WASHINGTON, D.C.—A review of Trump’s statements last week made it clear that he was inciting violence, as he very clearly told people to “remain peaceful” and not carry out any violence.
The dangerous cult leader encouraged his followers to protest at the Capitol, but to remain peaceful, which is an obvious instance of inciting violence, according to leading language experts and journalists.
“Let’s all remain peaceful,” he said, which clearly meant, “Go burn down the Capitol Building.”
“No violence!” added the deranged lunatic, which, according to the New York Times, was a dog whistle for “Minions, attack!”
“Go home,” he added, which meant, “Keep pressing the attack! We will not be defeated! Blow stuff up!”
At publishing time, Trump had said, “I’ve always encouraged peaceful protesting,” which meant he wanted his followers to go ransack an Arby’s.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
His fingers were crossed behind the lectern.
When you are the POTUS and you repeatedly tell your followers that the election was fraudulent and was stolen from them (a statement demonstrably untrue), you have to know that this will likely cause some degree of violent response. If you are making statements that you undoubtedly know will provoke violence even though those statements do not explicitly call for violence, then you ought to be subject to the same consequences that you would be subject to if you were to make statements explicitly calling for violence.
When the people see suitcases of ballots brought out and counted when all election monitors have been kicked out, the KNOW the election was stolen.
When people see election counting rooms, cover up windows so nobody can see what is going on “behind the curtain”, they KNOW the election was rigged.
When people see vote counting stop in major cities run by the opposition with your candidate maintaining a massive lead and then reopen the counting a few hours later with the opposition candidate ahead, they KNOW the election results are fraudulent.
At some point, the people have had enough of the fraud that they erupt spontaneously.
TN Patriot, the problem is that none of these claims of voter fraud have been able to stand up in a court of law. Trump’s legal team has so far lost dozens of court cases.
So in order for your claim of a stolen election to be true all of these courts, even ones with republican appointed judges, and including the Supreme Court, would have to be in on it. All republicans with positions of election oversight in all of these states would need to be in on it. All major media outlets, including FOX news, that have investigated these claims, would need to be in on it. At a certain point the scale of the conspiracy claim becomes too large to take seriously.
Not a single court has allowed the first piece of evidence to be presented. John Roberts does not want the court to get involved in the election and my guess is he calls each judge who is assigned a case and gives marching orders to that effect. All of the cases have been dropped by the judge before any arguments have been made.
The beauty of the democrats plan was the shear audacity of its size. In every instance they are fighting against anyone doing a forensic audit of the votes and the voting counting machines. they are running out the clock until next Wednesday at noon EST. If there is nothing to hide, why are they fighting tooth and nail to hide everything?
TROLLING are WE?
Unfortunately for YOU, NONE of the cases you mentioned ever went THROUGH a COURT PROCEEDING. ALL of them were blown off by the JUDGES in question!!!!!!
Troll on little anonymous one…does your trolling also look at how not one democrat or rino anywhere condemned the violence and destruction and deaths caused by the BLM and Antifa? Does your trolling offer any proof that Biden won the election? Prove that Biden won, you can’t.
I had an interesting email exchange with a friend’s husband. He informed me that Biden won in a landslide, that photos of Hunter Biden, naked, with little girls, was faked. The sad news is that this asshole moved to Texas from Portland, he ran away from Portland and brought his politics with him. He and his kind are going to destroy Texas but the difference for him will be that he won’t have anywhere to run away to once he’s killed Texas. No matter, he won’t believe that his politics have anything to do with the shit he’s soon to live in.
My girl…maybe, you are factually wrong: many prominent Democrats did, in fact, condemn any violence associated with any racial justice protests over the course of last year.
Ban this troll.
Pelosi, Harris, Nadler, Schiff, Schumer, AOC, Maxine Waters, Cory Booker, Omar didn’t condemn. In fact, they said the “protests” need to continue, get back in the street.
I would like to see your list of Dems who made contemporary condemnations. I bet it’s pretty short. The same goes for all the liberal media outlets. All praised the “protests.”
Get lost, shill…
Ban this troll.