Do the Pfizer “data dumps” really mean anything?

Guest Post by Kit Knightly

The latest batch of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine files just dropped. 80,000 pages of patient files and “trial data” and so and so on.

You can read them all here.

The question is, do they really tell us anything we don’t already know?

The big revelation doing the rounds at the minute is that the vaccines were never trialled with, and were specifically not recommended for, pregnant women.

But is this new information?

When governments started “recommending” the Covid vaccine to pregnant women in the Summer of 2021, everybody who had been paying attention knew that position was not backed up by any data at all.

OffG got temporarily banned from twitter for pointing this out.

More broadly speaking: Of course the vaccines were never tested on pregnant women, they were never properly tested on anybody.

It takes 10 years to safely produce and trial a vaccine, not 18 months. And what “trials” they claim to have done in that year and a half were a complete sham.

In a way, the “not recommended for pregnant women” disclosure is actually good for Pfizer.

Behind a facade of being legally mandated to publish these files, it’s now become public knowledge that Pfizer (allegedly) told people not to give the vaccine to pregnant women, but many countries did it anyway.

This shifts the blame (and potential legal liability) away from Pfizer and onto the governments in question.

A good example of how “forced disclosure” can be used to reinforce and direct a narrative, through a pretence of reluctance.

Going further, shouldn’t we be asking: Can we trust anything in these documents at all?

Just because Pfizer has been (apparently) legally “forced” to release them doesn’t mean they are important, relevant or even real. Who’s verifying the documents? Who’s auditing Pfizer to make sure they release everything? The US government? Some other government or agency?

Do you trust them?

The real damning documents – if such ever existed – have likely been shredded, burned and buried in 20 feet of concrete by now…and that doesn’t matter, because we already know everything we will ever need to know about these Covid “vaccines”:

  1. They were not subject to proper long-term testing.
  2. They have totally unknown long-term side effects.
  3. They allegedly “treat” a “disease” with a 99.85% survival rate.
  4. They don’t prevent infection.
  5. They don’t prevent transmission.
  6. The manufacturers are legally protected from being sued in the event they kill you.

Pfizer can release all the documents they want, nothing will change these facts…only distract from them.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
May 6, 2022 9:10 am

“They were not subject to proper long-term testing.
They have totally unknown long-term side effects.
They allegedly “treat” a “disease” with a 99.85% survival rate.
They don’t prevent infection.
They don’t prevent transmission.
The manufacturers are legally protected from being sued in the event they kill you.”

DO THEY PREVENT OR LESSEN YOUR CHANCES OF DEATH?

This is what so many of the jabby jab jabbers are so focused on. I have heard…”I got Covid but because I took the jab, I survived. I wouldn’t have survived if I hadn’t been jabbed”…so many times now.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Glock-N-Load
May 6, 2022 10:41 am

If you see Kirsch’s article posted here today, the answer is no. They not only don’t lessen your chance of death, they increase it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 6, 2022 9:26 am

Beating a dead horse. A huge % of us can’t remember what we had for supper last night. And didn’t cook it.
Walk into open manholes/traffic/etc. while playing with our phones. You know the drill.

ONLY gonna get worse, wishful thinking not withstanding.

Rachel
Rachel
May 6, 2022 10:34 am

The answer is yes, they DO tell us what we already know, the shot doesn’t work, all their claims of
get the shot, you won’t get it, you can’t spread it are all total BS. All their claims about how “Safe” they
are is also completely out the window. So now it’s time to ask yourself.
If it doesn’t work, if it’s causing more problems than it’s fixing, more than All vaccines combined over the last
30 years then just exactly what is it for ?

clbrto
clbrto
May 6, 2022 1:25 pm

there is no new information that will change my position on the clot shot

those who DID take it might want to pay attention, but they probably won’t, and their jabs can’t be undone anyway (hope they won the lottery on a more benign batch)

my aversion to western medicine, as currently practiced, has intensified to the point of absolute