Guest Post by Kit Knightly
A new report, published by the United Nations, has claimed the covid19 “pandemic” would have been prevented had the UN – and specifically the World Health Organizaion – been given more global authority.
The report is titled Covid19: Make it the Last Pandemic and are the published findings of the Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response, which focuses on how the world can look to prevent “pandemics” in the future.
This “independent” panel is chaired by ex-New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, ex-President of Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, and other political figures (including noted globalist David Miliband), and was established last May by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. (How a report commissioned by the WHO, calling to give more money and power to the WHO can be called “independent” I don’t know.)
You can read all about it on the reports own website. (Why a single report from the WHO needs an entire website of its own, again, I don’t know).
There’s a lot to unpack in the report’s eighty-six pages of bureaucratic double-talk, but their main conclusions are:
- Elevate leadership to prepare for and respond to global health threats to the highest levels to ensure just, accountable and multisectoral action
- Focus and strengthen the independence, authority and financing of the WHO
- Invest in preparedness now to create fully functional capacities at the national, regional and global level
- Establish a new international system for surveillance, validation and alert
- Establish a pre-negotiated platform for tools and supplies
- Raise new international financing for the global public goods of pandemic preparedness and response
- Countries to establish highest level national coordination for pandemic preparedness and response
All of which can be generally summed up as “give the WHO (and their cronies) more money, and more power”.
Each section of their recommendations contains several bullet points of its own, far too many to go through all of them, but there’s definitely some paragraphs that should cause any attentive reader to raise an eyebrow:
WHO to establish a new global system for surveillance, based on full transparency by all parties, using state-of-the-art digital tools to connect information centres around the world and including animal and environmental health surveillance, with appropriate protections of people’s rights
…Which means essentially legalising global surveillance programs on a massive scale, with – of course – “appropriate protections
of people’s rights” (and shame on you for thinking otherwise).
And then there is:
Future declarations of a PHEIC by the WHO Director-General should be based on the precautionary principle where warranted
…Which calls for the Director-General of the WHO to have the power to declare a global “pandemic”, not because there definitely is a new disease killing people, but because they think there might be.
Essentially handing the Director-General of the WHO the power to simply create a pandemic whenever they feel the need. Somewhat ironically the panel for “pandemic prevention”, is recommending making “pandemics” far more likely.
Further, the report goes out of its way to praise the countries which engaged in the most authoritarian “anti-Covid” measures.
Specifically, China is praised both for their “fast identification” of the virus, and their incredibly stringent lockdown measures. Another country held up as a good example is New Zealand, which was likewise very strict.
Conversely, the countries with allegedly “poor results” in dealing with Covid – though never named – are universally criticised for “denial of scientific evidence”, “eroding trust in healthcare measures” and having leaders who “appeared sceptical or dismissive” of the pandemic.
It goes on and on in that fashion. Every step of the way praising centralisation, globalisation and totalitarianism at the expense of sovereignty, individualism and liberty. And while the report itself may couch its agenda in soft diplomatic language, the authors behind the report have been far more forthright about what they really mean.
In a clear attack on national sovereignty, Helen Clark is quoted in the Guardian as saying:
[The pandemic was] compounded by a lack of global leadership and coordination of geopolitical tensions and nationalism weakening the multilateral system, which should act to keep the world safe.”
As well as criticising current regulations which put limits on the WHO’s powers:
[The WHO] was hindered and not helped by the international health regulations and procedures,
It’s fairly obvious what the message is here.
Throughout the overblown coronavirus “pandemic” narrative we’ve seen national governments all over the world use the phoney crisis to “temporarily” expand their powers.
Now the United Nations is getting in on the act, hoping to expand its global power mandate.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Let’s restate the premise as if we are cognitively impaired.
Your neighbor who has no children of his own wants all the parents on the block to take his parenting advice.
Your neighbor who accidentally burned his home to the ground because he put his BBQ grill up against the side of the house wants everyone in the neighborhood to take his advice on fire safety.
Your neighbor whose marriages have all failed (3) wants everyone to take his advice on how to be in a successful marriage.
yadda, yadda, yadda.
If you cannot do something successfully on a micro level, how on Earth could you be expected to do a better job on the macro scale?
It was WHO that vociferously denounced any and all plans to limit air travel from heavily infected areas into far flung destinations for months, not only allowing the spread to continue, but to actively speed up it’s distribution. It was only in those nations who rejected their advice where far lower numbers of cases were reported. Now they claim it was because they were allowed enough power to dictate terms that they could have limited its spread? Do they imagine that we are either stupid or inattentive to reality?
Do they imagine that we are either stupid or inattentive to reality?
Yes they do! And when it comes to a large numbers of people they would be right.
If the WHO cared about the spread of Covid 19, they would close our southern border.
HF- A valid argument could be made that the great unwashed is both stupid and inattentive to reality and good judgement if the tv stirs them into a fear frenzy. TPTB will get their world government before it is all said and done.
The beatings will stop when moral improves and the official joo world order is in place.
Absolutely not and as a matter of fact run all their ignorant evil asses out of New York, give the building back to the corrupt Rockefellers and never mention the un again.
Yes! Send the UN scumbags packing and sell the property to lucky Larry “Pullet” Silverstein, Tisch Co., or Mike Bloomberg. They know what to do with real estate.
Don’t shoot until you see the blue of their helmets..
They sure do make a wonderful Target
Like most TBP´ers, I have been skeptical of the whole Covid thing from the beginning. Not that it was not a major issue – it is -but why the governmental hysteria. I now have a theory.
Fauci and his fellow mad scientists at CDC, the WHO, NIH and other places, have been deep in bed with the ChiComs, for one reason or another (money, the opportunity to do “research” illegal or banned in their own countries, stupidity). They have been working with them and giving them money. They knew exactly what the Chinese were up to, knew it was dangerous as hell, knew the Chinese are sloppy and incompetent, but they did not care. Fauci himself is an obvious ego maniac and probably hoped to win a Nobel Prize off of this dodgy work, and I am sure some Chinese money slid into his pocket. Some of these academics and scientists are pretty weird so you never know what they are thinking. But we do know now that Fauci was up to his neck in it and lied to Senator Rand Paul.
It seems that the work on bat virus that the Chinese were doing could really have unleashed the Black Death on the world, depending on the “success” of their experiments. Fauci and the other Western scientists involved knew this also.
When the word out of Wuhan broke, they all panicked. They did not know just how bad it was or how bad it would be. That is why the British scientists published absurdly high projections for Covid deaths and why Fauci buffaloed Trump into the whole lockdown thing. He really did think this crap might wipe out the world.
By the time it became clear that this was a serious but not world destroying event, they all had too much invested to walk the cat back. Half the population had lost its collective mind – these are the folks screaming at you in a parking lot, in the open air and sunshine, because you don´t have a space suit on.
Now things are unraveling on them big time. Stand by for more revelations.
Saw this today. Maybe the idea applies….
“So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men.”
Troof!
YAWN. Who gives a flying fuck??
I’m guessing here …. but I bet the UN has issued THOUSANDS of “reports” since their inception. So, quick … name 5 off the top of your head. Can’t do it, can ya? Point is, a UN “report” is not worth using as toilet paper. And everybody knows it.
true but Agenda 21 seems to have definitely been used as a roadmap. WEF on the other hand seems to be making hard rules. They state something and sure enough a few months later the media floats their ideas
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2021/05/14/reuters-border-patrol-agents-contemplating-early-retirement-in-droves-from-bidens-us-welcome-patrol-n390042