Well, this is mind-blowing stuff, if true.
If you don’t have time to watch a 25 minute video, here is text explaining it (this is not a transcript of the video).
1 – SUMMARY –
This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.
Fractionalized vote:
Instead of “1” the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.
What fractionalized votes can do:
They allow “weighting” of races. Weighting a race removes the principle of “one person-one vote” to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.
GEMS fractionalizes votes in three places:
- The “Summary” vote tally, which provides overall election totals for each race on Election Night
- The “Statement of Votes Cast”, which provides detailed results by precinct and voting method (ie. Polling, absentee, early, provisional)
- The “undervote” count
Fractions in results reports are not visible.Votes containing decimals are reported as whole numbers unless specifically instructed to reveal decimals (which is not the default setting). All evidence that fractional values ever existed can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the decimals will fail to reveal they were used.
Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.
Fractionalizing the votes which create the Summary Results allows alteration of Election Night Web results and results sent to the Secretary of State, as well as results available at and local election officials.
Fractionalizing the “Statement of Votes Cast” allows an extraordinary amount of precision, enabling alteration of results by specific voting machine, absentee batch, or precinct. Vote results can be altered for polling places in predominantly Black neighborhoods, and can parse out precincts within a mixed batch of early or absentee votes.
Fractionalizing the undervote category allows reallocation of valid votes into undervotes.
Voting rights abomination
According to programmer notes, a weighted race feature was designed which not only gives some votes more weight than others, but does so based on the voter’s identity. Ballots are connected to voters, weights are assigned to each voter per race, stored in an external table not visible in GEMS. Our testing shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.
The study was prompted by two issues: (1) Anomalies in elections in Shelby County, Tennessee, which uses the GEMS election management system, in which inconsistencies were observed in reporting of results by GEMS; and (2) Concerns raised regarding the presence of middlemen during the election process, such that a single individual gains remote access to the election management program, in some cases in multiple jurisdictions.
The questions we examine are these:
Can election outcomes be controlled with enough versatility to allow a national impact? Does any mechanism exist that would enable a political consultant or technician to capture elections for repeat customers?
If the necessary features exist within the election management system to facilitate this:
Were such features embedded accidentally or on purpose; for what stated purpose were such features installed; if a reason was given, is that reason justifiable?
How might risks associated with inside access be mitigated?
Next:
Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2
THE END
This could explain how some dem districts end up with more votes than population.. count the votes as 1.5 votes each and voila!
Also, maybe this explains how 140,000 votes for Biden and ZERO for Trump magically appeared in Michigan overnight after counting had stopped. The machines programming making fractional adjustments? How could Trump be up by 5% points ( usually enough to call a race at 90+% counted) and miraculously have 92% of the remaining votes go for Biden overnight and the following day…… this system is so fraudulant that Trump must really have won by a 65/35 actual vote rate.
A man who couldn’t engender enough enthusiasm to get 30 people to show up in a parking lot when he was speaking got 70+ million votes?
C’mon man!
We are surely witnessing the greatest election fraud in history. Trump and his Republican party never stood a chance against such cheating and deception. Nothing is real in America any longer – everything is faked and manipulated, including the critically important election results. Do not understand why Trump/Republicans never challenged the GEMS system going into this election.
Thanks for posting this Stucky, it’s important, really important, especially with the ongoing voter frauds now happening.
The voting machine fraud and manipulation is an old story. Lots of videos abounding with all manner of nefarious voting machine hacks and misrepresentations of actual votes. JFK was elected due to shenanigans from Daley’s Chicago machine and LBJ was past master of the fraud. Difference today is the in-your-face open theft and the also open complicity of the media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvOKWeW_Fog
I guess they were so out of tune with reality in 2016 they never bothered with large scale fraud. After that they learnt that the public was not going to vote for their preferred swamp creature so they made it so they couldn’t loose. There should be the death penalty or life in prison for voter fraud!
More proof….https://archive.is/https://twitter.com/MattMackowiak/status/1323992377380450309
Wow were fucked ! Anyplace where this system needs to scrap the entire election and start proceedings for another 1 registered voter 1 ballot counted .
Any acceptance of this system by any American should put their asses in orange jump suits breaking rocks till they drop dead
The CEO’s of these companies that put these features into the software should be indicted for election fraud, along with anyone responsible for the coding.
I suspected something like this was going on and this ups those suspicions 1000 percent. Thanks for posting this Stucky. I went to the blackboxvoting.com link and they have a series of articles with at least two more planned. I read Part Two and will read the rest. It’s tough going and I don’t understand all the details, but one thing is clear. Why should there be any decimalization of the code? People vote in integers or whole numbers, there is a whole number of voters in any given election– 10,000, 22,396, 5,469,233, etc. There should be no decimalization capability at all. This is disturbing and infuriating, and could clearly be in play this election. I wish the writing was a bit more accessible and I wish the blackboxvoting.com site got a lot more exposure. I’ll do what I can and post the article on SLL with an attempt at a simplified explanation in the intro. Again, thanks for posting this.
Is this anything like or part of this “Hammer” program the Dems supposedly stole from the CIA under Obama? There was that General Mcenany(sic) guy banned from FOX on WarRoom talking about how this program can change results three percent surreptitiously. It has been mentioned here and other places.
Thanks, Robert.
I didn’t expect many, or even any, responses to this article. I posted it mostly for educational purposes (as well as the “recount” article.)
So, it’s very nice to read that you are going to try to simplify some of it on your website. Surely, you will also post it here!!
I read , most but not all, of the article. I’m in NH. So the machine I put my ballot in is one of these? Can we not then take the actual paper ballots like the one I filled out and match them up against what the machine said to find out if this is happening?
Stuck,
The article made my head hurt.
Statistical mathematics have that effect on some people.
Don’t feel bad.
The REAL issue is the stupid, greedy Democrats involved in the cheating don’t understand statistics and deviations, either. That’s fine with me because it makes their overt cheating that much more obvious.
Stucky
Here you go, my attempt at a simplified explanation at SLL:
The GEMS election vote counting system, used in whole or in part in 25 different states, can assign values for individual votes that can be either less than or greater than one. They can be whole numbers or fractional, decimalized numbers, and the weightings can be coordinated with preassigned percentages for each candidate. Weights can be based on individual demographics that indicate how a person will probably vote The weights are tied to a desired outcome. To give a simplified example, Candidate A may have 20 people who vote for him and Candidate B may have 50. A’s votes get a weighting of 5 and B’s a weighting of 1/3, or .33, so the vote totals 100 votes for A and only 16.666 for B, although the vote should be 20 for A and 50 for B. The computer coding then rounds up B’s votes to 17 so that the vote count is not reported as a fraction. Essentially, the GEMS system’s differential and fractionalized vote weightings allow for precise and extremely difficult to detect manipulation of vote totals from the precinct level on up. From Bev Harris and Bennie Smith at blackboxvoting.org, with a hat tip to Stucky at The Burning Platform:
Sounds good to me.
Could you post the text based code to cast votes that get split into fractional numbers? Could you post the code segment on how often the loop iterates? You must’ve seen it since you read the code so . . . post it then
Indeed. People like Greg Palast have been sounding the alarm about these election issues for decades. The masters appear to have overreached this time around. Dark times are ahead. Truth has become so difficult to find in our age that I do believe that when it does occasionally show up in the discourse it will be like seeing an ignited welding rod in a pitch-black room
The last time I voted (and likely ever will) was for Ron Paul in the Florida Repo primary. They bragged about using paper ballots. So like the rest of the herd, I filled it out for Ron (ignoring the rest of the ballot) and handed it to the clerk. She fed it through a machine that apparently, tabulated the vote. I asked her who programmed the machine and she answered with a laugh.
And this is just being uncovered now? Schlubs of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your masks! And that’d be plus for the many mouth-breathers who waddled to the polls or the mailbox and believed their votes would truly count for something. Next to come off should be the gloves.
Joe Stalin is laughing his damned demonic ass off in Hell.
I’ve seen of this before, but I watched this a little earlier. Heck of a video, but it’s four yrs old, back about the time I saw an interview on alexjones I think…
Why is this only on the alt media? Why hasn’t utoob banned it? Better still, if this is credible info, why hasn’t any mention been made of any specifics?
There is video of similar testimony from the ‘hanging chads’ if Florida twenty years ago…..
Maybe it never sees the light of day for a reason…….
“trust the plan”…lol
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<——-===
I thought that looked familiar.
Someone-Infowars maybe- covered that before ’16 election.
Which would make sense, being a major conveyor of all things conspiracy. (sarc)
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=when+did+video+fractional+magic+post&docid=608001394791353755&mid=CF100EB141286E767860CF100EB141286E767860&view=detail&FORM=VIRE
I heard this morning that the DHS was responsible for printing the mail in ballots. They were made with paper that had a non-radioactive isotope watermark in it. When Team Trump takes this to the SC and requests the ballots be produced…well, the jig will be up when all the fraudulent ballots don’t have the watermark are exposed and the perp walks will begin.
I hope that’s true. But I remember reading that some ballots were printed in one state that put the wrong vice president for Trump. Supposedly the state printed those ballots not DHS.
i pulled this off an aggreator site but their link wasn’t working but you can get an idea of what the story is about–
dhs apparently printed the ballots with a hity feature that is different from what the dem vote counters are turning in-
true?let’s hope so–
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/trap-set-dept-of-homeland-security-controlled-official-ballots-production-dems-print-extras-not-knowing-about-non-radioactive-isotope-watermarks-on-official-ballots/
Anyone have any info on if this is legit or more internet BS?
http://treeofliberty.me/2020/11/05/mainstream-is-censoring-this-ap-onewire-press-release-about-obvious-election-fraud-so-i-am-leaking-it/
There is an organization located in a Virginia suburb of the District of Corruption that has decades of voter fraud experience, even more than Biden/0bama could put together.
do you mean the committee4industrialagriculture?they only have our best interests at heart–
i haven’t taken time to watch the video so this could be what you posted but several years ago there was a video of several county supervisors of election here in fla that were in absolute shock b/c they were having a manipulated voting machine demonstrated to them–
Until this information goes viral we are sooooooooooo screwed, forever.
Move along, nothing to see here.
Actually nothing will happen. It’s not a secret that Nixon got screwed out of the Presidency by Kennedy who is beloved now. Also not a secret that Johnson killed Kennedy and was succeeded by Nixon. But the USA is still one large blob of land full of people that don’t like each other very much.
For all the bluster, this election is just another shiny thing that distracts the cattle while they are being moved from pen to pen through the chute. They know it, and and sadly deep down so do we.
Who owns Dominion Voting Systems? Ultimately, it looks like Staple Street Capital.
http://www.staplestreetcapital.com/Team
no problem, if you’re sure,
below is the procedure to file a voting rights action with DOJ:
(and you know who runs DOJ right? lol)
“Complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division’s Voting Section in Washington, DC by phone at 1-800-253-3931 or (202) 307-2767, by fax at (202) 307-3961, by email to [email protected] or by complaint form at http://www.justice.gov/crt/complaint/votintake/index.php “
Bill Barr will be right on it- like stink on shit.
is that Bev Harris trying to sell a new book out on Amazon? She stated on occasion “one guy checked all the voting machines in America” read what else she’s said, talking about polling numbers machines and polling numbers.