RCMP Rebel Over Mandatory Vaccinations

I was shown this by a customer of mine who is a member. When I asked him how many were involved his response was “more than I originally thought”. Not sure what that means?

For US readers this is **roughly** the equivalent of a splinter group of the FBI telling the Biden administration and all of the state governments they need to be investigated for how they’ve handled the pandemic in general, suppression of information and mandates.

From the letter:

“We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it is remembered. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. We are experts in law enforcement and investigations. We are losing faith in the motives of our government, and we will not willingly participate in actions against people whose Charter rights and freedoms are being violated.”

The system is breaking.

Via Mounties4Freedom

Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner, Brenda Lucki

RCMP National Headquarters
73 Leikin Dr
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2

October 21, 2021

Dear Commissioner Brenda Lucki:

We respectfully submit this open letter to express our most sincere concerns and resolute stand against the forced coercive medical intervention of Canadians, and against the undue discrimination experienced by those exercising their lawful right to bodily autonomy. We are not against vaccinations, but as law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that we believe go against the best interests of the people we protect.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

As Canadians, our constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the government, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and guided by law. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we firmly believe the government implemented mandates would not hold up under scrutiny.

As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.

As representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities, we have never witnessed such division in our country. This sense of “Us versus Them” will be further fueled by having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people, while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people, which goes against the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve.

As law enforcement officers, we already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. These have been compounded – considerably – by mandates that we believe are deeply unethical, threatening our livelihood, and dividing society.

As federal employees, what is being done to mitigate this stress? Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?

Police officers are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the law, and defend the public interest. We strongly believe that forced and coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict our duties and responsibilities to Canadians. We remain loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they have been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.

ABOUT US

This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of actively serving police officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from across the country. We have a wealth of experience which includes, but is not limited to, General Duty, Federal Serious and Organized Crime, School Liaison, Prime Minister Protection Detail, Emergency Response Team, Media Relations, and Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit. We come from various ranks, levels of experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and vaccination statuses. Together we are the Mounties for Freedom. We are individual police officers who united in the belief that citizens, including federal employees, should not be forced and coerced into taking a medical intervention.

OUR STANCE

In August 2021, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced, “Federal public servants need to be fully vaccinated,” and that for those without a medical exemption who choose not to be vaccinated: “There will be consequences”1.

Since that statement, many federal employees have been told they will be sent home without pay for refusing to receive a contested medical treatment. We have united in the belief that people should not be forced or coerced into receiving the current COVID-19 treatments – it should be voluntary. We stand united against the forced and coerced medical intervention of Canadians and against the discrimination faced by those who have exercised their right to bodily autonomy. We believe in democracy, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Bill of Rights.

This is not about whether people should be vaccinated – that is a personal choice.

THE LAW

Our primary duty as peace officers in the RCMP is the preservation of peace2. We have never witnessed the level of division in our country as we currently see from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is our responsibility, now more than ever, to make all efforts at preserving the peace in our country.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) protects fundamental rights and freedoms essential to keeping Canada a free and democratic society3. The Canadian Bill of Rights adds, “… the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge … the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions.4” It continues to say, “Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law.5

We believe our federal and provincial governments have failed to uphold the Charter, Bill of Rights, and Constitution and we are witnessing the erosion of democracy in Canada. As you know, the Charter does not guarantee absolute freedoms. If the government is going to limit freedoms, it must establish the limitations are reasonable given all available facts. The government must adhere to a process to prove their actions are appropriate, called the Oakes test. We firmly believe, if presented with all available evidence in a court, the government implemented mandates would not pass the Oakes test. At the time of writing this letter, the Charter’s section 33 Notwithstanding Clause has not been invoked for this pandemic.

Requiring mandatory COVID-19 treatment options is a slippery slope and allows the government to overstep its authority unchecked. It infringes on the fundamental belief in our society that the individual has the right and freedom to choose. The choice of whether to receive medical treatments has always been an individual’s right in Canada. The Canadian National Report on Immunization (1996) stated “Immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.6” Section 2 of The Charter guarantees these fundamental freedoms through the freedom of conscience (subsection a) and the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression (subsection b)7. Without individuals having the freedom to choose, we would not have a democratic society.

Though the Nuremberg Code is not a law, it is internationally accepted and falls in line with the spirit of our Charter and Bill of Rights. A key component of the Nuremberg Code is that participants in a medical experiment need to participate voluntarily without any form of force or coercion8. We have obtained documentation from several Canadian doctors who have explained the current COVID-19 treatment options in Canada, being referred to as “vaccines”, were recently authorized as new drugs despite the absence of long-term data9. According to these accredited Canadian doctors, these treatment options did not meet the criteria of true vaccines until very recently when the definition of vaccine was changed10,11. Without long-term data, these vaccines are still experimental. We believe the act of removing the rights and freedoms of citizens who refuse to participate in specific COVID-19 treatment options is a form of coercion.

The Criminal Code contains our country’s Criminal Offences and explains that a person commits an assault by intentionally applying force to someone else without that person’s consent12. The Criminal Code further explains that consent is not obtained from a person who submits, or neglects to resist, on the grounds of authority being exercised over them13. How then can someone give proper consent to a COVID-19 treatment injection when doing so under the threat of losing their job, freedoms, or livelihood? Canadian courts have already ruled that medical treatment without proper informed consent is an assault14.

As law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that violate the laws of our country and breach the rights and freedoms of the people we protect.

LEST WE FORGET

Each year, on the 11th of November, we remember those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms. From Flanders Field to Juno Beach, many Canadians have bled and died fighting tyrannical nations. We need to remember past events to prevent the repetition of history’s greatest mistakes.

On the 30th of September, we had the opportunity to reflect on such times during our first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. Under the direction of the Government of Canada, RCMP members were once issued lawful orders to remove children from their homes and transport them to residential schools. Canada is still recovering from the impact of those decisions and actions. The RCMP has yet to regain the trust of some citizens.

There was a time when scientists believed humans were divided into racial hierarchies and that a person’s intelligence level and characteristics were determined by race15. These beliefs were not heavily contested and were widely accepted as scientific fact16. Phrenology was also widely accepted as being a legitimate scientific study17. These are not examples of science being wrong but of people conducting poor investigations or misunderstanding their findings. These are just two of several historical examples of widely accepted scientific truths, which became ridiculed practices.

We look back at those times of racial hierarchy and wonder how something so wrong could have been so widely accepted as truth. It is just as hard for many people to conceptualize how RCMP officers could have blindly followed lawful orders that devastated so many lives. Yet now we find ourselves in dangerous waters, when RCMP officers are being forced under coercion and duress to participate in actions they believe go against the spirit of Canadian laws.

We find it ironic that an organization that preaches the honour and respect of Canadian values, and the sacrifice of their veterans, would support actions that contradict the values our veterans fought to uphold. Enforcement of identification and checkpoints was an early step in what would become the Holocaust. Canadian citizens of various backgrounds are being segregated and punished for choosing not to disclose a personal medical decision. We cannot think of a more ironic and cruel way for our governments to pay homage to the sacrifices Canadians have made worldwide to protect individual freedoms than by participating in a process that takes those freedoms away.

Today, instead of having one version of scientific “truth” during this pandemic, we have versions that contradict one another. How can some professionals be so certain their interpretation of science is correct when others give evidence to the contrary? History has already demonstrated we get things wrong even when our scientists agree.

We acknowledge there is a spectrum filled with beliefs relating to this pandemic. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to two main schools of thought: the common narrative (those who believe the current COVID-19 treatment injections are the way through the pandemic) and those who have concerns with the COVID-19 treatment injections. It’s important to note we are not discussing “antivaxxers” in this letter. We are discussing people with various vaccination statuses who pose questions about the current COVID-19 treatment options being forced upon them.

THE SCIENCE

RCMP members are not scientists nor healthcare professionals; our profession is law enforcement. We do not pretend to be experts in medical or scientific fields, but we are experienced and professional investigators: we look for the facts. Proper investigations follow simple practices that remain consistent across most fields. These practices include but are not limited to: asking the right questions, following evidence, being aware of how biases may affect results, and allowing the evidence to point to the conclusion – not allowing the conclusion to point to the evidence. Most importantly, a proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused several scientists and medical professionals to provide us with information they described as “science”, “scientific”, or “facts”. The problem with many of these statements is that the provided information often contradicted another piece of “scientific fact” that an equally qualified professional had produced. This makes it near impossible for the average person to know what to believe and what not to believe.

As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. This allows us some insight into the credibility of the information. Some professionals make definitive statements such as “It’s safe and effective” or “This is the way”, giving little or no explanation of how they reached their conclusion. When the information provided is challenged or questioned, the response often indicates the answer is something that cannot be questioned. The CDC recently changed its definition of immunity and vaccine10,11, allowing the current COVID-19 treatment injections to fit the definition. This is an example of actions taken when you allow your conclusion to point to your evidence.

Other qualified professionals have provided alternate pieces of information during this pandemic. It is not what their results were, but how they arrived at their results that we believe in. These professionals have all been able to articulate their findings quite well and are quick to admit the remaining questions they cannot answer. These professionals (from Canada18 and abroad19) have expressed warnings and concerns with the current COVID-19 treatment options condoned by the governments. Some of these concerns suggest a higher-than-average number of moderate to severe side-effects from the COVID-19 “vaccinations” compared with our traditional vaccinations19. Others have stated the current COVID-19 treatment options are proving to be less effective than initially believed20,21.

We have attached several documents as appendices to this letter which contain information we believe raises reasonable concerns with the current COVID-19 vaccination mandates seen across our country. We encourage you to review the documents and the work each document references thoroughly. Though we understand we have provided a lot of material – which will take time and resources to read – we believe the fact that there is so much evidence opposing the mandatory roll-out of the current COVID-19 treatments is reason enough to take our concerns seriously.

There have also been scientific papers that suggest natural immunity is a better form of protection than what the COVID-19 vaccination can give21-24. Why is antibody testing not being discussed as a potential option for RCMP members?

Here is a list of the documents we’ve attached to this letter. These documents are a sample of what is available and were written by people (or groups) of scientific or medical professionals in fields directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We defer to their expertise.

  • Appendix A – This is an open letter from Dr. Eric Payne, a pediatric neurologist in Alberta, to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. In his letter, Dr. Payne highlights several inconsistencies he has found with the common narrative. Dr. Payne provides several sources from around the world throughout his letter.
  • Appendix B – This is the Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration. This heavily sourced document provides information on the current pandemic and makes recommendations based on their findings.
  • Appendix C – This is a letter from Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist in Ontario, to the President of the University of Guelph. Dr. Bridle uses his extensive experience and qualifications to explain his concerns with the common narrative surrounding the COVID-19 treatment injections. Dr. Bridle also articulates his concerns with the COVID-19 health mandates.
  • Appendix D – This is an open letter from Health Professionals United to the Alberta Health Services. The letter outlines reasons why several frontline healthcare workers in Alberta heavily oppose mandatory COVID-19 vaccination mandates.
  • Appendix E – This is an open letter from frontline healthcare workers in British Columbia to Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan. The author(s) state their experiences and expertise are being ignored and ask that the vaccination mandates be revoked.
  • Appendix F – This is a report from Dr. Tess Lawrie from the United Kingdom. Dr. Lawrie demonstrates the abnormal number of reported adverse effects from the current COVID-19 treatment injections.
  • Appendix G – This is a comprehensive report comparing natural immunity to COVID-19 vs Vaccine-Induced Immunity. It was comprised from several scientists from Ontario and British Columbia.

CENSORSHIP

We are not against vaccinations, and we are trying to aid our country through this pandemic. We want to participate in a way that is safe for both our physical and mental well-being. We believe it is essential for people to participate with full informed consent by understanding all the risks of what they are being asked (or in this case forced) to participate in.

As experienced police officers, we have become accustomed to the media portraying us negatively or experienced the media misrepresenting the outcome of a police incident. It would be little to no surprise for us to hear that a media agency misreported an incident. However, it was surprising for us to learn that several of these scientists and doctors, who questioned the information fueling the COVID-19 treatment mandates, also spoke of censorship25-27.

As experienced investigators, we know it is our responsibility to present all available facts to the public – by proxy of the courts. It is not our place to decide what the outcome of an investigation should be. Our job is to collect all available facts so that the public (the courts) can make an informed decision. We have learned from past mistakes that presenting evidence that only supports one side, while ignoring or refusing to acknowledge evidence from another side, is wrong and tarnishes an investigation. We cannot provide evidence from witnesses who agree on one story while ignoring or hiding the witnesses who agree on a different account of an incident.

It would be unthinkable that RCMP members would blatantly disregard witnesses in an investigation to mislead the courts. The investigation would lose all integrity and the members would be criticized. Why then are we allowing this same behaviour to occur by other public figures? There are accredited medical professionals from our own country who are desperately trying to have their findings heard. Instead of allowing these professionals to speak freely and discuss their results publicly, they are being silenced by governing bodies25-27.

Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have allowed us to see how crucial it is that these professionals be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without the information being included in discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members) are not receiving the information they need to make an informed decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.

These medical professionals have tried to stand up and support their country. We are now standing up and supporting them. They must be allowed to share their information publicly to maintain people’s faith in the government. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. This is common around the world in countries whose tyrannical governments sensor information from their people.

DISCRIMINATION

We strongly oppose the discrimination that has already begun to create segregation in our country. It has divided families, ended friendships, torn apart spouses, and entered the RCMP workplace. We believe the current messaging being put out by our provincial and federal governments is promoting the creation of an in-group referred to as “Vaccinated” and an out-group as “Unvaccinated”. Even worse, the out-group has been labelled “Anti-vaxxers,” a term used out of context in a negative and derogatory way. The messaging from our governments is causing the dehumanization of the “Unvaccinated” group. By dehumanizing the out-group, an institution creates a greater divide between them and the in-group.28

Police agencies across Canada pride themselves in their efforts to hire officers reflective of the communities they serve. This allows community members to relate to their officers and see them as part of the community. We are representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities. Having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people will tear down some of the similarities RCMP members share with their communities. This will create a greater sense of “Us versus Them” between communities and police, which contradicts the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve for decades. We anticipate that unless this is corrected soon, it will continue to increase the divide in our country.

Dehumanizing individuals is challenging. It is easier to attach a label and stigma to a group. That way, anyone or anything that comes from the group can be written off28. The term “Anti-vaxxer” is currently being used to mislabel and group people into a category to take away their credibility. This has allowed things to be written and said against this group that would be intolerable if written or said about any other group.

On August 26th, 2021, the Toronto Star ran an article that read in large bold letters, “I have no empathy left for the wilfully unvaccinated. Let them die. I honestly don’t care if they die from COVID. Not even a little bit. Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU beds. At this point, who cares. Stick the unvaccinated in a tent outside and tend to them when the staff has time.29,30” If “willfully unvaccinated” was replaced with “Black”, “Gay”, or “willfully Muslim”, this would have been labelled a Hate Crime. How then can we allow such things to be said about people who choose not to receive a medical intervention? Should we allow the same messaging for those who choose not to get a flu shot one season?

The boldness of this statement being printed in a major newspaper shows how acceptable it is in our society to treat people as a lower class of citizens. As RCMP members, we must preserve peace in our communities and put a stop to this.

PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH

This pandemic has increasingly made people feel isolated from their friends, families, and peers. RCMP members already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. Members affected by the double-vaccination mandate have faced greater stress and isolation as they have watched their status as citizens and regular members begin to diminish. There is currently insufficient support for these members, and there does not seem to be a plan insight to provide adequate support.

The recent vaccination update has left some people feeling more isolated than ever. In times like this, people need support from a community, and our membership is no different. We fear there are more members afraid to speak up about these recent updates for fear of being targeted. Many members may be trying to stick this out on their own, or worse, suffering in silence. We ask that you attempt to reach out in partnership with the NPF to all members who may be negatively affected by these mandates and let them know their employer and governments support them.

Though most people seem to have little to no side effects from the COVID-19 treatment injections, an abnormal number of moderate to severe adverse reactions have included death31. What assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? Studies show that stress and sleep can play a huge factor in whether a vaccine is effective or not32,33. Are you ensuring RCMP members are provided with the appropriate amount of rest before an injection? What steps will the RCMP take to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?

We also believe enough evidence has been presented to question whether our governments’ actions in this pandemic are the most appropriate. This is causing moral and ethical stressors for some members as they no longer believe their role as police officers is reflective of the democracy Canada claims to be. Mental health and stress levels will have an impact on how members interact with the public.

PARALLELING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

The RCMP has taught us the importance and severity of domestic violence. Domestic violence is centred around power and control between an abuser and a victim. One of the biggest problems with domestic violence is there is often an escalation in the severity of abuse. RCMP members have been taught how to identify the signs that someone is involved in an abusive relationship. There are different types of abuse the abuser may engage in to keep control over their victim: Physical, Financial, and Emotional.

Emotional abuse is quite complex and will often include a variety of tactics such as socially distancing the victim from friends and family, discrediting the victim so they have difficulty obtaining support from others, and making the victim believe that their thoughts and beliefs are wrong – to the point the victim thinks they must be insane. When it comes to finances, an abuser will withhold money and assets from the victim. This ensures the victim cannot survive without remaining in the abusive relationship with the abuser. When an abuser feels they are losing control over their victim, it is quite common for them to escalate their tactics to maintain control.

The federal government is currently displaying several of those traits with its own employees, including the RCMP34.

Commissioner Lucki, we understand your position is appointed, and we are concerned that you too may be subject to a similar relationship with the Prime Minister. Though you, as our top Mountie, should be impartial, you may be forced into supporting some of these actions out of duress. We ask that you do what we ask our domestic violence victims to do – to take a stand against the abuser. This country needs strong and supportive people in positions of authority. Please show Canadians that the RCMP will remain impartial to political agendas and true to the Charter and our Bill of Rights.

PUBLIC INTEREST

Lastly, we want to draw attention to the public safety issues that will arise if these COVID-19 mandates are upheld.

Pierre Elliot Trudeau once said, “There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation.35” How is it our federal government is now saying it will be mandatory for employees working from home to receive the COVID-19 treatment injections?36

Regardless of their vaccination statuses, there are RCMP members who feel the steps taken by the federal and provincial governments are too extreme and do not have the best interest of Canadian citizens. Forcing these mandates will cause several RCMP officers to lose faith in the federal government’s commitment to the Charter. These RCMP officers will not participate in actions they believe contradict their morals, ethics, and Canadian laws. These RCMP officers believe it is their responsibility to challenge the federal government in court if necessary.

The RCMP, which is already understaffed, will have additional gaps to fill across the country when these members are not working. Communities will have lost healthy and experienced officers, causing a decrease in available resources. There will also be an increase in taxpayers’ spending as the federal government attempts to fill these gaps. Being short-staffed will have a trickle-down effect causing fewer RCMP bodies to be available to properly recruit, assess, and conduct adequate background checks on potential cadets.

Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have allowed us to see how crucial it is that professionals be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without including their information in discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members) are not receiving the information they need to make an informed decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.

We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it is remembered. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. We are experts in law enforcement and investigations. We are losing faith in the motives of our government, and we will not willingly participate in actions against people whose Charter rights and freedoms are being violated.

CALL TO ACTION

Commissioner Lucki, we ask that you represent the best image of the RCMP by remaining loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and not to any particular public figure. Our job as Mounties is to preserve the peace. If we continue down this road of segregation and discrimination, we risk repeating past mistakes. The divide in our society is quickly leaning toward a level of national security. We ask that you open an investigation to ensure no criminal acts were committed in the dissemination of information from federal and provincial health authorities or public figures in positions of trust. We ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they had been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent. As Canada’s national police force, we are unique in our ability to conduct a large-scale cross-country investigation, which must be transparent to regain trust in the government.

We also ask that you challenge the Federal Government’s decision to send Mounties home without pay for decisions they’ve made on beliefs protected by Canadian laws. Neither the RCMP, nor the communities they serve, can endure the loss of experienced police officers.

We await your response and your plan of action.Respectfully,

Mounties for Freedom

Mounties For Freedom

cc.

  • The Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, President of the Treasury Board of Canada Brian Sauvé, President of the National Police Federation

END NOTES

    1. Connolly, Amanda, “Notice Offering Options for Federal Workers Who Refuse Vaccines Was ‘Erroneous’: Trudeau,” Global News (2021). Accessed September 30, 2021, https://globalnews.ca/news/8118913/canada-mandatory-vaccines-federal-workers/.
    2. Government of Canada, “Duties,” Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-10). Accessed October 19, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/r-10/page-3.html.
    3. ———. “Learn about the Charter,” Accessed October 19, 2021. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csjsjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/learn-apprend.html.
    4. ———. “Bill of Rights,” Canadian Bill of Rights (S.C. 1960, c. 44). Accessed October 19, 2021. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/page-1.html.
    5. Ibid.
    6. Public Health Agency of Canada, “Canadian National Report on Immunization – 1996,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20080414131846/http:/www.phacaspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97vol23/23s4/23s4b_e.html
    7. Government of Canada, “Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Section 2,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rightsprotected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html#a2b.
    8. National Institutes of Health, “The Nuremberg Code,” Accessed September 30, 2021, https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code.
    9. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 18, par. 3. Appendix B.
    10. Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1, par 1. Appendix A.
    11. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention, “Immunization: The Basics,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm.
    12. Government of Canada, “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (1)(a). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
    13. ———. “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (3)(d). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
    14. Supreme Court of Canada, “Hopp v. Lepp,” 1980 CanLII 14 (SCC), [1980] 2 SCR 192. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1980/1980canlii14/1980canlii14.html.
    15. Bryson, Bill, The Body, narrated by Bill Bryson (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2019), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 4 min.
    16. Ibid.
    17. Encyclopedia.com, “Phrenology in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-andmaps/phrenology-nineteenth-century-britain-and-america.
    18. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2, par, 1. Appendix B.
    19. Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 19, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
    20. Lawrie, Tess, “RE: Urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021,” (June 9, 2021), p. 6, par. 4. Appendix F.
    21. Bridle, Byram, “COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents,” (June 15, 2021), p. 2, par. 2. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/06/2021-06-15-children_and_covid-19_vaccines_full_guide.pdf.
    22. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2-3. Appendix B.
    23. Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 2. Appendix C.
    24. Mallard, Bonnie, et al., “Which is better for future COVID-19 prevention: Immunity Following Natural Infection or Vaccine-Induced Immunity?” (October 8, 2021), p. 2, par. 3. Appendix G.
    25. Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1-14. Appendix A.
    26. Dzsurdzsa, Cosmin, “Derek Sloan Hosts Press Conference with Censored Doctors,” True North News. Accessed October 20, https://tnc.news/2021/06/17/derek-sloan-hosts-press-conference-withcensored-doctors/.
    27. Sloan, Derek, “Censorship in Canada,” Vimeo, June 17, 2021, CPAC Parliamentary Press Conference, 3:15. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://standupcanada.solutions/censorship-in-canada.
    28. Wilkerson, Isabel, Caste, narrated by Robin Miles (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2020), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 26 min.
    29. Slapinski, Mark, “‘Hate Speech’: The Toronto Star Slammed for Headline Wishing Death on the Unvaccinated,” Toronto 99. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.toronto99.com/2021/08/26/hate-speech-the-toronto-star-slammed-for-headlinewishing-death-on-the-unvaccinated/.
    30. Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 5. Appendix C.
    31. Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
    32. Walker, Matthew, Why We Sleep, narrated by Steve West (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Audio, 2017), Audible audio ed., 13 hrs., 52 min.
    33. Ibid.
    34. Sauvé, Brian, “Members who do not complete an attestation to being fully vaccinated can expect to be put on administrative Leave Without Pay,” National Police Federation (October 7, 2021). Email broadcast to NPF members.
    35. CBC Archives, “Trudeau: There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation,” CBC News (1967). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/omnibus-bill-theres-noplace-for-the-state-in-the-bedrooms-of-the-nation.
    36. Johnson, Gail, “Declare Your Covid-19 Vaccination Status,” RCMP NOC News. Email broadcast to RCMP members.
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

46
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
TonyBaloney
TonyBaloney

It’s aboot time.

Seriously, this awesome to see coming from the RCMP. Maybe it will spill over to the States. I’ve seen multiple Sheriffs style they will not enforce the illegal orders either, it should be every single one.

Bob P
Bob P

Agreed. Be interesting to know if it was 10 of them or hundreds of them. Also be nice if the Stasi provincial and city police would do the same.

LS
LS

48,000 signatures so far — as of 4pm EST Oct. 26th.

MrLiberty

Those guns on your hips aren’t just for decoration if you folks are actually serious.

Jimmy123
Jimmy123

It is not time anymore to talk. It is time for true action.

KaD
Iska Waran
Iska Waran

Gay bestiality or normal bestiality? I cannot countenance gay bestiality.

Any Moose
Any Moose

Did you check with Stucky first?

Poor Richard

Good for them. Time someone in this hemisphere stood up to be counted. We in the US are now looking at Canada as the bulwark of freedom? Interesting turn of events.

Doubt I will live long enough to see the FBI pen such a letter.

Red River D
Red River D

“…Doubt I will live long enough to see the FBI pen such a letter…”

Not even if you outlived Methuselah himself.

BL
BL

Francis- Outstanding blow back from the RCMP. They need to stand strong and bring down the the genocide cartel.

PRAY that God will give them victory.

Jdog
Jdog

If history is any teacher, at some point, the people will realize they have nothing left to lose, hive mentality will take over, and the chants will be, death to the tyrants, and the blood will flow like water.

fujigm
fujigm

Ah, just like the good old days…

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

Are the Mounties 100% in the business of framing and entrapping people? Because if not, they shouldn’t even be in the same sentence as our FBI. Also, there’s not one FBI agent in a thousand with either the inclination or the balls to refuse this unnecessary vaccine, the main purpose of which is to pave the way for a global social credit system. God bless these rebels.

Red River D
Red River D

Let’s be fair, Iska Waran.

The FBI does NOT just frame and entrap people.

Sometimes they clean up after sloppy mass kill operations and otherwise dispose of incriminating evidence!!!

(I’m sure they kidnap and execute people too. They’re a very multi-talent organization.)

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

I thought that all came under the general rubric of “framing and entrapping”, but you’re absolutely right – it’s better to be specific.

Ken31
Ken31

Yea but there is always some element of framing and entrapping. It is all extortion and blackmail related.

MMinWA
MMinWA

But but Hannity told us that 99% of FBI agents are good guys…didn’t he?

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

And people think LEOs are bad. They’re not all bad people. They’re trying to figure this out. Awesome post.

mark
mark

I know two LEOs who have announced, in no uncertain terms to everyone, they will never violate the Constitution (2nd amendment) or enforce mask mandates, and will never, ever be jabbed.

One of them I helped raise (nephew – father was a drunk/druggie never around – died young) and he confided conversations with his Chief (he is one of two LT. on this force) over drawing the line on following orders…and has helped sway the Chief to take the same stands in relation to the above.

This is in a red area/town in a blue state.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

That’s uplifting to hear, mark. I know it can be hard to trust them, considering what we have seen happen in Australia, but I know without a doubt many are struggling considerably and feel backed against a wall.

For the most part, they are trapped in these jobs because it’s all they’ve ever done and know how to do. Many really want to do the right thing by citizens. I personally have not had a bad experience with them…even when things could have gone very badly for me. Some have made my life easier when they really didn’t have to. They have my full support.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Mornin’ mark….

Alex Jones is a liar, a deceiver….a gatekeeper. I have had my suspicions about Stewart Rhodes since the Bundy and subsequent Malheur episodes. Give this a read….it’s rather long- the Revolver also has a long article about another snake in the wood pile on 1/6:

Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open

Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <—-====

Uncola

That is one heck of an epically written line in the sand. I do hope ZH picks it up. It needs to go viral because it’s such a well-reasoned, eloquently assembled, and fully documented, rebuttal… and with some real teeth, too. The abuser/victim accusation is spot on: “Physical, Financial, and Emotional’ control (i.e. abuse), indeed; and the following was particularly strong:

We ask that [Commissioner Lucki] do what we ask our domestic violence victims to do – to take a stand against the abuser [Prime Minister).

Overall, though, I believe this definitely addresses the tyranny underlying the forced vaccination mandates:

Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.

In the midst of such current widespread censorship, be sure to keep us informed as to whatever happens next with the RCMP and their domestic abusers. Because the letter appears to be a heartfelt appeal to reason and if that fails, I suspect there will be no more horsing around. One way, or another.

Thanks FM.

James
James

Nice if true.

My paranoid side says a govt. operation to weed out undesirables.

That said,migt bring a lot more undesirables to the battle,time will tell.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Brenda will fire them and replacements will be a bunch of goons.

Yahsure
Yahsure

Interesting! Maybe Sergeant Preston will sic King on them!

Nobody
Nobody

Karma. They are finally getting their taste. Just in case anyone has failed to fully comprehend why this is happening- this is divine justice unfolding before our eyes. ‘Law’ enforcement, as currently practiced, is NOT upholding the law. ALL cases that lawfully come before an actual court of law REQUIRE an ACCUSER with allegations of actual injury for a court to have subject matter jurisdiction to even hear a case. What does this ACTUALLY mean? Who is an accuser? An accuser is the alleged injured party. An accuser is the principal whom authorizes agency to peace officers to uphold the peace by upholding the law. An agent does not have ‘authority’ because they are only servants to the principal who does have authority. The accusing principal’s authority comes from the acceptance of LIABILITY for any false or fraudulent accusations – this is the only lawful path to a courtroom for ANY reason. Every instance where ‘law’ enforcement forced people to obey statutory codes or ordinances is TYRANNY. It is tyrannical for any entity that you are not working for to apply ANY of that entities laws to you. Constitutional and Statutory laws only apply to that entities active duty WORKERS. Constitutional and statutory law has NO APPLICATION WHATSOEVER TO THE PEOPLE not on duty for that entity’s capacity.

THIS IS THE LESSON DIVINE JUSTICE IS REVEALING TO US – CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LAW IS THE LAW FOR GOVERNMENT AND IS EXPLICITLY NOT THE LAW FOR THE PEOPLE.

ENFORCING AN ENTITY’S LAWS ON PEOPLE WHOM DO NOT WORK FOR THAT ENTITY IS UNLAWFUL, TYRANNICAL AND A COMPLETE DISMANTLING OF THE FUNCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE PROTECTIONS OF LAW.

A maxim of law that peace officers really need to understand is CONTRACT MAKES THE LAW. A valid contract has elements that must be present SIMULTANEOUSLY to actually be a contract. Those who meet all elements of a valid contract within the capacity of that entity are THE WORKERS ON DUTY IN THAT ENTITY.

The psycho cops who have been enFORCING statutory laws on people who those statutes have no application to, are now faced with divine justice for the absolute subjugation, fraud, coercion,false imprisonment of innocent people and complete dismantling of the common law – KARMA.

The psychos cops forcing statutory rule over people are CRIMINALS. They have along with the worst criminals of all, JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS, established the precedent that statutes apply to everyone when this doesn’t even make sense. No other entity expects the rules of its capacity applies to anyone outside of that capacity – Walmart doesn’t expect its employees’ rules apply to you if you don’t work for them and are on duty, every other entity has the same expectation EXCEPT FOR CRIMINAL AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENTS. The criminals running tyrannical governments want power, they want control, they want to be MORE EQUAL than any one else. THIS IS THE CRIME BEING PERPETRATED. THIS IS THE REASON FOR DIVINE JUSTICE BEING LEVIED AGAINST THE PSYCHO COPS.. THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING AND IT WILL NOT STOP AND ONLY GET WORSE UNTIL THOSE WHO WERE CONFUSED GAIN CLARITY ON THE ACTUAL SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LAW AND THEIR DELINEATION FROM THE COMMON LAW -THE PEOPLES LAW. ONCE THAT CLARITY IS GAINED YOU MUST REPENT FOR EVERY ACT YOU PERFORMED WITHOUT AN ACTUAL ACCUSER AND WORK TO ANSWER YOUR CALL OF AGENCY TO WE THE PRINCIPAL ACCUSERS TO ARREST THE JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS WHOM HAVE DISMANTLED THE PROTECTIONS OF LAW AND HAVE UTILIZED STATUTORY CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AS A WEAPON OF WAR AGAINST INNOCENT FREE PEOPLE.

THE WORST CRIMINALS IN OUR SOCIETY ARE THE JUDGES, PROSECUTORS AND COPS WHOM FORCE LAWS UPON US THAT HAVE NO APPLICATION TO US. THESE CRIMINALS HAVE DESERVED THE DEATH PENALTY THEIR ENTIRE CAREERS. INSTEAD OF UPHOLDING THE PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL APPLICATION OF LAW THEY HAVE ENSLAVED ENTIRE NATIONS OF PEOPLE TO OBEY THEIR CRIMINAL RULES THAT NEVER HAD LAWFUL APPLUCATION THEM -THE APPLICATION OF STATUTORY RULES TO THE PEOPLE IS THEIR CRIME.

NOW IT IS YOUR TURN. MAKE NO MISTAKES ABOUT IT, DIVINE LAW IS RENDERING JUDGEMENT UPON YOUR HEAD AND THE PAIN IS COMING. THE PAIN IS GOING TO BE MUCH GREATER THAN YOU CURRENTLY ENVISION BECAUSE REAL LAW BRINGS REMEDY AT 3X WHAT WAS INITIATED AND YOU PSYCHOTIC SLAVE HANDLERS HAVE DONE MOUNTAINS OF DAMAGE WITH MILLIONS OF VICTIMS IN YOUR INSANITY -YOUR CONFUSION OR CRIMINAL ACTS HAS EMPOWERED AND EMBOLDENED CRIMINALS WHILE MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO KNEW YOU WERE EITHER CONFUSEFD OR CRIMINALS WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH TYRANNICAL SLAVE SYSTEM.

WE TOLD YOU IT WAS SLAVERY AND THAT IT WAS CRIMINALS LEVYING WAR ON EVERYONE ELSE BUT YOU CALLED US SOVEREIGN CITIZENS, YOU DEMANDED THAT WE OBEY YOUR STATUTES AND WE TOLD YOU THOSE ARE NOT OUR LAWS, YOU DIDN’T CARE AND USED CRIMINAL FRAUD, VIOLENCE AND CAGES TO FORCE US TO OBEY YOUR CRIMINAL WILL. WE TOLD YOU THAT GOD SENT US BUT YOU LAUGHED. WE GAVE YOU EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO REPENT BUT YOU WERE GLEEFUL IN FORCING YOUR CRIMINAL WILL UPON US.

WE TOLD YOU! WE WARNED YOU! YOU IGNORED THE GOLDEN RULE AND NOW YOU HAVE SHOWN THE DIVINE SOURCE OF CREATION HOW YOU WISH TO BE TREATED THROUGH YOUR TREATMENT OF OTHERS. YOUR DAY OF JUDGEMENT IS JUST BEGINNING. YOU WILL BE GIVEN THE SAME MERCY YOU GAVE OTHERS -THE STATUTES WILL APPLY, YOU WILL OBEY AGAINST YOUR WILL AND BE IMPRISONED/ENSLAVED IN A TYRANNICAL SYSTEM THAT YOU INSISTED WAS REAL. YE MADE IT REAL AND NOW YE SHALL TADTE ITS POISON FRUIT.

WE ARE YOUR ACCUSERS, WITNESSES STANDING BEFORE THE CREATOR OF ALL, BEARING TRUE WITNESS OF YOUR EXTORTION, FRAUD, PERJURY, MURDER, RACKETEERING, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, WARFARE AND COMPLETE DISMANTLING OF THE PROTECTIONS OF LAW IN THE NAME OF ENFORCING THE LAW.

UNTIL EVERY JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR WHO HAVE USED THE FRAUDULENT MONOPOLY OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AGAINST THOSE WHO HAD NO ACCUSERS ARE ARRESTED, PUT ON TRIAL, CONVICTED AND EXECUTED FOR THEIR CRIMES, THE MASS GENOCIDE UNDER THE FRAUD OF VACCINATION REQUIREMENTS BY THE CRIMINAL CABAL WILL CONTINUE. THE CRIMINALS WILL GAIN PRECEDENT, PURGE RESISTORS, CONTINUE BOOSTERS AND SPRINKLE THE DEATH POISON IN A MANNER OF MANUFACTURED PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Your caps button is stuck. You’re welcome.

Julie
Julie

I support this letter unreservedly and am so incredibly relieved. THANK YOU! .

I am a 64 year old professional woman who has never been involved in any kind of ‘protest’ in her life. I am also not against vaccines and in fact I was double vaccinated when the vaccines were first released. However I will not get ‘the BC vaccine passport’ and now, even though I am vaccinated and I am the same person I was a month ago, I am no longer welcome in restaurants, at dances, in cinemas…

Since I got my vaccine over 6 months ago things have gone seriously awry.

How can anyone agree to and sign “informed consent” when they are not consenting freely but simply because they are scared to lose their job and their ability to provide for their families and pay their mortgages? Or, in the case of the severely disabled government worker I was with yesterday, who had to inform several of the provincial employees under her that they had to get the vaccine or be laid off. She was terrified of losing her care, without which she could not survive. It has been made clear to her that this is what will happen to her if she doesn’t ‘toe the line’. Even though she has had her own shots.

This is terrible bullying. In any other walk of life this would be illegal and unacceptable.

I am saddened beyond words at the level of division between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. I have two friends whose ex-spouses, one husband and one wife, have threatened to get their young children vaccinated against the other parent’s wishes.

I am on the board of a senior’s home where 70 residents are vaccinated and one courageous 86 year old woman is not. She has been ostrasized completely and sits alone at dinner now. For a year she ate alone in her room. Her previously ‘best friend’ will not sit with her. Why can no-one see that this is nothing less than cruel and unusual punishment?

I could go on. As a society we have been so scarred by the past 18 months.

Like the RCMP officers who remain loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights I implore you to order a thorough and independent investigation and collect statements from the Canadian doctors and other medical professionals who have been silenced. For all those Canadians that have spoken out have lost their incomes and their reputations.

More than anything I implore you to sanction the media for its actions and insist that they report both sides of the covid story. Equally. And without insulting adjectives such as name-calling ‘us’ Flat=earthers or anti-vaxxers or an unruly mob.

Do you not agree that everyone is entitled to bodily autonomy and no-one, not federal, provincial or private employees, should ever be forced into receiving any treatment? Let alone an unproven “vaccination” that doesn’t seem to be working?

Children – now as young as 12 but soon as young as 6 – are being allowed to ‘choose’ to be vaccinated without their parent’s consent in order that they can play with their friends at break time. Who will sit up all night with their child, nursing their symptoms should they experience an adverse reaction to the vaccine. Which is reportedly more common in the young (according to the CDC). Or get covid. The parents, of course. Do we allow such young children to autonomously choose anything else in their lives? Of course not.

I agree that to force or coerce someone into having a vaccine is nothing less than assault. I am beyond horrified at what is happening and I am proud of our Canadian RCMP for standing up for what is morally right and for their fellow Canadians. Thank you.

Again, I mention that the vaccine, upon which the whole official response to covid has been based, does not seem to be working. Earlier this month 6 seniors residents of an Esquimalt home died of covid. All of them were double vaccinated. Every single visitor, care aide and other person allowed direct contact with these elderly residents had been double-vaccinated for a while. The vaccine didn’t work.

Yes the vaccines are being updated to include the variants but I hear that by the time we receive the vaccine – always – the variants will have changed.

We can look at other countries and see how they have fared. Canada has the luxury of being able to learn from what is happening elsewhere in the world.

There are also other treatments available. Currently if you are diagnosed as having covid in Canada you will be told that there is no treatment. This is not correct. There are other treatments available. And if doctors were allowed and encouraged to use these treatments, lives would likely be saved.

I have a question… Is it not ‘illegal’ for the emergency use of an unlicensed medication (or vaccine) when there are other treatments available? Is this why Ivermectin (and other drugs) were suddenly ‘unauthorized’ and made unavailable to most doctors just before the vaccine was released under the heading of ‘emergency use’?

I believe that if the younger members of our society are ‘allowed’ to have covid and be treated this might, in turn, protect our seniors by offering the much sought after ‘herd immunity’. Almost all people under 50 survive covid easily.

In reality these seniors are living ‘the golden years’ of their lives in terror. This is a fact and something I see every day.

How many lives would have been saved if treatment, readily available and inexpensive, had been used in the early stages of the disease? This would have been whilst those suffering were still in their own homes. Certainly this would have taken the pressure off ICUs.

There is so much evidence available, all around the globe. Evidence that is readily available to us in these modern times of travel and the internet. We need to listen and to collate this information and be free to fight this disease with all of these tools. Not just one. (Interesting that the only one we are allowed to use is the one that makes the most money for the pharmaceutical companies?) And, tragically, the one that doesn’t appear to be working.

Thank you for reading my letter. I pledge my unwavering support to the brave men and women of the RCMP and to all who have peacefully rallied for so many months for the freedom to choose.

Thank you ‘Mounties for Freedom’ for renewing my faith in Canadian Society.

Julie Taylor
Registered Counsellor

Yahsure
Yahsure

She lost me after saying she was vaccinated.

RiNS

And it only took 19 months and for the mandates to start biting back at them before the Mounties acted.

Better never than late….

GNL
GNL

The purpose is chaos. Why is that so hard to see? Ignore them. Do not help them. Take what you need. Arrest THEM.

Anthony Petric
Anthony Petric

Not so easy. Must be dismantled by non violent proceedings. Must be done in accordance of the law. Any other methods will create a new narrative for opponents and the great awakening will go back to sleep. Then we’re fucked

Fielding Mellish
Fielding Mellish

Bit of a bummer….eh?

karalan

If the Canuckgov backs down, it sure as hell won’t be out of respect for the Canadian Charter of Rights – that document was a fraud from the get-go (with built-in excuses for ignoring it), and has never actually been honored in any meaningful way.
But good to see the push-back – the more the merrier. Strength in numbers is the best hope for the peasants, Canuckis or otherwise.

i forget
i forget

Well, the system is breaking because that is what the system does. That is why the system is. That is what people, in the main, are: Homo Systeman.

It’s a hard press to prove out the inherent inalienables that enlightened & enlightening Papas congratulated themselves & the audience for possessing, but Systemen ~ without chests…somebody left Pandora’s Chest open, out in the Reign, in MacArthur Park, & so the cake is melting & the pie is waving bye-bye ~ is flat out undeniable.

“Crea/ma/tive” destruction. Breaking Bad. Walter White-Heisenberg, reading Shelley’s Ozymandias out loud & ominously. That is the system.ephistopheles.keeter. Malariat s/nooses (& RNA splicing) ensues’s (Dr. Seuss’s cancelling woulda’ been hard to predict…but in devil take the hindsight?)…continuously-constantly.

https://news.brown.edu/articles/2012/06/lariats

In idealutopia-hopia, something impersonal would saddle & ride “the system.” Unterman needs an Ubernotman. But there isn’t one.

So untermasshen taters look to ubermenschen, aka, all too often, sociopaths & misanthropes. “Confidence sells,” she said.

Which means too the quis custodiet ipsos custodies themselves. And that, those, these Dukes of Moral Hazard, is the standard disaster recipe that’s always been on the boil…& the boils on the body politic…which is the sump that keeps the boils brimming & bursting in air…giving proof through the night that “our” flag is still there.

Well the deputy walks on hard nails and the preacher rides a mount
But nothing really matters much it’s doom alone that counts
And the one-eyed undertaker he blows a futile horn
“Come in,” she said
“I’ll give you shelter from the storm

Gods•ymbols, personal to some, have been failing to stay the saddle for centuries, from the beginning.

Competition would do it, be that impersonal saddle, but it is killed before it gets out of short pants, if not the crib (except for in small pockets & corners where, even then, Lance Strongarming is also not unknown).

Cowarld is scared to death of competition. And so compulsively attracted to fixed games, & thrown fights.

“If the chips fall where they may how can I be sure they’ll fall to me?” Say the you know the type.

S/he can’t be sure which way the chips will fall the as-may way.

But s/he knows the chips definitely *won’t* fall cattle futures “correctly” the as-may way.

& since the Plutoligarchy must have its continuous drenching golden showers – by right! – no competition is allowed & pocketed politicians are put to the task of making it all legal.

Where’d the masshen taters be without the essential wo/men far-seeing the non-essential competition & righteously doing away with it? On ventilators, instead of mindfucks, probably.

As-my’d mean bye-bye generational wealth concentrations, hello come-&-go ebb & flow. NIMBY say the self-entitled anti-tidalists.

Fear & Loathing in Lost Wages o’ sin•ecure, where they “usta’” spectate ~ between hands & pulls ~ nuclear bomb blasts.

No saviors, “good cops,” on hard nails or mounts, are coming to handle the “bad cops.” Never did, never will.

And, nobody serious would out themselves in a letter.

Or be hope-lassooed by such a letter.

Signing petitions, voting, “demonstrating” (Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly saying, “hooray for our side” ~ For What Its Worth)…is one definition of inanity.

(Catch-release ∞ is the hope cycle psyop that leads to learned helplessness degradation ~ more tortured dogs, at the hands of dog psychologists: look up Bodhi’s quote in Point Break ~ the apathy of confirmed doa•ctions.)

The letter, Scarlet AA, for double Agent, is for the hopium*-addicted to snort/inject/swallow. (Breathe deep, the gathering gloom ♪♫♪ the supply chain of which remains forever unbroken.)

Despite an outlier here & there, cops are a tribe, & you ain’t in it ~ Geo Garlin ~ nor are you who tribut(e)ters their bread.

If an enemy machinates becoming enemy of my enemy, that don’t make him friend, don’t make him anything more than he was pre-machination.

Far as that goes, too, nations ain’t ever been nuthin’ more than machination. Like these stalwarts, for the example that scales & slithers backward & forward in time, the flat ouroboros justa’ justiceless spinning:

“…the Old Order Empire of England failed to impose mercantilism & feudalism over the New (ha!) World. Consequently the thirteen colonies (on a Friday, the 13th!) imbibed (the imbibium) the Enlightenment’s radical theories, developing a basic libertarianism that recognized (some) individualism, (some) natural rights, & (some) private property (including castes; Systeman). Classical liberal colonists that supported radical change & decentralization fought reactionary defenders of the staus quo & government power, particularly over declaring independence from Great Britain….during the American Revolutionary War the radicals exercised the preeminently decentralist reform od secession. However, Pennsylvania’s merchant prince Rober Morris & other nationalists tried to institute an Old Order American Empire through the formidable Articles of Confederation. The nationalists hoped that their new empire would centralize government power, weaken the independent states, & facilitate special privileges, particularly a central bank & assumption of debts held by speculators.

While the reactionaries narrowly failed during the war, after the conflict ended they engineered a second movement through the Constitution under the guise of Federalism. Virginia’s James Madison & Alexander Hamilton of New York led the Federalists. The Antifederalists, commanded by George Clinton of New York & Patrick Henry of Virginia, bitterly opposed the new dispensation, correctly recognizing that the proposed power-aggrandizing polity was antithetical to the ideals (they were dealt) fought for during the Revolution. Despite the Antifederalists’ resistance, the Federalists utilized dirty political (continuation of war by other means) tactics & imposed their new government on the United States. While the ostensible leader was President George Washington of Virginia, Congressman Madison arranged the major policies behind the scenes. Madison strengthened the new government, particularly with a weak Bill of Rights that imposed few structural limitations upon the Constitution.

…Secretary of the Treasury Hamilton alienated Madison by using the Constitution to push for crony policies that benefited Morris & other northern Federalist elites, such as assuming public debts, enacting the Bank of the United States, & protecting land speculators. In response to Hamilton’s program, Madison opportunistically (the enemy of my enemy blahblahblah…) allied with the radical-moderate Thomas Jefferson of Virginia & disgruntled Antifederalists…. Hamilton & New England’s Essex Junto merchants secured a military program that moved the country towards their cherished goal of an American Empire. The Federalists suppressed resistance to taxes that financed their special-interest policies, expanded the territorial domain, & encouraged the Quasi-War with France to monopolize international commerce. By the end of the decade, Inspector General Hamilton was dangerously close to leading the long-awaited empire.

To defeat the Hamiltonian Federalists’ power grab, libertarians formed the Republican Party. The new coalition (bituminous, or anthracite?), composed of former Antifederalists & alienated Federalists, strategically interpreted the Constitution strictly to stop the Federalists’ machinations. They enshrined their states’ rights philosophy, the compact theory, in the “Spirit of 1798.” During the Revolution of 1800, the people rose up, drove the increasingly unpopular Federalists from office, & elected Jefferson president.

However, just when the Republicans thought they could roll back cronyism, power corrupted them (sure it did…doofus) & warped Jefferson’s dream for an “Empire of Liberty” into an Old Order empire. With the Federalist Party out of the picture, the Jeffersonian Republicans split into two groups (there can be only one ~ Highlander ~ chimera): Madison’s ex-Federalist moderate Republicans & the Antifederalist Old Republicans led by the Virginian John Randolph. In the middle stood President Jefferson….power corrupted the Republicans (right, sure, homo Systemantra to the scapegoat-rescue) into moderation during the early years of Jefferson’s administration. They secured some notable reforms, such as over the judiciary system & spending, but did not go as far as the Old Republicans desired because moderates wanted to court the opposition Federalists (uh-huh).

Despite the efforts of Randolph power soon corrupted the Republicans to pursue outright cronyism. The 1803 Louisiana Purchase & its massive territorial acquisition incentivized the Republicans to compromise on speculative land grants, pursue foreign policy maneuvers in Spanish Florida, support internal improvements to bind the country together, & engage in bellicose trade relations to protect commerce & conquer Canada & Florida. The Madison administration created an Empire of Power by aggressively encouraging conflict against Great Britain. After the War of 1812, the new National Republicans adopted (came out of the closet) the old Federalist cronyism, including the Second Bank of the United States & protective tariffs. With the National Republicans’ embrace of Federalist policies, the Jeffersonian Revolution ended in a resounding failure (the bad cops beat the good cops…ridiculous).

National Republicans’ adoption of the “American System” to strengthen the Madisonian empire, which advocated monetary nationalization, manufacturing subsidies, federally funded internal improvements, increased congressional interference with newly formed states, & imperialistic aggression. Major beneficiaries included the Philadelphia financial elite & the commercial Boston Associates. However congressman Henry Clay of Kentucky, Massachusetts’ congressman Daniel Webster, & Secretary of State John Quincy Adams only partially implemented the American System. This setback resulted from the Panic of 1819, caused by the second Bank of the United States reckless credit expansion (roll, roll, roll yer bloat…). The resultant downturn increased opposition (“again”) to the American System & exposed sectional animosities, interfering with National Republicans’ plans to enact protective (to them: no competition!) tariffs & public works. The panic bled into disputes over slavery & the National Republicans’ foreign policy of imperialism. (But…lol) Despite the Panic of 1819, slowly but surely the National Republicans fastened the American System upon the country.

Consequently (the latest newest best good cop…), New York’s senator Martin Van Buren organized a new libertarian coalition (to Newcastle…), the Democratic Party, to cripple (uh-huh) the American System. The Corrupt Bargain of 1825, when Clay helped Adams win the presidency in an overtime House election, especially motivated Van Buren to create his new party. Andrew Jackson of Tennessee, Vab Buren’s standard bearer, denied Adams’ reelection in the Revolution of 1828 (how many revs is that now?).

From the presidential administrations of Jackson to James K. Polk of Tennessee, the Democrats strove to destroy the American System despite furious Whig opposition. The Jacksonians succeeded where the Jeffersonians failed because of their radical free market ideology & determination to not work with the opposition. The Jacksonians transformed (full power, warp speed, Scotty…) the executive branch to eliminate the Second Bank of the United States & institute the independent (free at last, free at last…) Treasury. The democrats also used presidential power (precedential…) to move the country toward free trade, pay down the national debt, & reduce internal improvements spending, thereby weakening (uh-huh) the American Empire.

But (b-b-b-b-but…) power “corrupts,” & what “happened” to the Republicans also afflicted (even when they were asymptomatic…) the Democrats. The executive branch’s burgeoning power incentivized the Jacksonians to belligerently expand the empire to monopolize world commerce (who coulda seen that comin’? what with all the branch pruners & leaf polishers curtaining all those little Oz wizards?), a goal of expansionist southerners & northern businessmen. This portended an explosive situation regarding the growing slavery controversy, an issue largely absent from earlier political debates. Jackson & Van Buren pursued a peaceful foreign policy in the 1830’s (just ask the Cherokee, Seminoles, etc…), but in 1844 they split over Texas annexation & its implications for slavery & war against Mexico. President Polk used annexationas a pretext for conquering California ports during the Mexican War, a goal internationalist merchants & manufacturers had long desired. By the end, the Democratic Party’s laissez-faire creed was irrevocably extinguished (ffs…the bait was merely switched, yet again). The Jacksonian Revolution was another deafening “failure” (on purpose…weus wins again!) for liberty & anti-cronyism.” ~ from the introduction to Cronyism: Liberty vs Power in America 1607-1849, by Patrick Newman (introduces ya’ to the new men, same as the old men, over & over & over again…)

* I do like that word.

Anthony Petric
Anthony Petric

Your insight and kno is needed

Anthony Petric
Anthony Petric

I’ve been awake for only a year and I think you just explained how this is just the final round of WW2 without losing the reader (educated). You’ve done what the truth seekers couldn’t. I really hope you bring yourself to the frontline of this battle. All you need is the right platform. You speak their language.

Anthony Petric
Anthony Petric

I’m very pleased to know that the citizens of Canada still have protection. Be vigilant and most importantly, watch over each other. Corrupted individuals will be working against you (Respected officers of the RCMP) from every compartment of the ‘System'(Government and affiliation). Most importantly, make quick work of the medical tyranny. For this is only the tip of the iceberg and to secure the future of the human race, the entire iceberg must be removed. Time is of the essence and the opposition is masterful at wasting it. We stand with you! We stand together!! To the very end.

Paul J Fishman
Paul J Fishman

ANY RCMP officer or Administration that fall in line with the Predatory Federal Parliament of Ottawa are perverse predators. They will take orders at the US Canadian border to prey upon American citizens driving through the borders by trickery and arrests even IF they are fully vaccinated and fill out the ArriveCan application. They may take order to apprehend American citizens to take Covid-19 tests and hold them in detention centers for two days to get a negative test. Its possible they still may turn them back to the States or allow them in with restrictions. They may also deny Americans and other international travelers by airlines to be denied entry into Canada. That is why the airports are bogged down with the ArriveCan policy to stop international flights to and from Canada.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading