If Face Diapers Work . . . How Come They’re Not Working?

Guest Post by Eric Peters

As this country faces Mandatory Face Diapering – because the cases! the cases! – it’s interesting to note what’s happening in another country where Face Diapering has been mandatory for months.

The cases! The cases! are going up so much – in Britain – that the country is imprisoning its populace (i.e., “locking them down”) again.

What’s interesting about that is the fact that Face Diapering has been mandatory there for everyone, everywhere for months.

Which raises the question no one in the Sickness Cult – least of all its Archbishop, Joe Biden – seems interested in posing much less answering:

If Face Diapers “stop the spread,” why is the virus spreading in Britain?

Whatever your views about the dangers of the WuFlu, wearing a Face Diaper doesn’t offer much – if any protection – as evidenced by the fact that the cases! the cases! are increasing among a population that wears their Diapers all the time, everywhere.

The verdict is in.

Diapers don’t work.

So why wear a Face Diaper?

For reasons for that are several, none of them having anything to do with bodily health – the chief one being to stop the spread – of mental health.

People must be kept in a state of obeisant fear and that is most readily accomplished by insisting that everyone look as though they are terrified members of a Doomsday Cult. This serves the dual purpose of  terrifying the individual who is forced to wear the Diaper and of terrifying everyone else who sees nothing but Diapered people everywhere.

It creates the sight of a cult that everyone belongs to. This makes it extremely difficult for many people to show they aren’t cultists – even when they disbelieve in the cult’s bizarre theology – and even in the absence of enforcement.

There are many ways to understand this psychological operation.

One is the “racism” parallel, also used effectively by the same people pushing the Sickness Cult.

Most people are terrified of openly opposing any opinion which the arbiters of what is acceptable – the consolidated corporate media, its entertainment faction in Hollywood and of course the corporations themselves (who’ve succeeded, almost, in creating an oppressive nation-wide “company town” in which any sign of divergence from orthodoxy is punished by economic excommunication) declaim to be  . . . ” racist.”

Even to the extent of opposing or not enthusiastically amen’ing actually racist attitudes, such those expressed by the leadership of the Black Lives Matter movement, who’ve openly called for attacks on people who aren’t black and also even on black folks who don’t support the agenda planks of the BLM movement.

Most people genuflect, even if they don’t share the faith – because they are afraid of being seen as not believing.

The Face Diaper is of a piece, literally.

This piece of holy cloth is tangible evidence of submission to the faith. This faith must be enforced at all costs because if it should slacken or dissipate by visuals of obvious skepticism – the showing of faces – its power to terrorize and keep people submissive will falter.

The analogy here is The Wizard of Oz. He is great and terrible so long as Dorothy and her friends don’t see what’s behind the curtain. Once they do, the Wizard’s power wilts; he is no longer great and terrible.

He is just a crank pulling tricks on people.

This explains why the consolidated corporate media has been all over the cases! the cases! in Britain, expounding sonorously about the need to imprison – i.e., to “lock down” – the benighted, terrified people of that unfortunate country but utterly silent about the incongruity of the increase juxtaposed against the asserted universal palliative of Universal Face Diapering.

It didn’t “stop the spread.”

Ergo, there is no point in forcing Universal Face Diapering – unless the point is something other than “stopping the spread” . . . of a virus.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Just Thinking
Just Thinking
November 8, 2020 4:56 pm

What I can gather is that the positivity rate has-according to the CDC-remained around 5% throughout the summer.

What that would seem to indicate is that there is a given (constant) number of people, as a percentage of total population, that are carrying fragments of corona virus RNA, which is what the PCR test detects.

Last article I read showed that some labs are using up to 45 amplification cycles. And since the test is incapable of differentiating between live (infectious) virus and dead fragments, let alone viral load, case count-testing positive- is effectively meaningless.

Those two facts are all the “truth” or “science” we need.

Fuck all of you Karens and the horse you rode in on.

Passive resistance it is.

What pisses them off most is being ignored.

Make it so.

taxSlave
taxSlave
  Just Thinking
November 9, 2020 9:39 am

I am 100% with you Thinking.
I stopped wearing a mask back in April when I saw this as a means of oppression. I have been yelled at a couple of times by Karens, but I do not care.
Now, with the fraud of the election under our belt, I absolutely refuse to comply with the edicts of criminal scum (government).
Time still left to fight, and fight hard.

realestatepup
realestatepup
November 8, 2020 6:03 pm

When I ask people why we have never been required to mask in any other year for the flu their answer remains the same “because this time it’s more deadly!” Yeah…ok. The CDC itself lists survival rates for pretty much everyone as 99%+ for ages 69 and younger and 94.6% for everyone older. So really, the “deadly” part is not true.

You keep saying we have to stop ALL deaths from this thing, which means we would have to stop all deaths from all flu viruses. Ever. Which we don’t do, because you can’t.

Just like we don’t stop driving cars, riding bicycles, motorcycles, going swimming, or using knives. All things which COULD kill you. Actually, eating, which one must do to stay alive, could also kill you if you choke and no one is there to help you. Going down your cellar stairs to do a load of laundry also COULD kill you. Walking in the woods you MIGHT be bitten by a poisonous snake. Or better yet, a tick. And get Lyme disease.

The point I am making is life is risk, from our first breath to our last. What we do in between those two events is called living. Not existing. Existing is what we are doing now.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  realestatepup
November 8, 2020 11:33 pm

You forgot marriage.

yahright
yahright
November 8, 2020 6:59 pm

One of many reasons to not vote for Biden was his talk about more mask-wearing and lockdowns. It’s idiotic and unsustainable.

mark
mark
  yahright
November 8, 2020 7:32 pm

Thats one of the reasons the election is being successfully stolen…so far…many did not vote for Biden because of more mask-wearing and lockdowns.

Idiotic and unsustainable is a discription of everyone who actually voted for Biden…unknown millions less than who actually voted for Trump.

Chemist46
Chemist46
November 8, 2020 7:07 pm

Studies on the effectiveness of face masks

So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
1. A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
2. A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medince found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.
3. A Covid-19 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia came to the conclusion that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.
4. An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control).
5. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.
6. A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus” due to their large pore size and generally poor fit.
7. A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Chemist46
November 8, 2020 9:19 pm

Quit with your ‘studies,’ are you trying to kill gramma!

Dan
Dan
November 8, 2020 10:08 pm

How about a mask with the words “TRUMP 2024” on its front?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dan
November 8, 2020 11:49 pm

I only wear one if required on the job. It’s black fabric with a white Punisher skull on the right half.
The county health department closed down one of our local high schools for two weeks because two girls on the soccer team caught a cold. This was two weeks before they decided to take another week off for NJEA meetings that happened to coincide with national, state, and local elections.
I already had a low opinion of teachers and administrators. Now it borders on contempt.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
November 9, 2020 1:42 am

Oh, but the CHILDREN!!!

boron
boron
November 9, 2020 5:17 pm

I don’t understand how a mask could stop the spread of the virus. The smallest pore in the typical, pleated blue mask is >80 microns in diameter; the typical COVID virus particle is ~0.12 microns in diameter. To my mind, that means that 750 virus particles could stand shoulder to shoulder and pass quite easily through any pore in your mask.
There are people who say, “Yeah! but it stops your saliva and the viruses are suspended in your saliva.”
No argument! but the saliva dries and then you still have the same problem when the virus particle float free propelled by breath.
Besides which, are people dying from complications caused by the virus, or are people dying from other problems and a positive virus test.
Lastly: if you truly believe government statistics (and what you read in the NY Times), I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you – on the cheap!