2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine

Guest Post by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Monday, the FDA approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.

Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.

The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.

But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.

First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — available for use.

The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.

Second, the FDA pointed out that both the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, and the existing vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”

There is a huge real-world difference between products under an EUA compared with those that FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S law.

Both the Nuremberg Code and Federal Regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-licensed vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products.

The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from an generous retinue of liability protections.

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.

The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.

Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume that COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.

And FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority of vaccines available in the U.S., if not all, remain unlicensed EUA products.

Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.

The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
TN Patriot
TN Patriot
August 25, 2021 9:22 pm

And nobody can see the results for the long term testing of Comirnaty or the side-by-side test results of the “vaccinated” vs. control group because neither of these tests have been conducted. The FDA has approved a drug that has not been fully tested and has unknown side effects in the short and long term.

Anything smell fishy about this whole process?

Leah
Leah
  TN Patriot
August 25, 2021 9:44 pm

As an acquaintance of mine once said, “Smells like a TunaCunt.”

RJ
RJ
  TN Patriot
August 26, 2021 11:00 am

There is no control group because they vaccinated the ones who received the placebo.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  RJ
August 26, 2021 3:48 pm

Exactly, therefore they have NOT completed an FDA study of the “vaccine’s” efficacy, thus the need for a booster so soon after the initial jabs.

Once you get the booster, you will be safe from the virus, trust me, the science is settled. /s

Ken31
Ken31
August 25, 2021 9:23 pm

It is right there in the name of the product: COMIRNATY

Co-mortality-naty – It both kills and gives birth. It kills the lab rats so that the plutocrats may live eternally as transcending gods.

I am convinced these are human experiments and that is the prime directive of it.

Profit and power are side shows. This will hide better in chaos.

centinel
centinel
August 25, 2021 11:16 pm

Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

You have the right to refuse regardless of what it says. I’m sick of these vacuous explanations that people come up with to defend a decision to not take the shot. “It’s not FDA approved.” “This isn’t the approved version.” How about “Go to hell. I will never take your shot and I don’t owe you any explanation or rationale about why.”

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
  centinel
August 26, 2021 12:15 am

But if it causes financial or educational issues, it’s useful to cite the legal rationale…Then you can sue them…

messianicdruid
messianicdruid
  pyrrhuis
August 26, 2021 12:38 am

The courts are in Contempt of Citizen.

TonyBaloney
TonyBaloney
  centinel
August 26, 2021 4:32 am

Or BFYTW!

Ned Kelly
Ned Kelly
August 26, 2021 2:50 am

The University of Oxford‘s Clinical Research Group conducted a study recently which found that people who get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) carry in their nostrils 251 times the viral load of the Chinese Virus compared to “unvaccinated” people.

The preprint paper, which is set to be published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, is groundbreaking in that it confirms the threat of vaccinated people who are “shedding” the virus and who even knows what else on others when they venture out in public.

Even if the jabbed are not showing symptoms, researchers found that they carry with them extremely high viral loads that transform them into what Dr. Peter A. McCullough, M.D., Ph.D., calls “presymptomatic superspreaders.”

“This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally,” McCullough wrote in a piece for The Defender, a newsletter of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.”

Ken31
Ken31
  Ned Kelly
August 26, 2021 7:34 am

This is bullshit. If thy publish that, it will be more fake “science”. Asymptomatic spread? Nice try. They may be shedding spike proteins, but that is not the same as viruses. If they are infected and shedding virus, they will have symptoms.

If the only thing they use this for is to show asymptomatic spread, then I can guarantee you this study will not be reproduced anywhere.

This was not even a topic of debate before 2019. It has always been a conjecture that appealed to alarmist, though.

Mike
Mike
August 26, 2021 10:13 am

It was all smoke and mirrors. Their definition of “full approval” is giving approval to a vaccine that isn’t even on the market yet and then pretending that the experimental vaccine that they reauthorized the emergency use authorization for are the same thing. How clever.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Mike
August 26, 2021 3:51 pm

Car dealers get in trouble for a bait and switch program and nobody is in danger of losing their lives. Of course, nothing will happen to anyone at FDA or Big Pharma, other than getting big bonuses for a job well done.