Guest Post by The Zman
In theory, the difference between mob rule and liberal democracy is that the former operates outside of authority, while the latter is limited by a set of principles. The former is operating in the moment while the latter is deliberative. Instead of just doing what feels right in the moment, like exacting revenge, liberal democracy has processes and limits, forcing people to think about what they are doing before they act. It is majority rule slowed to a crawl by the ideals of western liberalism.
The problem is that liberal democracy is an industrial age political philosophy that is unsuited for the technological age. Fifty years ago, information flowed primarily by words on a page, carried around by men. Television and radio sped up the flow of information, but the information still got into those networks by foot. Before it could be on television, someone had to go out to the scene, make video, carry it back to the studio and then edit it. It was still a slow world.
Today, information flows at the speed of light. A conspiracy theory can be hatched and promoted to millions on-line in a matter of minutes. As the old expression goes, a lie is around the world before the truth is out of bed. It is why the race hoax has become a phenomenon of this age. By the time the truth of the incident has been revealed, we are onto the third or fourth race hoax. These stories collectively build up in the system to the point where they cumulatively become a truth of their own.
An easy example is the Chauvin case. There are people absolutely sure he stood on the man’s neck for nine minutes. They were convinced of this by the bombardment of lies they experienced on-line. They never bothered to watch the whole video when it was finally released. Why would they? They knew and everyone around them knew that Chauvin stood on Floyd’s neck until he suffocated. It is just another example of racist cops murdering an innocent black body for the crime of being black.
In a mass media society like ours, there can be no deliberation, so the psychology is that of the mob, not liberal democracy. There can be no concern for limits and process, as we are all forced to decide by those around us on-line. That is what happens in a mob of people excited by some event. As with a school of fish or a flock of birds, each person is responding to the actions of those around him. Mob psychology is an emergent property that transcends the mentality of the members.
A very good example is the behavior of corporate America. Supposedly, the heads of the largest corporations have been plotting to undermine what is left of election integrity in America. They had a “first of its kind” conference call about Georgia. They were compelled to act because, well, everyone around them is sure that Georgia has just reinstituted Jim Crow. They know this because everyone around them knows this and all of those people are good people like them.
We live in an age in which the most powerful people on the planet, some are the most powerful who have lived on this planet, truly feel they are in a twilight struggle against forces greater than themselves. The heads of the big banks think they are the little guy facing off against some invisible goliath. Others helpfully anthropomorphize it with pictures of people waving Trump signs. The insurrection hoax is all about validating the very real fear of the most powerful people on the planet.
This is the psychology of the mob. Whatever drove the people to show up on the street is soon confirmed and becomes the identity of the whole. The individual shows up because he is angry about something. Quickly he is just another corpuscle in the organism that is the collective anger of the members. He is now swept up in the mob, like a cork on an angry sea. Even though he could have real power in his own right, he feels powerless as a part of the mob swarming around him.
This is liberal democracy in the technological age. Democracy cloaks the people who are naturally in charge of society with the concept of the public will. Public policy is not the result of one man or a group of men, it is democracy. The price and supply of goods is not the result of decisions made by specific people, but by the invisible hand of the marketplace responding to millions of silent decisions. In a democracy, no one is responsible, because everyone is responsible, so no one is accountable.
In the slow motion world of the industrial age, this headless system can work reasonably well because people have time to stop and think. In the technological age, where no one can think about anything, cooler heads are trampled into the dust by mobs pushed along by forces external to themselves. Worse still, the mob mentality is amplified, so it is not just a mob, but a deafening mob. Those will real power fear the mob, so they lend their power to the mob.
Critics looking at what is happening, assume the people in charge, the people with real power, see some benefit in the chaos. Like liberal democracy, bourgeois objectivism is an artifact of a bygone age. In the technological age, the age of instant communication, the mob mentality is what prevails. What is good for the individual is no different than what is good for a liver cell. Individual good is subsumed into the emergent properties of the whole and the mentality of the individual is the mentality of the mob.
So much of what is happening today is just a replay of mistakes made a generation ago, often by people still in power. The assault on law and order is right out of the cultural revolution of the 1960’s. Most of the people in charge today were young adults back in those days. They should have the wisdom to see what is happening, but they care caught up in the moment like everyone else. They don’t feel like they have power, so they act like they are as powerless as the rest of us.
Liberal democracy in the technological age results in anarchy and mob rule. The consequences are inevitable. America is shaking itself to death over problems that could be mitigated with a little deliberation and respect for limits. No one has time for that as there is always another crisis, another mob demanding immediate attention for the object of their rage. Mob rule always ends in blood, either the blood of the mob or the blood of the innocent. This age most likely ends in both.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
The Dems have declared war on America and Americans. Whether it is HR dept’s not hiring Trump supporters, hospitals planning to discriminate against whites (Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital) or the unequal application of the law (Jan 6 arrestees vs. any BLM rioter) and on and on…..The civil war is here.
Now one Jerry Nadler (yep a small hat yet again!) is introducing a bill to expand the SCOTUS to 13.
The country is already dead but this will be the “crossing the Rubicon”…not that we have any faith in the SCOTUS but destroying it with 4 more Dems will be the straw that breaks the camels back….
https://www.everythinglubbock.com/news/national/the-intercept-dems-plan-to-unveil-bill-expanding-supreme-court-to-13/
Actually it is the government. FIFY
Fucking this right here^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This red and blue team shit has to stop. These fucking authors suck DONKEY DICK.
FUCK OFF WITH ALL YOUR TEAMS!!!!!!!!!
ZeroHedge has become so corrupted that they have started witholding articles to only those that pay for a membership fee.
ZeroHedge has become an enemy agent I’m sorry to report.
I love TheBurningPlatform and am happily contributing to it, because it asks, not extorts!
The Great Gaggle-Tyler Purge of June 2o2o. You had to be there…
I have never had meself blocked from the hedge’s articles,know they are trying “premium”but all articles there are also located elsewhere.
They say I can no longer visit at all without “premium”will then bail,till then,will visit all sites for info. and contribute to ones that really work for me(this site is one of them).
On a side note to admin.,if we contribute enough say by July will the thermometer end(barring a emergency),if so will not procrastinate and give now,perhaps thermometer space on page could be some daily jokes?
What say you folks here,jokes and give site a few bucks while they will still buy something?
There’s a lot one can criticize about ZH,
but calling their switch to a subscription model to “become corrupted” is outright hilarious, it only displays a certain socialist attitude by the accuser…
There are issues but yes the GI went over a line the Blacks do all the time. One issue is Blacks canvass White neighborhoods to come back at night to rob us. Another is Blacks destroy neighborhoods, cities, counties and states; it is wise to make them feel unwanted, just as they do us.
My experience in South Africa confirms your views rhs jr. There seems to be something in their inheritance that instigates violence and dishonesty. The parental mixtures are called ‘coloureds’ in RSA and they, together with Asians and Indians, are very much more civilised IMHO.
It is those of African descent that seem to be the problem which might have been created by our own exploitation of this continent in the past. Perhaps there is an embedded resentment which is materialised in bad behaviour? Whatever the reasons this is not going away and we will all pay the price in the coming years.
It’s the same with our American Negro, Peter.
They’ve gotten into the habit of believing their present racist social behaviors are justified based on three centuries of American history warped by our SJW educators littered with “fellow travelers”. The colonialism and exploitation angle is prioritized over the legal, educational, and technical progress that “white” economic expansion brought to everyone. EO and Affirmative Action on top of meritocracy isn’t enough when outright theft can be tolerated with the right people in charge.
Yes, same here in UK; continual snowflake SWs claiming rights without the corresponding responsibilities. But often the pendulum can return as social waves change direction – can’t see it just yet though.
what is being written as liberal democracy—antifa, blm, open borders, stimulus spending, a covid hoax, war on cops, open voting, etc.—sounds like a planned agenda of social and economic strife to result in a coup.
https://genzconservative.com/the-federal-reserve-for-dummies/#_ftn3
Complete fail by the author, even in theory.
A republic is limited by principles enshrined in its constitution. A democracy is “limited” by what the majority wants today.
Good point.
Not really. Look how well that worked. Talk to me of confederacy, because no righteous man dreams of empire.
Another good point!
A simple majority is a step forward toward tyranny of the majority.
Our present-day Progressive liberals understand this concept when they stooped to rigging the US election. Their compulsion to pack SCOTUS, do away with the electoral college or the legislative filibuster is a stark reminder the ultimate plan is Mobocracy, but they’re too stupid to realize it’s a death spiral creation they won’t be able to control.
Oh, the top realizes that quite well, they only believe it will happen after their time…
A very thoughtful article Zman, thank you. You have captured my own thoughts on this dysfunctional age of instant communication and confirmed its final conclusion. I remember and enjoyed the 60s when my generation engaged in drugs, sex and rock ‘n roll to the point that it is now destroying our societies – there is no going back to the ’50s when polite behaviour and personal integrity ruled the zeitgeist.
Chapter 13 of my book postulates a collapse of some sort, be it health (as of now), war which could well be in the runes or economic/global financial implosion of all the unpayable debt; or perhaps all three at once. I suggest that a return to the world of the 19th century may be unavoidable, but then, I won’t be around to see it.
If anyone would like an electronic copy of the complete book, I should be pleased to email a free PDF on request to: [email protected]