The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

Guest Post by Rich Lowry

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group.

If you are a firm believer only in polling averages, this isn’t particularly meaningful, but if you are familiar with Trafalgar’s successes in 2016, when (unlike other pollsters) it had Trump leading in Michigan and Pennsylvania and, in 2018, Ron DeSantis winning his gubernatorial race, it is notable. Regardless, it’s worth knowing why one pollster is departing from nearly everyone else.

To this end, I checked in with Robert Cahaly, who is predicting a Trump victory, on the latest edition of The Editors podcast. This piece is based on our conversation.

Cahaly was born in Georgia and got involved in politics going door-to-door as a kid. He started a political-consulting firm with some others in the late 1990s. Around 2008, he says, they realized that the polling they were getting wasn’t very good, so they started doing their own. He says they got good, accurate results in the races they were working.

In the 2016 primaries, they started putting out some of their own polls. “Our polls ended up being the best ones in South Carolina and Georgia,” Cahaly says. “So we started studying what it was that made those so different.”

Then there was the breakthrough in the 2016 general election. “We ended up having an incredible year,” he says. “I mean, we got Pennsylvania right. We got Michigan right. We had the best poll in five of the battleground states in 2016. And I actually predicted 306 to 232 on the electoral college. And we went from doing a little bit of polling on the side to that [being] our primary business in about 24 hours. And since then, that’s what we’ve been doing.”

Much of Trafalgar’s approach focuses on accounting for the so-called social-desirability bias. As Cahaly puts it, that’s when a respondent gives you “an answer that is designed to make the person asking the question be less judgmental of the person who answers it.” Cahaly notes that this phenomenon showed up as long ago as the 1980s, in the so-called Bradley effect, when the African-American mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, underperformed his polling in a gubernatorial race. It has been a hallmark of the Trump era and is one reason other pollsters missed the impending victory of Ron DeSantis over Andrew Gillum in the 2018 Florida gubernatorial race.

“I’ve got to get past what you want to say in public and get to what you really feel,” Cahaly says. “Because what’s in your heart is going to be what’s on that ballot.”

There are a number of methodological differences in how Trafalgar goes about its work.

One is the number of questions on its surveys. “I don’t believe in long questionnaires,” Cahaly says. “I think when you’re calling up Mom or Dad on a school night, and they’re trying to get the kids dinner and get them to bed, and that phone rings at seven o’clock — and they’re supposed to stop what they’re doing and take a 25- to 30-question poll? No way.”

Why does that matter? “You end up disproportionately representing the people who will like to talk about politics, which is going to skew toward the very, very conservative and the very, very liberal and the very, very bored, “Cahaly explains. “And the kind of people that win elections are the people in the middle. So I think they miss people in the middle when they do things that way.”

According to Cahaly, most polls are more than 25 questions. He keeps it between seven and nine, so respondents can answer in a matter of minutes.

Then there is how the questions are asked. “We do not like to do all live calls,” Cahaly says.

This goes back to the social-desirability bias. People with opinions that are unpopular “don’t want to be judged by somebody on the phone that they don’t know.” If this was always true, it’s particularly so now: “They’ve seen all this stuff of people being shamed for their opinion, people losing their jobs.”

So Trafalgar mixes up how it contacts people, and especially wants respondents to feel safe in responding. “We use collection methods of live calls, auto calls, texts, emails, and a couple that we call our proprietary digital technology that we don’t explain, but it’s also digital,” Cahaly says. The point, he continues, is to “really push the anonymous part — this is your anonymous say-so.”

Another factor, is that “conservatives are less likely to participate in polls in general,” he says. “We see a five-to-one refusal rate among conservatives.” That means “you’ve got to work very hard to get a fair representation of conservatives, when you do any kind of a survey.”

Trafalgar also goes about building its list differently. One thing the firm noticed in its polling in the Georgia and South Carolina primary in 2016, Cahaly says, is “people voting who didn’t know how to use the touch machines, people showing up who hadn’t voted in 15 years.”

It went out of its way to build a list including these kinds of low-propensity voters, “knowing,” per Cahaly, “that the other pollsters probably weren’t even reaching out to these people.” The firm has “a fingerprint” of characteristics meant to find these hard-to-identify voters.

Cahaly excoriates pollsters who use exit polls from the previous election to determine the demographics of the current electorate. “Exit polls can give you a sense of how people are voting,” he notes. “But how many people of a certain age, ethnicity, geography turned out? You ain’t got to guess at that. It’s a knowable number. And every single state maintains those statistics.”

He also has no use for relatively small sample sizes. “I think this is important,” he says. “We don’t do a state with less than a thousand. You see these polls, 400, 500, 600 people for a state. I don’t buy that. Your margin of error is far too high.”

Trafalgar tries to avoid so-called weighting to get the partisan mix of respondents right. A traditional pollster might want to get, say, 35 percent Republicans to have a balanced survey, but he comes up short because Republicans are less likely to respond. If only, say, 22 percent of Republicans answer, they are given additional weight to make up for the shortfall.

“The better you do at getting an even sample,” according to Cahaly, “the less weighting you have to do.”

One problem with weighting is that Republicans “who don’t like Trump can’t wait to answer a poll,” he says. “So immediately, within the 22 percent, they’ve probably overrepresented it, the anti-Trump Republicans, the Never Trumper types. Well, when you weight that up from 22 to 35, now you have skewed an already bad representation sample. So that’s kind of inherently how they can be so off.”

As a general matter, he discounts national polls. First, because the race for the presidency is won state by state, not on the basis of the national vote. Second, because all the methodological difficulties involved in getting a balanced, representative sample in a state poll of 1,000 people are magnified in a national survey. “It’s easily skewable at that point,” he says. “You start making assumptions.”

So how does he see the 2020 race? Fundamentally, as a motivation race, rather than a persuasion race, with perhaps 1.5 percent, at most, of the electorate undecided in battleground states.

The likeliest Trump electoral path to victory involves winning the battlegrounds of North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Arizona, and either Michigan or Pennsylvania among the former Blue Wall states (assuming he doesn’t lose states such as Iowa or Ohio).

This is Cahaly’s breakdown: He believes Trump will win North Carolina and Florida and discounts Biden’s chances in Georgia because the Republican-base vote is too big there (the same is true in Texas).

As for Arizona, “I think Trump has the lead,” Cahaly says. “I think [Republican senator Martha] McSally has some ground to make up. I see her about five points behind Trump, but I think Trump will probably win the state. And win it by a couple of points or more. And if he wins it big enough, McSally has a shot.”

Trump isn’t there yet in Pennsylvania, according to Cahaly. “Right now, we’ve got him down in Pennsylvania,” he says, “I think if it were held today, the undecided would break toward Trump and there’d be some hidden vote. He’d probably win Pennsylvania. But I’m going to give a caveat on only Pennsylvania. I believe Pennsylvania to be the No. 1 state that Trump could win and have stolen due to voter fraud.”

In Michigan, Trafalgar has Trump ahead. “I think he will win Michigan,” Cahaly says, citing fear of the Democratic economic agenda.

Overall, Cahaly sees another Trump win. “If it all happened right now,” he maintains, “my best guess would be an Electoral College victory in the high to 270s, low 280s.”

There it is. Among pollsters, you heard it from Cahaly first, and perhaps exclusively — a position he’s been in before.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Common Cents
Common Cents
October 19, 2020 2:12 pm

Trafalgar are the only polls I look at.

Home

bubbah
bubbah
October 19, 2020 2:16 pm

Pollsters thought Disantis in FL was going to lose by 7pts only days before the election in FL, he won by 1. There margin of error was 4%, that happened in multiple places last time. Trump won nearly everywhere that the pollsters said he was going to lose in 2016–that weren’t blue states. This time around Trump is doing twice as well with blacks, and black enthusiasm for Biden is horrible. Youth voters didn’t like Biden in the Primaries, and didn’t come out in large numbers at all for Bernie or he would have won. Republican voter registrations are up in nearly every state compared to Dems. Trump is polling 15-20% better with Hispanics this time as well. Trump gets 30,000 people to show up during covid–Biden struggles to get 50. The only thing Biden is winning on are huge donations (Trump is winning on individual donations) and the polls.

But its full out civil war time, the oligarchs, globalist are going full out to take out the US as a republic. The left wing media, and those paid by the cabals are just lying blatantly to set-up a color revolution. Not only that, if no one can begin to trust elections anymore—that pretty much puts a fork in the US. With no MSM voice left, and no large digital platforms left for anyone that isn’t one the Demo-Commie train…they are purposefully pushing the rest of us to either bow down and get runover permanently–with more horrific things to come, or they push us into fighting back. Either way, America is screwed. I’m not sure there is a 3rd path, if so I assume it would be some sort of eventual breakup of the country regionally–given after bloodshed that’s eventually what happens in balkanized countries–unless one side wins decisively by basically genociding the other.

22winmag - Jewish Yankee L.D.S. M110A2 Gunner
22winmag - Jewish Yankee L.D.S. M110A2 Gunner
October 19, 2020 2:20 pm

2020 America is just a fraction of a cunt hair to the right of Europe.

Get real.

Panzerlied
Panzerlied

22-I would never trust any polls conducted from any nations whose women don’t shave their armpits.
That’s just gross. It’s a wonder procreative activity even exists there.
Italy’s even worse, where the women grow mustaches to better resemble their mothers.
There, I think I’ve offended just about the entire continent of Europe.
Wait a minute, maybe Joe is into sniffing armpit hair – that’s it! It’s a bonanza!!

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest

Just remember, these are the same Europeans who want ever moar immigration of Negroes and Muslims to their respective countries.

They just hate themselves, their culture, and histories the same as Liberal Progtards in the USSA (and Canader).

Polls mean fuck-all squat in any case.

Machinist
Machinist
  Auntie Kriest
October 19, 2020 9:49 pm

Polls or Poles?

Coalclinker
Coalclinker

LMAO- the fake bible mormons sure know their cunt hairs, especially when there’s a 15 year old vagina attached to them. Your “apostles” get the first dibs, so get in line, you bat shit crazy adherent!

22winmag - Jewish Yankee L.D.S. M110A2 Gunner
22winmag - Jewish Yankee L.D.S. M110A2 Gunner
  Coalclinker
October 19, 2020 5:49 pm

Nice try.

Brigham Young had 5 adult wives.

Now if you’re so concerned about 15 year olds getting married or sold off to the highest bidder, why not throw billions of Spanish speaking people throughout history under the bus while you are at it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinceañera

Coalclinker
Coalclinker

Based on the click-copy-paste communist publication bullshit I see on here everyday, repeated every damned day, I would be elated to throw a few mormons and their fake bibles under the bus.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

I’ve never understood a guy having one wife and then deciding he wants an additional one.

mark
mark
  Iska Waran
October 19, 2020 10:26 pm

Yea…I know a lot of guys who had three rings with their wife(s):

1. The Engagement Ring.
2. The Wedding Ring.
3. The Suffering

Diaperless in NH ILuvCO2
Diaperless in NH ILuvCO2
  mark
October 19, 2020 10:56 pm

Well, I’ve had one wonderful wife for 35 years. I tell her since we are moving to SW virginia in 3 weeks, this is my forever home, before the nursing home, before the funeral home! There’s nothing better than a good woman! Of course, a good German Shepherd is pretty close.

mark
mark
  Diaperless in NH ILuvCO2
October 20, 2020 4:13 pm

Yea, I’m in the 44th year with a blue eyed, red headed West Texas country girl.

She followed me all over the country in a wild and whooly career…before building a modest working farm together. All my old buddies from Jersey were stunned when they heard I got married…having been a promiscuous rake with women prior to her…until they met her. Then they understood why I settled down with one woman.

Our route was a little different:

1. No engagement ring.
2. After a year alone living together without meeing either’s family or friends, a quiet wedding ring.
3. Duet singing.

Ivar Malmström
Ivar Malmström

In Germany, I know many people who really love Trump, some don’t like or even hate him and nobody likes Biden. Trump is the first POTUS who has really strong supporters here.

c1ue
c1ue

Yougov isn’t credible because the people who visit it regularly are skewed left.
The same for Fox or CNN polls – they aren’t reliable because their core audiences are skewed.

gatsby1219
gatsby1219
October 19, 2020 3:57 pm

People still believe polls ?

rhs jr
rhs jr
October 19, 2020 4:08 pm

Great, after the election, ship Uncle Joe to Europe.