Why Is the Human Being Not Like a Machine?

Guest Post by Jeffrey A. Tucker

In defense of regulatory mandates during oral arguments, the following words were spoken by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor: “Why is a human being not like a machine if it’s spewing a virus?” For her, it is a simple matter: regulatory impositions rule the machine world so why not the human one too?

The question came across to listeners (millions heard these arguments for the first time) as shocking. How can anyone think this way? Human beings carry pathogens, tens of trillions of them. Yes, we infect each other, and our immune systems adapt as they have evolved to do. Still, we have rights. We have freedom. These have granted us longer and better lives.

The Bill of Rights doesn’t pertain to machines. Machines don’t comply with Constitutions. Machines have no volition. Machines are things that must be powered by external sources, programmed by humans, and behave exactly as they are managed to behave. If a machine doesn’t do what is expected, it is broken and therefore repaired or replaced.

All this seems incredibly obvious and undeniable, so much so that one can only stand back in awe that anyone would doubt it, particularly a judge who holds the fate of human liberty in her hands. It seems utterly astonishing that such a person would not quite grasp the difference between the human experience and a mechanized widget.

And yet, what she said is actually not out of left field. It wasn’t a point she made up on the spot. The presumption that people should be managed like machines has been a baseline assumption pervasive in pandemic planning for the better part of 15 years. The delusion was born in the heads of a handful of people who happened to be close to power, and it has grown ever since.

Many great thinkers have tried to blow the whistle on these intellectual trends for a very long time. Twenty years ago, Sunetra Gupta warned us. Nonetheless, the modelers and planners carried on, building more models, fantasizing of central plans, cobbling together mitigation strategies, and otherwise plotting to remove human volition from the list of unknowns during a pandemic.

In other words, treating people like machines is not a radical idea and it is not purely the cranky invention of an ideologically motivated court judge. What Sotomayor said isn’t unusual at all, at least not in the confines of her intellectual bubble. She offered up a summary statement concerning many of the presumptions behind lockdowns and now mandates. It has been part of the agenda for a very long time, a view held by some of the world’s leading intellectuals that gradually gained influence within the epidemiological profession over the last decade and a half.

All of this is well documented. We just hadn’t fully experienced it until 2020. That was the year in which they found the opportunity to test the theory that humans can be managed as machines and thereby generate better results.

Have a look at Michael Lewis’s mostly awful book on the topic. For all its failings, it does a deep dive into the history of pandemic planning. It was born in October 2005 at the urging of president George W. Bush. The innovator was a man named Rajeev Venkayya, who today runs a vaccine company. Back then, he was head of a bioterrorism study group within the White House. Bush wanted a big plan, something similar to the big vision that led to the Iraq War. He wanted some means to crush a virus. More shock and awe.

“We were going to invent pandemic planning,” Venkayya announced to the staff. He recruited a group of computer programmers who had zero knowledge of viruses, pandemics, immunity, and no experience at all in the management and mitigation of diseases. They were computer programmers and their programs all presumed exactly what Sotomayor said: we are all machines to be managed.

Among them was Robert Glass from the Sandia National Laboratory, who cobbled together the idea of social distancing with the help of his middle-school-aged daughter. The idea was that if we all just stayed away from each other, the virus would not transmit. What happens to the virus? It was never clear but they believed that somehow a virus that could not find a host would then somehow disappear into the firmament, never to return.

None of it ever made sense, except in the models. In the world of computer modeling, everything makes sense according to the rules as set up by programmers.

You can read the original Glass paper on the CDC website, where it still lives today. It is called Targeted Social Distancing Designs for Pandemic Influenza. It’s a central plan that removes all human volition. Everyone is mapped according to their likelihood of spreading disease. Their choices are replaced by the plans of scientists. The model is based on a small community but it applies equally to an entire society.

Targeted social distancing to mitigate pandemic influenza can be designed through simulation of influenza’s spread within local community social contact networks. We demonstrate this design for a stylized community representative of a small town in the United States. The critical importance of children and teenagers in transmission of influenza is first identified and targeted. For influenza as infectious as 1957–58 Asian flu (≈50% infected), closing schools and keeping children and teenagers at home reduced the attack rate by >90%. For more infectious strains, or transmission that is less focused on the young, adults and the work environment must also be targeted. Tailored to specific communities across the world, such design would yield local defenses against a highly virulent strain in the absence of vaccine and antiviral drugs.

Here is a small map of infection transmissions as presented in this seminal paper.

Wait, this is my community? This is society?

You see here how this works. They have mapped what they imagine to be the infection path. They replace this path with closures, separations, capacity limits, travel restrictions, forcing everyone to stay home and stay safe. You wonder why they targeted schools? The models told them to.

Thus pandemic planning was invented, contradicting a century of public health experience and a millennia of knowledge concerning how pandemics really end: through herd immunity. None of this mattered. It was all about the models and what seemed to work on their computer programs.

As for human beings, yes, in these models, they are machines. Nothing more. When you hear the claims reduced to preposterous quips by a judge, they are laughable on their face. Or scary. Regardless, they are plain wrong. Surely every intelligent person knows the difference between a person and a machine. How can a person believe this?

But in a different context, you can take that same worldview, throw up some colorful charts, back it by a Powerpoint presentation, add variables that can change the model’s workings based on certain presumptions, and you can generate what appears to be a highly intelligent computerization that reveals things we otherwise would not see.

Blinded by science, we might say. Many people in the White House were indeed blinded. And the CDC too. They had hoped to deploy the newly codified system of virus control in 2006, with the Avian bird flu, which, experts warned, could kill half of the people who got the bug. Anthony Fauci said the same thing: a 50% case fatality rate, he predicted.

And yet many people were disappointed: the bug never jumped from birds to humans. They could not try out their great new scheme. Still, the modeling movement grew steadily over a decade and a half, gaining recruits from many sectors, and then enjoying enormous funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Obviously Gates himself was and remains convinced that the best way to deal with pathogens is through antivirus programs we call vaccines, while otherwise mitigating spread through human separation.

In 2006, I had speculated that disease planning was a new frontier for state control of the social order. “Even if the flu does come,” I wrote, “the government will surely have a ball imposing travel restrictions, shutting down schools and businesses, quarantining cities, and banning public gatherings. It’s a bureaucrat’s dream! Whether it will make us well again is another matter.”

“It is a serious matter,” I continued, “when the government purports to plan to abolish all liberty and nationalize all economic life and put every business under the control of the military, especially in the name of a bug that seems largely restricted to the bird population. Perhaps we should pay more attention.”

At the time, most people just ignored all this as so much noise. It was just another White House press conference, just another wacky bureaucratic dream from which our laws and traditions would protect us. I wrote about it not because I believed they would attempt it. My alarm was that anyone could dream up such a crazy plot to begin with.

Fifteen years later, that noise became the calamity that has fundamentally destabilized American liberty and law, wrecked trade and health, shattered countless lives, and thrown our future as a civilized people into grave doubt.

Let us not turn away from the reality: all of this was a product of intellectuals who did and do think exactly as Sotomayor. We are not humans with rights. We are machines to be managed. In fact, if you look back at the March 16, 2020, news conference at which these lockdowns were all announced, Dr. Birx said just in passing the following sentence:

“We really want people to be separated at this time, to be able to address this virus as comprehensively that we cannot see, for we don’t have a vaccine or a therapeutic.”

Here we have a leading advisor to the president essentially advocating for completely new and radical social transformation, as managed by public health professionals. A comprehensive plan for everyone to be separated, exactly as the disease planners 15 years earlier had advocated in their hare-brained computer models.

Why did reporters not ask more questions? Why did people not scream that this whole cockamamie scheme is inhumane and deeply dangerous? How could people have sat calmly listening to this gibberish and pretend it was normal?

It’s sheer madness. But madness can transverse the decades so long as its creators live within intellectual bubbles, enjoy generous funding, and never have to confront the results of their schemes.

This is the story of what happened to liberty in the US and all over the world. It was shattered by fanaticism, all rooted in a core presumption that we’d be far better off as human beings if our ruling class regarded us as no different from machines spewing sparks. They were permitted to reorganize the whole of our lives based on that principle.

What the Justice Sotomayer said strikes us now as both dangerous and delusional. It is. And yet her conviction is widely shared, and has been for at least 15 years, among the class of intellectuals who gave us lockdowns and pandemic controls. It’s their template. At their parties and conferences for all these years, such thoughts were considered normal, responsible, intelligent, and wise.

Now that they have had a go at it, where are they to defend the results? Instead, they have mostly left the scene, leaving the bag of intellectual rubbish in the hands of a Supreme Court justice who is both their accidental mouthpiece and their sacrificial victim. It was the statement that will define her career, forever cited as proof that she should never have been approved for that position.

In fact, what Sotomayer said about machines and humans was not rooted in ignorance as such; it was the fulfillment of the delusions of countless intellectuals the world over for most of this century. She was summarizing countless papers and presentations in the form of a casual quip, thus revealing it for the fundamental insanity that it truly is.

“Madmen in authority,” wrote John Maynard Keynes, “who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.” Sometimes that very distillation is what reveals precisely what we’ve tried so hard for so long to ignore. Sotomayer revealed the existential threat, in a way that was mortifyingly ridiculous, but also encapsulated everything that has gone wrong in our times.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

24
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
AK John

When you study then mind and many aspects of our bodies yes, we are a biological machine in many ways. But it’s the spark of God, Soul, that makes us unique individuals. So, curses to Sotomayer and her leftwing puppet masters.

Red River D
Red River D

The Machine is a diabolical counterfeit of living men and animals.

Thus, it’s been the dream and stated purpose of communism to merge with the machine, since at least 1917.

And The Beast has been laboring furiously to turn men into machines from the beginning. This is to remake mankind in the image of Beast… i.e., in the image of The Machine. This is the meaning behind the cogwheel symbol we see in advertising and marketing. It is to make individual men into interchangeable, universally-adaptable parts for The Machine.

The difference between Mankind and Machinekind is profoundly important.

AK John

Well said. When we are indulging in the passions of the mind, lust, greed, anger, attachment, and vanity, we are indeed beastlike.

very old white guy
very old white guy

No, that is pretty much human.

i forget
i forget

Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, 1818. And far older than that.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Men are not piano keys.

Balbinus

See Genesis 11:6

Willy
Willy

Try telling the believers of “singularity” that man and machine are different.

geo
geo

We are not “biological machines”; you can simplify and believe is some sort of “mechanisms” here and there…. but this does not make us machines.
Did you check the cell’s types and shapes?
Did you see that anyone is UNIQUE, but lives the same way like the other?
Did you find that “machining” is giving birth to different or to the SAME things!??
WE ARE NOT THE SAME as living beings, we are the same “in the image”… in a way we can be “seen” not by the too;s and measurement devices but with the spiritual, non-material means.
Whatever you “see” the complexity of a machine (man object) has, is way far from the complexity, reliability, versatility, flexibility… and design, never understood and perceived by the people.
The stupidity to believe that the human mind can find any secret of the Universe pushed the World to madness, too – one of the Papacy evil ideology and its delusional (all) Sects.
This madness is a factor in promoting the Tran-humanism, as well: destruction of the mankind by the psychopaths.
—–
Not saying anything about the “educated” idiocy spread for more than 70 years, based on the Frankfurt School (and followers) ideas…

i forget
i forget

That’s a fill in the blank. “Why is a human being not like a machine if it ________?”

When has that blank ever not been occupied by any number of “answers”? Citizen-cogs in the body politic marionette have *always* been machined by tools owned by puppets in the guise of masters.

“Why is a human being not like a machine if it spews Sotomayors?”

i forget
i forget

“Among them was Robert Glass…”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmzbosye2-Y

W Wilson
W Wilson

Maybe johnny boy will explain to her that she can’t say idiotic shit. Just shut up and vote how china joe wants

boron
boron

The basis for a totalitarian goverment

motley
motley

These people are luciferians. You do not count. You do not matter. You are not of their species. You are expendable. Just wait.

Leah
Leah

Correct.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

It appears the “wise latina” may really be just as dumb as a box of rocks, no offense intended towards rocks.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Incompetents can be more effective than sleeper agents. They are installed with deliberate purpose, because they are idiots.

Thunderbird
Thunderbird

I only have one word to describe Judge Sotomayer. Stupid. Not a doctor nor scientist so how can a ruling affecting millions of people be justified. She is up there to judge matters of law; not medical opinions. This is not a pandemic. Look up the meaning of the word in the dictionary. There is no emergency. Look up the meaning of this word then look at the situation at hand. What we have here is the supreme court making a ruling on stupid actions mandated by a President that is not a doctor nor a scientist listening to government so called expects and censoring private experts who have much skin in their opinions. Wouldn’t one come to the conclusion that something fowl is going on? The supreme court can only rule against the president’s mandate. If it does not then it is captured. We became the land of the free because of the brave. When we fail to be brave then we lose our freedom.

flash
flash

Try to keep up.

that she made a return visit in 1996 when she was a federal judge, and recently joined a Project Interchange US-Israel forum on immigration. In the process, she formed a lifelong friendship with Project Interchange founder Debbie Berger and her husband, Paul, who attended her swearing-in as a Manhattan appeals court judge in 1998. “She enjoyed Israel not just from an intellectual perspective, she liked the music and the people,” Paul Berger told JTA. Richard Foltin, the legislative director for the AJC, said her background naturally played a role in how the Jewish community would welcome her

https://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/Sotomayors-Jewish-ties

Thunderbird
Thunderbird

Not sure what you mean. My comment was expressed relating to the constitution. The constitution considers people not as machines but as self directing entities. Administrative law which is law outside the constitution does look at man as a machine. Administrative law has no bill of rights nor due process. It is built on statutes where administrators can formulate rules and regulations similar to an engineer formulating a program to run a machine.

Why is the Human being not like a machine? Because a Human being has a self directing ability to adjust behavior to influence an occasion.

My concern is that Justice Sotomayor will make her ruling based on administrative law which has the pattern of treating Human Being as machines and so her ruling may reflect this bent.

Anonymous
Anonymous

He means you are unaware of the ethnic culture wars going on in front of your face. She is a Jewish agent, not an American.

Thunderbird
Thunderbird

She is also a Human. Jewish agent aside, I am looking at how she rules on this. But thanks for the clarification.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Bone Machine

grace country pastor

“…and our immune systems adapt as they have evolved to do…”

Evolved? If we “evolved” from the primordial goo as I was taught as a youngster, then we are nothing more that biological machines and should treat each other accordingly. The strong survive. Let’s get it on.

Edit: I put an “end sarc” tag there but it didn’t appear.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading