When the Government Plays God: The Slippery Slope from Abortions to Executions

Guest Post by John W. Whitehead

Abortion on demand is the ultimate State tyranny; the State simply declares that certain classes of human beings are not persons, and therefore not entitled to the protection of the law. The State protects the ‘right’ of some people to kill others, just as the courts protected the ‘property rights’ of slave masters in their slaves.”—Ron Paul

The government wants to play god.

It wants the power to decide who lives or dies and whose rights are worthy of protection.

Delve beneath the rhetoric and spin that have turned abortion into a politicized, polarized and propagandized frontline in the culture wars, and you will find a greater menace at work.

Abortion may be front and center in the power struggle between the Left and the Right over who has the right to decide—the government or the individual—when it comes to bodily autonomy, the right to privacy, sexual freedom, the rights of the unborn, and property interests in one’s body, but there’s so much more going on here.

The Left would suggest that unborn babies do not have constitutional rights and the only right that matters is a woman’s right to privacy in choosing whether or not to abort a pregnancy. The Right, while fixated on saving the lives of unborn babies, seems less concerned about what happens to those lives from birth to death.

What few seem willing to address is that in the 30 years since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Roe v. Wade, the government has come to believe that it not only has the power to determine who is deserving of constitutional rights in the eyes of the law but it also has the authority to deny those rights to an American citizen.

This is how the abortion debate—a politicized tug-of-war over when an unborn child is considered a human being with rights—plays into the police state’s hands by laying the groundwork for discussions about who else may or may not be deserving of rights.

Even if (as a leaked draft opinion in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization suggests) the Supreme Court overturns its earlier rulings recognizing abortion as a constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment, that will not resolve the larger problem that plagues us today: namely, that all along the spectrum of life—from the unborn child to the aged—the government continues to play fast and loose with the lives of the citizenry.

Take a good, hard look at the many ways in which Americans are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

American families who have their dogs shot, their homes trashed and their children terrorized or, worse, killed by errant SWAT team raids in the middle of the night are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Disabled individuals who are being strip searched, handcuffed, arrested and “diagnosed” by police as dangerous or mentally unstable merely because they stutter and walk unevenly are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

School-aged children as young as 4-years-old who are leg shackled, handcuffed and strip searched for violating school zero tolerance policies by chewing a Pop Tart into the shape of a gun and playing an imaginary game of cops and robbers, or engaging in childish behavior such as crying or jumping are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Unarmed citizens who are tasered or shot by police for daring to hesitate, stutter, move a muscle, flee or disagree in any way with a police order are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Likewise, Americans—young and old alike—who are shot by police because they pointed a garden hose at a police officer, reached for their registration in their glove box, relied upon a cane to steady themselves, or were seen playing with air rifles or BB guns are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Female motorists who are unlucky enough to be pulled over for a questionable traffic infraction only to be subjected by police to cavity searches by the side of the road are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Male pedestrians and motorists alike who are being subjected to roadside strip searches and rectal probes by police based largely on the color of their skin are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

American citizens subjected to government surveillance whereby their phone calls are being listened in on, their mail and text messages read, their movements tracked and their transactions monitored are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Homeowners who are being fined and arrested for raising chickens in their backyard, allowing the grass in their front yards to grow too long, and holding Bible studies in their homes are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Decorated military veterans who are being arrested for criticizing the government on social media such as Facebook are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Homeless individuals who are being harassed, arrested and run out of towns by laws that criminalize homelessness are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Individuals whose DNA has been forcibly collected and entered into federal and state law enforcement databases whether or not they have been convicted of any crime are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Drivers whose license plates are being scanned, uploaded to a police database and used to map their movements, whether or not they are suspected of any crime, are being denied their rights under the Constitution. The same goes for drivers who are being ticketed for running afoul of red light cameras without any real opportunity to defend themselves against such a charge are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Protesters and activists who are being labeled domestic terrorists and extremists and accused of hate crimes for speaking freely are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Likewise, American citizens who being targeted for assassination by drone strikes abroad without having been charged, tried and convicted of treason are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

Hard-working Americans whose bank accounts, homes, cars electronics and cash are seized by police (operating according to asset forfeiture schemes that provide profit incentives for highway robbery) are being denied their rights under the Constitution.

So, what is the common denominator here?

These are all American citizens—endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, rights that no person or government can take away from them, among these the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness—and they are all being oppressed in one way or another by a government that has grown drunk on power, money and its own authority.

If the government—be it the President, Congress, the courts or any federal, state or local agent or agency—can decide that any person has no rights, then that person becomes less than a citizen, less than human, less than deserving of respect, dignity, civility and bodily integrity. He or she becomes an “it,” a faceless number that can be tallied and tracked, a quantifiable mass of cells that can be discarded without conscience, an expendable cost that can be written off without a second thought, or an animal that can be bought, sold, branded, chained, caged, bred, neutered and euthanized at will.

It’s a slippery slope that justifies all manner of violations in the name of national security, the interest of the state and the so-called greater good.

Yet those who founded this country believed that what we conceive of as our rights were given to us by God—we are created equal, according to the nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence—and that government cannot create, nor can it extinguish our God-given rights. To do so would be to anoint the government with god-like powers and elevate it above the citizenry.

Unfortunately, we have been dancing with this particular devil for quite some time now.

If we continue to wait for the government to restore our freedoms, respect our rights, rein in its abuses and restrain its agents from riding roughshod over our lives, our liberty and our happiness, then we will be waiting forever.

Already, the politicos are beating the war drums to herald the next phase of the abortion wars.

President Biden wants voters to elect more pro-abortion rights officials to ensure that “a woman’s right to choose is fundamental.” The Senate plans to vote to codify the right to an abortion into federal law. Chief Justice John G. Roberts is opening an investigation into how the Supreme Court’s draft abortion ruling was leaked. And polling indicates that the majority of the American people want abortion to remain legal.

Like clockwork, we find ourselves smack dab in the middle of yet another political circus that could get scary, ugly and overwhelming really fast.

Before you get too distracted by this conveniently timed diversion that has everyone forgetting about spiking gas prices, inflation, housing shortages, and warring empires, remind yourself that no matter how the Supreme Court rules in Dobbs, it will not resolve the problem of a culture that values life based on a sliding scale.  Nor will it help us navigate the moral, ethical and scientific minefields that await us as technology and humanity move ever closer to a point of singularity.

Humanity is being propelled at warp speed into a whole new frontier when it comes to privacy, bodily autonomy, and what it means to be a human being. As such, we haven’t even begun to wrap our heads around how present-day legal debates over bodily autonomy, privacy, vaccine mandates, the death penalty, and abortion play into future discussions about singularity, artificial intelligence, cloning, and the privacy rights of the individual in the face of increasingly invasive, intrusive and unavoidable government technologies.

Yet here is what I know.

Life is an inalienable right.

By allowing the government to decide who or what is deserving of rights, it shifts the entire discussion from one in which we are “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights” (that of life, liberty property and the pursuit of happiness) to one in which only those favored by the government get to enjoy such rights.

If all people are created equal, then all lives should be equally worthy of protection.

There’s an idea embraced by both the Right and the Left according to their biases that there is a hierarchy to life, with some lives worthier of protection than others, but there is no hierarchy of freedoms.

All freedoms hang together.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, we must never stop working to protect life, preserve our freedoms and maintain some semblance of our humanity.

Freedom cannot be a piece-meal venture.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
38 Comments
oldvet50
oldvet50
May 4, 2022 8:47 am

Years ago I noticed that the people who were against capital punishment were pro-abortion. Yeah, the same people that believe life is precious so we should not execute criminals believe we should be able to mutilate fetuses in their mother’s womb. The other people, myself included, only believe that innocent life is sacred, so fry the criminals and coddle the babies!

Obbledy
Obbledy
  oldvet50
May 4, 2022 9:16 am

That’s how you get people to cheer on the Devil……

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  oldvet50
May 4, 2022 11:31 am

By calling the unborn baby a fetus or zygote, it dehumanizes the living being growing in the Mother’s womb and makes it easier to deny it life. Drop the word fetus from your vocabulary and replace it with unborn baby. It makes them quite uncomfortable.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  oldvet50
May 4, 2022 2:03 pm

Whitehead has gone off the rails with this one. The equivalency he tries to make is among the most retarded arguments I’ve heard (and I’ve heard some doozies just lately).

Swrichmond
Swrichmond
  Anonymous
May 4, 2022 6:27 pm

Thanks for your input, Anonymous

Obbledy
Obbledy
May 4, 2022 9:15 am

Waiting for you to come to my house to further deny my God given rights……..just……….waiting………

Stucky
Stucky
May 4, 2022 9:31 am

First of all, it’s been almost FIFTY years since Roe vs Wade … not “30 years”. Jeez!!

Sooooo …. how many executions has the gooberment ordered in the past 50 years BECAUSE of Roe vs Wade? Oh ….none? Where’s the beef?

NOT disagreeing with the idea that gooberment would like to execute uncooperative citizens willy-nilly. However, tying together abortions with gooberment executions is, imho, a tad bit ridiculous.

BL
BL
  Stucky
May 4, 2022 9:44 am

Canada is getting a head start Stucky, they are euthanizing the poor. The day is coming here when older people will be told to pick a day within a time frame to go to the euthanizing center. You can have a party and invite your friends and relations. Is that beefy enough?

These Nazis will execute non-compliants in a heartbeat and tell the proles it’s for the greater good. Roll up your sleeve for your death vaxx and chant, “Hail Satan” Stuck.

B_MC
B_MC
  BL
May 4, 2022 10:24 am

The day is coming here when older people will be told to pick a day within a time frame to go to the euthanizing center. You can have a party and invite your friends and relations.

Star Trek episode “Half a Life”….

Lwaxana Troi causes trouble when she finds out that a scientist she has fallen in love with is due to commit ritual suicide…

Timicin attempts to explain that in his culture it is an accepted practice for all to undergo the ritual on their 60th birthday in the presence of their beloved ones to avoid old age, infirmity, indignity, dependence on others, and the cruel uncertainty about when the end would come.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Half_a_Life_(episode)

BL
BL
  B_MC
May 4, 2022 10:54 am

B_MC- While I understand that on about a hundred levels we are living out the STAR TREK episode plots, it does not change the fact that these nutballs are culling the world’s population. Is it for their own entertainment, is there really the evil KM that wants the whole world for themselves?

Be ready B_MC, the bell will toll for you and me if humanity fails to give these evil fukers the finger.

Ron
Ron
  Stucky
May 4, 2022 10:47 am

OK, take a good look at your state’s legislative activity over the last 2 years. The same elected servants that will not defend the babies still in the womb are the same who will not defend us against illegal jab/ mask mandates. The same will not restrict emergency powers of the governor. The same will not fund school choice or remove porn from schools. The same will not defend property rights by stopping energy companies using eminent domain to seize our land. This pattern goes on both sides of the aisle here in Iowa. Take a good look at your state. Your eyes might see the same pattern.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Ron
May 4, 2022 11:33 am

The uni-party rules everywhere.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Stucky
May 4, 2022 1:46 pm

Whitehead is good when he sticks to 4th Amdt issues, abuses by law enforcement, privacy concerns, etc.
When he ventures outside these areas he almost always loses me.

Swrichmond
Swrichmond
  Anonymous
May 4, 2022 6:30 pm

I can’t speak for him, but I will suggest some of you take the broader view from 30,000 feet and see the massive erosion of any “rights” you think you have and recognise the dot gov gives a shit about zero of them.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Stucky
May 4, 2022 7:55 pm

/The government may not have “ordered executions but they have legalized doctor assisted suicide. And some areas here in the US REALLY push it. Personally, I have had five different doctors INSIST on giving me a LETHAL INJECTION to end my chronic pain for me.

Cricket
Cricket
May 4, 2022 9:31 am

In Canada, there is no law pertaining to abortion so if you can find a doctor willing to do the procedure, a woman can abort her baby up to the moment of birth. We also have legalized euthanasia, which the government initially said would be only for those already dying of terrible diseases, but recently revised the rules to include those suffering from mental health issues including young and otherwise healthy people. They call it medically assisted dying, but it’s the state killing it’s own people supposedly with their consent.

We are ruled over by truly evil people.

Ghost
Ghost
  Cricket
May 4, 2022 9:38 am

Yes. Indeed. I saw this yesterday.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  Cricket
May 4, 2022 11:10 am

That’s what happens when your PM and more than half of his cabinet are under the spell of the WEF/Davos crowd … 

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Cricket
May 4, 2022 11:17 am

I fail to see how someone exercising the ultimate ownership of their body with the assistance of another is the government being evil or killing the population. It is only viewed as an evil government action by those who applaud the government’s belief that it owns everyone and their lives.

Margaret Sanger
Margaret Sanger
May 4, 2022 9:38 am

Just think how many more prisons we would have had to build today, if there hadn’t been available abortions 20-30 years ago

Why stop something that’s done so much good in inner city communities?

Ghost
Ghost
May 4, 2022 9:40 am

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-is-canada-euthanising-the-poor-

comment image

It is worse than a slippery slope. What happens when granny can’t pay her nursing home bills?

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  Ghost
May 4, 2022 11:12 am

England and other countries have done this same thing to the elderly throughout this fake ‘pan(dem)ic’ … here in the US, you just have to look at Cuomo’s death chambers — a.k.a. nursing homes …

daddy Joe
daddy Joe
May 4, 2022 11:06 am

John, Thank you for helping to frame the abortion issue in its larger context. Orwell said it best a long time ago: “Some animals are more equal than others”.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  daddy Joe
May 4, 2022 1:51 pm

“other people, myself included, only believe that innocent life is sacred, so fry the criminals and coddle the babies!”
— Oldvet50 (above)

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
May 4, 2022 11:13 am

To me, politicians interjecting their power into the relationship between a doctor and their patient is the bigger issue. The past two years have clearly shown where that slippery slope leads us.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MrLiberty
May 4, 2022 1:54 pm

Sorry, from where I stood I saw doctors and hospital administrators interjecting themselves between a patient and their rights (including life) for the almighty taxpayer dollar.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Anonymous
May 4, 2022 7:25 pm

Every doctor’s license is in the hands of state level politicians. The fact that freedom was not an option to the horrible and murderous behavior of the medical system is the direct result of government actions, laws, etc.

m
m
May 4, 2022 12:33 pm

Actually the [majority of the] people started playing God first, thereafter they had no problem with their gov’t doing the same…

Adrian
Adrian
May 4, 2022 1:08 pm

The State protects the ‘right’ of some people to kill others……

That is not a legal state, but a psychopathocracy (the mere vision of a state by the mindset of a certain type of core-psychopath, infiltrating and eventually overtaking governments everywhere in the world….to make its repulsive dreams come to fruition).

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Adrian
May 4, 2022 2:02 pm

Genesis 9:6

May as well claim that jailing someone for theft is some unjustified assumption of a ‘right’ to (just kinda randomly) deny the thief’s liberty.

Unborn children have committed no crime. They were innocently brought into existence as the foreseeable consequence of their parents’ actions.

Those subject to execution are exclusively those who have murdered others.

If you can’t see that distinction, well …

you’re lost.

arizona
arizona
May 4, 2022 3:20 pm

ALL you people are about to become my enemy, if my sister dies from your vaccine they gave her,shes old and stupid,but shes still my sister,YOUR nothing but a heard of worthless sheep,the only silver lining to this is, the RUSSIANS and Chinese will make short work of a nation of cowards..Biden just cut down your tree of freedom and liberty,yet your still laying on your couch getting drunk….

Anonymous
Anonymous
  arizona
May 4, 2022 4:25 pm

I have not yet begun to drink!

But, your comment confused me enough that I guess I’ll get crackin’.

Leethal
Leethal
May 4, 2022 5:58 pm

If they want to play god let them first apply their own laws to themselves. They would all be hanged within a day if this is done.

Notorious Lurker
Notorious Lurker
May 4, 2022 6:36 pm

Here’s an angle that no one has considered. RvW was based upon the medical procedure being a private decision between a doctor and the patient. Kicking this concept to the curb, that medical procedures can regulated at the state level opens the door for other medial procedures to be allowed or mandated. Since this 50 years of precedent is going to be voided, it opens the door for …(if you squint just right)… state level vaxx mandates. This is just going to be another divide right down the middle of this country when we need it least.

BL
BL
  Notorious Lurker
May 4, 2022 7:14 pm

NL- Expand on how it opened the door for state level vaxx mandate. As I explained before, Black’s Law states a mandate still requires consent, it is not written in stone, you can refuse to comply.

Notorious Lurker
Notorious Lurker
  BL
May 4, 2022 11:09 pm

BL, thanks for the reference to Black’s Law, that’s really interesting. But, the primer I read suggests that there will be divergent outcomes due to social differences in groups that have different social contexts. This is the exact case with what we saw when comparing the last 2 years in places like NY and TX. In places like blue states consent is assumed, in red, not so much. The “social structure” being different between these places. I admit it is a bit of a stretch to vaxx mandates, hence the squinting, but we have been stretched pretty far already.

It’s not really that much of a reach to go from the erosion of Dr./patient confidentiality we have seen combined with things like employee vaxx mandates to coerce public and private workers into the shot and then leap to state mandated shots for adults. This is already the case for public school and children across the country. Once the choices you make with your Dr. are no longer solely private, then those that want power will seek it there too.

Thanks for the insight into Back’s Law, this was where I got my primer oxfordbibliographies.com. I’ll keep digging 😉

Ed
Ed
May 4, 2022 10:00 pm

They have always played god.
If abortion goes away they will reinstate the military draft and kill that way.
They will have their blood.

Bill Halcott
Bill Halcott
May 5, 2022 7:08 am

I commented some months ago about abortion. I said that the Jesuits followed abortion debate to the logical conclusion. All the persons who missed being aborted in childhood are now adults. In their subconscious is the thought about those who were aborted. As we age we will begin to hear about mercy killing of the aged. Do not expect any consideration from young adults. There was no consideration for their fellow aborted victims.