Why All The Fuss About Ivermectin?

Authored by Brian C. Joondeph via AmericanThinker.com,

First hydroxychloroquine, now ivermectin, is the hated deadly drug de jour, castigated by the medical establishment and regulatory authorities. Both drugs have been around for a long time as FDA-approved prescription medications. Yet now we are told they are as deadly as arsenic.

As a physician, I am certainly aware of ivermectin but don’t recall ever writing a prescription for it in my 30+ years’ medical career. Ivermectin is an anthelmintic, meaning it cures parasitic infections. In my world of ophthalmology, it is used on occasion for rare parasitic or worm infections in the eye.

Ivermectin was FDA approved in 1998 under the brand name Stromectol, produced by pharmaceutical giant Merck, approved for several parasitic infections. The product label described it as having a “unique mode of action,” which “leads to an increase in the permeability of the cell membrane to chloride ions.” This suggests that ivermectin acts as an ionophore, making cell membranes permeable to ions that enter the cell for therapeutic effect.

Ivermectin is one of several ionophores, others including hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, and resveratrol, the latter two available over the counter. These ionophores simply open a cellular door, allowing zinc to enter the cell, where it then interferes with viral replication, providing potential therapeutic benefit in viral and other infections.

This scientific paper reviews and references other studies demonstrating antibacterial, antiviral, and anticancer properties of ivermectin.

This explains the interest in this drug as having potential use in treating COVID.

Does ivermectin work in COVID?

I am not attempting to answer that question, instead looking at readily available information because this drug has been the focus of much recent media attention. For the benefit of any reader eager to report this article and author to the medical licensing boards for pushing misleading information, I am not offering medical advice or prescribing anything.  Rather, I am only offering commentary on this newsworthy and controversial drug.

What’s newsworthy about ivermectin? A simple Google search of most medications describes uses and side effects. A similar search of ivermectin provides headlines of why it shouldn’t be taken and how dangerous it is.

YouTube screen grab

The Guardian describes ivermectin as horse medicine reminding readers considering taking the drug, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow”, saying it’s a medicine meant for farm animals. The FDA echoed that sentiment in a recent tweet, adding “Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” their word choice making it obvious who the tweet was directed to.

Perhaps the FDA didn’t realize that Barack and Michelle Obama often used the term “y’all” and that some might construe the FDA tweet as racist.

The FDA says ivermectin “can be dangerous and even lethal,” yet they approved it in 1998 and have not pulled it from the market despite it being “dangerous and lethal.” Any medication can be “dangerous and lethal” if misused. People have even overdosed on water.

It is true that ivermectin is also used in animals, as are many drugs approved for human use.

This is a list of veterinary drugs with many familiar names of antibiotics, antihypertensives, and anesthetics commonly used by humans. Since these drugs are used in farm animals, should humans stop taking them? That seems a rather unscientific argument against ivermectin, especially coming from the FDA.

And healthcare professionals are not recommending or prescribing animal versions of ivermectin as there is an FDA-approved human formulation.

Does ivermectin work against COVID? That is the bigger question and worthy of investigation, rather than reminding people that they are not cows.

A study published several months ago in the American Journal of Therapeutics concluded,

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

To my knowledge, these 18 studies have not been retracted, unlike previous studies critical of hydroxychloroquine which were ignominiously retracted by prestigious medical journals like The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine.

Yet the medical establishment refuses to even entertain the possibility of some benefit from ivermectin, castigating physicians who want to try it in their patients. 18 studies found benefit. Are they all wrong?

Podcaster Joe Rogan recently contracted COVID and recovered within days of taking a drug cocktail including ivermectin. Was it his drug cocktail, his fitness, or just good luck? Impossible to know but his experience will keep ivermectin in the news.

Highly unvaccinated India had a surge in COVID cases earlier this year which abruptly ended following the widespread use of ivermectin, over the objections and criticism of the WHO. In the one state, Tamil Nadu, that did not use ivermectin, cases tripled instead of dropping by 97 percent as in the rest of the country.

This is anecdotal and could have other explanations but the discovery of penicillin was also anecdotal and observational. Good science should investigate rather than ignore such observations.

The Japanese Medical Association recently endorsed ivermectin for COVID. The US CDC cautioned against it.

There is legal pushback as an Ohio judge ordered a hospital to treat a ventilated COVID patient with ivermectin. After a month on the ventilator, this patient is likely COVID free and ivermectin now will have no benefit, allowing the medical establishment to say “see I told you so” that it wouldn’t help.

By this point, active COVID infection is not the issue; instead, it is weaning off and recovery from long-term life support. The early hydroxychloroquine studies had the same flaw, treating patients too late in the disease course to provide or demonstrate benefit.

These drugs have been proposed for early outpatient treatment, not when patients are seriously ill and near death. Looking for treatment benefits in the wrong patient population will yield expected negative results.

Given how devastating COVID can be and how, despite high levels of vaccination in countries like the US, UK, and Israel, we are seeing surging cases and hospitalizations among the vaccinated, we should be pulling out all the stops in treating this virus.

Medical treatment involves balancing risks and benefits. When FDA-approved medications are used in appropriate doses for appropriate patients, prescribed by competent physicians, the risks tend to be low, and any benefit should be celebrated. Instead, the medical establishment, media, and regulatory authorities are taking the opposite approach. One has to wonder why.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Saxons Wrath
Saxons Wrath
  Administrator
September 4, 2021 8:58 pm

Why all the fuss about Ivermectin?
Because it stops the (((Elites))) from murdering you, quite simply…
Either via the “jab” to kill you slowly and passively (with plausible deniability), or letting COVID and “modern medicine” whack you with improper treatment and ventilators…
Agenda 2030 is coming..
Six BILLION people over the next 10 years is a LOT of dying and killing…
The Georgia Guidestones and Klaus will tell you all about it.
Prepare yourself accordingly…

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
September 4, 2021 4:23 pm
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
September 4, 2021 4:25 pm

“Antiviral (e.g. HIV, dengue, encephalitis)

Recent research has confounded the belief, held for most of the past 40 years, that ivermectin was devoid of any antiviral characteristics. Ivermectin has been found to potently inhibit replication of the yellow fever virus, with EC50 values in the sub-nanomolar range. It also inhibits replication in several other flaviviruses, including dengue, Japanese encephalitis and tick-borne encephalitis, probably by targeting non-structural 3 helicase activity.97 Ivermectin inhibits dengue viruses and interrupts virus replication, bestowing protection against infection with all distinct virus serotypes, and has unexplored potential as a dengue antiviral.98

Ivermectin has also been demonstrated to be a potent broad-spectrum specific inhibitor of importin α/β-mediated nuclear transport and demonstrates antiviral activity against several RNA viruses by blocking the nuclear trafficking of viral proteins. It has been shown to have potent antiviral action against HIV-1 and dengue viruses, both of which are dependent on the importin protein superfamily for several key cellular processes. Ivermectin may be of import in disrupting HIV-1 integrase in HIV-1 as well as NS-5 (non-structural protein 5) polymerase in dengue viruses.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711

Robin Banks
Robin Banks
  Iska Waran
September 5, 2021 7:52 am

Excellent article. I had been looking and collecting info about Ivermectin. The article gave me what I was looking for.

B_MC
B_MC
September 4, 2021 4:47 pm

These ionophores simply open a cellular door, allowing zinc to enter the cell, where it then interferes with viral replication, providing potential therapeutic benefit in viral and other infections.

So we should take zinc with Ivermectin?

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
  B_MC
September 4, 2021 6:49 pm

Yes…And you should be taking zinc and D-3 already…

CCRider
CCRider
  Administrator
September 4, 2021 5:14 pm

So, Carlin was right again:

nkit
nkit
  CCRider
September 4, 2021 5:53 pm

You mean about the same brush on all four areas??

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
September 4, 2021 5:22 pm

I can give you billion$ & billion$ of reasons TPTB do not want to recognize IVM or HCQ as treatments for convid.

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
  TN Patriot
September 4, 2021 7:16 pm

Another reason is that they want you dead…

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
September 4, 2021 6:48 pm

Tens of millions in Africa take Ivermectin for protection against parasites, and they don’t get Covid either!…It’s safe, and highly effective, but unprofitable for Big Pharma…and of course won’t kill or paralyze you like the mRNA shot…

ASIG
ASIG
September 4, 2021 11:49 pm

I want to Tractor Supply today to pick up some fencing and since I was there I wanted to check to see if they still had Ivermectin available and they were completely out of the Durvet brand of Ivermecdtin (apple flavored). They did have a few boxes of Zimecterin Gold and I bought a couple boxes of that.

After I got home I notice that brand (Zimecertin) also includes praziquantel 7.7%. Does anyone know anything about that other ingredient?

In the past they’ve always had plenty of the apple flavored Ivermectin but now none. I’m wondering if it’s being snapped up as fast as it hits the shelves.

Mygirl....maybe
Mygirl....maybe
  ASIG
September 5, 2021 12:11 am

DON’T take that brand of horse paste, it’s for liver flukes and similar parasites. The 1.87 % ivermectin is safe…it’s straight ivermectin in a carrier base. Three ingredients only. What you just bought isn’t safe unless you’re under medical supervision. 7.7 % praziquantel is a huge amount, meant for a horse that weighs 900 lbs.+ Side effects include…

Side effects requiring immediate medical attention
Along with its needed effects, praziquantel may cause some unwanted effects. Although not all of these side effects may occur, if they do occur they may need medical attention.

Check with your doctor immediately if any of the following side effects occur while taking praziquantel:

Black, tarry stools
blistering, peeling, or loosening of the skin
bloody diarrhea
blurred or loss of vision
chest pain or discomfort
chills
cough
dark urine
diarrhea
difficulty swallowing
difficulty with moving
disturbed color perception
dizziness
double vision
fainting
fast, slow, or irregular heartbeat
fever
general feeling of discomfort or illness
general tiredness and weakness
halos around lights
hives, itching, skin rash
joint pain, stiffness, or swelling
light-colored stools
lightheadedness, dizziness, or fainting
muscle pains, cramps, or stiffness
nausea
night blindness
overbright appearance of lights
painful or difficult urination
puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue
red skin lesions, often with a purple center
red, irritated eyes
redness of the skin
severe abdominal or stomach pain
seizures
sleepiness or unusual drowsiness
sore throat
sores, ulcers, or white spots on the lips or in the mouth
stomach discomfort with or without nausea
stomach pain
sweating
swelling of the eyelids, face, lips, hands, or feet
swollen glands
thickening of bronchial secretions
tightness in the chest
tremor
troubled breathing
tunnel vision
unusual bleeding or bruising
unusual tiredness or weakness
upper right abdominal pain
vomiting
yellow eyes and skin

https://www.drugs.com/sfx/praziquantel-side-effects.html

ASIG
ASIG
  Mygirl....maybe
September 5, 2021 12:22 am

OH – OK – but nothing serious, that’s a relief.

Thanks.

ReluctantWarrior
ReluctantWarrior
September 5, 2021 7:36 am

Why all the fuss? Because it works and it exposes the phony medical establishment that is pushing an unproven if not damaging gene expression altering shot.

Mr Anon
Mr Anon
September 5, 2021 3:11 pm

Why all the fuss about Ivermectin?? Simple. The rules for an EUA specifically state that no other treatment is available. Ivermectin makes a farce of the whole premise for giving you experimental gene therapy which is designed to do nothing but eventually kill you.

Tam
Tam
November 30, 2021 3:42 am

FLCCC says that Ivermectin is useful in all stages of the disease. It is far more effective in early treatment, and as mentioned, tests during the late phases will not see the powerful recoveries of the sort that make trials seem effective. But this does not mean it is useless in late stages of the disease, or that it may not produce a remarkable effect.