An allegedly leaked vaccine supply contract between Pfizer and the government of Albania has sent some shockwaves through social media over the last few days.
It doesn’t contain any really groundbreaking information but, if it’s genuine, it certainly confirms the worst suspicions many of us had about the terms of the vaccine supply agreements.
The document was first published by the Albanian independent media outlet Gogo.al back in January, but came to prominence in the Anglosphere three days ago, when Twitter user Ehden posted a long thread breaking down its contents. His account has since been “limited” (we’ve all been there), but you can read his blog here.
In the interests of open discussion, and without endorsing its authenticity, we present the whole document below. We recommend anyone interested download it, just in case it disappears from the net, as potentially embarrassing documents tend to do.
So, is the document genuine?
That’s hard to say. It certainly wouldn’t be unprecedented for it to be a “honey trap” leak. A document that makes outlandish claims, which many in the alternate media run with, only for it to be debunked and discredit all those who reported it. It happens. It’s why you should always approach any “leak” with supreme caution.
But one argument for the contract’s authenticity is its lack of any “huge groundbreaking admission” that would be the hallmark of a fake leak.
Since it was posted by Ehden, other “contracts” have leaked, which contain similar language and clauses. But, as these aren’t 100% proven genuine either, it would be wrong to use them to corroborate each other.
Stronger evidence can be found on the website of the Israeli Ministry of Health, where they have a (heavily redacted) copy of their “REAL-WORLD EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE COLLABORATION AGREEMENT” with Pfizer (we downloaded a copy of that too, just in case.)
These two documents do have some strong similarities.
Under “definitions” for example, both use the same word-for-word phrasing for the definitions of “product” and “affiliate(s)”. “Intellectual Property” is very similar too. As is a lot of the language under “Term and Termination”.
That is evidence that the document could be real…OR its evidence that good sources of Pfizer’s boilerplate legal contracts are available on the internet, as a useful resource for fakers. It cuts both ways.
There’s circumstantial evidence for the document’s authenticity, of course. The fact the Twitter account discussing it was “limited” almost immediately, for example. The fact it has been on the internet for nearly seven months and hasn’t been the subject of a single official denial by either party OR a “fact check” from one of those famous “independent fact-checkers”. These are all points in its favour.
As yet, it’s hard to be certain either way. But let’s say, for the sake of argument, that it’s real. What does it say?
A lot of the talk so far has been about the awful financial terms, but that’s not at all unusual in state contracts with private firms. The government agrees to terrible terms for the taxpayer, whilst accepting a back-hander here or there or a cushy job in the future. It’s the way the world works.
No, really, in the fifty-two pages, there are two key paragraphs that people should focus on.
First, under section 5.5 “Purchaser Agreements” [our emphasis]:
Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement. Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. Further, to the extent applicable, Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized.
This is simply logically irrefutable. Chemicals that have existed for less than year, by definition, have unknown long-term effects. (Which, incidentally, is what we got banned from Twitter for saying yesterday).
Second, under section 8.1 “Indemnification by the Purchaser” [again, our emphasis]
Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their respective Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research, development, manufacture, distribution, commercialization or use of the Vaccine, and each of the officers, directors, employees and other agents and representatives, and the respective predecessors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (“Indemnitees”), from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation), whether sounding in contract, tort, intellectual property, or any other theory, and whether legal, statutory, equitable or otherwise (collectively, “Losses”) arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine, including but not limited to any stage of design, development, investigation, formulation, testing, clinical testing, manufacture, labeling, packaging, transport, storage, distribution, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, licensing, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, provision, or use of the Vaccine.
Essentially Pfizer is totally protected from any legal liability in the event their vaccine actually does have any of those aforementioned “adverse effects that are not currently known”. A later paragraph even says that the government must pay Pfizer’s legal fees in the event they get sued.
And there’s no reason, at all, to think this would be just an Albania thing. Clearly, if they included it in this contract, they included it in every contract. In South Africa, for example, it is known Pfizer demanded sovereign assets as be used collateral for their legal indemnity.
*
To sum up, if the document is real, Pfizer’s vaccine distribution contracts:
- Acknowledge their product may not work.
- Admit it might have unknown harmful effects.
- Recognisess they are likely to be sued if that’s the case.
- Ensures legal protection of their huge profits.
We knew all that already. But it’s always good to get it in writing.
Many thanks to the reader who forwarded this story to us on Telegram. With our Twitter account currently “limited”, it’s more important than ever we use these alternative channels of communication. You can follow our telegram channel here.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Looks like we are going to have a big vacant lot to our north
No, they were neutered a long time ago. Ask many Canuks what they think of their Gov. and most smile and say they support it.
It’s a 50/50 mix. That being said I m stunned by how many people are taking the vax at the request of the same people and institutions they claim to distrust. It speaks to the power of the media’s ability to brainwash people.
Is it time yet ?
Yes.
Wait for the whites of their eyes…
The whole world is getting Pfizered. Legalized murder , guaranteed profits.
Know thy enemy –
1. CDC Director, Rochelle P. Walensky, is a jew.
2. CDC Deputy Director, Anne Schuchat, is a jew.
3. CDC Chief of Staff, Sherri A. Berger, is a jew.
4. CDC Chief Medical Officer, Mitchell Wolfe, is a jew.
5. CDC Director, Washington Office, Jeff Reczek, is a jew.
6. COVID Czar, Jeff Zients, is a jew.
7. COVID Senior Advior, Andy Slavitt, is a jew.
8. HHS Secretary, Xavier Becerra, is a jew.
9. HHS Ass. Secretary, Rachel Levine, is a dude and a jew.
10. Pfizer’s CEO is a jew.
11. Moderna’s vaccine created by a jew.
12. Johnson & Johnson’s CEO is a jew.
13. Teva is an Israel pharmaceutical company with a jewish CEO.
14. Regeneron Pharma CEO is a jew
15. AstraZeneca’s CEO was to take over as CEO of Israel’s Teva Pharmaceuticals which means he’s a jew
Now waste more of your life making a list of what religion every official and person identifies with. Start a website with categories. who knows, maybe it will support ur thinking.
You think you can keep using the same tricks forever? Your tribe needs to wake up to the futility of containing truth.
Anti-semitism is a mental illness.
Dude.. #8 is a wetback…not a jew… (sarcasm)……
In Spain, many Jews pretended to convert so that they would not be expelled for the crimes of their people. Their descendants do live in south and central America, too.
Jesus was a Jew.
No he wasn’t. He was an Israelite. Jew was not even a word in his time, it was mistranslated by Edomite, Kenite, Caananite Pharisees much later in the revised mistranslate Masoretic Text. Itself a willful mistranslation of ancient scripture by Edomite imposters who mixed themselves in with the Captives taken from the land of Judah by the Persians.
Today’s Jews are a mixture of Edomites, Caananites, Kenites, and Ashkenazis and all are of the seed of the Serpent.
Nice try, but no cigar. He was Jewish all right. His name was Yashua and he lived and died by Jewish customs and law. Sorry.
Did you even read the reply?
He was an Israelite and a Hebrew for sure and he lived and died by Israelite customs and laws not Jewish laws. They were given to Moses an Israelite Hebrew.
Jew is a made up name that only appears in mistranslated scripture. A bastardization of the name of the tribe and territory of Judah.
You know just enough about it to spread heresies for Satan and you will be held accountable on that great day because you could have known but chose not to.
Let me drop this down again from below where you can see it.
” Under the heading of “A brief History of the Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: “STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A ‘JEW’ OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISREALITE OR A HEBREW.” (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).” From page one of, https://fathersmanifesto.net/thejews.htm
The Pharisees Christ spoke to were part Hebrew but not Israelites.
Ahhh … I love the smell of the rotting smoldering brains of Joo Haters so early in the morning. Added bonus … there are 6 of you ignorant sluts!
The word “Jew” makes it’s first appearance in II Kings 16:6 …. “and drove the Jews from Eilat” !!
Thus putting an end to your blatantly erroneous lie.
Well, for most people.
You Joo Haters will type at the speed of light that this is a mistranslation, part of the Vast Conspiracy, blah blah blah … when, in fact, it is simply there, as plain as the nose on your face, which you spite in order to advance your hate.
====
Then, as if hell-bent on proving what an ignorant jack-ass you are you claim that “Jew” is a “bastardization of the name of the tribe and territory of Judah.”
Bastardization??? My god!! That’s EXACTLY the origin of the name!! You ignorant slut, Jane! You take Truth, and stand it on it’s head, all because ….. Joos bad, verrry bad.
Here is a Roman coin from Jesus’ era.
— The inscription says — “Yehuda defeated”
— The image is of a woman in mourning who represents defeated Yehuda
— on the other side is the image of the victorious Emperor Vespasian. The coin was minted to commemorate his victory over Yehuda ….the JEWS.
— And, of course, the Romans did NOT nail a sign on the cross — “King of the JEWS”! Nah. Never happened. The sign actually said “King of the JUICE” … for Jesus loved orange juice. /s
.
Just ignore me. I’m only a grumpy old relic. Carry on … keep spreading your lies and bullshit …. seems like you have quite a few willing sycophants here to cheer you on.
1) Jesus mother …… Jewish
2) Jesus, circumcised according to Jewish law
3) Jesus, worshiped faithfully in synagogue
4) Jesus’ disciples and other pals …all Jews
5) Jesus’ preaching … ALL from Jewish texts
6) Jesus observed all Jewish festivals and made the annual pilgrimage to Temple
7) Sign over his tortured mangled bleeding body … “King of the Jews”
CONCLUSIONS as put forth by “Anon I” and his merry band of Mental Midgets —–> Jesus was born, lived, taught and died as a Jew, BUT …. HE WAS NOT A JEW!!
STUCKY CONCLUSION: You Joo Haters … and consequently, Jesus Haters …. are seriously, very seriously, fucked up in the head.
Do you have legitimate evidence for those statements? The name on the coin does not say Jew.
“The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word “Jew” did not appear in it.
The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word “Jew” did not appear in it either. The word “Jew” appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.
Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word “Jew” nor did they care. They accepted the English word “Jew” as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios.” How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a new English word to them.”
From, http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm
“Origin Of The Word “Jew”
The word ‘jew’ is a modern word. It’s only been around for a few hundred years so when we talk about jews in ancient times, we cannot use the modern moniker we thoughtlessly use today. In doing so, we mistakenly link modern day ‘jews’ to the people of the Bible, the descendants of Judah.
The word jew comes from, depending on what language we are using, ‘Judean’, which was a person who dwelt in the land of Judea.
If I move to Japan, does that make me Japanese? Thankfully not, and as such, we can say the same thing for the people who moved to the southern part of ancient Palestine in the days of John Hyrcanus. Josephus informs us that it is he that is responsible for bringing in this mixed multitude(mostly Edomites) and forcing them to convert to the laws of Moses, what we later call Christianity.
Later in the 2nd to 6th century A.D., the term Judaism was applied to the religion of these Edomites(Idumea), Canaanites, and Pharisees, just like they hijacked the word “jew” so they could pretend to be the people of the Bible.
This is also why they include the Torah in their “holy” book, their ultimate source of Pharisaism(modern day Judaism), the Babylonian Talmud. It’s Identify theft; they need some truth in their books to push their lies and deception.
“Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in Middle English in various ways: “Gyu,” “Giu,” “Gyw,” “Iu,” “luu,” “Iuw,” “Ieu,” “Ieuu,” “Ieuz,” “Iwe,” “Iow,” “Iewe,” “Ieue,” “lue” (“Ive”), “Iew,” “Jew.” All these forms were derived from the Old French “Giu,” which was earlier written “Juieu,” derived from the Latin accusative “Judæum” with the elision of the letter “d.” The Latin form “Judæus” was derived from the Greek ‘Iουδαĩοσ; and this in turn from the Aramaic , corresponding to the Hebrew a gentilic adjective from the proper name “Judah,” seemingly never applied to members of the tribe, however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the south of Palestine (Jer. xliii. 9).” –Jewish Encyclopedia”
From,
Here is a Rabbi, FF to 0:45-0:50 ten seconds if you can handle it.
Stop saying it’s all Jews who are the problem, they’re not, anymore than all Muslims are terrorists. Every single one whom you have identified are not true Jews, they’re Zionists (or Ashkenazis). They are satanists, cabalists, and everything you see being done now by them is pure evil.
I was brought into this world by a Jewish doctor; my personal physician is also Jewish. Neither of these two were/are megalomaniacal mass-murderers, obviously. My physician is a good man, who also runs a methadone clinic here in town. I trust this man with my health without reservation, because he is one who honors his Oath.
Anyone who believes all Jews are bad and must die is entirely misinformed. Who controls the information? Who controls the media?
Do some fuckin research for a change before you start spouting racial hatred, mein freund. Or at least hate on the right people.
Mr. Oblivious said “Anyone who believes all Jews are bad and must DIE is entirely misinformed. Who controls the information? Who controls the media?”
MUST die?
You need to do some research. They are not a race for starters. Their very own Jewish encyclopedia says it’s a mistake to call them Jews.
” Under the heading of “A brief History of the Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: “STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A ‘JEW’ OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISREALITE OR A HEBREW.” (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).” From page one of, https://fathersmanifesto.net/thejews.htm
Thank you for your clarification.
Were you going to add anything to the conversation, or are you just here to make sure I got that straight?
Try following the entire conversation and learn to read for comprehension. The everyday “Jews” you speak of are allowing the Zionists to use and hide behind them. Unless they begin renouncing them in public it will continue. People like Unz and Makow and Brother Nathaniel put themselves on the line daily but are shunned and condemned by these “Jews” you talk of.
So who controls media and who are the right people we must hate ? Your inference to any Germanic/Nazi influences are totally misplaced ,a diversion tactic that the Jews have overplayed since WW2 as a cover for their own nefarious agendas. Anti semitism is continually promoted and repeatedly shoved down our throats, while the attacks on Christians are completely ignored. Go figure.
Correct. I don’t believe in Muslim mass immigration and think Islam is crazy, but I’m not going to hate on the Muslim carer who looked after my dying father in law, the muslim female doctor who gave my kids mask exemptions and told them not to get the jab, or the muslim doc who saved my wife’s life. Most Jews are just ordinary people getting through life.
Sure ‘most’ Jews are okay and just getting by. They are not the problem . It’s the one’s with all that wealth ,power and influence driving this evil agenda against humanity. And that whole Islamic terror threat was another one of the diversions created by them to keep the world divided and in fear.
Good work. I just assume heavy Jewish infiltration in any institution doing evil things.
Bill Gates is not a Jew; Jeff Bezos is not a Jew; Klaus Schwab is not a Jew…See, anyone can play this game. Now, let’s move on to Hungarians.
They are just chump change front men.
IF YOU TRY TO FORCE VACCINATE ME…I’M GOING TO KILL YOU.
Sentiment is now shared by gun owners across America. The bioweapon is a SYRINGE with graphene oxide.
Our defense is a gun with LEAD BULLETS. You have been warned.
https://gab.com/Gabriels_Horn/posts/106667161955949227
Plumbous -oxide injection with a protective cuprous shell.
No “boosters” needed.
https://canadafreepress.com/article/cdc-fda-confess-they-had-no-virus-when-they-concocted-the-test-for-the-virus
The US congress gave all vaccine manufacturers complete immunity in 1986. And all while under no more duress than the typical bribery/blackmail pressure they generally face.
Concerning the manufacturers immunity from lawsuits concerning their “vaccine”. It’s possible that their protection from liability can be pierced if it can be proven that the shot can be classified as Gene therapy and not a “vaccine”. The ingredients and design of the “vaccine” has more in common with “gene therapy” than it does with a vaccine. Hopefully the legal profession is looking into this…..
If such a contract has been signed by the UK government then I say this…
Did you ask me to read, consider or sign a contract with Pfizer or other company? I was not asked.
Did you obtain my agreement or consent to negotiate such a contract? No you did not.
Therefore Pfizer and others have no valid claim.
Pfizer’s claim is against the Government who have acted illegally and unlawfully therefore the contract is null and void.