SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL

Submitted by Hardscrabble Farmer

WIKI LEAKS RELEASES MOON LANDING CUT SCENES FILMED IN NEVADA DESERT

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

90
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
falconflight
falconflight

Glad to learn that the USSR, et. al., were all our right good friends covering for our hoaxes. /s

centinel
centinel

What would/should they have said?

falconflight
falconflight

lying fake Potemkin Americans for starters.

centinel
centinel

And everyone would have shrugged it off or ignored it. It’s not like the US’ enemies were paragons of truth and transparency either.

falconflight
falconflight

That’s right and that never stopped them from issuing a whole laundry list of lies on most any issue, but this one? Nah

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker

Little less than a decade ago I approached this with “of course we went to the moon, this is ridiculous”. A year later, reading and viewing anything and everything I could locate, I was deflated at how naive I was. The real clincher was the fucking lunar lander bullshit. The drawings resemble a Jeep chassis, and somehow that lander folded up into a large suitcase size box, and then unfolded out to the lander. They must of had folded up batteries lol. I took a golf cart to burning man once. Packing it up, loading it on the trailer, was a pain in the ass. took hours hours hours to recharge, weighs 800 pounds with 6 6 volt batteries. Taking a fucking golf cart to the moon? Fuck, give me break.

Javelin
Javelin

I read the “wagging the moon doggy” series and have ZERO belief we went to the moon.
The lander was the final straw. The aluminum foil, the rickety model, the amount of equipment supposedly on that small lander and the impossibility of it redocking with the orbiting ship makes it obvious to anyone with an open mind.

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker

Duh. Meant “rover” not “lander” the rover was allegedly folded up into the lander…

Hagar
Hagar

I am torn between wanting to believe Apollo 11 was real and wondering if the video clips shown are real. With the latest video editing, CGI, Photoshop, and voice editing can one believe anything your lying eyes see? The truth was not forthcoming about JFK in Dallas, Gulf of Tonkin, Murrah bombing, 9/11, WMDs, and more. So how can anyone know the truth with all the lies and deceptions from our governing masters whose lies and manipulations have been exposed so often? Quo Bono? And when did the plot to fake a moon landing begin?

Heartlander
Heartlander

The state of FILM technology in 1969 was primitive. There was no such thing as CGI. I don’t see how filmmakers could have faked all that. Then again, whenever we get the tiniest peep into DARPA, my mind is utterly blown — so who knows what they might do or might have done.

ONE of these two things — the 1969 events or the film above — is a fake. We just don’t know which.

Pilot Doc
Pilot Doc

Yep

BUCKHED/BUY MORE AMMO/MORE BOURBON TOO.
BUCKHED/BUY MORE AMMO/MORE BOURBON TOO.

As I’ve said here before, there were a lot of off limit places at the Johnson Space Center that could have faked the moon landing. I saw them with my Uncle who was one of the Astronauts docs .

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
motley
motley

Wait! What about the cyclops? What happened?

Quiet Mike

So does this mean Pro Wrestling is in fact, real?
Enquiring Minds Want To Know.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

In pro wrestling humans actually land on the mat.

fujigm
fujigm

And the choreography has to be exact, or serious injuries can occur…

gatsby1219
gatsby1219

That damn firmament always gets in the way…

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

Earlier today a few friends dropped by and we stood out on the lawn and watched the big, white clouds drift across the landscape at 1,000mph. I didn’t look like they were going that fast of course, but you can’t trust your eyes, they’re not really designed for sensory perception.

BL
BL

We had big dark clouds that were not moving at all, now that is a feat with that 1000 mph wind and all, how can some clouds not move at all or very little?? All explanations taken into consideration….seriously.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Mornin’ BL….

Compelling thoughts, without doubt.

Emperor Trump’s declaration of war against the “invisible enemy”, and Xiden picking up the baton….lol, it never ends.

This is the full length of a video blocked on youtube, along with the shorter version that is allowed to remain on the metatube:

https://rumble.com/voihw5-lets-go-brandon-more-scripted-political-theater.html

At 9 min. mark, a Church committee clip immediately followed by an old A. Jones and an old J. Rogan clip….fwiw.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcYNfXRmHTU

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <—–====

Viper131
Viper131

Hoodwinked, Scammed, and Beat down by the world’s elite — should be the name of this video. This dude produces this video in a couple of days on a cheesey desktop with more news than the entire world produces (for the elite). Hmmm… Wonder why.

Definitely recommend this. And forward it on.

https://sacredgeometryinternational.com/monopoly-who-owns-the-world/.

In line with elite scamming and beating us down. Lies fabricated by elite…. That someone counters easily.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao

Viper…..

The information in the video is great, but I disagree with the premise that ‘man’ can stop the direction of this world government thru a mass ‘awakening’.

I believe we are witnessing the closing days of The Age of Grace……

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<—-== so do 'they'

"At the hub of the Fintech movement stands what is known to some as the Big Three: Vanguard, State Street, and BlackRock. These are the monster corporations that facilitate resource management and financial technology for the largest conglomerates in the world. The most prevalent is the nearly $9 trillion corporation BlackRock,[xiii] which started as an asset-managing company in 1988. Growing over the next three decades to be a super-player in its field, it has even developed a huge impact in Washington, DC, and is now “the largest money manager in the world,”[xiv] operating seventy offices in thirty countries and servicing clients in more than one hundred countries, extending its global reach throughout “North and South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, the Middle East and Africa.”[xv] This firm runs a gargantuan technology operation that manages nearly $22 trillion in assets, and it has influential shares with Alphabet Inc. (Google’s parent company)[xvi] and “a stake of 5 percent or more in nearly 98 percent of firms in the S&P 500 index including Apple, Microsoft, J. P. Morgan Chase, [and] Wells Fargo…[and is the] world’s largest shareholder in fossil fuels.”[xvii] (Do you see how all the superpowers seem to be sitting at the same table?) Its assets and managed assets include nearly everything covered in the earlier explanation of Fintech, but this anomalous company also owns such curious resources as “stakes in Mexican toll roads, hospitals, gas pipelines, prisons, oil exploration businesses, and a coal-fired power plant,” along with interests in some of Canada’s road and bridge projects and other surprising holdings.[xviii] The corporation’s executive staff has been made up of many who have worked in prominent political positions, such as Barack Obama’s national security advisor Thomas Donilon and Coryann Stefansson, who served in the New York Federal Reserve Bank.[xix]

Particularly interesting about BlackRock is that it is slated to play a key role in Biden’s administration; in fact, the recently inaugurated has seated several BlackRock figures in Washington. For example, Biden named former BlackRock global head and Obama administration economic advisor Brian Deese as director of the National Economic Council.[xx] BlackRock global chief investment strategist, Mike Pyle, holds experience in Washington, DC, via his position serving the Obama administration, and was named to serve the Biden administration in the capacity of chief economic advisor for Vice President Kamala Harris.[xxi] It is also noted that the Biden administration set its sights on BlackRock former chief of staff Adewale Adeyemo, and it was rumored that Chief Executive Larry Fink “will serve as a top official at Treasury,” although, as of now, Fink asserts he plans to stay at BlackRock.[xxii]

Fintech is the means by which the entire world’s money will soon be moving. It will be controlled by oligarchs who use big corporations to control the cultural and political narrative, the constant digital delivery of propaganda, and…the supply of nearly all material necessities around the globe. The way our needs are met is rapidly becoming all-digital, all-controllable, all-obstructable. Access can be cut off immediately, and in a cashless society, what are we to do but comply with powers that be in order to keep access to our livelihood? If you don’t think this is already on the horizon, ask yourself this question: How many cash or check transactions have you conducted in the past few years—especially after the onset of the COVID-19 crisis? How much did you begin to purchase online rather than from a physical store? How many times—even at a restaurant or grocery store—have you conducted the entire selection and payment transaction from your smartphone or home computer before merely driving up and receiving your purchases? Even more, despite the hit that the economy took as a byproduct of the COVID-19 crisis, do you find it surprising that BlackRock’s assets rose 19 percent between December of 2019 and January of 2021?[xxiii] While our local economies struggled, Fintech made a killing. On the matter of transitioning toward a world more reliant on Fintech during the pandemic, Larry Fink stated, “It has led to a profound shift in economies and how societies even operate, creating opportunities to redesign our society.”[xxiv]"

Further on in the chapter:

"But, consider the ten anomalous rulers who facilitate the Antichrist’s economic system—one that will prohibit any kind of buying or selling without proper access (mark). The kings who operate with an enigmatic “sameness” have “no kingdoms.”

Their dominion is intangible. Perhaps it is digital…

And when they fall, so does the world’s economy.

As has been stated, Big Media is currently dominated by six corporations. Big Tech holds five. Somewhere in the middle of all this, Fintech is made up of three, but is rapidly falling under the domain of one, which is asserting its dominance worldwide, and in high places. As of today, this totals fourteen entities if we count the entire Orwellian trinity. We could likely be only a few corporate buyouts away from seeing ten world-ruling powers who have no palpable kingdoms.

Just a few more conglomerate mergers, and the ten could ascend to claim their thrones."

COUNTDOWN TO 2025 AND THE SECRET DESTINY OF AMERICA—PART 10: MYSTERY OF THE 10 KINGS OF REVELATION 17 REVEALED?

Gomer
Gomer

I used to believe this crap, too. I also so used to believe in the Easter Bunny, Santa, Epstein killed himself, that Hillary would go to jail…

fujigm
fujigm

Epstein’s not dead, Gomer.
They needed him to disappear, so he ‘committed suicide’.

Anonymous
Anonymous

After his suicide he was caught on drone cam at his pedo island

JimN
JimN

Now maybe Wikileaks can release the true “Zapruder” films.

BL
BL

The other day I related to another poster that Russia would use the proof they had on 9/11 and the fake moon walk as blackmail in the event the US screwed them out of their NG service to Europe, mostly Germany. Wait a while, this could get very interesting.

What will the sheep do when they have to face this is all a lie? Wait til they find out the Vax is a HIV Trojan horse, not to mention a clot inducer. I am awaiting the phone calls from those who said it is insanity to think they could fake any of this so I can listen for their heads to explode. BTW, I have seen outtakes of this hokey moon crap before.

BL
BL

HF- I know how much you enjoyed posting this little morsel, you iz bad. 🙂

MrLiberty

My wife’s father was the chief engineer at Rockwell on the Apollo project. His mother never believed that we landed on the moon. He passed away before I came to the realization that it was likely all bullshit so never got the chance to actually chat with him about it. Lots of silos, so plenty of opportunities for lies. No shock that Wikileaks had some truth.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I used to work next to Jesse Blue, and considered him a workplace friend. He and Bill Fairbanks built the lunar rover for Boeing, and I was left with the impression that it was almost a backyard type of project(?). I knew Bill Fairbank’s (rip) family as well, ~ ~ ~ but it is the same story for me, it was before I was questioning the validity of the landing, and I never grilled anyone about what they knew. Jesse, and Bill Fairbanks, in a way were known geniuses, and they would have known exactly what they were building. Whether they were building a vehicle that could function in Low Gs, and a vacuum, that could be folded together, or whether they were building a modified golf-cart to use on a movie set. Jesse loved to talk and relate stories, and talking to me was sort of a safety-valve for him. BUT> He never mentioned anything in detail about this project. (Sworn to Silence???)

On a strange note, defending the “Golf Cart” notion, NASA never had video demonstrating the unfolding of the Moon-Buggy. (???) (That I am aware of)

Heartlander
Heartlander

That touches on the thing that makes it hardest for me to believe that the whole thing was fake. Many thousands of engineers and other technical people would have had to be coerced/blackmailed to keep all this secret and carry the secret to their graves. THAT is what I find impossible, not the moon landings.

Two if by sea.
Two if by sea.

I’m happy believing that we did walk on the moon and am satisfied these films were for the purpose of visual aid.

gatsby1219
gatsby1219

The development of new spacesuits is critical for “returning humans to the Moon, continuing safe operations on the International Space Station, and exploring Mars and other deep space locations,” according to the report.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/astronauts-can-t-return-to-moon-by-2024-because-spacesuits-aren-t-ready-nasa-watchdog-1.5542505

gatsby1219
gatsby1219

The suits used in 1969 too small now ?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

Wrong color.

wink-wink, nudge-nudge.

Bobo
Bobo

Wait. We didn’t go to the Moon?

Francis Marion

I know. I’m shocked too.

Ned Kelly
Ned Kelly
Robin Banks
Robin Banks

How about a link so we can watch it on full screen?

Mista Ed - Shape Shifta
Mista Ed - Shape Shifta

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HBagDQeyW9uB/

Cut and paste into browser address bar

centinel
centinel

This one is my personal favorite:

BL
BL

Did the moon men film that lift off and follow it upward into that starless sky?

centinel
centinel

Exactly.

Kenan
Kenan

Nope.

Ed Fendell, back on earth.. as told by Skippopotamus on https://imgflip.com/gif/1jfhog

snip:

“The video of the Apollo 17 lunar module taking off (technically, only the ascent stage takes off) often puzzles people, because the camera tilts up to follow it in flight, implying that someone was there operating the camera, much to the delight of conspiracy nuts. In reality, the lunar rover had a television camera, the Ground-Commanded Television Assembly (GCTA), and it could receive remote control commands from an operator on Earth, which were used to shoot the launch. There are other examples of the GCTA panning and zooming “on its own” when both astronauts are in the frame, away from its controls. It was also used to look around the landing site after the ascent stage has departed.

Another common twist of the claim is that the camera movement in the video appears to have “perfect timing,” following the module closely despite the signal delay between the Earth and the Moon. This is easily explained: the take-off time was known in advance and the operators were able to plan ahead, taking into account the signal delay, the camera tilt speed and the angular velocity of the ascent stage. In addition to that, the Apollo 17 clip was the third (and final) try: the first mission to carry the Lunar Rover and the GCTA was Apollo 15, but the camera broke and couldn’t tilt up, so it captured only the moment of the launch; on Apollo 16 the camera worked correctly, but the lunar module flew out of the frame due to a miscalculation (the astronauts had parked the lunar rover on the wrong spot). “Third time’s the charm,” indeed. The camera system operator, Ed Fendell, became briefly famous among space buffs because of his spectacular last-chance success.”

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos

LOL

So let me understand this correctly: this guy’s saying that they had a remote-controlled camera on board the rover, capable of sending a TV signal back to Earth (on a slight delay), in the early ’70’s, a time when you had to play with the rabbit ears on top of your set (lots of them had — tinfoil!) just to get a decent picture, if you were lucky enough to live close to the station.

Now, even with this magical, never-before-used (and never used since) technology, he claims this TV feed — which wasn’t even strong enough bandwidth to be in color, but that’s another story — was somehow strong enough to be beamed to two satellite stations in Australia and one in the US and from there filmed live off monitor feeds (aka Kinescoping) and disseminated across the world, again allegedly live. So they had the technology to send a live TV feed from the Moon and back, but not be able to be transmitted as a live TV feed, and instead filmed feeds live off monitors.

Why would you need to do that? Why not just simulcast the live signal feed the monitors are receiving? Because that would be proof the signal was, indeed, live. There were plenty of TV shows back then (think sports games) which were transmitted live. So why not this one?

None of this matters anyway, of course, because all this super-prescient technology and all the tapes which recorded the Apollo footage conveniently disappeared (some time in the late ’70’s the tapes were, regrettably, either lost or reused… cuz that’s what happens to crucial historical documents, of course), so there is literally no argument here. Without actual proof there is no actuality.

scott henson
scott henson

Hahahaha, looks fake as fk!

fujigm
fujigm

Natch.
Everything the government sells is lies.

m
m

LOL, that is some Edith-level trolling! Thanks, HF.

Now really guys?
On bitchute. From an… italian (?) poster. Without a link to the source of this above presented video given there.
A brief search on wikileaks shows they didn’t “release” such a video.
(Or maybe I fell for a fake wikileaks site? Then link to a more real one, please!)

Jag Owf
Jag Owf

Don’t cloud the issue with facts! But muh conspiracy theories!!!1!elventy

brian
brian

More like, My mind is already made up so don’t confuse me with facts.

Rod Stuart
Rod Stuart

It is out takes from the 1978 movie Capriocorn One.

Ghost
Ghost

My son was here yesterday (the rocket scientist) and I asked him about editing history with algorithms. I asked him if changing the record of the past actually changes the past in his opinion. And, he agreed that if an algorithm had access to “all” of the data links, the record of the past could be changed.

“But, I’m standing right here,” I said to the mirror in fear.
“No you are not,” said the bot as it erased my last thought.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

I was going to post the photo of Kubrick at the studio in England with all the head honchos from NASA. I’ve used it numerous times.

Google has erased all but three of those images- there used to be hundreds- and those three will not link.

I’m sure that there’s a plausible explanation m will explain to us.

Ghost
Ghost

comment image

This one? You are correct… there are not as many as there once was. I downloaded a copy of it, just in case it disappears too!

I’m sure there is a plausible explanation. Or will be soon.

m
m

I’m afraid I can’t do that, Dave HF.

I mean a photo of a group of people together – is there anything that could disprove that they were conspiring together?

– – –
Stop it, you’re killing me!
Or actually more like “Stop, you’re making it worse!” {/Monster Inc.}

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

If you have some rational explanation why all the big wigs at NASA including Werner Von Braun decided to take a government funded trip to a movie studio in London to visit with the director of the recent movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, I’m all ears.

No explanation for it has ever been presented by NASA for the confab, no one has ever demonstrated any evidence that Kubrick ever worked on any documentary films- or any project for NASA for that matter-, and no one has ever offered any plausible reasoning for why the entire top echelon of the Apollo program decided to take a hiatus in the midst of the single most ambitious project ever undertaken by mankind, with the deadline looming in order to go talk with a big shot Hollywood director in another country.

And now there appears to be an effort by search engines to make these previously easy to find images far less accessible to the public.

But I’m sure there’s a perfectly rational explanation for it.

m
m

Note: I don’t know the date that photo was taken on. I assumed it was before 2001 was released, you say it was after (but before the “moon landing”, obviously.)

But anyways, I look at it the other way ’round:
If I would want to fake the moon landing because we realized we cannot do it for real, but cannot publicly admit to it because of da Russians, would I then send all my top men to visit a known director in London? Even assuming no photos would have been taken.
Because it needed all the top NASA brass to talk Kubrick into it??
But of what importance is a film director for a fake moon landing film shooting anyways? Couldn’t any other halfway talented director have done that, too?
I mean it’s not like Kubrick had some ‘secret sauce’ formula stored inside his brain, plus it being one that nobody could have reverse engineered from the film sets and talking to the personnel involved where they did ‘2001.’

So the whole thing reeks a little too much like “hey, that’s great, a smoking gun, now we can stop digging and doing further complicated thinking over all those puzzle pieces.”
That’s not how it works, you still need to keep looking for ‘the dog(s) that didn’t bark.’

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

You didn’t present a plausible explanation for why they felt it necessary to meet with him, you just said that if they did make a fake they could have gotten someone else. Isn’t that a red herring? Or is it a McGuffin, I get them confused.

You think this was some sort of Government version of Make A Wish? Hey, you guys have been kicking ass with the Apollo program, what say we check off something from your bucket list and send you to meet the guy who directed Dr. Strangelove?

Why did they stop what they were doing and take the time to fly to England to meet him?

Anything at all.

Go.

m
m

I didn’t because I don’t have to. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

You however, if peddling a complex and elaborate conspiracy, need to explain why all the “if I’m doing a conspiracy, why would I do exactly that {specifics}” -when it is a bit obvious outside of the ordinary-, still don’t apply – i.e. where/what is the plausible denial.

To start with the most basic: Why didn’t they let single person Kubrick fly to the US, instead of sending a bunch of people to London?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

And the cigar is help us convince people we went to the Moon.

I’ll do you one last solid and answer your question-

You fly in the entire front line of your operation including our favorite Nazi and you make an impact. You make him an offer he can’t refuse. Good cop/bad cop, kettling, etc.

Now back to mine.

Why were they there if not to get him to make a film for them?

m
m

So you’re saying they did an all-strings-pulled-operation to fly to London to “convince” him – but they had no way or option (all strings pulled, remember!) to make him fly to the US??
Why? Because the UK is such a freedom loving and independent-from-the-US country they wouldn’t have allowed the US to trick/blackmail/force/capture Kubrick, to get him to the US??
This is so hilariously one-sided by you, it’s basically self-propaganda.

Answer: I don’t know, maybe because he had just released a film which was stunningly ahead of it’s time, and has to do with space travel?
I watched “2001” in the late 1980’s for the first time, and only after watching it I read it was produced in 1968. That made my mouth drop open, figuratively. How could someone do such a film in such an unbelievable quality (of non-CGI) tricks, at the time?

Which brings us to a more advanced question:
If they used him to create fake moon landing films, you think Kubrick would have not managed to put some fake star constellations into at least some of the shots? I mean such was obviously not done on 16mm film. Where would the difficulty have been.
(And do you really want to bend Occam’s razor even more into a pretzel, and [as the only conceivable excuse that comes to my mind] say Kubrick did it on purpose, as a hint for the fakery?)

Muscledawg (not to be known as Delusionaldawg)😉
Muscledawg (not to be known as Delusionaldawg)😉

Well I’ll be……
At least I made some $$$ selling my lunar orbital charts for some of the apollo missions.

AL Tru
AL Tru

The Van Allen Belt.
“The Shining” Room 237

m
m

Off topic:
Great news for Australia! According to a German newspaper, international travel from and to Australia has been allowed again, starting today Monday.
What? No, not for tourists, those are still not allowed to enter Australia. For Australian citizens.
A great day for freedom – Australia allows its own citizens to travel across it’s borders again!!

Random63
Random63

Sigh….all I see is clips of a film crew interspersed with clips of the astronauts on the Moon. Nice try though, but not buying the debunk nonsense.

Worked at KSC for a number of years, and met several Apollo astronauts along with many engineers and technicians who worked in the program.

Believe what you wish. I really don’t care.

Anonymous
Anonymous

It’s not really about belief … it’s about evidence. Since you were an insider, please explain what magical process was used to get the astronauts through the Van Allen radiation belt?

Robin Banks
Robin Banks
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

I met an astronaut once. I was with my son who was five at the time and I asked him to explain why we couldn’t see the dark side of the Moon, just a friendly inquiry to help me explain it to a kindergartener in simple language.

He wasn’t able to do it, although he tried before ending the conversation with that’s a really good question. I found that to be oddly illuminating. In regards to just how informed astronauts are, about their profession and all.

Here’s the thing. Maybe we did go, but all this fakery surrounding it, all the lies, the manipulated footage, the fake Moon rocks, the deleted data, the erased footage, the Nuremburg quality of the interview of the Apollo 11 crew, the never going back part, add it all up and it feels hinky squared.

But thanks for the permission to believe what we like, that was mighty white of you.

centinel
centinel

NASA “lost” the original footage. How does that happen. Also, I believe they came out a few years ago and said they also lost the technology to return to the moon.

Even for government, that’s too incompetent to be believable.

m
m

That’s really funny.
Because it displays your premise that the government should somehow been in possession of all required engineering diagrams and drawings at some point, in the first place.

There were at least a dozen major companies involved to design and build the needed parts. You think in 1972 the gov’t sent all of them a message “please send us a copy of all plans, diagrams, parts lists etc., as we will do safekeeping of them, for when we want to fly to the moon again”?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

Obviously you’ve never filed an income tax return.

I bought a house. I have copies of all the blueprints, schematics for the systems, warranties, instruction manuals, etc.

NASA is a government agency. If they bought the stuff, they own it. In what world would anyone expect otherwise?

This is not the kind of place where people will let something that vapid pass as a reasonable explanation.

Ghost
Ghost

Since the federal government started shifting noncombat duties to federal contract, a lot of what is purchased is considered “proprietary.” When I worked at Northrup, we couldn’t access Boeing’s information on equipment without government request. Which meant we couldn’t get it even though we’d been hired to reverse engineer the piece of equipment. It was/is ridiculous.

The government liaison didn’t want to make Northrup or Boeing upset, so he wouldn’t request it for fear of losing his post-retirement career with one or the other.

m
m

Wow, now that was one of the poorest arguments I’ve ever seen here by you.

If you buy a car, you also get a copy of the construction designs?

Even if you have something hand-tailored for you,
a) does that include the rights on all calculations, plans, and production instructions?
b) and even if the answer were yes, would you get them handed over to you (on paper), and keep them for 50 years??

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

If my car was the first and only one ever made in the history of mankind and was never reproduced ever again, then yeah, I’d probably ask for them.

When you file your fucking taxes you have to have proof of every single jot and tittle for seven years according to Federal law no matter how insignificant your income.

This wasn’t some kind of contract for ten thousand pair of jungle boots, it was the single most ambitious and unparalleled undertaking in human history done on the public dime. The Smithsonian has the suits on display, but your telling me that the really significant aspects of the mission- the technical and scientific work that made such an achievement possible- were flushed down the toilet?

The lengths people will go to hold onto their beliefs is stunning.

m
m

Your one-sided view on things is breathtaking.
The single most ambitious and unparalleled undertaking in human history had a million moving pieces, was never intended to be put into mass production, but somehow the documentation was guaranteed to be in perfect shape to be put away by gov’t bureaucrats for future generations??

Anybody who worked on a single small half-way complex software project nowadays will break into uncontrollable laughter at such a stance.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

Yeah, yeah, yeah, the dog ate their homework, got it.

centinel
centinel

Regardless of the literal likelihood of preserving the diagrams and processes, the larger picture here is the notion that technology has somehow regressed since the late 60’s. Especially the computer guidance technology and automation that would be so critical to the mission.

NASA coming out and saying that they can no longer do because of the technology is an enormous red flag for credibility. It is patently absurd.

MrLiberty

Easy to lose what you never had to begin with.

Ivor Mechtin, M.D. at Law
Ivor Mechtin, M.D. at Law

I found that to be oddly illuminating. In regards to just how informed astronauts are, about their profession and all.

Appeal To Authority appears to be the main ingredient holding the Global Brainwash in place.

Then The Science spake, saying Thus saith The Science…..

Pilot Doc
Pilot Doc

If we did go, we didn’t go like they show

nkit
nkit

You put your left foot in, and put your left foot out, and
you do the hinky pinky to keep the boogeyman out…

gatsby1219
gatsby1219

Do you get the “Jab” too ?

Fielding Mellish
Fielding Mellish

I cannot say definitely, one way or the other, if the entire Apollo program was a hoax. What is clear is that going to the Moon beginning in 1969, mostly without mishap sans Apollo 13, seems today like a near impossible task. Much of the technology for doing this was not available. The computer technology of the time, seems to me, to have been less than adequate for the task. I do not believe that the command module provided enough shielding to carry them through the Van Allen radiation belts alive. I am also less than sure that our space suit technology could have withstood the extreme temperatures on the lunar surface. These videos clearly show that the Astronauts where not only practicing but were being directed as if in a film. Did they really just act the part?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Was the first crew murdered for not going along with the program? (Grissom, White, and Chaffee)

centinel
centinel

It would have sent quite the message to the other participants.

Note from Nevada
Note from Nevada

Probably safe to say that the entire public NASA program was used as distraction to the war in Vietnam and other dirty deeds going on at that time.

a9racer
a9racer

I KNEW there was something hinkey about bldg 7….

Ivor Mechtin, M.D. at Law
Ivor Mechtin, M.D. at Law

Anybody ever seen K 19, with Harrison Ford?

If we have had the technology since the 60’s to ward off deadly radiation ( the Van Allen belt, no atmosphere on the moon) why has that technology never been adopted for use on nuclear powered submarines?

When the Fukushima reactor was critically damaged in that tsunami, why didn’t NASA trot out their Moon Suits and donate them to the people working to contain the dangerous radioactive leak?

Hmmmm……..

Sensop

comment image

Everyone hold your spot and … Take two!

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading