50 Years Ago: The Day Nixon Routed the Establishment

Guest Post by Pat Buchanan

50 Years Ago: The Day Nixon Routed the Establishment

Ten days after the “silent majority” speech, Vice President Spiro Agnew, in Des Moines, launched an assault on the unholy matrimony of media power and liberal bias. Agnew questioned whether the networks near-monopoly over the primary source of information for the American people should be permanently ceded to so tiny and unrepresentative an elite.

[Note: Agnew speech video included below]

What are the roots of our present disorder, of the hostilities and hatreds that so divide us? When did we become this us vs. them nation?

Who started the fire?

Many trace the roots of our uncivil social conflict to the 1960s and the Johnson years when LBJ, victorious in a 61% landslide in 1964, could not, by 1968, visit a college campus without triggering a violent protest.

The morning after his narrow presidential victory in 1968, Richard Nixon said his goal would be to “bring us together.” And in early 1969, he seemed to be succeeding.

His inaugural address extended a hand of friendship to old enemies. He withdrew 60,000 troops from Vietnam. He left the Great Society largely untouched and proposed a Family Assistance Plan for the poor and working class. He created a Western White House in San Clemente, California.

In July, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon.

America approved. Yet the elites seethed. For no political figure of his time was so reviled and hated by the establishment as was Richard Nixon.

By the fall of 1969, that establishment, which had led us into Vietnam and left 500,000 U.S. troops there as of January 1969, had turned against their own war, declared it “an unwinnable war” and “Nixon’s war,” and begun to cheer the huge anti-war protests scheduled for October and November.

David Broder of The Washington Post was one who saw clearly what was happening: “It is becoming more obvious with every passing day that the men and movement that broke Lyndon Johnson’s presidency in 1968 are out to break Richard Nixon in 1969. The likelihood is great that they will succeed again.”

In a cover story titled “Nixon in Trouble,” Newsweek echoed Broder:

“From almost every quarter last week the nine-month-old Administration of Richard M. Nixon was under sustained attack and angry fire, and increasingly the target of the attacks was Mr. Nixon himself and his conduct of the Presidency.”

On Oct. 15, some 250,000 descended on the capital for the largest demonstration in history. A stunned Time declared that, instead of resisting its demands, Nixon should prepare “the country for the trauma of distasteful reversal.”

Time wanted Nixon to declare Vietnam a lost cause.

But by now, Nixon, realizing his presidency was in danger of being broken like LBJ’s — but believing he was reading the nation better than the establishment — had decided to wheel and fight.

On Nov. 3, 1969, Nixon delivered an Oval Office address that was carried live on every network. After reciting the case Ike, JFK and LBJ had all made for resisting a Communist takeover of South Vietnam, Nixon laid out his own policy, the rationale for it, and urged the “great silent majority” to stand by him for peace with honor.

The network commentators almost universally disparaged Nixon’s address as repetitive and unresponsive to the crisis of his presidency.

Washington’s elites, however, had misread the nation.

An instant poll found that 70% of the country supported Nixon’s declared policy. A coalition of 300 House members endorsed Nixon’s stand. Liberal Democrats in the Senate rejected Nixon’s policy, but Southern and conservative Democratic senators backed him.

Ten days after the “silent majority” speech, Vice President Spiro Agnew, in Des Moines, launched an assault on the unholy matrimony of media power and liberal bias. Agnew questioned whether the networks near-monopoly over the primary source of information for the American people should be permanently ceded to so tiny and unrepresentative an elite.

VIDEO: Spiro Agnew: Television News Coverage Speech – Des Moines, Iowa – Nov 13, 1969
Note: Audio version and full text of speech can be viewed here…]

All three networks carried Agnew’s speech live, but were rocked on their heels by the reaction. Scores of thousand of telegrams and letters poured into network offices and the White House, with the vast majority agreeing with the vice president.

The liberal establishment had sustained a historic defeat.

By December, Nixon was the most admired man in America. His approval rating in the Gallup Poll was 68%. Only 19% disapproved of how he was conducting his presidency. Dr. Billy Graham was the second-most admired man, and Agnew third.

Nor was this but a blip in the Nixon presidency. When, three years later, Democrats nominated the most impassioned and articulate of their anti-war senators, George McGovern, Nixon would crush him in a 49-state landslide.

In Watergate, the establishment would get its pound of flesh for its rout by Nixon in November 1969 and its humiliation in November 1972. But that establishment would never recover what it lost — the respect and regard of the American people in the ’60s and early ’70s.

JFK’s “best and brightest,” whose hour of power was “Camelot,” were broken on the wheel of Vietnam. After taking us into Southeast Asia, they had washed their hands of their own war and declared it immoral.

So great was the loss of esteem for the establishment among the silent majority, America’s elite would soon cease to call themselves liberals and change their names to “progressives.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Reluctant Warrior
Reluctant Warrior
November 1, 2019 7:20 am

credit
credit
November 1, 2019 7:41 am

“When did we become this us vs. them nation?”

answer – after killer Ted Kennedy got legislation in the 60s for the purpose of flooding the country with millions of “them.”

flash
flash
  credit
November 1, 2019 8:08 am

comment image

President Lyndon Banes Johnson
1965 Immigration Act

This bill that we will sign today is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions.This bill says simply that from this day forth those wishing to immigrate to America shall be admitted on the basis of their skills and their close relationship to those already here.This is a simple test, and it is a fair test. Those who can contribute most to this country–to its growth, to its strength, to its spirit–will be the first that are admitted to this land.

(i.e New Americans are better Americans)

Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA)

‘Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on … what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge … the charges I have mentioned are highly emotional, irrational, and with little foundation in fact. They are out of line with the obligations of responsible citizenship. They breed hate of our heritage.’ (Senate Part 1, Book 1, pp. 1-3)

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  flash
November 1, 2019 9:22 am

“We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin.

But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people.” – Theodore Roosevelt

TampaRed
TampaRed
  credit
November 1, 2019 1:04 pm

i’d disagree with your point,senor credit–
if you were correct then you would largely agree w/your brother,friends,native born co workers,etc.–
i’d say it became an us vs them when 2 things happened,when people became more susceptible to being brainwashed by stories of people in need,and when people started believing that we could have both guns/butter w/o any sacrifices–

flash
flash
November 1, 2019 7:56 am

Deep state did Nixon too. Muh democracy.

Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America

https://www.amazon.com/Family-Secrets-Dynasty-Powerful-Influence/dp/B007TFR8J0

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
November 1, 2019 8:39 am

I’m amazed at the Nixon/Trump correlations.

Roger Stone, a Trump confidant, worked for Nixon and has that tattoo of Nixon on his back. For those who read it, factor in the history of Trump as revealed in Whitney Webb’s series on the mintpress.com site….

Trump waits to be impeached, his man Roger ‘Nixon’ Stone is going to trial shortly, but has been/still is under a gag order….

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <—–==Nixon did his part in '71, after the freemason Roosevelt initial move in the magical year of 33

"Claiming it was a move against currency speculators (how that is possible with a fixed exchange rate was not clear), Nixon took the United States off the gold standard internationally. Roosevelt had already taken the U.S. off the gold standard domestically in 1933."

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  ordo ab chao
November 1, 2019 9:00 am

+1

The staged Roger Stone and Max Blumenthal arrests are pure theater to make them look downtrodden and credible.

Neither is neither.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
November 1, 2019 9:07 am

I stopped reading at “routed the establishment.”

As if.

Dung Beetle (EC)
Dung Beetle (EC)
  22winmag - w/o tagline
November 1, 2019 2:10 pm

Tricky Dick, martyr.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
November 1, 2019 9:24 am

Nixon’s sin was not doing a Harry Truman and accepting blame for what his people did. He lied to our faces and we never forgave him.

overthecliff
overthecliff
November 1, 2019 9:29 am

Why did they go after Nixon? It seems to me he was one of them. Was it to smear those who believed in the principles Nixon supposedly stood for?

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
November 1, 2019 10:36 am

Poor Pat, he just can’t help it.
The elephant in the room might be that they made sure to get rid of Agnew before they forced Nixon out.
And they were correct to do so. Agnew was a rabid Anti-Semite who unfairly charged the Jews with controlling the media and undermining the Republic.
It was Nixon who gave us the War on Drugs and the EPA. Now the Feds are the biggest drug dealers on the planet. Who could have possibly seen it coming. He’s batting 500 though. Look what a blessing the EPA turned out to be.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Fleabaggs
November 1, 2019 1:07 pm

i liked nixon,don’t make me have to hunt you down & steal your inhalers–
how’s your temps there?

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  TampaRed
November 1, 2019 1:56 pm

Red.
He also hastened our impoverishment by dumping the Breton Woods agreement and getting the Saudis to help set up the Petro Dollar to further LBJ’s lie we swallowed as you mention earlier and is the reason you get charged 300 dollars each for my inhalers sent by the VA. My point was cryptic and I should have qualified it with Nixon was very much in the establishment. He made the Jews mad according to his memoirs.
It was -10 the other day but now we’re suffering a heat wave in the mid 30’s. Why go to AZ when I have warm days like that right here.

gatsby1219
gatsby1219
November 1, 2019 2:08 pm

Another DS hit ?