“Climate Change” Is A Hoax

Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter

“Climate Change” Is A Hoax

I hate science, evidently, because I’m woke to the manifest truth about what the leftist elite currently calls “climate change.” It is the second most staggering fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people after the media’s promotion of the unstoppable candidacy of Beto (who is a furry). Like some suckers still do, I once believed that “science” was a rigorous process where you tested theories and revised those theories in response to objective evidence. But in today’s shabby practice, “science” is just a package of self-serving lies buttressing the transnational liberal elite’s preferred narrative. Our alleged betters hope that labeling their propaganda “science” will science-shame you into silence about what everyone knows is a scam.

Nah. “Climate change” is a hoax. Come arrest me for felony denial.

Understand that the term “climate change” does not refer to actual meteorological phenomena but, rather, to the sordid rat-king of lies, scams and power grabs that we are commanded to accept as pagan gospel lest we burn to a crisp or drown or suffer…whatever the Armageddon du jour is. When you say “climate change is a grift,” and you should as often as possible, you are pointing out that this green-on-the-outside/red-on-the-inside fake frenzy is really just a set of intertwined grifts transparently designed to separate you from your freedom and your property in the name of somehow adjusting the weather.

Observing that “climate change” is steaming garbage served in a dirty ashtray is not disputing that the climate changes. That the climate is not static, and never could be static, is one of the myriad reasons that this whole idea is ridiculous. The planet gets hotter, it gets colder, sometimes quickly, sometimes over eons, and there are a bunch of reasons why, like the sun and volcanos. Human-produced carbon might be one of the factors, but there’s simply no evidence that it is a significant one. Of course, if they really cared about carbon, they would be up in arms about China and India, which are upping their output while we are slashing ours. Yet the object of their ire is your New York strip. Gosh, does that seem consistent with 1) someone truly concerned about atmospheric carbon, or 2) someone who trembles with joy at the notion of bossing around you rubes out in gun/Jesusland?

The underlying premise of their claims seems to be that there is a “right” temperature for the earth; watch them sputter when you enquire about that perfect setting for Earth’s thermostat. Remember, if you ask questions you hate “science.” If they did stop telling you how you hate “science” long enough to respond, they might explain that of course there’s no perfect temperature – it’s not like LA, where it’s always 72 degrees.

But then, what are they comparing the present climate to in order to declare that our climate is “getting worse?” If you establish a climate baseline, then you can compare what’s actually happening to the baseline and that might demonstrate that the whole thing is baloney. That would be awkward. It happened after Katrina. Oh, Katrina’s proof positive that Gaia is really ticked off and…and…and…then we had a bunch of years without much hurricane action at all. You might think that this would be evidence that maybe the climate wasn’t in chaos, and that they would be happy to be proven wrong, but no, it doesn’t work that way. Every time the weather fits the narrative, you see, it’s proof that the climate kooks are right, and every time the weather fails to fit the narrative, well, weather’s not climate. At least until the next heat wave or storm; then weather will totally be climate again.

Heads, you must give us all your freedom and money, and also tails, you must give us all your freedom and money.

Now, we’re being told that we’re all going to die in…I guess we’re down to what? About 11.5 years this go ‘round? Of course, we’ve been told many times that we’re doomed and the deadlines have come and gone with the doomsdayers not missing a beat. They’re like old timey Elmer Gantrys promising the apocalypse over and over again, with their hardcore true believers regularly showing up for the rapture over and over again no matter how many times the Four Horseman fail to turn up.

We haven’t even seen one horseman.

Back in the 70s, I remember we were promised an ice age if we didn’t give liberals our money and freedom. Then in the 80s, we were promised death by ozone hole if we didn’t give liberals our money and freedom, and then doom by acid rain if we didn’t give liberals our money and freedom. By the time they started promising that we were all gonna die from global warming if we didn’t give liberals our money and freedom, I was still wanting my ice age. It would be nice to have a white Christmas in LA.

So, where’s my damn ice age?

Oh right, only a climate denier – Climate, I deny thee! – might wonder why we should hand over one, ten, a hundred trillion bucks to people who have never once been right about their predictions. You evidently hate “science” if you expect the “science” people to be correct at least one time in a half-century.

And they’re not even good at short-term prognostication. Heck, for several days Hurricane Dorian was supposed to slam head on into Florida and then…it didn’t. The Obamas just bought a $15 million pad on the beach – what’s that say about their faith in “science?” But don’t worry, the guys batting .000 so far will definitely get the temperature in 2119 right if we only just write them a huge check and transform ourselves from citizens to serfs.

That’s another big red flag – have you noticed how “science” always tells us that the only possible response to the climate hullabaloo is to give liberals exactly what they always wanted anyway? How lucky are the leftists to have had an existential problem drop in their laps where the only solution is to give them everything they could not otherwise convince us to give them? What a remarkable coincidence!

And what’s also weird is how nothing that we must do right now no time to debate it’s a crisis think o’ the children in any way inconveniences or calls for sacrifices from our climate crisis-pushing elite. Boy, they really scored with climate change – if they were going to manufacture a crisis in order to get the power and money they craved, how would they do it any differently?

Now, they might claim that they too will have to sacrifice to the Angry Weather Demon, but it’s unclear how. I suppose they might stop flying across the globe to climate finger-wagging festivals in private jets, but call me jaded for thinking that if it’s such a crisis today and they have not stopped doing it yet, they won’t stop jetting about down the road. Oh, but you will. You most definitely will stop flying and driving the vehicles you choose and eating cheeseburgers and using straws that don’t disintegrate into gummy sludge in your Dr. Pepper. But them? Pete Buttigieg explained away his zipping around in Gulfstreams as necessary because it is important for him to be pestering people in Des Moines. Bet you that pretty much everything our betters want to do will turn out to be “important.” And I’ll bet that nothing what you peasants want to do will.

One might think that if stopping carbon was important, you might want to explore nuclear power. But you would think wrong. After all, if there’s plenty of electrical power, the elite loses the political power that comes from divvying up a scarce resource. If they control the power, they control you. Cheap, plentiful power makes you freer, which is a bug, not a feature.

Oh, and those many millions of people in Middle America who directly or indirectly rely on fracking and the rest of the fossil fuel industry? Even bloody-eyed, Gaffe-atronic Joe 3000 wants to shaft you. Better learn to code or something, because your good job is history. Weird how all the sacrifice once again falls on those out in the hinterlands and not on the blue coastal city swells, huh? But you’ll be able to rest easy knowing that our moral superiors in Brooklyn and Alexandria and Santa Monica enjoyed showing you sweaty rubes who’s really the boss by impoverishing you. Because that, and not the weather in a century, is and always has been what the “climate change” hoax is really all about.

If you want to read a vivid account of what happens if the Democrats succeed and manage to enslave us through weather inquisitions or disarming those of us who don’t commit crimes or however, check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels, People’s Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. People you despise for being cruise-shilling grifter dweebs called these tomes “appalling.” Can there be a greater endorsement?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

33
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Anonymous

Folks on the Left think it’s a grand hoax, too. Start building bridges – being kept separated and in our squabbling Tribes is the way they will win in the end.
https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog

Fast Floyd

The entire socioeconomic structure is a hoax. That’s why the corporate/government complex is working so diligently to censor thought that contradicts their narrative. The “climate change” aspect of the narrative is a bold ploy to further tax and redistribute the wealth of the productive.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

It was global warming. Then it was climate change. It’s currently the “climate crisis”, but they’re already changing it to the “climate catastrophe”. I expect “the climate cataclysm” by Thanksgiving.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

There’s actually a chance that Dems’ presidential nominee for 2020 will be 16 year old Swedish eco-warrior-princess Greta Thunberg. Sure she’s not eligible, but that didn’t stop Obama.

subwo
subwo

Climidia!

SmallerGovNow

Inconvenient FACTS…

#1 CO2 is not the primary greenhouse gas. Water vapor is and contributes 90% of the greenhouse effect.

#2 CO2 is plant food. Without it plants die, animals die, and humans die.

#3 Our current geological period (Quaternary) has the lowest average CO2 levels in the history of the planet.

#4 More CO2 equals more plant growth. Greenhouses pump CO2 in to increase production and there have been thousands of peer reviewed experiments that prove this is true.

#5 More CO2 means moister soil. Plants require less water to grow when there is more CO2 in the atmosphere.

Chip

SmallerGovNow

Global Warming Petition Project, over 30,000 scientists reject global warming projections… http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php

SmallerGovNow

6CO2 + 6H2O + SUNLIGHT —> C6H12O6 + 6O2

CO2 is plant food!!!

Sue Robinson
Sue Robinson

Chip is right. Here are more ‘inconvenient facts’:

The percentage of CO2 in our atmosphere is 400 parts per million, which equals 0.04 percent. That means if we cut our CO2 levels IN HALF we will have reduced them to 0.02 percent. While we destroy our economy, kill millions of innocent people, and burn down nature’s fuel, all at the same time.

There are good websites out there with solid information on this HOAX. These sites are revealing what actually is occurring, which is global cooling due to reduced SUN Activity.
Here are examples from the site “Ice Age Now.info”:

1. NASA reports that the next solar cycles will be the weakest in 200 years.
2. U.S. Growing Degree Days Plummet. In fully 95 percent of U.S. zip codes, Growing Degree Day temperatures dropped by 12.8 percent on average. You can type in your own zip code and find out what the number is in your area.

There are many other articles on what this means for the national and international food supply if this cooling trend continues. (note: These are Sun cycles. We are entering Solar Cycle 25 right now, which is predicted to be one of lower sun activity – fewer sunspots, etc. Actual scientists – many of them physicists – write about this. Some of them compare the “Climate Emergency’ cult to the Hare Krishna cult although they are far more dangerous. Then they apologize to the Hare Krishna folks.)

3. Canadian Crop Estimates in “sharp decline.” Information from Statistics Canada.

Other good sites are Ice Age Farmer, Adapt2030, and Yanasa Ama Ranch, which has very good material on the agricultural situation. That site reports that the farming community is watching carefully for early frosts this fall, for example. AND that Midwest corn country has sold down last year’s inventory, which has kept prices low, but Katie bar the door for this fall and next year.

And another example: Those big round hay bales that sold for $50 each in Idaho last year are selling for $200 a bale now and there are no delivery guarantees. This means cattle and dairy people are going to be selling down their herds. So, we might have decent beef prices at the supermarket for awhile, but that could change really quickly once the herds are reduced.

Finally, I read that what we are beginning to experience is described as a ‘Grand Solar
Minimum,’ which has happened at various times over the millenia. Look it up.

All of this is complicated with respect to the science, obviously. But the ‘climate change’ and now ‘climate emergency’ people are wrong. Many of them stupid and ignorant – useful idiots – but more are, ah, worse than that. Much worse.

Godspeed everyone.

Ottomatik
Ottomatik

Chip, that was an impressive elucidation, Kurt was entertaining but fell short, he did not cross the Rubicon and highlight just how fucked the Carbon Scam truly is. So thank you for moving the line. He did catch up some folks that may be tragically behind the curve, on who is getting fucked, but there are not that many around, most know.
And those that don’t, don’t care, or worse, they want poverty inflicted on all, there are a lot of these idiots.

Dan O'Keefe

Nobody has ever stated what the upper level of CO2 is that would threaten life on earth but we know that there is a lower level that would certainly mean the end of life.

SmallerGovNow

Just ask anyone who buys the man made global warming bullshit the following questions…

What exactly is a “global” temperature and what is a “global” CO2 level? They are both absolutely worthless and statistically meaningless numbers.  But let’s play along, what should the average global temperature be?  And what should the global CO2 levels be?  Come on all you AGW “scientists”.  Answer these two simple questions and provide your reasoning.  We’re listening… Chip

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Chip…

You seem to be on top of this fraud. May I solicit your opinion on Dane Wigington of geoengineeringwatch.org ?

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<——-==

My thinking is that he is top notch, but I'm little bit scientific and a whole lotta bit of "their lying to us"…….thnks

SmallerGovNow

I’ve seen several interviews with Dane on USA Watchdog dot Com. He comes across as creditable but I’m not sure I buy the breadth and depth that he claims we are able to influence the weather with chemtrails. At first I thought he was really out there but then I did a bit of research. In the State of Texas for example you have to have a license to be a “cloud seeder” to enhance local rainfall. There is actually “Weather Modification” division in the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. Here’s a link to their website…

https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/weather/summary.htm

The site claims that there are cloud seeding operations covering 31 million acres in Texas, one-sixth of the land of the state! The state even co-sponsors some of the efforts of several weather modification associations within the state.

So it appears that weather modification initiatives have been occurring for several decades lending more credibility to Dane’s arguments. What I don’t buy (but can’t give you definitive proof on – JMO) is Dane’s claim that they can use such efforts to effect “global” weather events/temps.

Hope this helps… Chip

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

I remember being fascinated by the description of “seeding clouds” with dry ice in grade school almost 60 years ago.
I consider all the “climate crisis” stuff to be exactly as Kurt calls it. A fraud designed to seize control of every aspect of everything. The planet is neither a closed system or zero sum game. Staggering quantities of ice and water enter the atmosphere every day and enormous amounts of water leave every day. If we have rising sea levels obliterating islands and coastlines it would more likely be caused by a massive ice asteroid entering the atmosphere.
No one ever mentions it but the planet moving a partial degree on its axis abruptly changes the situation over huge parts of the world as well. North Africa was a German settled farming region 1,200 or so years ago. The axis tilted a tiny bit and the farms turned into the Sahara Desert in less than 50 years. Can’t tax that away!

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Chip..

It sure does help ! Reading some of your posts over time, I think “he knows”……your reply makes me feel less crazy, lol…

Yrs. ago, I found an interview with an airforce colonel from the Vietnam era wherein he talked about his role in cloud seeding to maximize monsoon conditions……

In other words, I find myself considering the “prince of the power of the air….and spiritual wickedness in high places…” allows for a considered approach toward ‘stuff’ that can be found on the ole interweb…Like the document “Owning the Weather by 2025; weather as a force multiplier”

Another source that’s been ‘out there’ for a good number of years, easily found in pdf by searching the title; and added to the Biblical world view I hold…..well, mayber Dorian was intentionally stalled at minimum…..

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<<<———== I've chased this rabbit down the hole, and it's deep

Thanks for an honest reply ! I'll hit that Texas link and check it out.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

As in all scams, just follow the money.

Anymouse
Anymouse

Stop trying to battle the propaganda forces with facts. This has nothing to do with the climate, this is a psychological operation designed to do one thing: get the people behind the idea to monetize emissions.

The banksters have used financial engineering to put a price on every input variable used in production, to the point where there are no longer any variables left to monetize or “trade” or bundle into derivatives, the only thing left to monetize is: the output of the system.

They want to be able to monetize smokestacks, tail pipes, every aspect of the carbon economy.

They need to scare a whole generation of infants and nanny state participants in their safe spaces, to be able to pull of this next great scam.

Eventually, if you allow them to user your fear (not talking to any TBPers here) they will be able to tax or put a value on the air we breath, if you allow them to monetize the “carbon dioxide emissions”

PS: CO2 is less than 0.03 % of the atmosphere, so, put to put things in perspective, look at the pie chart:

https://www.conceptdraw.com/examples/gases-in-the-air-percentages

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

The tax crazed filth running Illinois are scheming now to tax you for “sewer use” by calculating how much water runs off your roof and into the storm sewers. It won’t matter if you capture it already to avoid the high price to water gardens and lawns. In Shitcago they already tax parking lots for rainwater runoff. Many cities have outlawed private wells and cisterns because of the hundreds of Dollars or more in free money they get from every house from these ridiculous water and sewer rates which should be called “desperate pension funding scams.”

subwo
subwo

My town does that. They raised water rates and people cut back use. The sewer works didn’t get the throughput it needed and they raised their rates to make up the difference. It was recently illegal in Colorado to divert water to catchment systems.

Anonymous
Anonymous

THE LEFT ARE THE NPCS.

They rely on authority. Can they explain comparative advantage with respect to trade? Now that they are free traders?

Can they explain the necessity of Nitrogen availability according to their own theory of excessive carbon creating a global greenhouse?

The wonder Of it all
The wonder Of it all

No matter what, the Earth will tell us, we won’t tell it
– next thing will be a conference preventing those pesky asteroids that ‘can’ appear

MrLiberty
MrLiberty

It is not a hoax that the climate is always changing. All that is being associated with the changes, who is to blame, how we can “solve” it, etc. is where the hoax and the lies reside.

Voltara
Voltara

Sociopaths seek power and from their ranks graduate psychopaths rule. It’s always been that way and it always will, because that’s what they do

Buzz
Buzz

When Al Gore was born in 1948, there were 7,000 polar bears on the planet. Today, after his warnings that polar bears would die off because of global warming, there are only 25,000 left.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

God has such a sense of humor. Last year they were on their latest kick that all the penguins were disappearing. Then we found an isolated island with more penguins than they thought there were everywhere combined.

Stucky

“Climate Change” Is A Hoax”

Wow. Really????

Looking forward to Kurt’s next stunning revelatory article; “WATER IS WET!!”

Paul Kostel
Paul Kostel

Please report the recent court decision on Michael Mann’s lawsuit against Tim Ball. Michael Mann a professor at Penn State, published a hockey stick graph in 1998 that showed no change in climate for the last 1000 years until recent times when the temperature increased dramatically = the hockey stick. This graph is the basis of the UN and Al Gore’s movie claims of global warming due to humans. He never published his data nor methods used to create the graph! About 9 years ago Tim Ball called Mann out by saying: Michael Mann should be in the state pen not Penn State. Mann sued Ball but never released his data and method so on August 24 the judge threw out the lawsuit and instructed Mann to pay court costs that are in the millions. Mann should also be facing fraud charges. Of course MSM has not published this. Now there no data supporting global warming. I’m using a phone so I can’t show Mann’s graph nor Tim Ball’s graph but please look this up and publish it far and wide if possible.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

Mann also lost in court to Mark Steyn in a suit filed in Canada. Steyn’s book “A Disgrace To The Profession” eviscerates Mann and shows what an incredible joke his “research” is. One gem is that the “97% of scientists” claim resulted from a mailed survey of which only a fraction were returned and those disagreeing were put in the “circular file”leaving IIRC around four dozen of the responses from the thousands of questionnaires sent. Later some of the “97%” said they were misquoted.
Color me a proud Deplorable Denier.

Paul Kostel
Paul Kostel

I’m a scientist and it is amazing to ask why earth has a climate. Even other scientists have trouble answering due to MSM programming. The sun is why we have a climate and there are solar cycles – lots of sunspots during solar maximum and few to zero sunspots during solar minimum. We are in a solar minimum now and some recent models suggest we may be going into an extended solar minimum like the Maunder Minimum (which was covered up by Michael Mann’s fraudulent graph)

RunningRoach
RunningRoach

Will AOC’s “Green New Deal” really save the planet?
The AGW argument is failing. We might as well be debating how to avoid or diminish the impact of a zombie apocalypse. Anthropogenic global warming is a blatantly political scheme, designed with one simple outcome in mind… Redistribution of wealth. It’s the biggest scam in history. Think about this for a moment… If the United States were just another third-rate world country and not the greatest economic power on earth, would this debate even be taking place? And… Why should acceptance or denial of the validity of any scientific thesis break along political lines worldwide? It makes no scientific sense.
As an engineer and mathematician who has been examining this thesis for quite some time, I must admit that I can’t find any overwhelming and convincing evidence that supports the disastrous predictions that proponents of AGW serve up. The only conclusion I have arrived at is that the Earth’s climate has been, is, and will always be changing with or without our insignificant and puny involvement.
Some inconvenient facts:
1. Only 3.27% of all CO2 generated comes from man, the other 96.73% comes
from nature.
2. Water vapor by a factor of 26 has more of a GGE effect than does CO2… But we can’t do anything about it…as only 0.001% of water vapor comes from man; the other
99.999% comes from nature.
3. After adding the contributions of methane, nitrous oxide, and CFCs it turns out only
0.28% of the GGE comes from man, the other 99.72% comes from nature.
4. If man ceased to exist, the reduction in the GGE would be one part out of
about 400, or barely noticeable.
5. According to ice core records spanning millions of years, the CO2 increases
occur about 800 years AFTER the temperature increases. That is, CO2
doesn’t cause rising temperatures, rising water temperatures cause CO2
to gas out of solution from the world’s oceans into the atmosphere.
6. CO2 is taken out of the environment by plant life. Nature again!
7. Bottom line…CO2 from burning coal or any other sources is not a driver of climate. CO2 is a passenger.
And one last thing: Want the real reason for climate change? Check out the orbit of the earth around the sun, including; the changing shape of the orbit, the tilt of the axis and wobble around the axis. All of these phenomena occur in cycles of 10, 40, and 100 thousand years and cause all kinds of havoc including the Mini Ice Ages (80,000-90,000 years) followed by global warming (10,000-20,000 years.)…All confirmed in ice core analyses. So, just what can a retrospective analysis of a mere 100 years, 1000 years or even 1500 years tell us?… Squat!
It’s been touted that there is a 97% consensus among scientists that global warming is a real crisis that we should be concerned with. Bull! Science is not about consensus. I’m a scientist. and I regard it as my job to continually reevaluate the evidence and reconsider my conclusions. That’s my job. However, some people don’t really want scientists, they want political activists. If you want a scientist, give me a call…If you want an activist, call a flat earther!

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading