finished most of the Jews were slaughtered as well. Where was god’s wrath?
In the end, for all of recorded history, it has been lowly men who have put right the travesty which was visited upon mankind by other lowly men. You might argue that it was lowly men inspired by the word of The GOD, but still, it was men who did the smiting, not god and not angels. Just men. And no matter how you see the world, you will have to admit that those men were not just Christians, but Jews, and Atheists, and in Cambodia, they weren’t even Abrahamic.
The real problem with faith is that it promotes a complacency that suggests that the best thing to do is let god take control. This has never been proven to be a successful strategy. The faithful have acquiesced to the masters of all mankind until they finally have had enough and then they have risen up and killed the masters of all mankind. They have waited for their The GOD to come a set them free, and then, when he did not, they finally did what needed to be done. In between the onset of the misery and the doing of what needed to be done there were many years of suffering and many millions of people slaughtered; as they waited for their The GOD to come.
So, faith is fine. You can have your faith, but don’t allow it to lull you into a false sense of security. Don’t assume that your faith is a shield against your oppressors. The only shield against your oppressors is your own actions. You are the one who will serve the justice that you seek. No one else will seek the justice for you and god has never shown any interest in protecting the just. For that matter, he has shown precious little interest in protecting the faithful either.
Now I realize that this is going to be an incendiary post. I fully expect that a lot of comments are going to be bible quotes, and that is great. My intention is not to denigrate your personal The GOD, but rather to point out that there are many, many different versions of The GOD. As long as you cling to the notion that your version is the one true The GOD, then this world is going to be a contentious place. I happen to believe that the Christians seem to be the most evolved of the world religions, but let’s face it, I was raised Christian and live in a Christian country although in a heathen state. So what else would I believe? But at the very least the Christians have seemed to have advanced beyond the slaughtering the non-believers stage and that is a good thing.
I have posted this not as a challenge, but to invite your thoughts so please do express your own faith freely. I will endeavor to do the same. And thank you to order out of chaos and Grace County Pastor for inspiring this post.
Hahaha, Hollywood,
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<—- it also says "In God We Trust"….???? what 'god' would that be, Hollywood?
you've touched on some points that shows your admitted failings on any in depth foundation of understanding to begin with. Which I find hard to believe, given that you were raised in a 'christian' home and have a son who is a 'Southern Baptist' pastor…….makes me simply think you aspire to the Great Kingflinger position.
I be around….
Yes, yes you will. But really I be flinging no king.
Haha…told you I’d be around, had to hit the early bird special down at the old folks home.
So, you be flingin no king, but the first two posts you make are exactly that. You seem to have your britches pulled up too high and your belt’s cinched a couple notches too tight………it may be what keeps you with a chapped ass…
If you want to have a real conversation, welcome. If you want to mock and ridicule an individual who has nothing to gain, nothing to lose, then waste some one else’s time. Your consistent reference to a title of ‘The God’ even when resulting in grammatical error is evidence your intent was more to claim the position of ‘they all be the same god’, or the past wars, etc……let everyman be fully persuaded in his own mind; the dust will clear eventually
You do a disservice to GCP by placing him in the same context as someone like me. I can’t speak for him, but IMHO he is no ‘man of the cloth’. He is a student of the Word of God as revealed in the KJB, and is a witness thru testimony of the efficacious sacrifice of Jesus Christ.
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<<——
a twenty foot span in a load bearing wall with a two by four header.
“. . . he (GCP) is no ‘man of the cloth’. He is a student of the Word of God as revealed in the KJB, and is a witness thru testimony of the efficacious sacrifice of Jesus Christ.
Yep, that would be GCP. He is a true ambassador for Jesus Christ as revealed in Paul’s epistles specifically for this period in history.
Let me respond to you both. I consider GCP to be a man of the cloth. I also consider my son to be a man of the cloth. But that’s not really the point is it. No matter what I think, or for that matter what you think, GCP is the only one who can adequately describe his views on this topic. I know that he reads these posts and I hope that he will express his own thoughts, as you both have.
The Gods created a slave race partially from their own DNA and then lost the need for those slaves. The slaves, having a portion of The Gods within them, yearn after their progenitors for full clarification of this mystery. The essence of the real God looms over all this confusion, and if real God created/rules over the universe, he is certainly not a micro-manager. It was The Gods who did the micro-managing. Per Arthur C. Clark “Magic’s just science that we don’t understand yet.” Replace the word science with God.
Nice
The only thing, and I mean the ONLY thing I gather from this post is the absolute fact that you have not read (for comprehension anyway) a single word I have posted on this or my own website. I have elaborated on the above directly to you time and again and I grow weary of your continued foolishness. If you ever have real questions Rob, you know where to find me and I’ll answer them to the best of my ability. You might consider giving attention to your own son first. You could learn a lot from him.
Oh, and your grandmother was a monkey… really! (I just had to toss that in there. Flingin’ the monkey shit like a boss… what?)
I actually directly quoted from your web site. How is it that you could possibly contend that I have misunderstood you. I used your exact words. If you are trying to say that I didn’t understand them, then all well and good. I am happy to have you explain your statements so that I can have a better understanding of what it is that you are trying to say.
Admittedly, I did explain how I interpreted what you had written. Perhaps you think that I failed to understand. Please take a moment and point out where I went wrong.
THE God didn’t save Elbow Cay.
No I suppose he didn’t. But perhaps they were wicked.
Perhaps they didn’t pray enough.
It’s obvious by the use of the word save here that many of you do not or cannot differentiate between being saved physically vs. being saved spiritually. The later being what really matters.
For truly saved believers we become sojourners alone in this secular world and our true home is the spiritual realm with Jesus, not earth in it’s current state. When you understand and believe this physical death short of the rapture only becomes a door we must pass through to enter our eternal spiritual bliss.
Apart from God’s Spirit secular man cannot know the rhings of God.
Satan is the God of this world. Ephesians 2:2 calls him ‘the prince and power of the air’. But there will still be miracles reported in Dorian’s wake. Wait and see.
It’s a club, Holly and you can’t admit that you’re not a member or you instantly lose your spiritual street cred.
What sets the God of the bible, Jehovah, and His Son Jesus apart from all other god’s is the many great miracles, and the meticulous written record of thousands of years of history and archeology.
Unfortunately there are no videos so it makes it easy to suggest they are generally all ancient made up fables that cannot be proven.
The God of the bible knew this would be the case and therefore used predictive prophecy in writing over thousands of years to authenticate His given word.
Isaiah 46:10 New King James Version (NKJV)
10 Declaring the end from the beginning,
And from ancient times things that are not yet done,
Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand,
And I will do all My pleasure,’
This is truly the means to know that the God of the bible is true. By studying biblical predictive prophecy that has been 100% accurately fulfilled we know that the uet unfulfilled or still future prophecies wll come to pass.
The last greatest indisputable biblical prophetic fulfillment was the regeneration of the nation of Israel in 1948 prophesied by the Prophet Ezekiel in chapter 36.
The next will be the rapture of Jesus’ church approximately 1993 years after His first triumphal entry in 32AD.
Then the 7 year tribulation period or 70th week of Daniel or time of Jacob’s trouble.
Then the second coming of Jesus.
We do not put our faith blindly in a god of fables but in The God who all knowingly declares the end from the beginning.
For it is written.
Hey Eyes… Just out of genuine curiosity, how did you arrive on the rapture occurring 1993 years after Jesus’ entry??? That would put the rapture around 2025…
I’ll take a stab at making short sweet explanation considering it really involves multiple in depth parts. You’ll need to do some homework to fill in the blanks.
Let’s start with Hosea 6:1&2. I believe God is stateing the timeline of the jewish diaspora of 2 days or 2000 years beginning with Jesus’ triumphal entry on palm sunday and ending around 2032. The 1 day then refers to the 1000 year millenial reign of Jesus beginning at His second coming.
The 69th week of Daniel has already been proven to have ended on Jesus’ triumphal entry and we know rhe 70th week of Daniel or the 7 year tribulation period begins 7 years prior to His second coming or around 2025.
The premillenial rapture will begin anytime between now and around 2025 depending on a potential gap and how long between the rapture and 2025.
I believe the Matthew 24 olivet discourse parable of the fig tree in conjunction with the psalm 90:10 definition of a generation is a confirmation text by Jesus stating His second coming will occurr within around an 80 generation from the regeneration of Israel as a nation or by around 2028. Minus the 7 year tribulation period that puts the rapture by around 2021.
I think we are entering the sweet spot of anytume over the next seven years or so the rapture will occurr.
That would potentially put it during the last trump or trump of God in the rapture verses in 1 Corinthians 15:52 and 1 Thessalonians 4 in the KJV to potentially correlate with the presidency of Donald Trump.
That along with all the other worldwide current events taking place that aline with the scrptural end times.
Could I be wrong? Sure, but I don’t think so.
Ready or not He will come!
Thanks for taking the time to share your insights…
Will investigate further…
kudos
i agree with you generally, but disagree with the dogmatism. after phasing through aramaic, greek, latin and english, how can one tell if “You will not see the kingdom Of God lest you be born again,” means either a spiritual awakening in Christ or actual reincarnation? but i surely agree that biblical prophecy is uncanny. however, attempting to interpret prophecy before it is realized is a fool’s game.
Often times the closer we get to a specific biblical prophecy fulfillment the clearer it becomes.
After the fact is undeniable.
HR sez
I really didn’t want to step into this particular part of the swamp.
Calling bullshite on that…
Yeah Rob. That’s for sure. I was pondering on how to approach this. It really was Chaos’ comment that inspired me to toss out this turd.
Haha Hollywood….thanks for the a.m. chuckle.
After chewing on some of the mush I serve up, an incoherent pile is most often the result.
But…..
‘Da Perfessor’ posted an extremely coherent statement below, and it seems to me that you went full circle in response to ‘Drud’, and ended up with “Do what you will”….?
Both my 90 yr. old mother in a rest home, and my 86 yr. old mother-in-law in a little two bedroom around the corner from us, are dealing with strokes…mini-strokes….I think they call them (‘TIAs’ ?), nothing at the level you describe….but it’s always lurking.
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum-
I guess the part of my comment was the part where I said THE God….you will relate my belief to that of a Hindu and ‘their’ god, or islamic and ‘their’ god…..and on and on. Which then opens the door for a one world religion, after all, its all the same god, right?
Discussions on such a topic as this are endless….for instance, we could begin with the ‘Abrahamic’ faiths. The question seems to originate with the son of the bond woman Hagar, and the son of the Promised to Sarai….
A great nation….to each of them
HR,
I have a friend who likes to say: “Religion is for people afraid of going to hell. But spirituality is for people who’ve been there.”
And I’ve often wondered if spirituality isn’t an appreciation for that which is larger than our own thinking. In this sense, learning would be akin to awakening – or going beyond one’s own thoughts to something bigger.
A “skeleton key” is “a key with nearly the whole substance of the bit filed away so that it may open various locks.”
What if we were like that? I mean like when our mode of thinking is filed away to the point we can make connections, seek similarities, recognize patterns, and open doors like Neo in the matrix movie. What if the “key” were open-mindedness and curiosity or similar? Would we see more?
I certainly don’t have all the answers but I do wonder if it’s like that for so many of us “outside looking in” and missing the connections.
Saying “I don’t know” takes a certain humility, and I wonder if that’s where things get interesting for so many folks.
I saw the following on meme several months ago and I really liked it: “The quieter I become, the more I hear“. Common sense? Maybe. Or perhaps it’s more than that.
Thanks for the post.
In the US Navy we called it radio silence.
And we know to not break it.
Therefore, keeping the faith is often what we do. And other times what we don’t do.
Uncola, you are both a scholar and a gentleman sir…
Why gÖd gave us two ears and one mouth…
Knowledge talks, wisdom listens.
Self pride and ignorance is the lock that stands between God and Man.
Humility and selflessness is the key that opens that lock.
As to whether The One God is the same for multiple religions, I’ll post this here in case anyone is interested in whether the Muslims’ Allah is the same as Christians’ God.
It’s from the perspective of a Catholic apologist/theologian – not one “certified” in any fashion, so far as I know – but a religious autodidact.
That was a pretty good read, Iska. I would be interested to read how the author stands on Pope Bergoglio’s move to consolidate the world religions, or at the least, to hear where he stands on the recent appointment of Cardinals from diverse nations:
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum<<<—who is the god that approved the undertaking of a new order for the ages?
On a lighter note, one that may lend to the credibility of the author; wasn't the Daily Planet the newspaper in Metropolis, where Superman lived? In Gotham City, the home of Batman, the newspaper was the Gotham Gazette…..?
I haven’t listened to (EWTN radio) or read much from Jimmy Akin lately. I think he’s gone squishy. I don’t think he’s a believer in Ann Barnhardt’s hypothesis that Bergoglio is an evil antipope. I’m with Barnhardt on that. It wouldn’t be the first time an antipope’s heresy is later excused by his having been a pretender. After he’s dead and his heresy is undeniable, they can just whip out the ol’ “well, he wasn’t the real pope anyway” card. Someday it’ll come to an end.
The bible declares that the wisdom of God is foolishness to those that are wise in this world or those that are perishing.
People all see the world differently.
Rob, you see the world in a certain way, live your life a certain way, and write/share things because you wish to write/share what you think with other people.
Rob, you see other people as being smarter or dumber, better or worse, depending on how they see the world.
If other people don’t really understand how things really work, they end up getting themselves in trouble, and maybe getting other people in trouble.
Rob, you understand how things really work. And you want to share this with others, so they can learn how to understand how things really work.
At this point, you’re done — you’ve done all you can do. You’ve shared the truth of what you have learned, and you cannot force people to change their thinking.
Or can you?
No.
Thank you Onnie. I sincerely appreciate your kind words.
HR –
Over the decades, I have been called out as “stupid” for “believing”. Never left a dent.
Admittedly, you have not overtly stooped to condescension in your post (Thank you!) but I have to answer the over-arching theme therein the same way as I have many times prior when a dedicated atheist or agnostic (“A/A” hereafter) calls me out without warning or reason.
Me: “So, you are claiming that no God, an author of objective truth, exists?”
A/A: “Yep – you have it completely!”
Me: “So, we are all a simple result of random atomic/molecular/biomechanic interactions, over a long stretch of time, to arrive here as sentient humans disagreeing in opinion?”
A/A: “Agreed!”
Me: “So, if your thought processes…and therefore also mine…are the ultimate result of randomness in assembly to their current state THEN what is the point in even discussing our respective opinions??”
A/A: “Ummmm… what do you mean?”
Me: “Well, I am not gabbling at you to change your mind about a Creator. You are gabbling at me to inform me of my foolishness in being accountable to the Creator that I can discern through the logic of His works. And your source of authority is some sort of miraculously accidental random assemblage of now-existing logic which is apparently grounded in nothing but your worship of it.”
A/A: “Well, I think you are not getting the whole picture…”
Me: “Then give me arguments of where I am missing out…it’s been decades but, with a moment of recollection or two, I can handle from Socrates out through Bergson…after that all “Philosophy” became pretty derivative.”
A/A: “………..random stuttering syllables…….”
Please note – I bear you no ill will and I offer no Scripture quotes…I am simply questioning the rather questionable logic that undergirds your proselytizing for an authority of random nothingness. If you actually believe that why bother with preaching it. Random is random and the supreme law of the land is “Do what you will.” which is demonstrably unable to progress either a person or a society.
If you are not aware of “Pascal’s Wager”, I humbly ask that you search for it and read it. It’s just a couple lines.
Further, I will offer a short and eminently readable list of books that will overthrow your certainty in most of what you have written above:
The Problem of Pain (C.S. Lewis.)
Mere Christianity (C.S. Lewis)
God in the Dock (Lewis again, a selection of letters and essays)
The Everlasting Man (G. K. Chesterton)
I do believe, Rob, that you are seeking “something”. None of these books are beyond you. You do exhibit mental acuity though it is sometimes ineptly expressed.
Pax,
Da P
Thank you Da P. However, I tried very hard to avoid suggesting that my own feelings on the existence of The GOD was important. What I was hoping to get to, perhaps inarticulately, is that even if you believe in The GOD, you are most likely going to have to do what is right eventually.
How is doing “what is right” decided upon?
As far as I can tell, it is entirely up to you.
Me, personally…I get to decide upon the very concept of “right” and “good?”
Or is it each individual?
Or “society?”
How is “right” decided upon? I was not clear, but I was attempting to ask a far deeper question than what you answered.
No grasshopper, you were not. Each individual must decide for himself what is right. “Your decision is entirely up to you.” Now how you come to that decision is much more complicated as there are others who are making their own decisions and you and your decisions are affected by them and the decisions that they have made. This is why there are newspapers and fox news and cnn. People who are not you are setting themselves up to profit from manipulating how you might come to your own conclusion, but in the end, that decision is always yours and yours alone.
Nobody buys the “the devil made me do it” thing any more.
What the fuck are you talking about? Nowhere have I ever anything remotely approximating a defense of a “Devil Made me do it” argument. A very typical and trite new atheist argument I have heard countless times.
You counter your own argument very, very persuasively. You say that there is a right thing to do, but then say its entirely up to the individual. Stalin did his own “right” thing. So did Jim Jones. The point I was making, is that there is a a “Good”, there is a “Right.” They are not clear targets or actions, necessarily, they are more like vectors in the opposite direction of what we know to be wrong or evil, namely reveling in the maximal suffering and slaughter of others. How did we (big We as in humaity) find these vectors? Through thousands of generations of trial and error. How did we make sure that these hard earned lessons were not forgotten? We encoded them in stories and the stories became religions. And religion is a biological, evolutionary, human universal…every culture at every time and every place. Sure, is there unnecessary even counterproductive dogma and ritual attached…of course, but the standard new atheist line of “reasoning” considers only this and ignores the staggering, universal utility of it.
Now, this is a pure reductionist, yet still pro-religion argument but its still nowhere near conceptual bedrock…what it all rests upon will always be mystery. That is where faith lies (and Faith is VERY different concept from that of religion or that of God). Way, way, way under your hand-waiving dismissals.
Really Drud. I wasn’t referring to you with the devil made me do it. I was merely trying to observe that each of us is responsible for our own decisions. You asked how is that decision made? I answered that we all must come to our own conclusion. For some reason this seems to have set you off, and I apologize if it has. That was not my intent.
Well, for one, the use of “Grasshopper” was remarkable condescending and you had to realize it as such.
Two major issues I have with this argument is that it implies a moral relativism which is, I think, both technically incorrect and more than a little dangerous. The other, is the notion that this tiny (but still wondrous and inconceivable) scrap of consciousness constitutes the totality of what we are. Our conscious minds rest atop eons of genetic and epi-genetic code that makes up our if not literally infinite, then practically infinite subconscious minds. We do not simple “decide” upon the “right” thing to do. At best, if we observe and integrate some of our subconscious depths continuously for a long period time, we can begin to steer the ship of Being through the literally infinite seas of existence.
OK, you are being way deeper than I am. But from what you say in this comment, how is it that my statement isn’t exactly what you are saying? I am not implying moral relativism at all. I am saying that each of your scraps of consciousness is responsible for coming to their own conclusion. that is all I am saying. I make no allusion to relativism at all. In fact, it seems to me that I am placing our scraps of consciousness in a position of responsibility.
And perhaps you were referring to the old student teacher version of the grasshopper quote. That is not the one that I was thinking of. I was thinking of a discussion between equals.
Wouldn’t have come up with that from grasshopper…i was surprised by how good RED 2 was…RED 1 for that matter
Yeah two of my favs.
If it’s how or what you have like to have done to you is a good start.
Yes it certainly would be. Isn’t that some kind of golden rule or something?
Hey, Hollywood…
I’m listening to your boy PJW on info wars right now….if you’ve got time, you should put an ear to it, technical stuff about the roll out of the credit score type system for red flag gun laws….Alexa, Google Home,
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum
PJW just told about an article from 9-6-06, (nearly 13 yrs to the day)…they just said PJW article is linked to at top of Drudge.com
da golden rule es correcto —
treat people like they’re your brother,not your bro in law–
You might like these Laws :
Sigh…nice.
What about Screwtape? In the collection?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/government_should_get_out_of_the_flood_insurance_business_comments.html#commentID-83612481
Detailed piece on flood insurance. Details about Mississippi floodplains explain about alluvial soil.
Well written.
Would listening to an erudite, brilliant scholar help?
Oh the aporia of humanists, religion and god.
Religion is a decipherable description of an indecipherable cause we label Gød.
Faith:
“Ultimately, we all must consider that inarticulate sense for actuality which is out ultimate safeguard against the aberrations of mere logic.” C.S. Lewis
We were admonished not to spread the word but to reveal only to those friends who asked a probing question; where introducing it would make sense. For many years I did not understand why. The last 3 years have made it very clear.
Evolution takes it’s own sweet time… it is though, sure.
Curiously , even when I didn’t know, I still believed there was a God… could never understand how one could be an atheist.
Muhammad and Christ did not serve the same God:
I would like to thank you all for your carefully considered opinions. You have all been eloquent in your thoughts while I have been out shooting rats in the back yard. Two down so far.
Sorry I haven’t been able to keep up but my brother in law just had a stroke and got the last rights so I have been a bit distracted.
we’re thinking of you rob,let us know how it turns out–
It was a stroke but he is recovering already. No last rights. Fake news.
Thanks
While I believe in a higher power or energy, it’s not like other people who worship a God. Somebody once said: “ Man has not been able to create (or personify) a “God” that is greater than man’s own proclivities “ How do different sects of Christians , Muslims or ? reconcile their different beliefs while supposedly being divinily inspired??
Breathing is secular..
haha…and before long we will get to pay a secular tax for the ‘privilege’
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum- ragnarok is training wheels for the ride that’s comin’
The Temple
Led by Prophets
Sold by Priests
And defended by Soldiers
hahaha…I can only post the one upvote…..
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum- <<<<—that Jesuit Pope Jorge B. should be shown somewhere in there with the 'priests or prophets'
She’s a pantheistic princess and as old as time. And she’s buying a stairway to heaven.
what I was thinkin’. Thanks for posting.
rins,
you best get ready 4 dorian–
our prayers worked,”god,please spare us in favor of someone who is not as devout as us.”
tred again,does anyone know why the name field keeps reverting to anonymous?
Already been in touch with Odin,
We’re good!
I find that every time I use CCleaner to blow out all of the junk that the internet leaves on my old creaky hard drive, I also manage to blow out my name and it reverts to Anonymous. Maybe you are doing something like that.
Just for frivolous fun and no profit.
Verbal Kint: Keaton once said, “I don’t believe in God, but I’m afraid of him.” *Well I believe in God, and the only thing that scares me is Keyser Soze.* The Usual Suspects
*a direct quote of mine.
If you take the premise I make, that Keyser is a female, the one I set up as the protagonist in the events transpiring in Göerme Turkey, the following quote makes more sense.
Verbal Kint: He becomes a myth, a spook story that criminals tell their kids at night. “If you rat on your pop, Keyser Soze will get you.” And nobody really ever believes.
I posted a photo of KeyserSusie I took, developed and printed; and of the boat with no drugs on it, on my FB page should anyone wish to have the exposure.
This viddy is intended to start at 2:16 No one was harmed in the making of the myth other than the GS 3-13 I exposed smuggling drugs out of Istanbul.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OLIgEua4PU?start=136&w=560&h=315%5D
Perhaps in another venue