“This Interview Could Save Your Life” Part Two: The Dangers of the Injections

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
ursel doran
ursel doran
August 29, 2021 9:03 am

Fauci finally Admits what Real experts have been saying for two years.
Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw—It reports cases that don’t exist.
The PCR tests were run at 40 cycles. Fauci admits cannot get an accurate result above 35 cycles. As I have continually informed you, the test was run at high cycles intentionally in order to scare people into the vaccine with false high case numbers.
Americans are endlessly gullible. And they are so poorly educated that they are incapable of understanding the issues before them.

Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts

Ken31
Ken31
  ursel doran
August 29, 2021 2:16 pm

The design of the tests means anything over 28 is too high to be meaningful. They do not have dual specificity, is why. Just primers and a generic test for DNA. Due to dimerization, you can’t trust that. No paper trying to do that would pass peer review.

In other words, he is still lying.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  ursel doran
August 30, 2021 1:27 am

The PCR tests can generate false positives, but you seem to be implying that the true number of Covid cases is lower than the 37 mil official cases in the US. The opposite is true. The CDC estimated – based on a randomized antibody sero survey – that 40% of the population had had Covid way back in March. It seems probable that half of the population has had Covid – with many of the cases so mild they didn’t even know they had it or bother to get tested.

B_MC
B_MC
  Administrator
August 29, 2021 9:53 am

Scroll down a bit and you will see videos of protests in Switzerland, France and the UK.

Cleveland
Cleveland
August 29, 2021 10:10 am

These interviews can also save your life.

https://1000covidstories.com/

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
August 29, 2021 10:30 am

Anyone have a link to Part One?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  ILuvCO2
August 29, 2021 4:57 pm

niebo
niebo
August 29, 2021 10:38 am

I like how McCullough, er, abstains from answering certain questions, in part because, with any reading between the lines, his answer(s) are a matter of deduction but he avoids allowing himself to be “scarlet-lettered”.

And my question is . . . at what point to do the asleep and brainwashed begin to ask the more pertinent question, “Well . . . why on earth would they lie about ever’thang . . . just to get everybody to take a shot that nobody needs?”

Ken31
Ken31
  niebo
August 29, 2021 2:20 pm

They are not programmed not to accept any explanation without hard proof. That might never exist. None of us know exactly what is going on, just the general patterns and specific lies.

I wouldn’t mind others thoughts on the ethics of what you are describing as avoid the scarlet-letter.

mark
mark
  niebo
August 29, 2021 2:31 pm

niebo is back.

Good to see you buddy!

GNL
GNL
  mark
August 29, 2021 3:22 pm

Mark,

I just got off the phone with my 83 year old father. He’s sure he beat Covid and now he’s going to take the jab.

mark
mark
  GNL
August 30, 2021 10:01 am

That is insane Donkey…do your best to warn him!

Mygirl....maybe
Mygirl....maybe
  niebo
August 29, 2021 2:55 pm

I like how McCullough, er, abstains from answering certain questions, in part because, with any reading between the lines, his answer(s) are a matter of deduction but he avoids allowing himself to be “scarlet-lettered”.

McCullough is currently being sued by Baylor medical systems to the tune of a millions dollars. They sued him the same day they mandated that ALL their employees get the clotshot.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-expert-dr-peter-mccullough-sued-by-texas-health-system/

https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2021/07/28/all-baylor-scott-white-workers-required-covid-19-vaccine-october/

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  niebo
August 30, 2021 1:36 am

McCullough is a very effective and believable speaker. It’s the kind of video (albeit a little too long) that you could pass along to a vaccine evangelist and perhaps start them thinking … EXCEPT then the interviewer pipes up with questions about conspiracies and propaganda and even saying that opposition to treatments stemmed from Trump Derangement Syndrome. I’m not saying the interviewer is wrong. I am saying he detracts A LOT from the effectiveness of the video.

Guest
Guest
August 29, 2021 11:54 am

I think this video will be the one.
Disturbia.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Administrator
August 29, 2021 1:24 pm

Yes. Just a cursory reading of comments to various good-informational sites (sorry this one too) shows the BOTS are out and planting comments designed to dissuade and cripple the very good information we now have. The NWO guys are, clearly, becoming very worried. But the uninformed will take these sly comments and discount the information. Watch it folks.

mark
mark
August 29, 2021 2:35 pm

I have a brother-in-law in Texas, in sales…under tremendous pressure to take a jab…going to send this TBP link to him…have sent many others.

DON’T TAKE THE POISON BRO!!!!

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  mark
August 30, 2021 1:52 am

As I understand it, the FDA played fast and loose with the “approval”. From a regulatory point of view, they treated the Pfizer mRNA vaccine as two separate “things” even though they’re identical molecularly:

1) there is the currently-available Pfizer vaccine for which they’re extending both the emergency use authorization (EUA) and Pfizer’s release from liability

2) there is the Pfizer-BioNTech “Comirnaty” (brand name) vaccine, which is “approved”, but only subject to completion of safety testing regarding myocarditis that won’t be complete until 2023. The “approved” Comirnaty brand does not exempt Pfizer-BioNTech from liability and is not even currently available.

It’s true that the current Pfizer vaccine and Comirnaty are physically identical, but from a regulatory point of view they’re not. Pfizer gets to be held harmless because their vaccine is being administered under an extended EUA, and the only “approval” the FDA has issued is subject to two more years’ safety testing.

If your brother in law has to be vaccinated to keep his job, tell him to demand an FDA-approved vaccine. That means Comirnaty only. It is not available (because Pfizer would be liable for damages) and it’s subject to additional safety testing. If he demands to see a vial labeled “Comirnaty” they won’t be able to provide one.

flash
flash
August 29, 2021 2:38 pm

“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.”

― St. Antony the Great

willem
willem
September 1, 2021 7:27 pm

I have one simple observation to all this stuff about mandates. Why are each of us presented, prior to injection, with the text of a package insert listing all the potential side-effects of the shot, if we are not expected to consider these risks and make our own uncoerced informed decision?