YOU COULD FACE CONSEQUENCES

They deleted this tweet, but we know what they are planning. Know your enemy.

Image

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

103
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

88, huh?

That’s anti Semitic.

Rusty Pipes
Rusty Pipes

I have good memories from ’88. I met my (first) future ex-wife in ’89…

Anonymous
Anonymous

Since you know the number is pulled out of their ass, 88 probably has some coincidental Kaballa significance.

BL
BL

Anon- You are correct…… translated from the Tzava at’ Harivash of the Kabbalah 88, You should show compassion for the Shechinah when speaking in a way that removes the words from GOD.

Shechinah can refer to the place where a person or animals dwell. (or goyim)

Anonymous
Anonymous

I thought that was a solid intuition. You just need to know the enemy.

mark
mark

Back in the day 88’s were a hellva artillery round…had an Uncle who told me…

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

I got out just in fucking time,

ticky
ticky

Aces and Eights, chai

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia

This intense push to get everyone vaccinated has a strange odor to it. It is almost as if the vaccine has some special ingredient that TPTB want everyone to have. Some ingredient that the public might not ingest on their own. Kinda like Jim Jones kool-aid.

Nah, there I go off on my conspiracy theories again. I’m sure governments and the elites are only doing it because they care about the wellbeing of us dirt people.

Ken31
Ken31

It may not be the case that THESE not-vaccines are not the intended weapon. First run, they need to work out how to get everyone to take it. Then the next iteration will be weaponized.

It would go a long way to explaining the inconsistencies of the scamdemic, if it was a dress rehearsal. This is why TPTB spend a lot of money on think tanks, institutes, and intel analysts. They are not smart enough to come up with a plan on their own, but they could compartmentalize such planning. Maybe that is wild speculations, maybe I am just doing what they do.

So this could be the weapon, or the rehearsal to one, or maybe something else altogether, but when they lie so often about so much, we can be sure they are up to no good.

Unvisible
Unvisible

HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT FOR THOSE WITH EYES WIDE SHUT:

comment image

A Dolphin Hiding
A Dolphin Hiding

6’s ? Not seein’ it, sorry.

On the other hand, can’t decide if that is
* A big, friendly smile underneath
* A Saturnian scythe
* Encoded message they are all going to bug out to Antarctica once they make even Switzerland unfit for habitation

Unonymous
Unonymous

No fret Dolphin. Eyes wide shut.
comment image

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug

The Bible is flawed and so not divine. Humans thinking they are Satanic and acting Satanic does not conjure Satan into existence any more than your gawd. You are emotionally incontinent in a scary and intellectually intractable world.

So what if it’s on purpose. The original number was ‘668’ not ‘666’. The star of David is 666. They bait you on if it’s intentional. You can think nothing else but what they want you to think in static futility. Just pray 24/7.

Btw, ‘reality’ = ’66’ and ‘doug’ =’6′.
Also, Uno = ‘1’ and ‘nymous’ = ‘665’. You sick puppy.

Stephanie Shepard

That one I hadn’t noticed before.

Anonymous
Anonymous

comment image

BL
BL

Sneaky bastards……

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug

I completely agree with your analysis, Ken31. Just the right allowance for known unknowns. Of course, if little people die as a side effect, that is fine with T.H.E.M. Whatever the death outcome, they will weaponize the narrative hell out of it. Most Murikans vill listen. So that makes this situational awareness incredible genius. How the hell does this order stay together? When do we water crops with Gatoraid?

BL
BL

Correct me if I am wrong but it is against the law for your employer to require you to disclose your personal health information. As I said before, YOU should require the employer to sign a legal document that requires THEM to guarantee that if you comply they will be responsible for any harm from said vaccine , their legal department won’t go there. They cannot require you to produce proof of vaccination, you must volunteer. If there are any HR specialist out there pipe in about this subject. TIA

Anonymous
Anonymous

From a legal perspective this is a bad idea. They are already by law liable. I don’t think you want to weaken the existing blanket protections by implying they are insufficient.

BL
BL

Does blankets protection cover all loss of wages, loss of contribution to retirement plans and in case of death income to family? If you are so impaired as to never return to work and require a caretender are they liable? Never trust that you will be fully covered unless spelled out completely.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

If it is covered by worker’s comp, you are screwed and are not allowed to sue. Your heirs may have a case, but you do not.

BL
BL

Which is why I would ask them to sign my document taking it away from workers comp. guidelines. If they won’t sign it relieves you from their request. It is worth a try or get a job in a company that does not require the vax. If they fire you, take them to court.

Llpoh
Llpoh

BL – you have this wrong. Employers will almost 100% certainly be able to ask about the vax, and almost 100% certainly be able to fire an employee who does not get vaxxed. The legal obligation to provide a safe workplace will cover the employer. It is not a individual health issue but an OSHA issue.

BL
BL

Llpoh- That is fine, but we are not obligated to roll over for them. What happens when they require that you join a certain political party or openly worship Satan.

Workers should be given an opt out option releasing them from workplace illness which you take at your own risk.

If you knew this was the biblical mark of the beast, would you still support the side of these corporations?

Mygirl....maybe

So, if you have a pre-existing condition, say an auto immune disease, and cannot safely take the jab, can an employer still mandate you do? Would that not be endangering their health and isn’t OSHA all about health and safety?

BL
BL

Loopey- If you read the WEF 88% notice you would have figured out that 56% does not add up to 100%, and the 16% of employers who MAY require SOME employees could drop the figure down to a mear 40%. So stick that in your 100% peace pipe and smoke it Chief.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

Hippa?

BL
BL

HIPAA, could stop employers from requiring proof of Covid vax. That does not include some types of businesses that are not employing a shopper, etc. which means you may have to wear a mask or will be excluded from travel.

Warren
Warren

Forcing people to take a experimental medical treatment is a violation of the UN Charter and the Nuremberg Code.
Criminalizing this by governments but not the private sector is not justified under the we were just following orders.
Otherwise the next Dr. Menglele will. set up an NGO , instead of just working as a government ahent. and it will be perfectly legal

Nothing but the truth.
Nothing but the truth.

Saw this article today which could make those employers mandating the jab, culpable for any injuries or adverse effects –

https://www.newstarget.com/2021-05-18-osha-employers-mandate-covid-vaccines-liable-adverse-reaction.html

Llpoh
Llpoh

Of course that is correct. However the employer is highly unlikely to be criminally liable, or civilly even, but the employee will be covered as for any other injury. The employer will be able to point to a huge body of “evidence” in their defence.

Anonymous
Anonymous

That is a really good huge point I overlooked.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug

I’m happy to oblige. You’re wrong. Not only is there no magic dirt, there is no magic text. It’s the people, xxxxx!

comment image

From the next post, “A Nation of Sheeple”:

So, as Lysander Spooner so aptly said, “But whether the Constitution really be one thing or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorizes such a government as we have had or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.”

subwo
subwo

BL, The EEOC has dictated that it is lawful for a business to require employees to be vaxxed. I read that airlines like Delta have a two employ system. New hires are required to be vaxxed but current employees are not required. They argue that they only had 6% jobs to fill for all current applicants so they can require it. I was in home depot at noon. I counted 2 men and one woman besides me that were maskless. All employees were so that must be a condition of employment too.

BL
BL

My statement still applies, and as I also said before, if an employer mandates you be vaxxed you can seek employment from one that does not. Fuk Delta and the EEOC.

TampaRed

has anyone come across a list of major employers who require employees to be vaxxed?

Llpoh
Llpoh

As I detail below, my belief is there will be few of such businesses. Legal reasons will make it almost certain.

Anonymous
Anonymous

The EEOC has not constitutional authority to make such dictates. But that hasn’t ever stopped the federal government before.

TampaRed

employers can require you to vaxx–
however,since these are still only conditionally approved,i’m not so sure that they can require it w/o assuming liability–

BL
BL

Tred- That has been our point throughout this thread.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

It will be approved shortly. Get in fucking line. Sheep.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

That was then, this is now.

Stephanie Shepard

I heard OSHA is saying if employers require their employees to be vaxxed they’ll be liable for any side effects because it’ll be considered an “on the job” injury. I tried to find a source to post but all I could find were articles behind a paywall.

MrLiberty

https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine

Here is the link.

And big shock that the crimes of big pharma would be socialized onto employers…but hopefully this will make them think twice. But where are the injunctions against the university of California and all the other colleges and universities demanding these experimental shots?

Stephanie Shepard

Settlements for the adverse side effects will probably have a domino effect the same way it did with asbestos.

Anonymous
Anonymous

They did. There have been no statutory cutouts to exempt employers from the consequences of their own actions. An injury resulting from an employer’s policies is always a clear cut case of workers compensation.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Good luck getting made whole in the worker’s comp courts.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug

Getting made ‘hole’. TFIFY lol

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

My son’s college says you need to be vaxxed. But don’t really have to. If you don’t you will be subjected to horrible quarantine and shaming procedures. That’s how they will get around the lawsuits in my opinion.

Rusty Pipes
Rusty Pipes

Many of the people promoting the vax are also supporting de-population (get out of our way, you fucking peasants!) I’ll pass…

Anonymous
Anonymous

Clumsy and arrogant.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

Don’t they always tell us what they are going to do before they do it?

BL
BL

TN- You might want to refer to”The Simpsons” episodes from ten years ago, there is prolly a clue in there somewhere. 🙂

Anonymous
Anonymous

I think that is important to their brand of pagan/satanism. It allows them to do the evil and blame their victims.

Anonymous
Anonymous
TN Patriot
TN Patriot

Currently, there is a worker shortage throughout the United States. If employers stick to their guns regarding “vaccines”, then they will lose a large % of their applicants and those who have taken the jab will be able to negotiate from a superior position. I don’t think any large corporation wants to give their employees that kind of power.

This is another scare tactic to drive the herd. We have the power, but only if we decide to use it.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug

There is no worker shortage. We are flooded with workers and business restrictions. There is no abundance of jobs. Slaves have jobs. If workers are not valuable, they don’t get paid like they’re valuable. Americans should be valuable workers. We ain’t. There is no such thing as passive force from the outside.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

I guess it depends on if you live in a free state or a dictatorship. In the last 6 weeks, I have seen numerous help wanted signs in Memphrica, Nashville, Little Rock, Oklahoma City and Denver. In fact, a grandson got a really nice position in Denver earlier in the year and his company is looking for some more like him.

I can assure you someone looking to hire a mechanic is not going to insist on a vaccine certificate. There are too many job openings and not enough mechanics to fill them.

Anonymous
Anonymous

There are plenty of workers. Just not many willing to pay them. Why the fuck should anyone want to participate in a society that values wall street profits over lives. Products don’t need to cost more to pay workers more. Record profit margins need to come down.

Cricket
Cricket

Within a few years I fully expect all those lawyer ads on TV currently asking if you used baby powder or were exposed to asbestos, will morph into lawyer ads asking ‘did you have the experimental gene therapies they called Covid vaccines? You may be entitled to compensation…’

BL
BL

Cricket- The vaxx Nasis/Big Pharma are immune from litigation, yet the sheep line up. Talk about stupid. Big Pharma are the only ones coming out of this with immunity and billions of $$$$.

Cricket
Cricket

All these lawyers managed to get large settlements from somewhere for drugs like Fen-phen and Vioxx. It can be demonstrated that there are already therapeutics available that negate the need for the emergency authorization for the so-called Covid ‘vaccines’. If it’s not big pharma, it will be the corporations or government agencies who forced people to get the Covid shot or anyone else involved in the process that lawyers can find with deep pockets.

In Canada you can also go to the Human Rights Court, where nearly 100% of defendants lose and are forced to pay damages, with the notable exceptions of Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn.

And when someone asks ‘have I been vaccinated?’, I respond with ‘are you HIV positive?’ or ‘have you had an abortion?’. When they look at me puzzled, I explain ‘oh, I thought we were asking each other personal health questions.’

BL
BL

Did Fen-phen and Vioxx have advanced immunity before the drugs were released for use?

I like the way you handle the personal vaxx question, but sadly I think a quantum tattoo is in humanity’s future if they submit.

TampaRed

bl,
vioxx is one of the reasons that i am very skeptical of big pharma/medicine–
20 years ago i was on vioxx–it was the best painkiller i’ve ever used–knocked the pain out w/o getting you high or zombie like & it lasted the entire time until it was time 4 another dose–
the problem is that it was a killer/disabler & they knew it b4 it ever went onto the mass market–
i was in my early 40 s when i was on it & it did not bother me–what if it were today when i’m 20 years older & 20 lbs heavier,would i be one of their victims?

BL
BL

Tampa- My point was the Covid vax had immunity for Big Pharma before distribution to the public, Vioxx and Fen-phen did not, Cricket used them as examples of litigation with future litigation of Covid vaxx cases. Correct me if I am wrong that Vioxx and Fen-phen producers had immunity, obviously not.

TampaRed

i agree w/you,i just wanted throw that in–
between friends,family and myself,i’ve got several bad experiences i could tell about vaccines & medical testing–

Cricket
Cricket

Lawyers have found ways to get compensation for injuries caused by the HPV vaccine Gardasil. Ironically, it’s alleged Merck skipped proper testing for Gardasil due to losses they suffered when Vioxx was pulled from the market. I’ve no doubt lawyers will be able to the same for injuries caused by the so-called Covid vaccines.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

Good one.

TampaRed

cricket,
i saw a sign 4 one of those already here in tampa–

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

One can hope. Go lawyers! For once.

RiNS

This is good news! If they are doing this obviously, the rollout is going to plan and the Schwabs are starting the get frisky. The fact that they had to delete it is just the icing on the cake!

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly

Employers will back-off, except for those who already jumped in with the corrupt government.


OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance.

The question asks whether an employer who mandates employees receive these experimental COVID-19 shots is required to record any adverse events as a result of these injections. Such recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may not only leave an employer vulnerable to worker’s compensation claims, but such incidents could also impact the employer’s safety record.

The question and answer in full:

If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

This clarification comes as an increasing number of employers seek to mandate the experimental injections despite possible illegality. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported this beginning trend in varieties of fields, including machine operators, office workers, restaurant waiters, and medical staff.

“The Houston Methodist Hospital network is mandating vaccines for both existing employees and new hires, barring an exemption,” Chip Cutter of the WSJ wrote. “Those who fail to comply will at first be suspended without pay, and later terminated.”

Under the new OSHA clarification, such employers may be held liable for injuries due to these requirements.

For example, 39-year-old nurse aide Janet More died last New Year’s Eve within 48 hours of receiving one of these injections. According to her brother, she at least had the impression “it was a mandatory vaccine that she had to take for her job.”

A similar case involves the sad death of 28-year-old Sara Stickles, a nutritional specialist at Swedish American hospital in Rockford, Illinois who died just five days after her second shot of one of the mRNA gene-therapy vaccines. She too had the clear impression that these injections were required by her employer.
— Article continues below Petition —
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/employers-may-be-liable-for-any-adverse-reaction-from-mandated-coronavirus-shots-osha

Llpoh
Llpoh

Let me know when they say that employers will not be liable for the spread of the virus in the workplace if the employer does not require the vax. So, saying the employer is liable for vax injury is not the same saying that they are not responsible for the spread of the virus owing to not requiring the vaccine.

The employer is in a legal conundrum. But requiring the vax is by far the least risky as it keeps the employer covered against claims they did not provide a safe workplace.

Mygirl....maybe

Requiring the vac is indeed less risky for employers. Last year in the first COVID-19 wrongful death lawsuit, the daughter of an Illinois factory worker alleged that her mother died of the virus contracted by her father, who worked at a meat processing plant. She sued and won.

The nation’s businesses are vulnerable to claims that workers brought the coronavirus home and infected family members, according to Reuters. At least one risk analysis firm said such litigation could cost employers billions of dollars.
…The complaint against Aurora alleges that Ricardo Ugalde worked on the company’s processing line in April when Aurora knew it had a coronavirus outbreak at its facility. It alleges the company failed to warn employees or adopt prevention measures.

Based on this lawsuit, there are several arguments to be made in favor of mandating vaccines.

There is a misconception regarding Pharma company immunity from vaccine lawsuits. That’s because pandemic-related claims for vaccines will be routed to a rarely used federal program set up to encourage drugmakers to help combat public health emergencies. It spares pharmaceutical and device makers from costly liability lawsuits in exchange for taxpayers compensating injured patients — though it doesn’t guarantee there’s funding to do so.

https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/08/14/579150.htm

https://www.pymnts.com/legal/2020/virus-infection-lawsuits-could-cripple-united-states-employers/

Tilt
Tilt

I forgot to go to law school, but isn’t it against federal law to mandate treatments brought out under the EUA?

Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA

falconflight
falconflight

Legal smeagal

Anonymous
Anonymous

Despite rumors to the contrary, the FDA approval will be rammed through in short order by hook or by crook. Thus, the question is moot.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Only if congress rams through a law to let them.

Mygirl....maybe

…isn’t it against federal law to mandate treatments brought out under the EUA?

Short answer is no.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidance indicating that employers generally can mandate COVID-19 vaccinations. “The EEOC specifically addressed vaccinations that are authorized or approved by the FDA,” noted Anne-Marie Vercruysse Welch, an attorney with Clark Hill in Birmingham, Mich.

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) also recently said that the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) generally allows employers to mandate vaccines that have been approved by the FDA. The DFEH specially noted that the FDA has authorized and recommended three COVID-19 vaccines—all of which have been authorized under an EUA.

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/employer-mandate-covid-vaccine-eua.aspx

KaD
KaD

overthecliff
overthecliff

If I get the vax ,I can’t get the disease and can’t transmit it. I can go maskless inside and outside except in crowded venues because I might contract the disease and or transmit it to someone. Something about this logic makes my bullshit alarm go off.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

If you get the vax, you CAN contract the disease (see NY Yankees), but you probably will not die, unless you have comorbidities.
Hope that straightens it out for you and explains why you still should mask up. 😉😉

Zulu Foxtrot Golf
Zulu Foxtrot Golf

My company was very taken aback by how many people said they were not getting vaccinated: Upwards of 85% said nope.

Put a feather in that cap you fucken witch doctor cunts.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

Sounds like you work with some great people.

mark
mark

The instinct to survive is starting to stir…even among the propagandized, brainwashed, and dumbed down…to a degree…

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

A lot of my elderly friends could not wait to get the jab. Most are pretty conservative, so I was shocked when they lined up. The granddaughter was pushing her Nana to get it when we visited with them a few weeks ago. My wife was smart and did not get into an argument with her, as she is totally against it.

All of my sisters and BIL got it. A couple were shocked when I told them it had not been approved by the FDA and had not been fully tested. As I said on another thread, Lester Holt told them to get it and they did.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I suspect vaccination rates and popularity are complete fabrications. Why start being truthful now about anything? I trust a poll like Z F G over anything coming out of official sources.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

Based on the number of people I know who have taken the jab, I tend to believe Admin’s 37% number he used in This was a Test and We Failed. For further proof, I look at the number of people still wearing the face diaper after almost all government agencies have told us it is OK to take it off.

Zulu Foxtrot Golf
Zulu Foxtrot Golf

My company was recently acquired by a mega-corp, but all the legacy enployees were a part ofnthe company when it was family owned and operated with about half ofnua being vets and a good chunk of the other half being self-dependent types. I got lucky as hell starting here. Like-minded people are a refreshing change from all the other tool bag jobs Inhad outside the military.

ZFG, out.

P.S. Their mask shite is also being shucked by a good chunk of us as well lol.

Llpoh
Llpoh

The situation is this: almost everywhere, the employer is required by law to maintain a safe workplace. If anything happens, the de facto position is that the employer is liable. The penalties for failing to provide a safe workplace include both civil and criminal penalties.

So, as an employer, that is what you face. If you do not require the vaccine, and an employee transfers the virus to another employee, and that second employee gets sick, or perhaps even dies, the employer may find itself well and truly screwed. Business owners could well be personally at risk both civilly and criminally, and a defence would be difficult to make. The employer would be screwed, pure and simple.

If the employer requires that employees get vaccinated, and that employee gets sick and or dies, the employer may find itself well and truly screwed. The claim would be for workplace benefits, but in my generally expert opinion, civil or criminal penalties would be unlikely to apply, as clear defence would be available to the employer.

However, in the event that the employer requires vaccinations, the employer is generally covered from civil and or criminal liability as they can show they took all appropriate steps to provide a safe workplace.

So, the employer has to take a chance, one way or the other.

But here is the thing, in summary. If the employer requires the vaccine, the employer would almost certainly not be subject to civil or criminal penalties. If the do not, then personal risk can be significant.

The laws will drive the decision. A business must maintain a safe workplace, and any injury is evidence that the business did not. Not requiring the vaccine would be heavy evidence that the employer ignored a known risk, and that is a serious breach of the law.

In all honesty, if I still owned a business, it is likely that I would require that employees be vaccinated. I was never in the business of putting my personal assets or freedom at risk. So I would either do one of two things: require the vaccines, or close the business. I would have to weigh the moral/ethical issues – ie wrist of death or serious injury from the vaccine – vs the moral/ethical issues re abandoning my capital and making perhaps hundreds of people unemployed.

Unless the laws are changed or amended to provide the employer relief if they do not require the vaccine, then I would expect the vast majority of employers to require the vaccine. They really do not have a choice except close the business or assume personal risk.

Anonymous
Anonymous

So, as an employer, that is what you face. If you do not require the vaccine, and an employee transfers the virus to another employee, and that second employee gets sick, or perhaps even dies, the employer may find itself well and truly screwed. Business owners could well be personally at risk both civilly and criminally, and a defence would be difficult to make. The employer would be screwed, pure and simple.

Was this true of Influenza, which has an FDA approved vaccine? You know, back in the bad old days Before Covid?

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2

Good question!

TampaRed

llpoh,
the us chamber of commerce is powerful on both sides of the aisle–if they wanted employers to not be liable if an employee transmits the disease on the job they would get their way–

Leah
Leah

Thanks for posting another side. Always willing to hear it. Below is not meant to be obtuse.

Unless the definition of vaccine was changed, and if so, I’m queasy in my gut. I originally read the OP and was pissed as fck. Was ready to blaze a rant. Someone I know says company will let people who are jabbed (not vaxxed) have free reign if they entered the jab info into a DB. The company would suppress the depts who had a low rate. Wtf? It’s about boosting the numbers.

Asked boss about thoughts if our company did the same. Reaction was freedom. I died a bit on the inside.

In your thoughts, is this a vaccine? It doesn’t appear to be approved. Do your thoughts stand if this isn’t an approved jab?

Thanks.

Glock-N-Load

The claim would be for workplace benefits, but in my generally expert opinion, civil or criminal penalties would be unlikely to apply, as clear defense would be available to the employer.

But the employer knows there is a possibility of an employee getting hurt and or killed from the vaccine. How is that not negligence?

Llpoh
Llpoh

Because the “science” and general medical advice is that people should be vaccinated. The employer could use that defence easily. It would not be negligence. People are being told they need to vaccinated. That is the defence.

It would quite possibly be negligence, legally, if the employer does not require the vaccine and someone dies, as the “science” is saying that people need to be vaccinated. And if the employer ignores that advice, they are potentially toast if an employee catches the virus at work. I would not want to be that employer.

bug

I don’t buy it.

Go ahead and PROVE they caught the virus at work.

Just like in all of your positions, Llpoh, you only care about how anything might affect you. Anything else is below your notice.

ReluctantWarrior
ReluctantWarrior

In most cases they will want you to sign a waver absolving them of blame for any injury or deaths suffered. I would refuse the take the vaccine on that basis and then if they fire you, sue the pants off them. What good is a job if you are dead or injured? I guess if you become disabled as a result you could get disability.

Llpoh
Llpoh

RW – on what grounds will you sue? The employer by law must maintain a safe workplace. “Science” says that the vaccine is required to do that. The EEOC has said employers can so require.

Remo
Remo

World Economic Forum also announced they are working with the Biden* administration to ensure that vaccinated people survive the coming food shortage.
In a totally unrelated event, the Bureau of Reclamation has shut off the A Canal for the first time in history. That canal irrigates 150,000 acres of farmland.

TampaRed

remo,
do you think it might be possible that the name biden will be as malignant as the name stalin?

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading