“Proceed With Caution At Your Own Peril” – Merck’s COVID ‘Super Drug’ Poses Serious Health Risks, Scientists Warn

Via ZeroHedge

As it turns out, all the scientists and doctors who insisted that Merck’s “revolutionary” COVID drug molnupiravir is extremely safe weren’t faithfully adhering to “the science” after all. Because according to a report published Thursday by Barron’s, some scientists are worried that the drug – which purportedly cut hospitalizations in half during a study that was cut short – could cause cancer or birth defects.

So much for having a “strong safety profile,” as Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed in an interview on the day Merck first publicized the research.

It’s perfectly understandable why Merck might choose to play down this safety risk: assuming it’s approved, the drug is widely expected to be one of “the most lucrative drugs ever” – which is one reason why Merck’s shares soared into double-digit territory after the announcement.

As we reported earlier this week, Merck and its “partner” Ridgeback Biotherapeutics will profit immensely by charging customers up to 40x what it costs to make the drug, which Ridgeback originally licensed from Emory University for an “undisclosed sum”. The drug was developed with funding from the federal government.

According to Barron’s, some scientists who have studied the drug believe that its method of suppressing the virus could potentially run amok within the body.

Some scientists who have studied the drug warn, however, that the method it uses to kill the virus that causes Covid-19 carries potential dangers that could limit the drug’s usefulness.

Molnupiravir works by incorporating itself into the genetic material of the virus, and then causing a huge number of mutations as the virus replicates, effectively killing it. In some lab tests, the drug has also shown the ability to integrate into the genetic material of mammalian cells, causing mutations as those cells replicate.

If that were to happen in the cells of a patient being treated with molnupiravir, it could theoretically lead to cancer or birth defects.

In particular, Raymond Schinazi, a professor of pediatrics and the director of biochemical pharmacology at Emory who studied the drug while it was being developed, and published a number of papers on NHC, the compound that’s the active ingredient in the drug. He published a paper that showed the drug can produce a reaction like the one described above, and insisted it shouldn’t be given to young people – especially pregnant women – without more data.

Schinazi told Barron’s that he did not believe that molnupiravir should be given to pregnant women, or to young people of reproductive age, until more data is available. Merck’s trials of molnupiravir have excluded pregnant women; the scientists running the trial asked male participants to “abstain from heterosexual intercourse” while taking the drug, according to the federal government website that tracks clinical trials.

Barron’s even shared a paper published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases in May by Schinazi and scientists at the University of North Carolina which reported that NHC can cause mutations in animal cell cultures in a lab test designed to detect such mutations – something Merck claims it has tested for. The paper’s authors concluded that the risks for molnupiravir “may not be zero”.

Merck told Barron’s that it has run “extensive tests” on animals which it says show that this shouldn’t be an issue. “The totality of the data from these studies indicates that molnupiravir is not mutagenic or genotoxic in in-vivo mammalian systems,” a Merck spokesman said.

Still, scientists and doctors who have studied NHC say that Merck needs to “be careful,” and it’s not just Schinazi warning about the drug’s potential risks.

Dr. Shuntai Zhou, a scientist at the Swanstrom Lab at UNC, said “there is a concern that this will cause long-term mutation effects, even cancer.”

Zhou says that he is certain that the drug will integrate itself into the DNA of mammalian hosts. “Biochemistry won’t lie,” he says. “This drug will be incorporated in the DNA.”

Merck hasn’t yet released any data from its animal studies, but the scientists believe that it would take long-term studies to show that the drug is truly totally safe.

“Proceed with caution and at your own peril,” wrote Raymond Schinazi, a professor of pediatrics and the director of the division of biochemical pharmacology at the Emory University School of Medicine, who has studied NHC for decades, in an email to Barron’s.

Analysts are already warning that these questions about the drug’s safety suggest the reaction in Merck’s shares was a little “overblown”, to say the least. Investors apparently were so eager for a new “pandemic panacea” (now that the mRNA jabs have proven to be much less effective than advertised) that they didn’t ask too many questions about safety, or even question the paucity of data. One analyst for SVB Leerink Dr. Geoffrey Porges described investors’ reaction from Friday as “wishful thinking”.

Even once the FDA authorizes the drug, Dr. Porges believes it will come with strict limitations on who can and can’t use it. “I think it is effectively going to be a controlled substance”, Dr. Porges said, adding that the risks to pregnant women, or women who may soon become pregnant, could present thorny problems for the FDA’s advisory committee reviewing the drug.

Given that the safety risks of the drug seem well-documented already, Wall Street’s gushing about the drug’s prospects – “it really is THAT good”, one analyst insisted – seems like an idiotic blunder in retrospect. The product of what one might call “magical thinking”.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
KaD
KaD
October 8, 2021 11:34 am

COVID-19: The Emergence of the Pandemic Industrial Complex

Anonymous
Anonymous
  KaD
October 9, 2021 2:19 am

The doctors and the pill companies have pretty much shot their wad for at least half of the population.

JIMSKI
JIMSKI
October 8, 2021 11:50 am

This is close to the opening of the movie ” I am Legend “

Unprecedented
Unprecedented
October 8, 2021 12:31 pm

Molnupiravir works by incorporating itself into the genetic material of the virus, and then causing a huge number of mutations as the virus replicates, effectively killing it.

Sounds like a great plan. What could go wrong?
comment image

anon I
anon I
  Unprecedented
October 8, 2021 1:56 pm

She’s the reason I quit drinking. Kept leaving with her at closing time and ran out of arms to chew off.

anon I
anon I
October 8, 2021 1:19 pm
August
August
  anon I
October 8, 2021 6:05 pm

You only have problems in the body sites that have blood vessels. Duh….

whoopie
whoopie
October 8, 2021 1:31 pm

Type in the name of the drug at wikipedia and you’ll see that there are serious concerns over it’s mutagenic potential. This drug was investigated by another pharma as a flu treatment and dropped out of fears it could cause cancers.

B_MC
B_MC
  whoopie
October 8, 2021 2:49 pm

Correct.

Molnupiravir doesn’t stop the virus from replicating, though; instead, the drug introduces errors into the virus’s RNA that are then replicated until it’s defunct.

With antivirals such as this, “basically you’re going to put a piece of sand in the gears and hope it stops the impact of the virus,” says Gomez, the former Niaid scientist. But, he adds, stopping the virus by creating errors in the genetic code or through other means can come with unintended consequences. “You don’t know where the sand might end up in the other parts of the body.” A company called Pharmasset Inc. (a hepatitis C drugmaker Gilead bought in 2011) investigated molnupiravir’s main ingredient around the turn of the century, but it abandoned development over concerns that it was mutagenic, meaning it could lead to birth defects.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-03-25/merck-mrk-molnupiravir-pill-could-change-the-fight-against-covid

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  whoopie
October 8, 2021 5:55 pm

Mutagenic would have been a good brand name.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Iska Waran
October 8, 2021 11:08 pm

Mutagenaprofit – Muffit for short.

Steve
Steve
October 8, 2021 1:50 pm

You mean if the vaccine doesn’t kill me, Molnupirivir will give me a second spin on the wheel of death?
Way to go Big Pharma!
Yeah, fuk that incredibly safe, incredibly effective and incredibly cheap Ivermectin with a 40 year unmatched safety profile.
Livin on the edge- Woo Hoo!

CrossingTheRubicon
CrossingTheRubicon
October 8, 2021 2:23 pm

Not difficult to see that Barrons has been paid off with Pfizer Buck$$$$. Pfizer crowding out all the other big pharma gang members. No matter though, I don’t even trust Merck’s witchcraft potion. I feel confident in my golden pass of natural immunity.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug
October 8, 2021 4:25 pm

I appreciate the opportunity to speak to the people that went ahead and got the jab. I speak their language. I will speak to them thusly: Baaaah.

—Sweaty Teddy, 07 October 2021

Isaiah 63:14 (NASB):

As the cattle which go down into the valley, The Spirit of the LORD gave them rest. So You led Your people, To make for Yourself a glorious name.

Isaiah 53:6 (NASB):

All of us like sheep have gone astray, Each of us has turned to his own way; But the LORD has caused the iniquity of us all To fall on Him.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 8, 2021 5:04 pm

Doc’s name is SchiNAZI. Ain’t that something?

I guess approving drugs has been reduced from 10 years … to 10 minutes. Ain’t that something?

STUCKY. No fucken idea how I suddenly became Anonymous!!

Doctor de Vaca
Doctor de Vaca
October 8, 2021 6:11 pm

Gee, what could go wrong? Thank You not Merck. I believe I’ll take the Cow Meds, please pass the Ivermectin…moooo!

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Doctor de Vaca
October 8, 2021 9:48 pm

doc,
are the regulators cracking down on you guys prescribing ivermectin?

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
October 8, 2021 11:06 pm

I prefer Merck’s FIRST effective drug for Covid. Had to buy the horse version, but glad to have some just in case.

Oh, and Let’s Go Brandon!!!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MrLiberty
October 9, 2021 2:24 am

We could all send Brandon free pillows to go with his free “vaccines”.

Fielding Mellish
Fielding Mellish
October 9, 2021 7:15 am

You would have to be crazy to take this. The cost alone is excessive and it is not needed and experimental. Proceed with due caution. Check out the possible side effects.