Waiting Upon Structures to Crack

Submitted by Thaisleeze

Guest Post by Alastair Crooke

Waiting Upon Structures to Crack — Strategic Culture

Jeffrey Tucker, in a piece entitled How Close Is Total Social and Economic Collapse?, writes, “Economies and societies fall apart slowly, then a bit more, then all at once. We seem to be in the middle period of this trajectory [in the U.S.]. The slow part began March 2020 when politicians around the world imagined that it would be no big deal to shut down the economy and restart it once the virus went away”. What a beautiful display of the power of ‘science-driven’ government it would be – Technocracy on a war-footing.

But, “[n]one of it worked. You cannot turn off an economy and normal social functioning and then turn them back on like a light switch. The attempt alone will necessarily cause unpredictable amounts of long-term breakage, not only of economic structures but also of the spirit of a people. Everything going on now reflects the disastrous presumption that doing that would be possible – and not cause dramatic and lasting damage. It was the greatest failure of politics in a century”.

Everything works until suddenly, it doesn’t. As Minsky said, stability breeds instability. The problem is that complex systems are inherently fragile. The optimization that makes them cost-effective also removes the redundancies that make them resilient. Things can fall apart quickly when some unforeseen event occurs. Not only things; the collective public psyche is a fragile complex system too – it cannot be restored to what it was simply by jabbing the re-set button.

Tucker views this essentially as a failure of judgement. Maybe it is, and maybe it isn’t – which is to say, a judgement failure in the way he means it. Yes, the supply-chain debacle may not adequately have been foreseen; or the self-harm that has resulted from attempting to de-couple from an intertwined economy as ubiquitous as that of China (i.e. microchip disruption).

But perhaps the reason the vaccine strategy is not being reconsidered, but has become cult doctrine on which the Establishment has doubled-down, is that it was conceived at the outset, not just as a means to an end – i.e. creating herd immunity via vaccines – but also an end in, and of itself.

Looked at in this way, we can perceive not just ‘one failure’ – that a V-shaped recovery on re-start, was presented as gospel – but rather, a series of related judgmental ‘failures’. These may give the appearance of being a troupe of wandering errors of well-intentioned, yet flawed analysis, though in fact, they were always connected by being conceived at the outset as ends in, and of themselves.

The commonality to these ‘errors’ lies with their being of ‘one project’ – being of one ‘genus’ – and not simply being a string of accidents of error.

The ostensible logic is that by ‘nudging’ almost everyone to get vaccinated, it will help achieve herd immunity, and thereby eliminate the virus. Is the Tucker-like flaw here that it was assumed that the vaccines were not ‘leaky’ in respect to variants; or that the vaccinated would not be vulnerable to infection; or that the vaccinated would not carry, shed and transmit the virus; or that any protection would not degrade in weeks or months? Perhaps they misunderstood the history of the SARS family of virus (to be not particularly susceptible to vaccines, from their tendency to slide sidewise into variants); or then again, maybe mass vaccination is also an end in itself?

No vax, no job? The unvaxed have become ‘the enemy’, in exactly the way that philosopher Carl Schmitt said that casting an ‘enemy’ is supposed to work: the assignment of a label so black and so unremittingly ‘other’ that mediation with such ‘monsters’ ‘who put the lives of others at risk’ becomes inconceivable. Such black and white Manicheanism is the essence of politics, Schmitt wrote approvingly. In Italy, for example, representatives of the political, medical and media establishment have openly accused the unvaccinated of being “rats”, “subhumans” and “criminals”, who deserve to be “excluded from public life” and “from the national health service” and even deserve to “die like flies”.

Is this another failure of thinking clearly? The inability of leaders to comprehend how such language tears society apart; that a society will not return to normal social and functioning, directly on the Green Pass ‘switch’ being turned off (if it ever is)?

Or, is it an end in itself? – Vaccination as a proxy for political loyalty – the majority defining itself in polar opposition to a demonized minority: ‘Holding the wrong political ideology makes you unclean’. You should be purged. Perhaps that is why the Biden administration is also not concerned about mass firings (and its economic disruptions) – because It helps purify the country of Trump-supporting recalcitrants?

Most obviously, the rushed ‘greening project’ tied to a declared climate ‘emergency’ is a counterpart to the shut-down and vaccine flaw. It seems that this similarly was imagined as straight-forward: the world would pirouette away from dirty to clean energy, through carbon ‘mandates’ that would shut-down both personal and collective carbon profligacy. And the economy then would be re-booted after $150 trillion had been spent on green renewables. Another display of the power of ‘science-driven’ governments, run by experts, supposedly untainted by partisanship, or expectations of personal gain.

Again, it’s not working: You cannot just ‘turn off’ a fossil-fuel based economy, and then turn it back on, a short-while later, as a green-washed ‘net zero’ one.

We may, on the one hand, perceive this as a simple failure to appreciate the practical impediments that have given the world its energy crunch, and its concomitant huge cost-hikes for consumers – albeit triggered, we are told, out of a pure concern to save the planet.

Or, on the other hand, is the carbon mandate also an end in, and of itself? i.e. the transition to a global technocratic managerial class, and the transfer of key policy tools away from the national level to the supranational? If so, this too, is not working. The social costs of the energy price shock will ripple across politics and cause further breakages in the economy.

And, is the associated shift from traditional economic management to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) – which happened to overlap with the pandemic shut down – a simple coincidence arising out of the need to act to protect people during the Covid crisis? One that has witnessed the Central Banks’ ‘creation’ of $30 trillion of liquidity injected into economies, as pandemic support. Was this then, just an unfortunate misappreciation of the risks of generating (non-transitory) inflation that would impoverish consumers, and possibly provoke economic recession?

Or, was it an end in itself, too – conceived at the outset as the jet-fuel that would finance the transition from hyper-financialised individualist capitalism (that is acknowledged even by the technocrats) to be no longer sustainable, to a stockholder corporate managerialism that would largely displace individual property rights, in favour of broader ESG, social, environmental, and diversity visions of stockholder corporatism?

As long ago as 1941, James Burnham in The Managerial Revolution, was making the case that the old paradigm of labour versus capitalism was passé; that progressive evolution would transition the world away from the capitalist-socialist dialectic to a new synthesis – an organizational structure made up of an élite managerial technocratic class – a type of society that was both ‘socialist’ (ESG and woke), yet also corporate entrepreneurial. It would be led by experts that understood problems beyond the ken of the public. Burnham believed this was in process to replace capitalism on a world scale (‘Davos’ calls it stockholder corporatism today).

Does this have an end in itself? Of course – the elite oligarchic class is preserved, and controls money and credit, albeit now at a supranational level, (i.e. the ECB practicing strict credit rationing for companies, according to its own Green doctrines). But this isn’t working so well either: We are experiencing both an energy ‘price-shock’, and disruptive inflation (more breakages).

At the international geo-political plane, things don’t seem to be working either. Team Biden says it wants a ‘managed competition’ with China, but why then send Wendy Sherman (who is not noted for her diplomatic skills) to China as Biden’s envoy? Why has there been this continuous chip-chipping away at the 1972 ‘One China’ policy with a series of small, seemingly innocuous moves on Taiwan if Team Biden wants contained competition (what he said he wants in a recent call with President Xi), but falters, time after time, to instigate a serious relationship?

Does the Team not understand that it is not ‘containing’ competition, but rather playing-with-fire, through its’ opaque hints that the U.S. might support Taiwan independence?

And then, why of all people, despatch Victoria Nuland to Moscow, if the competition with Moscow was to be quietly ‘balanced out’ as Biden’s face-to-face with Putin in Geneva seemed to signal? Like Sherman, Nuland was not received at a senior level, and her ‘Maidan arsonist’ reputation of course preceded her in Moscow. And why decimate Russia’s diplomatic representation at NATO HQ, and why have Secretary Austin talk in Georgia and Ukraine of NATO’s ‘open door’?

Is there some hidden logic to this, or were these envoys intentionally sent as some kind of ‘kick-ass’ provocative gesture to underline who’s boss (i.e. America is Back!)? This is known in Washington as ‘capitulation diplomacy’ – competitors are presented with only the terms of their capitulation. If so, it didn’t work. Both envoys effectively were sent packing, and Washington’s relations with these key states are degraded to near zero.

The Russia-China axis have come to the conclusion that polite diplomatic discourse with Washington is like water off a duck’s back. The U.S. and its European protégés simply do not hear what Moscow or Beijing says to them – so what is the point to talking to ‘tin-eared’ Americans? Answer: None.

Tucker wrote in respect to pandemic lockdowns that “everything going on now reflects the disastrous presumption that [continuing] doing that [which it was already doing] would be possible, and not cause dramatic and lasting damage. It was the greatest failure of politics in a century”. Is this true for America’s foreign policy too (i.e. capitulation diplomacy)?

Is it assumed that the way for America to retain global primacy is to continue coat-trailing China on Taiwan and its One China policy; and to coat-trail Russia on NATO membership for Ukraine? And that repeated hints at bilaterals with a folksy Biden are all that is necessary to stop events spiralling out of control?

Is all this coat-trailing and provocation simply Team Biden misjudging how serious China and Russia are about their Red Lines ‘meaning it’, or, is it an end in itself? (As an aside, Burnham was clear that many wars would have to be fought before a managerial society could fully take hold. These wars would lead to the destruction of sovereign nation states, such that only a small number of great nations would survive, culminating into the nuclei of three ‘super-states’. Burnham believed that “sovereignty will be restricted to the few super-states”.)

Tucker’s initial question, we should recall, was How Close Is Total Social and Economic Collapse? Our point in this piece is that this litany of failures are linked by being conceived at the outset, as ends in, and of themselves. And to one extent or another, none are working. So is a perfect storm gathering?

The commonality to these distinct ‘errors’ lies with their being ‘one project’ – a stealth coup of the policy tools and structures of public accountability, at the national level, and their transfer to the supranational plane (also known as the Re-Set). They derive, all, from the cult of technocratic managerialism. In the last analysis, Tucker is right: In the pursuit of this project, and its failing flock of subsets, “the attempt alone will necessarily cause unpredictable amounts of long-term breakage, not only of economic structures but also of the spirit of a people”.

Cults historically are dismissive of fragility in complex systems. They are focussed on the means to ‘ends’. They would not necessarily see Tucker’s ‘breakages’ even as breakage. Human attitudes and behaviour – i.e. people – are seen as an obstruction, and as Biden repeatedly warns, “if people won’t help, they must get out of the way of vaccine rules … get out of the way of people doing the right thing”.

It seems that Russia and China, seeing all this, will remain aloof and patient – waiting upon structures to crack.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

33
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
falconflight
falconflight

I just read (Ok maybe it’s propaganda) a Pew poll wherein doctors are the highest rated profession for trustworthiness. 54% of AmeriKows so saith.

Red River D
Red River D

I just deduced scientifically, via reading your post about Pew Poll Propaganda, that 54 percent of Americans are hopelessly, irreparably, tragically, terminally and unequivocally…

…too stupid to continue breathing.

Now can we get a Mulligan on the last fifty five years please?

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka

That is either a lie or people have a hard time giving up that notion, because it is truly frightening to live in a world where you cannot even trust doctors any more.

More likely, it will soon become apparent that the damage to the trustworthiness of doctors is so widespread that it can never be regained or it will take decades.

Eddy O
Eddy O

If one can’t trust one’s bartender……..

Ken31
Ken31

Don’t believe polls. They are fake and even if they wanted to give us real numbers, they would not be able to. I trust doctors about as much as peddlers of used durable goods. The profession is a disgrace.

falconflight
falconflight

I am generally suspicious of polling and make it a practice to review the crosstabs before giving it credibility or not. In this case, I thoroughly believe the polling. Why wouldn’t people believe this result? Look at AmeriKa. For months on end, my wife and I were often the only people in stores NOT wearing the holy rag. And this is in 80% voted for Trump Country.

Doc Adams
Doc Adams

The profession has prostituted itself. How many people respect whores?

Anonymous
Anonymous

depends what kind of “discounts” I get

m
m

Entirely believable.
Not sure why people here think they need to attack the messenger.

Let me spell it out to all of you:
Most people are unwilling, if not unable, to cope with the realization “You are on your own.” Generally speaking, in this society of lies-built-upon-lies nobody, not government, police, the judiciary, the military, philosophers, philanthropists, NGOs, nor churches will come to your rescue or even try to defend your rights.
Did you come to the same conclusion, already after the Snowden revelations and the non-action of all institutions afterwards? Thought so.
You’re welcome.

Quiet Mike

A rational people do not put their children at risk in order to save the lives of their elderly. This vaccine agenda is Satanic.

Red River D
Red River D

I reject that slander of Satan!!!

There’s no way Satan is that stupid. I think Satan lost control of the Machine when they put Brandon in charge.

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis

And Satan is furious that Brandon is getting the credit…

Arthur
Arthur

No, this fake crisis is not a political miscalculation. It was clear from the start that it was a coordinated attack on society itself, calculated to inflict lasting damage. It was no mistake.

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka

One could argue that it was not clear in March or even April 2020, but it certainly was by July.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

If you understand the principles of liberty…then it was absolutely clear what was happening from the very beginning.

(King Ivor…please ignore my statement regarding liberty.)

Anonymous
Anonymous

Mr. Cooke,
There was no error.
There were no failures.
Nobody EVER gave a shit about immunity, herd or otherwise.

Everything is going according to plan.
In fact, better than TPTB imagined it would.

Red River D
Red River D

“…In fact, better than TPTB imagined it would…”

They underestimated by an order of magnitude how gullible and soft-headed the average American “male” happens to be at this stage of the Apocalypse!!!

rhs jr
rhs jr

What causes you to think females are not?

Red River D
Red River D

My point is that the MEN fell down on their job to hold this place together.

This NEVER could have happened to our nation, culture or civilization if AMERICAN MEN had done their job.

See the Garden of Eden for my meaning.

There’s nothing new under the Sun.

Horseless Headsman
Horseless Headsman

One thing they may not have counted on is for the survivors to go Mad Max on whatever is still standing when the smoke clears. If we can’t have it, neither can they.

m
m

You need to read more attentively.
Mr. Crooke is only being kind, in not shredding Jeffrey Tucker’ piece outright.

This statement by Alastair
[…] it was conceived at the outset, not just as a means to an end […] but also an end in, and of itself.
[I.e. not a failure of judgement.]
couldn’t be more damning, not just towards Jeffrey but against the whole TPTB.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

“The slow part began March 2020 when politicians around the world imagined that it would be no big deal to shut down the economy and restart it once the virus went away”.

But that isn’t true.

There was never any plan to “re-start the economy” and the virus is never going to go away.

Some of us pointed that out right at the beginning, we said if this happens they will never relinquish control. Masks will become a permanent part of the landscape in the West for the hoi polloi in the same way they are ubiquitous in Koranland for the women folk.

This has always been about the consolidation of power and authoritarian control over people’s lives, the elimination of the middle class, and a never ending anarcho-tyranny. This isn’t some kind of Barney Fife goes to Washington incompetence, it’s a grand plan by some very sick, very evil people with a god complex. And none of it- not one aspect of this clown show- would ever have been possible if it weren’t for the deliberate ignorance of the great mass of selfish, stupid, obese, tech-addled dimwits to enable these pathetic losers the power over their lives.

I don’t remember which poster keeps saying it but he’s right as rain- This isn’t a pandemic, it’s an IQ test.

GNL
GNL

ICE-9, I think.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

He should turn it into a bumper sticker. And a T-shirt. And a beer cozy.

I want one.

Ghost
Ghost

Out of curiosity, I went looking and found some interesting links. Second one I think you will find fascinating for a variety of reasons, but mostly because it was written in May 2020.

There Are Answers that Are Clearly Wrong

Consider the meatpacking industry, especially in the U.S. As you may be aware, the Covid virus has tended to cluster in three particular kinds of places: retirement or long-term care facilities; prisons; and meatpacking plants.

The discussion of the closing of the meatpacking industry in the spring and summer of 2020 is something to think about, especially when folks are paying $5+ a pound for hamburger that is full of who knows what.

Covid-19: A Global Intelligence Test

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis

One of my favorites…Vonnegut would be proud!

m
m

This isn’t a pandemic, it’s a morality test.

ICE-9 unmasked himself as a kind of psychopath, me thinks.

willem
willem

“Looked at in this way, we can perceive not just ‘one failure’ – that a V-shaped recovery on re-start, was presented as gospel – but rather, a series of related judgmental ‘failures’. These may give the appearance of being a troupe of wandering errors of well-intentioned, yet flawed analysis, though in fact, they were always connected by being conceived at the outset as ends in, and of themselves.”

As some have observed, we can know that what is happening isn’t just random incompetence. If it was, the “errors” would sometimes cut in our favor. The fact that they never do tells you that they are part of a plan.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Since all of this is happening worldwide and in the same direction, it is clearly a culling of then useless eaters. The only green solution is a depopulation solution and the elites like Gates have openly told you so for years.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading