The Nashville Bombing vs. The Oklahoma City Bombing

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

The Nashville bombing raises questions about the Oklahoma City bombing.  In 1995 the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was blown up.  Allegedly, the building was destroyed by a fertilizer bomb in a Ryder rental truck parked on the street.  The Murrah building had massive reinforced concrete columns, some being  3 feet thick if memory serves. The front third of the building was destroyed with columns turned to dust.

The guilty parties were allegedly Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.  According to reports, the blast killed 168 people, injured 680 others, and destroyed or damaged 324 buildings within a 16-block radius along with 86 cars and caused $652 million of damage in 1995 dollars.

At the time US Air Force General Partin, who had high level responsibilities for ordinance and weapons development, distributed an expert report to 75 members of the House and Senate.  The report proved that the Murrah building blew up from the inside out.  Many Americans concluded that the truck bomb was cover for an inside job.  McVeigh and Nichols were regarded as patsies who thought they blew up the building, but their role was to direct attention away from those responsible.

General Partin’s report was quickly tossed into the Memory Hole. To get rid of the evidence the Murrah building was hauled away and buried just as the steel in the World Trade Center buildings in 2001 was sent abroad to be melted down, and an official bogus report was issued like the 9/11 official reports. Instead of a real investigation, we got a controlled explanation.

Twenty-five years after the Oklahoma City Bombing we have another bomb in a vehicle parked in the street in front of a building.  This time the building is an AT&T building. The parked vehicle is a RV which could hold as much explosives as a rental truck.  An interesting difference is that the RV is much closer to the building, seperated only by a sidewalk, whereas if memory serves, the Murrah building was set back from the street.

When the RV bomb went off, 3 people were injured, and building damage seems to be limited to blowing out windows.  Clearly, there is no comparable structural damage to the Oklahoma City bombing.

Why?  Was the RV bomb just an oversized firecracker?  Or was General Partin, clearly an expert, correct when he concluded that the Murrah Federal building was blown up from the inside out?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Glock-N-Load

I know as much about explosives as I do about nuclear astrology 🙂 but, this doesn’t look like inside out to me…
comment image

Todd H.
Todd H.

Half of the building is completely gone, yet it still didn’t collapse at free fall speed into its own footprint.

Glock-N-Load

As I said, I know almost ZERO about explosives.

Stucky

Hilarious.

There was no thermite. If there was even on molecule of thermite, the building would pancaked at free fall speed. Hilarious fact!

Apple
Apple

If you remember the news that morning, they reported finding other bombs in the building.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Apple…

Yes, they did. My wife has kin that frequently used a day care that was located in the bldg.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trN122LbnWA

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<——====

DeaconBenjamin
DeaconBenjamin

The report did not prove that the building blew up from the inside out. It proved that the columns were severed.

Check Six
Check Six

Deacon, you are correct. I just went back to my copy of Ben Partin’s report and he had specifically stated that explosives were used on four critical columns. The building did not blow out, it fell down as a result of the critical supporting columns being destroyed.

Doc
Doc

Correct. The columns could only be severed with charges placed on them. The building didn’t blow up – the explosives did.

Depressed Aussie
Depressed Aussie

Agreed. just looks like a few tons of ammonium nitrate/diesel or similar. Blast also directed upwards supports a ground level detonation. If the explosives were inside the building the rubble would have been more scattered not laying in the building footprint

Doc
Doc

Notice all of the heavy construction equipment? This photo is after an extensive clean-up has been well under way. ANFO is too slow to cut steel. It is is used in mining to push rather than shatter. High explosives need to be placed in direct contact with the things it is meant to cut. Air compresses and will not transmit the pressure wave, instead acting like a giant spring absorbing the energy and re-releasing it in the opposite direction.

I usually agree with your posts, and am trying not be be a wise ass, but please stick to nuclear astrology.

:^)

Johnny Hooker
Johnny Hooker

Da goyim know, yet they do nothing…

Apple
Apple

The rv was just a propane grenade. No explosives at all or there would be a crater in the street.

Doc
Doc

The RV painted the target with an IR laser to guide the warhead to it’s target to penetrate the hardened structure. AT&T switching centers are hardened and EMP proofed for national security.

This attack destroyed a very large amount of evidence of voting fraud.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

NPR spent a segment yesterday pondering why when a Muzzie blows up a car it’s “terrorism”, but when a white guy blows up his RV it’s not labeled terrorism. Yup, they actually turned the whole thing into “America is racist, part 437”. Not a single mention of how the Nashville guy had speakers blasting out a warning for people to evacuate the area. Never seen a jihadi do that. If that was terrorism, it was the nice kind. If your grievance is only with AT and T, I don’t much care if you blow up their infrastructure.

DeaconBenjamin
DeaconBenjamin

Partin’s report was distributed to all House and Senate members.

Guest
Guest

Ignore anyone these days who do not mention the possibility of DEWs. We’re not in the 90’s anymore (although they had them then).

Doc
Doc

DEW’s generate a huge amount of localized heat, but do NOT explode. This was precision bunker penetrating ordinance.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading