BBC: “Nearly 13% of hospital patients with confirmed Covid were unvaccinated.” You Mean, 87% Were Vaccinated?

Via Blue State Conservative

To the BBC, this headline was best. “Covid-19 in Wales: A third of positive cases are unvaccinated.” Correctly translated, this means that at least 66% were vaccinated, but wait, there’s more!

In the second paragraph, we learn that “Nearly 13% of hospital patients with confirmed Covid were unvaccinated.” So, 87% were vaccinated.

But wait, there’s more!

Although 80% of patients have been double-dosed with a vaccine, public health officials said this is not evidence that the vaccine is not working – and that vaccines keep 95% of people out of hospital.

One-third of positive cases were not vaccinated, and 13% of the unvaccinated were hospitalized with confirmed cases of COVID. And 80% of the hospitalized patients had both doses. But that doesn’t mean the vaccine does not work.

Jab Juice keeps 95% of people out of the hospital, but 80% of the people with COVID in the hospital were vaccinated.

The BBC just turned water into wine!

But wait, there’s more.

The sheer numbers of people vaccinated – nearly 95% of those over 60 and 84% of those under 60 – mean that statistically, double-vaccinated people will still be a significant proportion of hospital patients.

The vaccine will keep 95% of people out of the hospital, but we’ve seen so many in the hospital because so many of them are vaccinated. And that must explain why two-thirds of COVID-related deaths are among the vaccinated.

The piece also reports that the actual number of hospitalized over 60 are unvaccinated, which undercuts all the other facts in the article, but it must. The goal (beginning with the headline) is to get more people vaccinated even if they still end up sick, in the hospital, or dead.

Because it works!.

I guess the missing component is the definition of “works.”

I can help. Ivermectin works. No hospitalization is required, nor must we suffer ridiculous headlines like the one from the BBC, or – and this matters – the numerous harms attributed to The Jab™.

This article was originally published at Granite Grok.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Russ Wood
Russ Wood
October 5, 2021 9:29 am

But – but – but WITHOUT any jab, the chance of ending up in hospital is less than TWO percent! So now, WITH the jab, it’s risen to FIVE percent! Er – what does one call a NEGATIVE vaccine?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Russ Wood
October 5, 2021 10:57 am

This roughly confirms what you’re saying.

Gomer
Gomer
  Russ Wood
October 5, 2021 11:09 am

“…what does one call a NEGATIVE vaccine?” POISON!

Just Thinking
Just Thinking
October 5, 2021 9:29 am

THAT is some serious math there, folks.

I’d love to hear Boris walk us through that.

Actually JRB, freewheeling it, as his handlers scramble about in a frenzied manner.

Did Boris comb his hair?

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 5, 2021 9:40 am

Of course, the “vax” work. Even there is no real way to know, but your symptoms will be much less severe once you got “vaccinated”. Trust “science”!!!

Ken31
Ken31
  Anonymous
October 5, 2021 3:21 pm

I always found it odd to make a claim about something completely unverifiable.

Reaper
Reaper
October 5, 2021 10:06 am

I bet Lou Costello could do the math.

B_MC
B_MC
October 5, 2021 10:07 am

Is this the same BBC? What is going on?

“So Trump was right.” Thus begins a broadside in the Sunday Times that amounts to a clarion call for the world: America’s president came to power in an election that was “rigged.”.

“The American public is slowly waking up to the fact that they are being led by an ineffectually devious, senile halfwit,” Rob Liddle writes.

https://trendingpolitics.com/narrative-collapse-british-media-finally-appear-to-be-questioning-bidens-u-s-election-legitimacy-knab/

Misfit71
Misfit71
October 5, 2021 11:23 am

I think its time to eliminate the socially engineered words ‘breakthrough case’ because the numbers don’t support such bullshit in two words – it is not a breakthrough when the shit simply does not work as a vaccine

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Misfit71
October 5, 2021 6:11 pm

The traditional phrase for those ‘breakthrough cases’ is ‘vaccine failure,’

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
October 5, 2021 12:24 pm

Three kinds of lies – lies, damn lies, and statisics.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MrLiberty
October 5, 2021 6:12 pm

Remember the 6 million.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 5, 2021 6:07 pm

You Mean, 87% Were Vaccinated?

You’d just be charged with mathcrime, for pointing this out without a permit, and exiled to a prison camp in Australia.

Don
Don
October 6, 2021 1:13 am

Ahhh! But you are missing the point , the vaccinated maybe dying at a higher rate but at least they will be free of Covid when they die ! Success !!!!