Biden and Dems Are Set to Abolish the Suburbs

Guest Post by Stanley Kurtz

President Trump had a great riff at his rally the other day in Phoenix. It was all about “abolish,” about how the Left wants to abolish the police, ICE, bail, even borders. Trump’s riff is effective because it is true. The Left has gone off the deep end, and they’re taking the Democrats with them.

Well, there’s another “abolish” the president can add to his list, and it just might be enough to tip the scales this November. Joe Biden and the Democrats want to abolish America’s suburbs. Biden and his party have embraced yet another dream of the radical Left: a federal takeover, transformation, and de facto urbanization of America’s suburbs. What’s more, Biden just might be able to pull off this “fundamental transformation.”

The suburbs are the swing constituency in our national elections. If suburban voters knew what the Democrats had in store for them, they’d run screaming in the other direction. Unfortunately, Republicans have been too clueless or timid to make an issue of the Democrats’ anti-suburban plans. It’s time to tell voters the truth.

I’ve been studying Joe Biden’s housing plans, and what I’ve seen is both surprising and frightening. I expected that a President Biden would enforce the Obama administration’s radical AFFH (Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing) regulation to the hilt. That is exactly what Biden promises to do. By itself, that would be more than enough to end America’s suburbs as we’ve known them, as I’ve explained repeatedly here at NRO.

What surprises me is that Biden has actually promised to go much further than AFFH. Biden has embraced Cory Booker’s strategy for ending single-family zoning in the suburbs and creating what you might call “little downtowns” in the suburbs. Combine the Obama-Biden administration’s radical AFFH regulation with Booker’s new strategy, and I don’t see how the suburbs can retain their ability to govern themselves. It will mean the end of local control, the end of a style of living that many people prefer to the city, and therefore the end of meaningful choice in how Americans can live. Shouldn’t voters know that this is what’s at stake in the election?

It is no exaggeration to say that progressive urbanists have long dreamed of abolishing the suburbs. (In fact, I’ve explained it all in a book.) Initially, these anti-suburban radicals wanted large cities to simply annex their surrounding suburbs, like cities did in the 19th century. That way a big city could fatten up its tax base. Once progressives discovered it had since become illegal for a city to annex its surrounding suburbs without voter consent, they cooked up a strategy that would amount to the same thing.

This de facto annexation strategy had three parts: (1) use a kind of quota system to force “economic integration” on the suburbs, pushing urban residents outside of the city; (2) close down suburban growth by regulating development, restricting automobile use, and limiting highway growth and repair, thus forcing would-be suburbanites back to the city; (3) use state and federal laws to force suburbs to redistribute tax revenue to poorer cities in their greater metropolitan region. If you force urbanites into suburbs, force suburbanites back into cities, and redistribute suburban tax revenue, then presto! You have effectively abolished the suburbs.

Obama’s radical AFFH regulation puts every part of progressives’ “abolish the suburbs” strategy into effect (as I explain in detail here). Once Biden starts to enforce AFFH the way Obama’s administration originally meant it to work, it will be as if America’s suburbs had been swallowed up by the cities they surround. They will lose control of their own zoning and development, they will be pressured into a kind of de facto regional-revenue redistribution, and they will even be forced to start building high-density low-income housing. The latter, of course, will require the elimination of single-family zoning. With that, the basic character of the suburbs will disappear. At the very moment when the pandemic has made people rethink the advantages of dense urban living, the choice of an alternative will be taken away.

That’s all bad enough. But on top of AFFH, Biden now plans to use Cory Booker’s strategy for attacking suburban zoning. AFFH works by holding HUD’s Community Development Block Grants hostage to federal-planning demands. Suburbs won’t be able to get the millions of dollars they’re used to in HUD grants unless they eliminate single-family zoning and densify their business districts. AFFH also forces HUD-grant recipients to sign pledges to “affirmatively further fair housing.” Those pledges could get suburbs sued by civil-rights groups, or by the feds, if they don’t get rid of single-family zoning. The only defense suburbs have against this two-pronged attack is to refuse HUD grants. True, that will effectively redistribute huge amounts of suburban money to cities, but if they give up their HUD grants at least the suburbs will be free of federal control.

The Booker approach — now endorsed by Biden — may block even this way out. Booker wants to hold suburban zoning hostage not only to HUD grants, but to the federal transportation grants used by states to build and repair highways. It may be next to impossible for suburbs to opt out of those state-run highway repairs. Otherwise, suburban roads will deteriorate and suburban access to major arteries will be blocked. AFFH plus the Booker plan will leave America’s suburbs with no alternative but to eliminate their single-family zoning and turn over their planning to the feds. Slowly but surely, suburbs will become helpless satellites of the cities they surround, exactly as progressive urbanists intend.

If America’s suburban voters understood that all this is what Biden and the Democrats have in store for them, it could easily swing the election. That means President Trump now has another “abolish” to add to his list: Joe Biden and the Dems want to abolish America’s suburbs.

There’s just one hitch. Incredibly, although AFFH is arguably Obama’s most radical initiative, Ben Carson’s HUD has still not gotten rid of it. Instead, Carson suspended enforcement of the rule early on and then tinkered around for three years trying to come up with a replacement. What Carson has developed so far is something you might call “AFFH lite.” While this possible replacement removes many of the regulation’s excesses, Carson has so far retained the most egregious feature of AFFH. He still wants to use HUD money to gut suburban single-family zoning. How Carson can even think about taking this stance in the face of President Trump’s explicit directive to reduce and remove excessive federal regulation is a mystery.

It will be very tough for President Trump to make a political issue out of Biden’s housing plans so long as his own cabinet secretary is talking about killing suburban single-family zoning with AFFH. I think Carson’s wobbling on AFFH explains a lot about why Democrats have become so bold with their plans to undo suburban zoning. If even the Trump administration goes along with federal attacks on suburban zoning, the Dems figure they’ve got political cover. Time was when Obama administration officials would turn somersaults to deny that they were going to control suburban-zoning decisions, even when it was obvious that this was their plan. Now, Biden and Booker are remarkably open about their desire to densify the suburbs and get rid of single-family zoning.

The Democrat war on the suburbs is a golden gift to President Trump, but he won’t be able to make use of it until he throws over Carson’s AFFH lite and completely guts Obama’s wildly radical regulation. Then Tump can go to town on Biden and the Dems for making war on the suburbs.

If there were ever proof that Biden has shed his centrism and been taken over by the Left, this is it. Biden got the nomination by declining to endorse the most radical plans of his rivals. But take a look at Biden’s housing plans and it’s clear that he is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Left. Progressive urbanists’ long-cherished dream of abolishing the suburbs is now within reach. With AFFH restored to its original form by a President Biden, enforced to the hilt, and turbo-charged by the Booker strategy, suburbs as we know them will pass from the scene.

With them will disappear the principle of local control that has been the key to American exceptionalism from the start. Since the Pilgrims first landed, our story has been of a people who chose how and where to live, and who governed themselves when they got there. Self-government in a layered federalist system allowing for local control right down to the township is what made America great. If Biden and the Democrats win, that key to our greatness could easily go by the boards.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
32 Comments
Yahsure
Yahsure
July 1, 2020 10:17 am

Biden had a thought and this was it? Agenda 2030 has stuff about eliminating ownership and moving people into the projects.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
July 1, 2020 10:29 am

Here in Minneapolis “homeless” tent camps are being set up all over the place. Initially they were just regular drunks, druggies and mentally ill in pockets of light industrial areas (not far from the riot-sparked infernos). Then 600 (!) of them set up in Powderhorn Park – an area long favored by ex-hippie weirdo socialists and assorted malcontent jagoffs. Now they’re setting up in parks all over the city – right next to the rich areas. Of course stupid white women are bringing them bottles of water and such. It’s so obviously planned. Where were these thousands of mostly-white able-bodied homeless four months ago when it was winter? They’re just trying to replicate CHAZ in Seattle. I assume this same shit is happening throughout the country. Suburbanites should be recoiling in horror. http://www.Twitter.com/mtracey has been documenting our local version of this insanity the last few days.

Muscledawg
Muscledawg
  Iska Waran
July 2, 2020 6:44 am

“jagoffs”. LOL. Haven’t heard someone else say that since I stopped working in Shitcago back in ’87.

Franz
Franz
  Iska Waran
July 2, 2020 7:27 am

An up-vote for using the term “weirdo”. Haven’t seen that in ages.

Steve
Steve
July 1, 2020 10:56 am

This is another wealth transfer. White people moved to the suburbs to get away from the crime, congestion and feral inhabitants.
They preferred to have beautiful peaceful places to raise their children.
This AFFN will redistribute their wealth to the feral urban shitholes and simultaneously move the urban trash into the once peaceful suburbs. Expect property taxes to rise while your property values decrease as the feral urbanites invade your once peaceful communities. Crime soars and local parks are no longer safe.
More for them and less for you….enjoy yet another benefit for voting democrats in to power.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  Steve
July 1, 2020 11:32 am

Imagine combining AFFN with eminent domain.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  Glock-N-Load
July 2, 2020 2:15 pm

Don’t!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Steve
July 2, 2020 9:08 am

That $1m McMansion you bought and paid $3m with interest for and spent another $1m keeping it painted, ac heat, yard manicured. You got like $4 m in it right. Well that urban scum has an agenda and its been played for the last 45 years. They move in using section 8. Yes into mcmansions. Because they all get govt assistance. They do not keep up the property, park on the grass and become a general feral nuisance until the first home goes up for sale. Then the one feral on that street that has kept their yard manicured no longer does. On purpose. Making it hard for you to sell. You finally sell but its 14% lower. This cycle continues for about 8-12 years until the last feral buys that mcmansion for under $100k with free govt money. Now they are loving your life in your mcmansion walking to parks and schools albeit with fear of another feral thug may shoot them….but they got for free what you paid $4 million for…..loafer

CCRider
CCRider
July 1, 2020 11:10 am

I stopped reading here: “Republicans have been too clueless or timid to make an issue of the Democrats’ anti-suburban plans.” What a crock of shit. Call people like McConnell, Graham and Ryan any bad name you want but clueless and timid they are not. In fact, they’re totally clued in with how things really work in the district of criminals and have the balls to have passed the “CARES” act 96-0 which poured half a trillion bucks on their doners whilst sprinkling peanuts on the rabble. You hear this bullshit from Tucker also.

The other explanation is that they’re actually on the same side with the same goals. But they can’t go there because it begs the next question: If they’re both on the same side what fucking good does voting do?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
July 1, 2020 11:35 am

Was going to say that this author is a dupe. What he describes is United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. Not only are Reupublicans, including Trump, all on board with these Agendas, so are both Democrat AND Republican Governors, County Commissions, and Mayors all across the country.

This is in no way news to anyone whose information and actual thoughts do not come straight out of the aptly monikered “idiot box”. It has been underway for more than 20 years, with nothing but compliance and assistance from BOTH wings of the Uni-party.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  Anonymous
July 1, 2020 12:45 pm

Exactly.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  CCRider
July 1, 2020 12:47 pm

CCR.
Right. We’ve been told wait till the next election for 60 years now.

CCRider
CCRider
  Fleabaggs
July 1, 2020 2:27 pm

How many times have we heard that voting is soooo friggin important because of supreme court nominations? Right. So the Bill of Rights was just eviscerated and not a peep was heard from these protectors of the Constitution-political hacks that they are. Then, of course, there is justice roberts-intrepid conservative that we were told he was. Tell it to aborted babies in Louisiana.

AlwaysTrumperTampa
AlwaysTrumperTampa
  CCRider
July 1, 2020 9:19 pm

rumors are that both thomas & alito want to retire & breyer is 81,ginsberg is 87-
whoever is elected will probably get at least 4 picks–

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/07/01/rumors-swirl-supreme-court-justices-samuel-alito-clarence-thomas-may-retire/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20200701

CCRider
CCRider
  AlwaysTrumperTampa
July 1, 2020 10:01 pm

It doesn’t fucking matter.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
July 2, 2020 9:11 am

It really doesn’t st this point. The leftist do not realize their game is up and we are fed up and this shit is about to go ballistic.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  AlwaysTrumperTampa
July 2, 2020 2:21 pm

Moah Fake Noose!

BUCKHED/BUY MORE AMMO
BUCKHED/BUY MORE AMMO
July 1, 2020 12:18 pm

Hmm…well the Fed’s own 97% of the mortgages so they thus own the Suburbs and more. What you’ll see is what happened to a Black friend of mine. She owns her own home, through hard work and savings. What she saw the last year of the Obozo administration was folks she knew who were Section 8 folks move into Suburban neighborhoods. Including one lady she knew who moved into a 4 bedroom,3 bath home down the street from her.

She came to work livid about how this friend doesn’t work and has all of expenses paid for the most part . She railed that folks who haven’t worked in years have a better house than she did.

So buckle up folks…the have-nots are coming and they want what you have.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  BUCKHED/BUY MORE AMMO
July 2, 2020 9:15 am

Yes. They own the home so instead of section 8 the govt is buying them from the banks to get the bad debts off the balance sheet then putting these section 8 people in the neighborhood as a diversity measure. When you see this sell immediately. These fuckers bring their old housing projects in, get the white kids hooked on drugs, white girls as a black sperm depository for drugs, and crime shoots up and businesses fail and people start selling homes cheap. And within 10 years its the damned projects…in the burbs. They are worse than locusts and its in their culture and nature. Look at every black country. White show up raise their standard of loving and when whites leave after giving them a working city it become the jungle again. Within a few years. South Africa is a fine example.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
July 1, 2020 1:08 pm

Here in the beautiful, deep-blue state of Oregon, we already implement most of these fine policies. The Legislature eliminated single family zoning in all but the most rural counties last year. They even outlawed covenants that allow only single family homes to be built on lots in subdivisions. You can’t have people making their own decisions, you know.

Years ago Oregon enacted urban growth boundaries to keep all the sheep in their pens. You cannot live outside an urban growth boundary unless you have 80 acres and make nearly $100,000 off farm or forest activities on your land. Consequently, most everyone is jammed inside the urban areas and paying extraordinary amounts for land and housing. And people wonder why we have a homeless problem.

All the school taxes go into a state pot and are divvied out “equitably” to the school districts in the state. That means you can’t move to a wealthy suburb thinking those school get more money.

Regarding the transportation policies the author talks about, we did that years ago. All our transportation money is funneled through a regional planning agency called Metro. Most of the money is then used for planning, bike lanes, and transit. We haven’t built a new freeway in the Portland area since the 70s.

The end result Portland is punching way above its class in traffic congestion. We are up there with the big boys like LA and Chicago. Also, like California and Seattle our home prices are astronomical and in all our new subdivisions in the suburbs 3000 sq. ft. home are being crammed onto lots that are 5000 sq. ft. or less.

But hey, you can be homeless and live here for free.

TC
TC
July 1, 2020 3:06 pm

Trump’s been president for 3.5 years now and had both houses of Congress and the USSC for 2 of them. Why didn’t he end this bullshit AFFH already? Why doesn’t he end it NOW while he’s still President? At this point you have to be seriously mentally deficient to believe Trump or any other Republican is going to stop anything the left does.

doc
doc
  TC
July 1, 2020 8:55 pm

Trump’s been fighting wave after wave of non-stop bullshit thrown at him from a deep state that is terrified of the damage he can do to their progressiveness since his election.

I’m not crazy about the guy, but if people like Upchuck Schumer foam at the mouth in their hatred for Trump,I have to continue to support him.

TC
TC
  doc
July 1, 2020 10:40 pm

What fighting has Trump done? He’s caved or backtracked on literally every single issue. Why do you feel compelled to support someone who has betrayed you on everything he promised in 2016? If it’s not malicious on his part, then he’s completely powerless against them. Again, why would you vote twice for someone who won’t or can’t accomplish anything? I don’t get it.

Common Cents
Common Cents
  TC
July 1, 2020 11:58 pm

Who are you voting for?

TC
TC
  Common Cents
July 2, 2020 8:58 am

Mel Gibson is my first pick. If there’s a significant movement to write in Tucker, I’ll do that. (Though I suspect Tucker is probably controlled opposition, otherwise he’d be off the air already.)

overthecliff
overthecliff
July 1, 2020 5:08 pm

CWII has started. Will Americans do what is necessary? They can’t protect them all.

AlwaysTrumperTampa
AlwaysTrumperTampa
July 1, 2020 7:12 pm

another thing they’re doing,and it’s been going on since the late 80 s at least,is to either have a housing authority buy an apt complex in a nice area or simply wink & have a developer build a complex & have it be section 8 from the day it opens–

Steve
Steve
  AlwaysTrumperTampa
July 3, 2020 8:03 am

Another Obongo legacy…

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 2, 2020 9:01 am

Weld a jack hammer to the underside frame of your big truck. Have a toggle to raise/lower and you have an instant budget killer by providing some creative etching to the roads. Wont take long for sand rocks weather to completely destroy the road within 2 years. Break them fiscally. In every way….