China’s Big Surprise (Years In The Making): An EMP Attack?

Authored by Peter Pry, op-ed via The Hill,

The coronavirus pandemic has exposed dangerous weaknesses in U.S. planning and preparation for civil defense protection and recovery, and those weaknesses surely have been noticed by our potential enemies: China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and international terrorists.

The U.S. spent decades, and billions of dollars, supposedly preparing for biological warfare. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the departments of Defense and Homeland Security are supposed to have contingency plans to protect the American people from lethal biological weapons such as anthrax and genetically engineered smallpox, which could have mortality rates of over 90 percent.

But our defenders have not even been able to competently cope with COVID-19, which has a mortality rate under 1 percent. The White House took over management of the pandemic, apparently to compensate for the failure of the U.S. government to have adequately stockpiled such basics as ventilators, masks and pharmaceuticals.

Hostile foreign powers surely have noticed the panicked, incompetent U.S. response to the virus that shut down a prosperous U.S. economy, self-inflicting the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The nationwide lockdowns brought shortages of all kinds, exposing societal and critical infrastructure fragility — and causing widespread fear.

Adversaries also have noticed the ongoing U.S. “cold civil war.” According to federal authorities, radicalized young people on both sides of the political divide and criminals have been infiltrating recent protests — rioting, toppling statues and setting fires. The swelling counter-culture anarchy and self-condemnation is reminiscent of 1968, a year of riots and anti-war protests in America that is recognized by most historians as the psychological turning point toward U.S. defeat in the Vietnam War.

North Korea applauds America’s domestic chaos as proof that democracy does not work and the future belongs to totalitarian states such as China. America looks fragile to dictators who would replace the U.S.-led world order with a new one dominated by themselves. China, for example, has been planning to defeat the U.S. with an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and cyber “Pearl Harbor” attack for a quarter-century. As I warned the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security in 2005, Chinese military writings — such as the following excerpt — make reference to U.S. vulnerability to EMP attacks:

“Some people might think that things similar to the ‘Pearl Harbor incident’ are unlikely to take place during the information age. Yet it could be regarded as the ‘Pearl Harbor incident’ of the 21st century if a surprise attack is conducted against the enemy’s crucial information systems of command, control and communications by such means as electronic warfare, electromagnetic pulse weapons, telecommunications interference and suppression, computer viruses, and if the enemy is deprived of the information it needs as a result. Even a super military power like the United States, which possesses nuclear missiles and powerful armed forces, cannot guarantee its immunity. … In their own words, a highly computerized open society like the United States is extremely vulnerable to electronic attacks from all sides. This is because the U.S. economy, from banks to telephone systems and from power plants to iron and steel works, relies entirely on computer networks.”

As noted in a May 14, 1996, People’s Liberation Army newspaper about a surprise attack on U.S. critical information systems:

“When a country grows increasingly powerful economically and technologically… it will become increasingly dependent on modern information systems… The United States is more vulnerable to attacks than any other country in the world.

So it is very bad news, more than a year after President Trump issued an Executive Order on Coordinating Resilience Against Electromagnetic Pulses, that the Department of Energy (DOE) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have done nothing to protect the national electric grid or other critical infrastructures that sustain the lives of 330 million Americans.

Instead, non-expert bureaucrats conduct endless studies and conferences to wrangle over technical issues — in effect, reinventing the wheel regarding EMP — that were resolved long ago by real EMP experts. The “coordination process” for national EMP preparedness is the same kind of bureaucratic fumbling that Washington regards as “action,” which gave us the biological warfare unpreparedness and inability to properly respond to the coronavirus pandemic.

Hopefully, the U.S. Navy is better prepared to cope with an EMP attack than are DOE and DHS. A nuclear EMP attack against U.S. aircraft carriers is the key to victory in China’s military doctrine, as noted in a Feb. 12, 2000, article in the official newspaper of the Shanghai Communist Party Central Committee:

“The weak points of a modern aircraft carrier are: 1) As a big target, the fleet is easy for a satellite to reconnoiter and locate. … 2) A high degree of electronization is like an Achilles’ heel for an aircraft carrier fleet, which relies heavily on electronic equipment as its central nervous system. These two characteristics determine one tactic.” Therefore, military strategist Ye Jian said in the article in Jiefang Ribao: “The possession of electromagnetic pulse bombs (missiles) will provide the conditions to completely destroy an aircraft carrier fleet, and the way to complete victory in dealing with aircraft carrier fleets.”

In March 2020, a panel of China’s military experts threatened to punish U.S. Navy ships for challenging China’s illegal annexation of the South China Sea by making an EMP attack — one of the options they considered least provocative because the crew would be unharmed, but most effective because the ship would be disabled. Now three U.S. aircraft carriers are in the Pacific to challenge China’s aggression in the South China Sea.

Dan Gallington, a former senior Defense Department official, asks in his recent Washington Times article, “Is America on the path to another Pearl Harbor, but with China?”  

China may offer the answer soon.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Cow Doctor
Cow Doctor
June 22, 2020 8:28 am

William Forstchen’s “One Second After”. If you haven’t read it, you should.

AmazingAZ
AmazingAZ
  Cow Doctor
June 23, 2020 6:57 pm

Just ordered it. Thanks!

musket
musket
June 22, 2020 9:10 am

Since Clinton took over from Bush in January of 1993 the hiring policies took a severe left turn and hired predominantly for social or political reasons. An overwhelming majority of these individuals from GS9 to SES5 are not and were not ever qualified for their duty positions. Additionally the hiring mix in places like the Pentagon were altered slowly but surely moving the uniforms out and suits in to support the changing of policies and procedures to insure that control was vested in the establishment and not for the support of soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen and coasties.

What have now in the Pentagon and across the board in the Federal Civil Service is a very large collection of classless clowns that are most appropriate for Firesign Theater and not for the administration of the business of the country.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  musket
June 22, 2020 11:23 pm

Firesign Theater was the cream of comedy. They defined laughter delivered with class.

Classless Goobermint imployees are not laughable except for an oblique reference in Father’s day cards like the one I received.

“Happy Father’s Day!”

“Relax. Sit back. Don’t do anything.” (Open card)

“A tip from the Federal Government.”

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
June 22, 2020 9:15 am

All military communications equipment is hardened against EMP. It is a design requirement by the DOD. Also, all military communications systems have generators that are hardened against EMP in case the grid goes down. The author might be right about civilian infrastructure but he doesn’t know squat about military infrastructure. I quit reading this article after his ignorant statement about the u.S. military being susceptible to EMP.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
June 22, 2020 9:27 am

An EMP attack against the US mainland would be considered an act of war and retaliation would soon follow, so why not take out the Carrier Group with a nuke. It would not take a very big one to destroy the entire fleet.

Private Gomer
Private Gomer
  TN Patriot
June 22, 2020 2:01 pm

Why not do both, simultaneously?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Private Gomer
June 22, 2020 3:26 pm

Obviously, it would have to be simultaneous, otherwise the response would be immediate.

anarchyst
anarchyst
June 22, 2020 10:47 am

If an EMP attack takes place it will be done by israel.

Panzerlied
Panzerlied
  anarchyst
June 22, 2020 4:11 pm

ana- Looks like your comment stepped on the third rail and aroused the wrath of the stalwart jew lovers, both of whom offered their disapproving downvotes. Even on TBP, the truth has its detractors.

Gloriously Deplorable Paul
Gloriously Deplorable Paul
June 22, 2020 7:44 pm

China won’t risk an attack while Trump is president. They know he’d launch a full retaliatory response. The man can’t abide by insults or loss of face, something the Chinese understand well.
They’re evil but not stupid.