Democracy and Tyranny

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

Democracy and Tyranny

During President Donald J. Trump’s impeachment trial, we’ll hear a lot of talk about our rules for governing. One frequent claim is that our nation is a democracy. If we’ve become a democracy, it would represent a deep betrayal of our founders, who saw democracy as another form of tyranny. In fact, the word democracy appears nowhere in our nation’s two most fundamental documents, the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The founders laid the ground rules for a republic as written in the Constitution’s Article IV, Section 4, which guarantees “to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.”

John Adams captured the essence of the difference between a democracy and republic when he said, “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe.” Contrast the framers’ vision of a republic with that of a democracy. In a democracy, the majority rules either directly or through its elected representatives.

As in a monarchy, the law is whatever the government determines it to be. Laws do not represent reason. They represent power. The restraint is upon the individual instead of the government. Unlike that envisioned under a republican form of government, rights are seen as privileges and permissions that are granted by government and can be rescinded by government.

Here are a few quotations that demonstrate the contempt that our founders held for a democracy. James Madison, in Federalist Paper No. 10, wrote that in a pure democracy, “there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.”

At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph said that “in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.” Alexander Hamilton agreed, saying: “We are now forming a republican government. (Liberty) is found not in “the extremes of democracy but in moderate governments. … If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy.”

John Adams reminded us: “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

John Marshall, the highly respected fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

Thomas Paine said, “A Democracy is the vilest form of Government there is.”

The framers gave us a Constitution replete with undemocratic mechanisms. One constitutional provision that has come in for recent criticism is the Electoral College. In their wisdom, the framers gave us the Electoral College as a means of deciding presidential elections. That means heavily populated states can’t run roughshod over small, less-populated states.

Were we to choose the president and vice president under a popular vote, the outcome of presidential races would always be decided by a few highly populated states, namely California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania, which contain 134.3 million people, or 41% of our population.

Presidential candidates could safely ignore the interests of the citizens of Wyoming, Alaska, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Delaware. Why? They have only 5.58 million Americans, or 1.7% of the U.S. population. We would no longer be a government “of the people.” Instead, our government would be put in power by and accountable to the leaders and citizens of a few highly populated states. It would be the kind of tyranny the framers feared.

It’s Congress that poses the greatest threat to our liberties. The framers’ distrust is seen in the negative language of our Bill of Rights such as: Congress “shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, and shall not be violated, nor be denied.” When we die and if at our next destination we see anything like a Bill of Rights, we know that we’re in hell because a Bill of Rights in heaven would suggest that God couldn’t be trusted.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 3:15 pm

If we must have ridiculous elections, then at least make them honest.

Have Amazon or Walmart offer for sale, at a price of $1, either the Trump bullshit or the Bernie bullshit. Everyone has a dollar to spare. Let the population vote by purchasing either of the bullshits. Their credit card statement will be their receipt to show who they purchased.

This eliminates all the lines, the completely compromised voting machines and exit poling.

Now, along with this suggested improvement, I also propose an additional 3rd candidate named Noneof Theabove. Lets see who wins!

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 3:32 pm

Which means the rich would vote for the president and vice president.

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  Vixen Vic
January 30, 2020 3:34 pm

What has the degree of wealth to do with it?

Please enlighten me.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 4:13 pm

Because the rich can buy more Trump bullshit or more Bernie bullshit. And they would fund dead people buying, illegals buying, and straw purchases of bullshit. Therefore, they would choose the president and vice president.

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  Vixen Vic
January 30, 2020 4:24 pm

Amazon and the credit card processors produce a database of who purchased what. Along with a prosecution database of anyone that voted more than once.

The Fed Gov takes the so far valid database and knocks it against their database of legal US residents and weeds out the non eligible including illegals and finds out where they are to send over a deportation squad.

Any dead people would be identified by the IRS records, Social Security records, or just ask the NSA that probably knows how often each person takes a piss.

Given over 300 million residents and voting made easy, turn out would set records. The number of possible fraudulent votes coming from a infinitesimal fraction of the population of professional political hacks in the DNC or RNC would stick out like a sore thumb. Not even they are stupid enough to try that.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 4:42 pm

Your plan is not feasible. Not everyone has a debit or credit card. Some are un-banked. A lot of people only use cash by choice. If cash is used, fraud is built in. And many stores have a minimum limit, say $5, for credit card purchases because it costs them money to accept them, so a $1 purchase can’t be done. Not everyone wants to order something they won’t wear or pay for that privilege. I sure wouldn’t pay a dollar to vote in any manner. Social Security fraud occurs after older people die more than you realize, so that’s not reliable. The .gov isn’t using E-verify now so they’re not likely to use that data bank of legal citizens for verification. The government doesn’t go after voter fraud now. What makes you think they would do so under this system?

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  Vixen Vic
January 30, 2020 4:49 pm

Make EBT cards valid for this purchase and make a new law that says Amazon must accept them. The ass hats are good at making new laws.

As for any remaining people not covered, the increase in voting via this suggestion would far and away dwarf any people left out. They could opt to use the old system if they wanted to.

Why would they have to order anything else but a flavor of bullshit? Let Amazon keep all the money to pay for the service.

The gov’t COULD use all the databases at their disposal and the fraud not caught would be a rounding error.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 5:44 pm

If they could make this system work, they could make regular voting work. But we know they won’t do anything to fix anything.

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  Vixen Vic
January 30, 2020 5:49 pm

My original post was half in jest with the last paragraph.

Candidly, I don’t want voting to work as it props up a completely corrupt system.

Democracy and every other form of government is nothing but a mafia operation. Only if the territory a government controlled was very small would I opt for government. The proper size is, of course, a population of 1.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 5:52 pm

Which is why I don’t vote.

StackingStock
StackingStock
  Vixen Vic
January 31, 2020 12:05 am

Vixen Vic

Looks like the catfish found in England, not the U.S., at least in my area.

Well we don’t want you unarmed Cucks voting in the US also.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  StackingStock
January 31, 2020 12:38 am

Can someone interpret this for me because it makes no sense.

StackingStock
StackingStock
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 30, 2020 11:54 pm

None of The above

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
January 30, 2020 3:31 pm

Good article.

mike
mike
January 30, 2020 3:40 pm

Thank you for this article, spoken from the heart.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 30, 2020 5:23 pm

I cringe every time I hear someone refer to what should be but no longer is our form of government as a democracy !
We are supposed to be a democratic republic of independent states and the constitution gave us separate but equal powers between executive , legislative and judicial branches .
Too bad most representatives in all branches hold about as much respect for our bill of rights and constitution as the do for toilet paper . “THEY” have literally squeezed the shit out of the charmin till it’s FUBAR

candle in a hurricane
candle in a hurricane
January 30, 2020 7:56 pm

Democracy is 2 wolves and 1 sheep voting on what’s for dinner.
let that sink in.
there I fixed it for you.

the experienced
the experienced
January 31, 2020 8:59 am

Pretty good article. The word “democracy” is totally abused these days.

But there is one little country that has a close resemblance of a democracy working for about four hundred years now:
Switzerland
How do they keep it going and going longer than anyone else?

bob
bob
January 31, 2020 9:04 am

The tyranny of consensus. Kinda like high school all over again. Except your status/rank in the clique doesn’t determine whom you will or will not be boinking at homecoming. It determines how broken your spirit and aspirations will become for the sake of the “greater good”. Democracy is tyranny, unquestionably. Totalitarian pricks hiding behind the mirage, the fake promise, of consensus.